tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post116958284354664168..comments2024-03-28T14:32:19.334+00:00Comments on Who Would Have Believed The Singularity Would Be So Stupid?: The Natives Are Getting RestlessPastoriushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169621308239626652007-01-24T06:48:00.000+00:002007-01-24T06:48:00.000+00:00Read the interview with Paul Sperry on http://www....Read the interview with Paul Sperry on http://www.sperryfiles.com/ and you will understand that government security agencies CANNOT be trusted because they have been INFILTRATED.<BR/><BR/>Tom said: "That is what I was getting at. If the government fails to do it's Constitutional DUTY, does that give the people the right to perform that duty?"<BR/><BR/>Why do you even need to ask whether or not it is OK to defend your country? The government is NOT the country. No one can accuse you of treason for demanding that the government, your servant (a traitorous one at that), enforces the laws on the books.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169614412301910872007-01-24T04:53:00.000+00:002007-01-24T04:53:00.000+00:00LiveFreeOrDie,You don't sound like a radical to me...LiveFreeOrDie,<BR/>You don't sound like a radical to me. But, I'm sure that many people would think I'm a radical. And, they will continue thinking I'm a radical, until we get hit with a terrorist attack that kills more than 10,000 or more Americans.<BR/><BR/>At that point, everything that seems radical today, will suddenly be considered the height of prudence.Pastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169614001753547232007-01-24T04:46:00.000+00:002007-01-24T04:46:00.000+00:00Please don't take me for an idiotic, radical anarc...Please don't take me for an idiotic, radical anarchist. I love this country, thought I was fighting for it when I went to 'Nam, and will fight for it and the freedoms provided by the republic, not democracy, in which we live. Regarding our politicians, Pogo said something like we have met the enemy and it is us.<BR/><BR/> Tomlivfreerdiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16606967758790261406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169612816727444992007-01-24T04:26:00.000+00:002007-01-24T04:26:00.000+00:00That is what I was getting at. If the government f...That is what I was getting at. If the government fails to do it's Constitutional DUTY, does that give the people the right to perform that duty? Found a couple of interesting sites on national referendums, one saying that Congress has voided that right.<BR/><BR/>http://www.iandrinstitute.org/National%20I&R.htm<BR/><BR/>http://www.initiativefortexas.org/nrm1.html<BR/><BR/>http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlev.html<BR/><BR/> Tomlivfreerdiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16606967758790261406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169610140983912642007-01-24T03:42:00.000+00:002007-01-24T03:42:00.000+00:00Tom,I agree with you. The online stuff on legal ju...Tom,<BR/><BR/>I agree with you. The online stuff on legal justification for dissolution of government is full of dense legalese. Will need to spend a lot of time to understand the arguments. As for doing something, what about looking into the possibility of holding a binding national referendum on stopping Muslim immigration (not just from Islamic countries but also those from the West)?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169606201946959122007-01-24T02:36:00.000+00:002007-01-24T02:36:00.000+00:00Anonymous, Funny you should ask. I did a small se...Anonymous,<BR/> Funny you should ask. I did a small search on dissolution of government and got John Locke, which I couldn't understand. Found a site, Mr. Jefferson says, or something where the writer pointed out how the framers of the Constitution conveniently omitted the "people" in Constitutional and/or governmental change. Now being of limited education it is hard for me to make sense of these thinkers. Of course they didn't have the distractions of tv and the internet. Near as I can figure out, if the Feds do not accept the responsibility laid out in the Constitution then it falls to the states and eventually to the people. The 2 that stand out to me are the protection and security of the borders and our freedom. I'm sure there is an answer in there but I'll be dogged if I can figure it out.<BR/><BR/> Tomlivfreerdiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16606967758790261406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169596715831214792007-01-23T23:58:00.000+00:002007-01-23T23:58:00.000+00:00...Alzheimer's?http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwat......Alzheimer's?<BR/><BR/>http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/014947.phpAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169594681719713642007-01-23T23:24:00.000+00:002007-01-23T23:24:00.000+00:00I don't know whether elected representatives are a...I don't know whether elected representatives are any use. Those that can do anything have long since been bought by petrodollars.<BR/><BR/>In fact those who can't do anything and are utterly useless also seem to have been bought. I see former presidential hopeful Dhimmi Carter is back in action on behalf of the one true religion. <BR/><BR/>I was rather surprised because I assumed he was dead, either because I hadn't heard of him for many a year or because I thought he must have done the honorable thing at the end of his presidency and retired to his study with a bottle of whisky and a revolver.<BR/><BR/>Anyway, its not for me a Brit to criticise American politicians, so in the interests of UK/US understanding I'd like to nominate ex-Peanut Farmer Dhimmi Carter for the prestigious Neville Chamberlain Peace Prize.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169592559464735862007-01-23T22:49:00.000+00:002007-01-23T22:49:00.000+00:00There have been a lot of discussions online as to ...There have been a lot of discussions online as to what can we do about the threat of radical Islam. Various suggestions have been made...from writing letters to our elected reprentatives, getting the facts out to the public via blogging...to more extreme measures, such as nuking Mecca. Sometimes it seems like the sitaution is hopeless, there is nothing effective that we can do.<BR/><BR/>However, more and more I am beginnning to think that radical Islamists will be defeated-- by their own actions. As they become more and more extreme [and more and more absurd], people will start to wake up. <BR/><BR/>Unfortunately this process is prolonged by the dhimmitude of most of the MSM...but so many Muslims are making so many demands for special treatment...and the violence is spreading to so many areas..I think that eventually people will start to realize the facts.Krishna109https://www.blogger.com/profile/10497968813137194720noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169590288592209222007-01-23T22:11:00.000+00:002007-01-23T22:11:00.000+00:00livfreerdie, what does the Constitution and the De...livfreerdie, what does the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence say about an open rebellion? I imagine this has been studied already in the case of the open rebellion that was the Civil War.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169589484266441942007-01-23T21:58:00.000+00:002007-01-23T21:58:00.000+00:00I went to the Bucks Free Press web site to check o...I went to the Bucks Free Press web site to check out the comments. The front page showed a count of 152 comments. You can see that it's a burning issue because it generated way, way more comments than the other articles. However, the comments are not shown when you click on the article link. Other links with comments do show the comments after each article. This is a clear case of self-censorship. The blunt truth is that it won't be long before non-Muslims put survival above all else, cease to care about the distinction between good and bad Muslims, and rise up to purge any perceived threat by all means. People can see clearly that government security agencies do not, and will never have, enough manpower and money to keep tabs on the hostile elements in their midst. Worse, the power of these agencies are proscribed by law (even though it may have more power to act than a civilian) and these agencies have trouble with their Muslim employees, e.g., the recent case of the Muslim policewoman refusing to shake hand with her male superior and the recent case of the Muslim policeman refusing to guard the Israeli embassy. Sites like westernresistance.com do a better job of in-depth reporting than the legacy media.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-1169588397269582922007-01-23T21:39:00.000+00:002007-01-23T21:39:00.000+00:00This brings up the question that I have asked on s...This brings up the question that I have asked on several sites, what do we do? Grab our guns, jump in a few pick-ups, drive to Capitol Hill and throw the bums out? The election system is owned by those with the most money. Those elected, it seems, could care less what the people think. There is a line in the Declaration of Independence that goes something like this, when a long train of abuses... it is the right, the duty... to put an end to it. Do we wait for a "Seven Days in May" scenario? And how do you organize to effectively throw out the government when the Constitution calls it treason? How do you pull off an illegal act legally?<BR/><BR/> Tomlivfreerdiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16606967758790261406noreply@blogger.com