CDC LITERALLY DISCUSSING "ISOLATING HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS" IN "CAMPS": Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings
SOURCE.
What is the Shielding Approach1?
The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.3 In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population.4,5
For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.
In theory, shielding may serve its objective to protect high-risk populations from disease and death. However, implementation of the approach necessitates strict adherence1,6,7, to protocol. Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.
A summary of the shielding approach described by Favas is shown in Table 1. See Guidance for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among high-risk individuals in low-resource, displaced and camp and camp-like settings 1,2 for full details.
Table 1: Summary of the Shielding Approach1
Most vulnerable would be my 84 year old father. He is pragmatic. At his age the next heartbeat could be the last one.
ReplyDeleteIs there something scaring the shit out of the science community? Will future variants be like MRSA (methicillin resistant staph aureus) or something for which there is no treatment.
Is the virus a cluster FUBAR? I dunno. I just know the government message has never been one of strong families support a strong nation. Everything is about Balkanization of family units. I would think strong families that love and care for one another are the best future hope. But what do I know? I will soon fly out to care for my father during the 'Vid. Third visit.
We now have in excess of 10,000 people who have died proximate to being vaccinated. From what dis they die? The interest in doing autopsies and publishing the categorization and stats of the primary and contributing causes of death is zero. Why? Yet the push to vaccinate grow stronger, even hinting of segregation and internal passports.
ReplyDeleteThe several vaccines appear to be 80-90% effective in the real world, but news of the variant has some around 60%. Yet there are therapeutics that have near zero risk of complications that have effectiveness in that range as well. We are forbidden to discuss this. YouTube has taken videos down that discuss them.
I have spoken to more than one Covid survivor who told me the physicians they went to when they were initially infected told them to go home, there was nothing to be done. Go to the ER if breathing problems developed. This standard of care is criminal.
There is more to this story. Elites and the medical community have impeached themselves. We are on our own to determine and effect a course of action.
— theBuckwheat
Great comments, guys.
ReplyDelete