I already don't like what comes after America .. it's THIS

The evil dwarf is right.
AMATEUR.


They know it in Moscow, Peking, Paris, Rome, Ottawa, Tel Aviv (and Jerusalem), Rio, Caracas, Lima, Havana, Mexico City (and every border town where narcotrafficante contractors are cleaning their MP5's for their assaults INSIDE and therefore ON the USA). They know it in London (where they pulicly diss the special bond that Obama has already devalued), Berlin, Warsaw, and Kiev. They know it in New Delhi and and Islamabad and Peshawar and Quetta and Jalalabad and Qandahar.

They sure know it in Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Brunei, and around the gulf where they are smiling quietly as American gas get ready to top $4/gallon this summer.

They know it at MoveOn and Sorosland where they giggle as they tell Andy Stern and other real movers which levers to push and pull, at the White House, and around the corner with the moronic Reid and his rictus smiled zombie artifact gal pal Pelosi.

Those people, the president, dem leaders, congressmen and senators are disposable to the underlying cause of fundamental change in creating a post american nation of castrati in a mass of vanilla equally outcomed dullard following direction in uniform uncomplaining stumbling numbed crowd stupified thorazined existing from day to day IDIOTS. That's why they found themselves in a crowd going over the ledge on health care and disbelievingly, comically, pathetically insist all is allright even though they heard the rivets popping off the side of the ship when the iceberg dumped all those chunks on deck. That's why they MUST insist that the resistance, and make no mistake THAT'S WHAT IT IS NOW, must be racist, hood wearing freaks.

Sorry, I am a jew, jackasses.
I worked in civil rights.
I ORGANIZED anti Vietnam protests.
And I am dead center in the RESISTANCE known as the tea party in this POST AMERICA DESERT of of social, economic, gaian and mind numbing slogan-ed, framed, and astroturfed justice.
I believe in that 6 page thing.
I believe it's central idea is the RIGHT IDEA.

This do nothing, sorry assed, self blaming, help me because I can't help myself set of policies WAS VOTED IN BY A SIZABLE MAJORITY.

THIS IS WHAT COMES AFTER AMERICA.

Just call me Noam Chimpsky

It's off the rails.
As a president once said, prior to turning things around, "the bottom is out of the tub"

Bill Ayers Continues to Defend Weather Underground Terror Attacks on His Blog

From Gateway Pundit:

Dig it!… Obama’s terrorist pals are blogging about the revolution.

Barack Obama’s family friends Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn still feel no remorse for their acts of terrorism.

Unrepentant terrorists Bill Ayers and terrorist wife Bernadine Dohrn continue to this day to defend their acts of violence during the 1960’s and 1970’s. In a March 6, 2010 post on his blog, Bill Ayers again defended the murderous acts of The Weather Underground.

…Empire, invasion, and occupation always earn blow-back. In 1965 most Americans supported the war, but by 1968 people had turned massively against it—the result of protest and organizing and a burgeoning peace movement, and of civil rights leaders like the militants from SNCC, Muhammad Ali, and Martin Luther King, Jr. denouncing the war as illegal and immoral. Even more important, veterans came home and told the truth about the reality of aggression and occupation and war crimes. The US government found itself isolated around the world and in profound and growing conflict with its own people inside its own borders. The Vietnamese themselves were decisive: they refused to be defeated. The Tet Offensive in 1968 destroyed any fantasy of an American victory, and when President Lyndon Johnson announced at the end of March, 1968 that he would not run for re-election, it seemed to us we had won a victory.

But peace proved to be a dream deferred, for the war did not end—it escalated into an air and sea war, expanded into all of Cambodia and Laos, and every week the war dragged on another six thousand people were murdered in Southeast Asia. Six thousand human beings—massive, unthinkable numbers—were thrown into the furnaces of war and death that had been constructed by our own government. The war was lost, but the terror continued. All Vietnamese territories outside US control were declared “free-fire zones” and airplanes rained bombs and napalm on anything that moved, destroying crops and live-stock and entire villages. John McCain, an unremorseful war criminal, flew some of those missions. As a young lieutenant, John Kerry testified in Senate hearings at the time that US troops committed war crimes every day as a matter of policy, not choice.

No one knew precisely how to proceed, for the anti-war movement had done what it had set out to do—we’d persuaded the American people to oppose the war, built a massive movement and a majority peace sentiment—and still we couldn’t find any sure-fire way to stop the killing; millions of people mobilized for peace, and our project, our task and our obsession, was so simple to state, so excruciatingly difficult to achieve: peace now. The war slogged on into a murky and unacceptable future, and the anti-war forces splintered then—some of us tried to organize a peace wing within the Democratic Party, others organized in factories and work-places, some fled to Europe or Africa or Canada, others to communes, the land, and hopeful but small organizing projects. Some began to build a vehicle to fight the war-makers by other means, a clandestine force that would, we hoped, survive what we thought of as an impending American totalitarianism. Every choice was contemplated, each seemed a possibility then—and we had friends and family in every camp—and no choice seemed utterly beyond the pale.

The Weather Underground carried out a series of illegal and symbolic attacks on property then, some 20 acts over its entire existence, and no one was killed or harmed; the goal was not to terrorize people, but to scream out the message that the US government and its military were committing acts of terrorism in our name, and that the American people should never tolerate that. Some felt that our actions were misguided at best, off-the-tracks, indefensible and even despicable, and that case is not impossible to make. But America’s longest war itself, with all its attendant horrors, was doubly despicable, and while many stood up, who in fact did the right thing; who ended the war; who transformed the world?

…We remember our lost comrades, their many brave, as well as their damaging last acts, and we continue to vibrate with the hope and despair they embodied then.

Bill Ayers Bernardine Dohrn

Of course, Ayers was not being completely honest about his terrorist past. San Francisco’s police officers union accused Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn in a 1970 bombing that killed San Francisco police officer Sgt. Brian McDonnell.

Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn were accused in 2009 of bombing a police station and killing Sgt. Brian McDonnell .

It’s comforting to know that our president was close friends with this unrepentant terrorist since his college days, huh?

OBAMA DOES SOMETHING RIGHT!

Obama Authorizes Assassination of American-Born Jihadist Cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, First Known US Citizen to be Approved for Targeted Killing

(Daily Mail)- The Obama administration has authorised the killing of a radical Muslim cleric who is also a U.S. citizen.

It is extremely rare, if not unprecedented, for an American to be approved for targeted killing.

Anwar al-Awlaki, believed to be hiding in Yemen, has been tied by U.S. intelligence to the 9/11 hijackers, to the failed Christmas Day bombing in 2009, and to the Fort Hood massacre last year.

The decision to add him to the U.S. target list followed a National Security Council review because of his status as an American citizen.

Officials said Awlaki, 38, directly threatened the United States. 'Al-Awlaki is a proven threat,' said a U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'He's being targeted.'

A former senior legal official in the administration of George W Bush said he did not know of any American who was approved for targeted killing under the former president.

U.S. intelligence agencies had viewed Awlaki as chiefly an Al Qaeda sympathiser and recruiter for Islamist causes with possible ties to some of the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers.

But that assessment started to change late last year with revelations about Awlaki's contacts with both the Nigerian suspect in the attempted Christmas Day bombing and to the U.S. Army psychiatrist accused of shooting dead 13 people at a military base in Texas the previous month.

Rep. Jane Harman, chairwoman of the House of Representatives Homeland Security Subcommittee on Intelligence, described Awlaki as 'probably the person, the terrorist, who would be terrorist No. 1 in terms of threat against us.'

The cleric, born in New Mexico to Yemeni parents, used his personal website to encourage Muslims around the world to kill U.S. troops in Iraq.

LL comments:

IF this is accurate, it would be a horrible breach of security since the 'finding' the president would have to sign to authorize this is a secret document. The regime of barack hussein obama has ushered in a whole new set of rules and perhaps it's no longer classified, but I would find that too strange to be considered.

Super Geniuses in Govt .. I know we'll be okay now

Bernanke Says Joblessness, Foreclosures Pose Hurdles

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said joblessness, home foreclosures and weak lending to small businesses pose challenges to the economy as it recovers from the worst recession since the 1930s.

Am I the only one that senses there is something BASIC wrong with these people?

Something missing?

It's all backwards in their brains.

The economic situation PREVENTS the creation of jobs, not the other way around.

It's like the idiot congressman unconcerned about that 6 page thing from 1789.

It reveals some inner complete disconnect about the people who walk those halls.

If you want to be able to say things are better, GET OFF THE BACKS OF THE PEOPLE WHO CAN MAKE SOME DIFFERENCE.

When you see what they are doing, reinforce success. When they fail. LET THEM. They'll try again.

FUCK 'EM ALL

IF THEY'VE FORGOTTEN

WHAT THE WORD

AMERICA

MEANS

Sean Hannity Version

Full Version

So I'm sitting here wondering if somewhere deep in the abyss of the Pentagon, or maybe even in the field, there isn't someone like a Brigadier General Jack T. Ripper, a long term career someone, saying to himself and friends that enough is enough. He is disemboweling our defensive capability, he is dismanteling our security, he is opening the door for them to walk right in and undermine our very essence.

How long until someone like that tries to go all knock knock on 1600 Pennsylvania Ave and (peacefully) relieve the Commander in Chief of command?

I'M NOT ADVOCATING ANYTHING HERE all you Federal monitors and sonsabitches snitches need to understand. Certainly not sedition. Just postulation. Just asking the question many out there may be thinking. The unthinkable in America as we have always known her.

As we had always known her.

Newsmax:

Gaffney: Obama Nuclear Plan Takes 'Dangerous' Risks With U.S. Security
Tuesday, 06 Apr 2010 07:48 PM
By: Jim Meyers

Leading national security expert Frank Gaffney has a few choice words for President Barack Obama’s policies on the production and use of nuclear weapons — “reckless,” “dangerous,” “irresponsible,” “ill-advised,” “very risky” and “catastrophic.”

Gaffney, founder and president of the Center for Security Policy, also tells Newsmax that Obama is taking “considerable risks” with Americans’ security, and his policies could ultimately lead to the “disarmament” of the U.S.

And he says the policies raise questions about the president’s judgment “and his faithful execution of his constitutional responsibilities for the common defense.”

Gaffney was nominated by President Ronald Reagan in April 1987 to become assistant secretary of defense for International Security Policy, the senior position in the Defense Department with responsibility for policies involving nuclear forces, arms control and U.S.-European defense relations.
He also served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for Nuclear Forces and Arms Control Policy.

The Obama administration is altering the country’s decades-old nuclear weapons policy to reduce the role and number of such weapons, with the target of a nuclear-free world, according to a newly released document called a nuclear posture review.

Obama would renounce the development of any new nuclear weapons, and commit the U.S. not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty — even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons.

He is also about to sign a "New START" [Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty] with Russia reducing long-range nuclear weapons.

In his exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV, Gaffney says: “Both the new nuclear posture review and the START treaty reflect the president’s overarching ambition, something that’s been a fixation of his going back to 1983 when he was a young radical at Columbia University, and that is with the idea of disarming the world.

“But as a practical matter the only country he can disarm is the United States, and I think both of these are steps in that direction.

“He is foreclosing any modernization of our nuclear deterrent. He is saying we’re not going to modernize our forces. The practical effect of the president’s decision not to modernize our nuclear deterrent is to condemn it to obsolescence, and [to lead] ultimately to the disarmament of the United States.”

Congress could reject the decisions Obama has made on the use of nuclear weapons and the modernization of our arsenal, and could opt not to ratify START, Gaffney says.

But “whether under a Democrat-controlled Congress dominated by leftists, who probably see more or less along the same lines as the president on the virtues of nuclear disarmament, it’s not clear that is going to happen,” he adds.

“But I hope there is going to be a response from the American people to some of these very risky ideas that I think most people are going to find defy common sense, and certainly are not prudent in a world in which countries like North Korea, Iran, China, Russia are [developing] nuclear threats, and perhaps other capabilities as well, in a way that will be very dangerous to us in the future . . .

“The American people are being confronted with a president who believes that he can take considerable risks with their safety and security. I think they probably won’t see it that way, and they’ll let their elected representatives know they don’t.”

Asked if Secretary of Defense Robert Gates opposed the new policies, Gaffney responds:

“We know for sure that during the last administration, when he was also the secretary of defense, he spoke very vociferously about the necessity of modernizing our nuclear forces . . .

“Anybody in a position of real responsibility who appreciates that it is and will remain vital to the security of the United States to have a credible, safe, reliable nuclear deterrent, will tell you you need to modernize the ones we have — because they’re increasingly not safe, increasingly not reliable, and certainly ever less effective.”

Obama has said he is now convinced the course Iran is on will provide them with nuclear weapons capabilities. Gaffney was asked if he is alarmed that the administration is not taking a more aggressive approach with Iran.
“It alarms me that at the very moment the president is acknowledging that he is, essentially, just going to get used to [a nuclear-armed Iran] — that one of the most dangerous countries on the planet, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is getting nuclear weapons — he is saying we’re going to permit the increasing devaluation, in fact disarmament, of this country.

“I just think that the juxtaposition of these two realities further raises questions about President Obama’s judgment and his faithful execution of his constitutional responsibilities for the common defense.”

The START pact Obama has agreed to sign limits the U.S. and Russia to 1,550 operationally deployed nuclear warheads. Asked if that will be enough to preserve our defense, Gaffney says:

“I don’t know what the right number is and I’m very leery of people who tell you they do know.

“The Russians are busily modernizing their forces. They have fewer numbers but they are going to have very modern nuclear weapons. Communist China is busily expanding both the number and the quality of the nuclear weapons in its inventory.

“At the same time every other nuclear power is modernizing its nuclear arsenal. Some of them are friends of ours, some of them are not necessarily. Then there’s the rogue states North Korea and Iran.

“When you put all this together, I’m not sure whether it is advisable for the United States to have fewer nuclear weapons than it has had. But it is catastrophic not to have whatever number we wind up with be as modern, as safe, and as reliable as we know how to make them. And President Obama has explicitly foreclosed that option.

“The only nuclear power in the world, actual or incipient, that will not be able to produce any nuclear weapons will be the United States of America. I think that is wrong. I think it is irresponsible. And I’m fearful it will prove reckless.

“Then there’s a whole class of weapons of which [the Russians] have thousands, unmatched by us, called tactical nuclear weapons, that aren’t counted in this treaty at all. Some of them are off the coast of the United States today, weapons the size of the weapon that devastated Hiroshima pointed at our cities. And they don’t count at all.”

Ronald Reagan had stated that his ultimate goal was the elimination of nuclear weapons. Newsmax asked Gaffney what he thinks Reagan would say about Obama’s policies.

“Having worked for him in the nuclear weapons policy business, I can tell you that President Reagan was committed to assuring the effectiveness of our nuclear deterrent. Most of the nuclear weapons that we have still in the inventory today were deployed during his time in office.

“So while he had an aspiration, I think he was very clear that in the interval he was determined to maintain effective deterrent forces . . .

“I think he would be appalled by what is going on today, and probably most appalled by those who are using his sentiments about nuclear weapons to justify this reckless and ill-advised denuclearization of the United States that is going on under the Obama administration today.”

Asked if Obama would use nuclear weapons if he faced a crisis, Gaffney responds: “I think any president would be very, very reluctant to use nuclear weapons. This president, by virtue of everything he has said and done to date, I think would be exceedingly unlikely to do it.

“Here’s the rub: Most of our enemies — and we do have enemies in the world — probably have figured that out as well and may be emboldened by it.

“Even if he is persuaded that the circumstances require the use of nuclear weapons for the safety and security of the American people, and even if he were willing to use them, if this present practice persists of allowing our nuclear deterrent to atrophy, it’s not clear they’ll work when they should. And that I’m afraid would be a very, very dark day for America.”

Salud! (updated at bottom)

Today we raise a shot of Wild Turkey and a glass of Guinness to the anonymous French dude who, without regard to self or cellphone, jumped into the freezing and probably toxic East River to help a father rescue his 2 year old daughter who had just fallen in.

And then quickly and quietly disappeared into a cab without waiting for thanks or fame.

So if you know who this guy is slap him on the back and buy him a drink for us (put it on Pastorius' tab, he's good for it) and then keep it to yourself. It's nice to know there are still people out there who do it just to help someone in need and not to get on the morning talk show circuit.

MSNBC:

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Who rescued tot from river plunge?
Two men leaped in to save her, then one quietly vanished

By Mike Celizic
TODAYshow.com contributor

They’re calling him a Frenchman, but even that is uncertain. All anyone really knows is that New York’s mystery hero leaped into the icy East River to help rescue a 2-year-old girl and then disappeared into the city.

The man has not been seen since Saturday afternoon, when he helped rescue Bridgette Sheriden after she plunged 20 feet into the river while visiting a tourist attraction at the South Street Seaport with her parents. Jumping into the water fully clothed, not even pausing to take his phone from his pocket, he helped Bridgette’s father, David Anderson, stay afloat after he saved his daughter.

And then the mystery man climbed out of the river, got in a cab, and left.

He got a shout-out from TODAY co-hosts Matt Lauer and Ann Curry Monday, inviting him to identify himself. But even New York’s tabloid reporters haven’t been able to track the man down.

read the rest here

UPDATE:

Hero who helped rescue tot is found
French tourist says he didn’t think twice about aiding child

NEW YORK - A French tourist who rescued a toddler who fell into New York's East River says he didn't think twice about diving in to save the girl.

Two-year-old Bridget Sheridan fell off a gangplank at the South Street Seaport museum Saturday. Her father, David Anderson, says she slipped through guardrails when he averted his eyes to adjust his camera.

Julien Duret, of Lyon, France, jumped into the water. Anderson followed closely behind. Duret scooped up the girl and gave her to her father.

"The emotion took over," Duret told the Daily News Tuesday from his hometown of Lyon, France. "I didn't think at all. It happened very fast. I reacted very fast. ... I've never done anything like that before."

The New York Daily News says the 29-year-old tourist got in a cab after the rescue. Duret says he doesn't think he's a hero and that anyone would do the same thing.

"I was just happy that I was able to help her, and I am just happy that the family has been reunited," he told the Daily News.

Anderson says his daughter was unhurt. He says he feels guilty about momentarily taking his eyes off her.

US: Obama Bans Islam, Jihad From National Security Strategy Document

Image by jmtimages via Flickr

President Barack Obama's advisers will remove religious terms such as "Islamic extremism" from the central document outlining the U.S. national security strategy and will use the rewritten document to emphasize that the United States does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terror, counterterrorism officials said.

The change is a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventative war and currently states: "The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century."

The officials described the changes on condition of anonymity because the document still was being written, and the White House would not discuss it. But rewriting the strategy document will be the latest example of Obama putting his stamp on U.S. foreign policy, like his promises to dismantle nuclear weapons and limit the situations in which they can be used.

The revisions are part of a larger effort about which the White House talks openly, one that seeks to change not just how the United States talks to Muslim nations, but also what it talks to them about, from health care and science to business startups and education.

That shift away from terrorism has been building for a year, since Obama went to Cairo, Egypt, and promised a "new beginning" in the relationship between the United States and the Muslim world. The White House believes the previous administration based that relationship entirely on fighting terror and winning the war of ideas.

via FOXNews.com - Obama Bans Islam, Jihad From National Security Strategy Document.

Yeah, winning the war on ideas on Islamists is so wrong, isn't it? Let's don't discuss flogging, honor killings and the infidels' beheadings that happens along the world...

More in Memorandum.

Crossposted from T&P.

Related articles by Zemanta

• AP: Obama to delete references to Islamic extremism from national-security policy (hotair.com)

"I WANT MY ... I WANT MY ... I WANT MY FREE INSURANCE"

That ain't workin'
That's the way you do it
You got yer Obama on the MTV
That ain't workin'
That's the way you do it
Yer money fer nothin' and yer insurance for free

From McClatchey:

Questions reflecting confusion have flooded insurance companies, doctors' offices, human resources departments and business groups.

"They're saying, 'Where do we get the free Obama care, and how do I sign up for that?' " said Carrie McLean, a licensed agent for eHealthInsurance.com.

Just take my entire earnings and send me an allowance

Image via Wikipedia

Why work hard?

Why strive?

Why invent?

Paul Volcker, in addition to the VAT he wants, also warns we WILL have to place an additional tax on energy, carbon, (and PS, Oxygen and H20).

Just put it all on cruise control, and buy some to be price fixed venti cappucino where you will have plenty of time since the govt will, instead of allowing companies to lay off the most inefficient during a downturn, instead compel companies to put everyone on part time.

And before you look for another job, you will need a job seeking license to show with your resume at interviews.

Along with your health certificate.

All which will not be compulsory will be forbidden.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Deficit hole: falling into VAT might be worse (crosscut.com)
• 5 more fresh articles...

Obama Admin: So sorry, your new taxes, a SALES VAT tax, will be going to pay for bailing out banks, GM, AIG and our other philosophical agendas

Hey Obama, look up, I see an asteroid.

The United States should consider raising taxes to help bring deficits under control and may need to consider a European-style value-added tax, White House adviser Paul Volcker said on Tuesday.

Volcker, answering a question from the audience at a New York Historical Society event, said the value-added tax "was not as toxic an idea" as it has been in the past and also said a carbon or other energy-related tax may become necessary.

Though he acknowledged that both were still unpopular ideas, he said getting entitlement costs and the U.S. budget deficit under control may require such moves. "If at the end of the day we need to raise taxes, we should raise taxes," he said.

Anyone who has been to Europe or some other places knows how obnoxious these taxes are and how corrosive they are to spending. They are so depressing to sales that when you leave you are able to get the taxes refunded. This admits to evidence how frightened the Euros are of the nature of these taxes on sales to those who ARE NOT COMPELLED TO SPEND THEM AND CAN GO ELSEWHERE.

This is NOT going to end well. Those who have been educated in the present system and way of doing things simply see more govt, more layers, more spending and more power as the route to solve problems. They are not COMPETENT to do these things. They are not competent because they are not omniscient.

THAT IS WHY MARKETS WORK

The larger the problem, the bigger the solution they seek.

The bigger the solution, the more funds they seek.

The more funds they seek, the more power and coercion they MUST seek to enforce the funds collection they must have.

Human nature.

That is why the Constitution is a document which at heart LIMITS what govt is permitted to do.

LIMITED.

Time to limit these people who can NEVER achieve what they are attempting and will RUIN ALL in the attempt.

It's pretty easy to see the difference between LIBERALS like Hubert Humphrey and the social-progressives who occupy the leadership of the democratic party today. The leaders today have KILLED liberalism. Not Pat Buchanan, or Ann Coulter, or Neocons, or republicans.

These people and their ideas will have to face an historic repudiation at the polls.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Deficit hole: falling into VAT might be worse (crosscut.com)
• Here we go: Top WH advisor says it's time to start thinking about a VAT (hotair.com)
• Volcker: Tax Increases Coming Soon to an Economy Near You (seekingalpha.com)
• Value-Added Tax: Why A Euro-Style VAT May Be The Only Way To Fix The Deficit (huffingtonpost.com)
• FNC's Hume: Value-Added Tax Passage During Congressional Lame-Duck Session a Possibility (newsbusters.org)
• A U.S. Value-Added-Tax: Suicide, Not Salvation (seekingalpha.com)
• Why the national sales tax must be stopped (trueslant.com)
• 5 more fresh articles...

Sonny Rollins

My One and Only Love

EDL Scenes from the Front: Leading the March

From Atlas Shrugs:

EDL Rally: [4/5/2010 10:01:06 PM] Trevor Kelway: This is the Russian girl who did the short speech in Russian to support the families of those who have died in recent suicide attacks. She wanted to lead the march.

I thought my readers should see more of what actually happened at the EDL rally.

Sareeta, a British Indian Sikh girl and her friend, who was of Caribbean appearance immediately made it clear that the English Defence League was not formed as an organisation which discriminated against individuals from an ethnic background other than English. Surprisingly there are still some narrow minded individuals and groups around in this day and age who will attempt to smear an organisation with these accusations for political gain, even though they know the accusations to be false. Also, Guramit gave a speech, and there was also a speech by a young girl with family in Russia. She gave her speech in Russian as a message of support for the recent Muslim Metro suicide bombings. Sareeta's speech, and the young girls speech can be found here.

EDL Supporters are pelted with Bricks and Bottles

Unfortunately, whilst Sareeta was giving her speech, a mob had approached a corner of the cage surrounding us and started to throw bricks and bottles at us. This caused a surge towards the area, and the missiles were thrown back. Police officers outside the cage did nothing. They stood idly by as we were pelted with a barrage of missiles. This was the moment when some members of our group proceeded to shake the fences down in an attempt to chase the offenders away. We were completely defenceless from inside this makeshift cage, and though we do not condone violence, self defence is the right of every human being. As i mentioned , the police stood and did nothing from outside the cage, and left our stewards to attempt to diffuse the situation. Eventually the fences came down, and at this point the police officers who were standing at the safety of the exterior of the cage appeared to run away! Our stewards did a fantastic job at calming the crowd and containing them in the designated area alone, and as you can see by the video, no major disruption was caused.

Robert Spencer has more on the latest subterfuge to infiltrate the EDL.

EDL rejects white supremacists, neo-Nazis trying to infiltrate

Here is a message from English Defense League leader Tommy Robinson, further belying charges that the group is racist, neo-fascist, neo-Nazi, etc. "Extreme Far Right Nationalists Trying To Recruit EDL": EDL rejects white supremacists, neo-Nazis trying to infiltrate

ISLAMIC ARMED FORTRESS EMERGES FROM POCONO MOUNTAINS

This is just about an hour and a half from my house. During heavy traffic. . .

The Last Crusade thanks to Michael

WORLD’S “MOST DANGEROUS ISLAMIST” ALIVE, WELL, AND LIVING IN PENNSYLVANIA

FEDS TURN BLIND EYE TO MOUNTING HOMELAND SECURITY THREAT
by Paul L. Williams, Ph.D.

The most dangerous Islamist in the world is neither Afghani nor Arab.

He comes from neither Sudan nor Somalia.

And he resides in neither the mountains of Pakistan nor the deserts of the Palestinian territories.

This individual has toppled the secular government of Turkey and established madrassahs throughout the world.

His schools indoctrinate children in the tenets of radical Islam and prepare adolescents for the Islamization of the world.

More than 90 of these madrassahs have been established as charter schools throughout the United States. They are funded by American taxpayers.

One of these charter schools – - Tarek ibn Zayed Academy (TiZA) in Minnesota – - is so radically Islamic and subversive in nature that the Minnesota Department of Education issued two citations against it and the American Civil Liberties Union is suing it.

Dozens of his universities, including the Faith University in Istanbul, train young men to become lawyers, accountants, and political leaders so that they can take an active part in the restoration of the Ottoman Empire and the Islamization of the Western World.

He also allegedly operates compounds to train jihadis in the tactics of guerilla warfare.

This individual has amasssed a fortune – - over $30 billion – - for the creation of a universal caliphate.


His name is Fethullan Gulen and he resides not in the wilds of southern Turkey – - but the mountains of Northeastern Pennsylvania.

From his fortess headquarters, located on 28 acres at 1857 Mt. Eaton Road in Saylorsburg, PA, Gulen plots the overthrow of secular governments and oversees the spread of education jihad throughout Asia, Europe, and the United States.

Gulen is surrounded by an army of over 100Turkish Islamists, who guard him and tend to his needs. The army is comprised of armed militants who wear suits and ties and do not look like traditional Islamists in cloaks and turbans. They follow their hocaefendi’s (master lord’s) orders and even refrain from marrying until age fifty per his instructions. When they do marry, their spouses are expected to dress in the Islamic manner, as dictated by Gülen himself.



The Saylorsburg property consists of a massive chalet surrounded by numerous out buildings, including recreational centers, dormitories, cabins for visiting foreign dignitaries, a helicopter pad, and firing ranges.

Neighbors complain of the incessant sounds of gunfire – - including the rat-tat-tat of fully automatic weapons – - coming the compound and the low flying helicopter that circles the area in search of all intruders.

The FBI has been called to the scene, the neighbors say, but no action has been taken to end the illegal activity.

Sentries stand guard at the gates to the estate to turn away all curiosity seekers.

Within the sentry hut are wide screen televisions that project high resolution images from security cameras.

Before the hut is a sign that reads “Golden Generation Worship and Retreat Center.”

It’s hard for the local residents to understand that the Muslim who operates this compound is not an American political or intelligence official – - but rather a radical Islamist from Turkey.

Gulen fled Turkey in 1998 to avoid prosecution on charges that he was attempting to undermine Turkey’s secular government with the objective of establishing an Islamic government. Since his arrival in Pennsylvania, the Department of Homeland Security has been trying to deport him. But in 2008 a federal court ruled that Gulan was an individual with “extraordinary ability in the field of education” who merited permanent residence status in the U.S.

The ruling remains quizzical because Gulen has no formal education training.

Gülen, according to the Middle East Quarterly, was a student and follower of Sheikh Sa’id-i Kurdi (1878-1960), also known as Sa’id-i Nursi, the founder of the Islamist Nur (light) movement. After Turkey’s war of independence, Kurdi demanded, in an address to the new parliament, that the new republic be based on Islamic principles. He turned against Atatürk and his reforms and against the new modern, secular, Western republic.

How powerful is Gulen? And why is he such a threat to America and the Western world?

Consider this.

Turkey is now ruled by the Justice and Democratic Party (Adalet ve Kalkinma, AKP)- – a party under the Gulen’s control. Abdullah Gul, Turkey’s first Islamist President, is a Gulen disciple along with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Yusuf Ziya Ozcan, the head of Turkey’s Council of Higher Education.

Under the AKP, Turkey has transformed from a secular state into an Islamic country with 85,000 active mosques – - one for every 350- citizens – - the highest number per capita in the world, 90,000 imams, more imams than teachers and physicians – - and thousands of state-run Islamic schools.

Despite the rhetoric of European Union accession, Turkey has transferred its alliance from Europe and the United States to Russia and Iran. It has moved toward friendship with Hamas, Hezbollah, and Syria and created a pervasive anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, and anti-American animus throughout the populace.

Speaking on Monday at the inauguration ceremony of “TRT al Turkiye”, the new channel of the state run TV station TRT, Prime Minister Erdogan said Turkey will always be on the side of Muslims wherever they are.

Gulen’s tentacles stretch throughout the country since his followers, known as Fethullahists, have gained control of the country’s media outlets, its financial institutions and banks, and its business organizations.

According to Bayram Balci, a Turkish scholar, the Gulen schools that have been established throughout the world seek to expand “the Islamization of Turkish nationality and the Turification of Islam” in order to bring about a universal caliphate ruled by Islamic law.

Several countries have outlawed the establishment of Gulen schools and cemaats (communities) within their borders – - including Russia and Uzbekistan. Even the Netherlands, a nation that embraces pluralism and tolerance, has opted to cut funding to the Gulen schools because of their imminent threat to the social order.

But Gulen’s activities in the United States, including the establishment of an armed fortress in the midst of the Pocono Mountains, have escaped national press attention.

In his public statements, Gulen espouses a liberal version of Sunni/Hanafi Islam and promotes the Muslim notion of hizmet – - altruistic service to the common good.

Despite the paramilitary training at his Pocono fortress, Gulen has condemned terrorism and called for interfaith dialogue. He has met with Pope John Paul II, the Greek Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomeos, and Israeli Sephardic Head Rabbi Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron.

In private, Gulen has stated that “in order to reach the ideal Muslim society ‘every method and path is acceptable, [including] lying to people.’”

In a sermon that was aired on Turkish television, Gulen said:

You must move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers … until the conditions are ripe, they [the followers] must continue like this. If they do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads, and Muslims will suffer everywhere, like in the tragedies in Algeria, like in 1982 [in] Syria … like in the yearly disasters and tragedies in Egypt. The time is not yet right. You must wait for the time when you are complete and conditions are ripe, until we can shoulder the entire world and carry it … You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institutions in Turkey … Until that time, any step taken would be too early—like breaking an egg without waiting the full forty days for it to hatch. It would be like killing the chick inside. The work to be done is [in] confronting the world. Now, I have expressed my feelings and thoughts to you all—in confidence … trusting your loyalty and secrecy. I know that when you leave here—[just] as you discard your empty juice boxes, you must discard the thoughts and the feelings that I expressed here.

Why has the federal government opted to turn a blind eye to Gulen and his mountain fortress?

Why have Gulen’s madrassahs been kept under the radar screen of Hoimeland Security?

Why have the CIA and FBI allowed Gulen to wreak havoc and topple secular governments without interruption or intervention?

The answers remain anyone’s guess.

IRS Commissioner: Don't Worry, If You Don't Buy Health Insurance You'll Only Lose Your Tax Refund

Lying Obama lacky. Why are they hiring 16,000 new IRS agents? To not stringently enforce the individual mandate?...

Individuals who don’t purchase health insurance may lose their tax refunds according to IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman.

After acknowledging the recently passed health-care bill limits the agency’s options for enforcing the individual mandate, Shulman told reporters that the most likely way to penalize individuals that don’t comply is by reducing or confiscating their tax refunds.

Click on the title to read the whole story.

COURT: NO INTERNET CONTROL FOR FCC; BLOW TO JULIUS, REGULATION, RULES

To Nuke, Or Not To Nuke?

From Ace Of Spades:

I don't want to defend Obama, and, thankfully, I don't have to; I'm critical of his idiotic non-decision decision.

But, at the outset, I have to say it doesn't change a hell of a lot. On 11 September 2001, a terrorist group supported by the Islamofascist government of Afghanistan attacked United States civilians with what could be deemed a "nuclear-level" attack. I have read analyses that claimed the energy released by the bombing, in the form of collapsing buildings, reached the lower levels of a nuclear attack. Of course, a nuclear attack would have added that energy of falling buildings to its total energy, too; but it terms of death and destruction, certainly the attack was nuclear-like. If four bombs have ever managed to kill 2996 people in one attack, I don't know about it, and certainly this is nearly unprecedented if not completely so.

From what I gather, the Bush Administration put out the word that "all options" were on the table, and there was some leaking that nukes were being considered, but I doubt that was ever very serious. Within weeks we were planning a conventional attack. The reason given for setting the nuclear option aside was that the Taliban had nothing big enough to bomb with nukes, but that turned out to be not quite true: Certainly the forces gathered at Tora Bora could have been killed with a small nuclear attack (and likely bin Ladin as well).

But even in the face of such a horrific attack, a terrorist attack directed mostly at civilians, an attack that seemed to blur the boundaries between a conventional-level and nuclear level attack, we never seemed to seriously consider the nuclear option ourselves, and the only talk about it seemed to be for purposes of diplomacy and internal politics, bluffing our enemies and appeasing the large swaths of the American public that wanted irradiated blood.

Some argue that we needed to "preserve the ambiguity" about the use of nuclear weapons that has been maintained since the start of the Cold War. But that begs the question: Is there any genuine ambiguity about our actual policy? From what I can tell, we have a pure negotiating position, a pure bluff, that says, on paper, maybe we'll use them. Our actual policy is that we won't under virtually any circumstances. For there to be some "ambiguity" here, a number of foreign actors would have to believe the bluff, and I'm not sure any do.

Go read the whole thing.

Video: Homeland Security Counterterrorism Chief, "Tolerance and Diversity Define Islam"

Amnesty International Official Says "Defensive Jihad" Doesn't Violate Human Rights

From Weasel Zippers:

(CNSNews.com) – A simmering dispute over collaboration between Amnesty International and a former Guantanamo Bay detainee with Taliban sympathies has heated up after a senior Amnesty official argued that “defensive jihad” is not antithetical to human rights.

A trio of South Asian women’s rights campaigners expressed dismay at the prospect that Amnesty International would not unequivocally condemn the “defensive jihad” concept.

“If this is the official position of the world’s leading human rights organization, this would gravely undermine the future of the human rights movement,” said Amrita Chhachhi, Sara Hossain and Sunila Abeysekera in a letter to Amnesty Secretary-General Claudio Cordone.

“It is the argument of ‘defensive jihad’ that the Taliban uses to legitimize its anti-human rights actions such as the beheading of dissidents, including members of minority communities, and the public lashing of women,” they said.

Double Shot Bluesday Nooner!

Buddy Guy
Tramp



Junior Kimbrough
Burn In Hell

2012 !!! Obama forswears retaliatory nukes? J CARTER ON CRACK !

FIRST ...NO NEW NUKES

Mr. Obama described his policy as part of a broader effort to edge the world toward making nuclear weapons obsolete, and to create incentives for countries to give up any nuclear ambitions. To set an example, the new strategy renounces the development of any new nuclear weapons, overruling the initial position of his own defense secretary.

SECOND...NO RETALIATION FOR A WMD ATTACK AGAINST THE USA

For the first time, the United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons or launched a crippling cyberattack.

JUSTIFICATION:

Those threats, Mr. Obama argued, could be deterred with "a series of graded options," a combination of old and new conventional weapons. "I'm going to preserve all the tools that are necessary in order to make sure that the American people are safe and secure," he said in the interview in the Oval Office.

What gain for the safety of the people of the USA, HIS PRIMARY REASON FOR BEING ALIVE, can be gotten from this policy?

By demonstrating in detail by policy what nice guys in the neighborhood we are, what gain from other nations and culture can be reasonably expected when all of history has DEMONSTRATED OBJECTIVELY that at the best of times the best behavior of nations is NEUTRALLY AMORAL.

Let us say his purpose is TRULY to LEAD TO A WORLD WITHOUT NUKES ... what proof historically can he offer, what behavior of nations today can he offer that DEMOSTRATES that this will not lead as it always has to large cataclysmic wars of mutlinational, multicontinental nature killing millions by way of lack of deterrence?

Let us say he is serious about his EXCEPTIONS for states such as Iran and North Korea .. what in his actions so far would lead ANYONE to believe he is serious in his will to USE such weapons against, ultimately, the people in those states?

What MISTAKES IN ACTION will be caused by this policy, mistakes by OTHERS about the nature of the USA which might lead to PRECISELY what Mr. Obama clearly wants to avoid at all costs. CAUSED BY THIS POLICY.

CAUSED BY THIS POLICY.

Obama is UNFIT for foreign leadership.

Obama is UNQUESTIONABLY a believer in social democracy a la EU at the least, and an outright socialist at worst.

He cannot brook serious criticism as his PERSONAL reaction to Mr.'s Limbaugh and Beck this week DEMONSTRATES.

Barack Obama represents the worst example of the American people being sold on utter baloney in personality cult in history.

Had Mr. Obama truly been a serious leader, Mr. Obama could have chosen a policy which states that we NEED (arbitrarily) 1268 (pick a number) nukes to have a credible deterrent against foreseeable enemies today. He could have said we will develop slowly a replacement strategy for that number of weapons (since some of them are 25-30 years old), which is an UNBELIEVABLE reduction from where we were in the 1970's (20-40,000 weapons EACH for the USA and USSR).

Mr.Obama could have said that a WMD attack on the USA would result in a cataclysmic change in the fate of the world and its cultures. And simply said NO MORE, and had the SAME POLICY he detailed.

But Mr. Obama's concern for his image as peacemaker, as opposed to the realities required by the ACHIEVEMENT COMPELLED by earning such a title are clearly at odds with those things which must be done in the achievement.

Grant made peace. Sherman made peace. Ike made peace. Nimitz, Halsey, MacArthur, FDR, Lincoln made peace.

Mother Teresa did NOT. She was able to do what she did under the umbrella of time gifted to her by such men.

One overarching truth about the nature of human beings has never entered this man Obama's world, and threatens us all.

SI VI PACEM.....

Related articles by Zemanta

• No more cold war thinking | Johan Bergenäs (guardian.co.uk)
• Obama administration to announce new nuclear strategy (telegraph.co.uk)
• 5 more fresh articles...

Critics Blast Holder for Stalling Voting Rights Probe

Newsmax:

Monday, 05 Apr 2010 07:46 PM
By: David A. Patten

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has given U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder an April 12 deadline to state whether the Justice Department will stop stonewalling an investigation of alleged voter intimidation involving three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self Defense in Philadelphia.

A letter from Commission chairman Gerald A. Reynolds to Holder declares that the organization's efforts to obtain information from the Justice Department are at an "impasse."

The Commission wants to know why the Department dismissed a complaint filed against several New Black Panther defendants who were videotaped confronting a cameraman and brandishing a nightstick outside a polling place.

According to the Commission, the men blocked access to the polls, harassed voters and poll workers, and hurled racial epithets. Police were called to the scene and the two men were ordered to leave.

Videos of the incident have been posted on YouTube.

Bartle Bull, an author and civil rights veteran who ran RFK's 1968 presidential campaign, was observing the Fairmont Street polling station in Philadelphia when the incident occurred. Bull filed an affidavit that stated he overheard one of the men tell a white poll observer, "You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

Bull, a former publisher of the Village Voice, was awarded the 2003 civil rights medal by the late liberal lion Sen. Ted Kennedy for his voting-rights work in Mississippi. He was monitoring polling activities on Election Day 2008 in his role as chairman of New York's Democrats for McCain organization.

In his affidavit, Bull called the incident "the most blatant form of voter intimidation I have encountered in my life in political campaigns in many states, even going back to the work I did in Mississippi in the 1960s."

Bull tells Newsmax he believes the incident was part of a larger campaign to intimidate poll watchers, who were trying to expose voters who had been fraudulently registered by the now-defunct ACORN organization.

"Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy did not die to have uniformed thugs with weapons blocking the doors to polling places," Bull tells Newsmax.

He adds that he was "appalled but not surprised" when the Holder Justice Department announced it was dropping the case. "Eric Holder's job is to defend the supporters of the administration," he says.

Reynolds' letter states that the Department "appears to have failed to prosecute this case in a robust manner," and by so doing "it appears to have provided hate groups of every ilk a precedent that will assist them in avoiding liability for voter intimidation."

The Commission on Civil Rights was established by the Civil Rights Act of 1957. The Obama administration would be hard-pressed to dismiss its findings: Four of its eight board members are appointed by the president.

The Commission began investigating the case after the Justice Department dismissed a voter intimidation lawsuit in May 2009 over the objections of career civil service attorneys who recommended pursuing it.

The Commission isn't the only group getting stiff-armed while trying to find out why the Department dropped the case.

"We've been stalled as well," Tom Fitton, president of the nonprofit Judicial Watch organization, tells Newsmax.

Fitton says Judicial Watch filed Freedom of Information Act inquiries on the case several months ago, and has received no response.

While Fitton plans to let the administration process continue to play out, he tells Newsmax "It's looking more and more like we've going to have to sue in the end."

When the alleged intimidation came to the attention of the Justice Department's Voting Rights Section in January 2009, it filed a civil complaint charging that the New Black Panther members had acted inappropriately and intimidated voters.

Because the defendants never answered the complaint, Reynolds wrote, "the Department could have moved for a default judgment, which career lawyers responsible for the case in both the Voting and Appellate Sections, reportedly recommended."

Instead, the Department overruled its own staff's recommendation, and dismissed all charges brought against the defendants, with the exception of one charge against the man who held the nightstick.

Against that defendant, according to the Commission, the Department "then sought an injunction against this defendant that orders him to refrain from displaying a weapon within 100 feet of polling places, in Philadelphia only, until November 2012."

The Washington Times reported Monday that, according to unnamed sources in the department, the Voting Rights Section had been on the verge of seeking judgments against the men when Loretta King, who was serving as acting assistant attorney general, issued a delay order.

That delay reportedly came after a meeting with Associate Attorney General Thomas J. Perrelli. The Times reports that it was Perrelli -- the department's No. 3 political appointee -- approved dismissing the charges.

The Civil Rights Commission is seeking to obtain testimony on the New Black Panthers decision from Justice Department personnel. It also seeks documents reflecting any communications among Loretta King, Attorney General Holder, and Perrelli.

Reynolds wrote that the Department has "repeatedly refused" to answer basic requests for information. He points out that a 1975 statute passed by Congress requires "All federal agencies shall cooperate fully with the Commission to the end that it may effectively carry out its functions and duties."

The Justice Department has been sending Reynolds written assurances that it "seeks to be as responsible as possible," while only producing documents of primarily historical interest.

Its basis for not producing the request information "remains unclear," Reynolds says.

Reynolds asks in his letter: "…has the President invoked executive privilege over the materials that the Commission is seeking? If that is the case, the President or the Attorney General must so state."

Fitton tells Newsmax the whole matter smacks of a cover up.

"You never know until you get the underlying documents, but given the behavior it's fair to question whether it is a cover-up," he tells Newsmax.

"There's really no good legal reason, or policy reason, for withholding information about this decision. So their behavior can, I think, fairly be described as a cover-up. If there's nothing to hide, release the information.

Fitton, who calls the video of weapons being carried outside a polling place "shocking," says the administration may just be hoping that the controversy will go away.

"I think it's particularly ironic that the nation's first black attorney general, the first black president, are in a fight with the civil rights commission on a voting rights case," he says.

The U.S. Commission on Civil rights is an independent bipartisan commission of the federal government, charged with investigating and reporting on civil rights issues -- especially those affect a citizen's right to vote. Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., also has been pushing the Justice Department to justify dropping the charges.

Both the original black panthers, and the Huey P. Newton Foundation, have condemned the New Black Panthers group, saying on its Web site that it "serves to incite hatred rather than resolve it."

The Anti-Defamation League says the New Black Panther Party for Self Defense is responsible for "inflammatory bigotry," calling it "the largest organized anti-Semitic black militant group in America."

Important Culturist Article on Muslim Integration

Danish Psychologist: ‘Integration of Muslims in Western Societies is Not Possible’

Felix Streuning

Danish integration problems with Muslims became public worldwide in 2006 when the newspaper Jyllands-Postenpublished 12 cartoons of the prophet Mohammed. Exactly two years later riots broke out again because of the reprint of the Mohammed cartoons by all major Danish newspapers.

Currently 70 percent of the prison population in the Copenhagen youth prison consists of young man of Muslim heritage. Is this recent violence and general violent tendency among Muslims solely coincidental, or is there a direct connection?

In February 2009, Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist published a book entitled Among Criminal Muslims: A Psychologist’s Experience from Copenhagen. In his book, Nicolai Sennels shares a psychological perspective of this Muslim Culture, its relationship to anger, handling emotions and its religion. He based his research on hundreds of hours of therapy with 150 young Muslims in the Copenhagen youth jail. EuropeNews interviewed the author about his book and its consequences on integration of Muslims in Europe.

EuropeNews: Nicolai Sennels, how did you get the idea to write a book about criminal Muslims in Denmark?

Nicolai Sennels: I got the idea in February 2008 during a conference on integration in Copenhagen, where I was invited as the first and only psychologist working in a Copenhagen youth prison. My speech at the conference was about the fact, that foreigners’ culture plays a significant role concerning integration, crime and religious extremism. I emphasized, that people from a Muslim culture find it difficult, if not impossible, to create a successful life in Denmark.

This statement was met with great resistance from Danish politicians and also my own boss from the youth prison. I was quite surprised since I thought that my point is obvious: some cultures fit better into Western societies than others. All of Europe is currently struggling to integrate Muslims but this endeavor seems to be impossible. According to the Danish police and the Danish Bureau of Statistics more than 70 percent of all crimes in the Danish capital are committed by Muslims. Our national bank recently published a report stating that a Muslim foreigner costs more than 2 million Danish kroner (300,000 euros) in federal social assistance on average, caused by the low participation in the work force. On top of this, we have to add many additional types of social welfare that unemployed people can receive in our country: expenses in connection with interpreters, special classes in school – 64 percent of school children with Muslim parentscannot read and write Danish properly after 10 years in a Danish school – social work, extra police etc.

My statement resulted in a legal injunction, a kind of professional punishment, which stated, that if I ever repeat this, I could be fired. According to the Copenhagen authorities it is apparently permitted to state that the serious problems among Muslims are caused by poverty, the media, the police, the Danes, politicians, etc. But two things are definitely not allowed: 1) discussing the significance of culture and 2) our foreigners own responsibility for their integration in our societies. Unfortunately many very powerful politicians lack a clear understanding of the psychological aspect of culture and the influence it has on integration.

READ THE REST HERE

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.5905/pub_detail.asp