tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post5557219744009252701..comments2024-03-28T14:32:19.334+00:00Comments on Who Would Have Believed The Singularity Would Be So Stupid?: We Do Not Need To Ban The Religion of Islam - We Merely Need to Enforce Our Existing LawsPastoriushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comBlogger26125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-19503199740240609682011-07-22T13:36:37.819+01:002011-07-22T13:36:37.819+01:00Epa,
Yes, I think he might have done just that.
S...Epa,<br />Yes, I think he might have done just that.<br /><br />So, uh, what do you want to do now? I mean, we have no ball to play with.<br /><br />Let's go set something on fire.<br /><br />;-)Pastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-10624935169586277102011-07-22T13:33:33.044+01:002011-07-22T13:33:33.044+01:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7TGlcHy3ughttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7TGlcHy3ugPastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-82408283077709516722011-07-22T10:45:04.037+01:002011-07-22T10:45:04.037+01:00Did Super Samson take his ball and go home?Did Super Samson take his ball and go home?Epaminondashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04811906954763827459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-14456428208858519002011-07-22T05:25:31.393+01:002011-07-22T05:25:31.393+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Super Samsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01666330144641541874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-80306054363924609622011-07-22T05:23:24.461+01:002011-07-22T05:23:24.461+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Super Samsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01666330144641541874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-9740786770822945392011-07-22T05:19:24.686+01:002011-07-22T05:19:24.686+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Super Samsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01666330144641541874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-66556699413400183092011-07-22T02:11:33.057+01:002011-07-22T02:11:33.057+01:00By the way, I'm not saying you are the equival...By the way, I'm not saying you are the equivalent of a White Supremacist. It may be, simply, that you have not thought through your ideas very well. And honestly, that is what it sounds like to me.Pastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-44937026383696328702011-07-22T02:09:50.453+01:002011-07-22T02:09:50.453+01:00Non-Jews can not have an opinion on Jewish issues?...Non-Jews can not have an opinion on Jewish issues?!?<br /><br />What Tribalistic nonsense.<br /><br />Any idea which can not be expressed in words, is not a coherent idea.<br /><br />Any idea which can not be expressed in words is either illogical or purely sensual in nature. If it is purely sensual in nature, then as pleasant as it might be to you, it is base, and not worthy of exalting as an attribute which lends you pride in your tribe.<br /><br />If there is a coherent Judaism, or Jewish culture, it would be express-able in words. Your argument that it is something that can only be shared "between the brothers" (for that is the notion you put forth, in so many words) is laughable, and smacks of something very close to the kinds of arguments I hear from White Supremacists.Pastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-3435283874823564762011-07-21T21:46:51.371+01:002011-07-21T21:46:51.371+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Super Samsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01666330144641541874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-86244696821568466482011-07-21T21:45:44.638+01:002011-07-21T21:45:44.638+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Super Samsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01666330144641541874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-33142848914382521812011-07-21T19:50:39.125+01:002011-07-21T19:50:39.125+01:00BTW, I am not orthodox, but no matter how TINY th...BTW, I am not orthodox, but no matter how TINY they might be in your mind (I am SURE SEN LIEBERMAN WOULD DISAGREE SINCE HE IS ONE) ... thinking for an instant it is MORE IMPORTANT to damage one religion by harming another 'tiny' one might be one of the more breathtakingly unamerican things I have seen posted posted here.<br /><br />It is NO DIFFERENT than tossing the Bahai's into the garbage in the mind of many takfir minded muslims.Epaminondashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04811906954763827459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-91891651690754618942011-07-21T19:47:55.135+01:002011-07-21T19:47:55.135+01:00Samson, SPEAK OF ASSUMPTION....
you can call me M...Samson, SPEAK OF ASSUMPTION....<br /><br />you can call me Melech Pincus Hakohane<br /><br />Kosher slaughtering of animals as 'licensed' by othrodox rabbis I have known IS ABSOLUTELY not unlike halal slaughtering I have witnessed.<br /><br /><br />Worse than that, and far more importantly you also just took out VOODOO.Epaminondashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04811906954763827459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-46509837563107507582011-07-21T19:14:13.378+01:002011-07-21T19:14:13.378+01:00But don't let the rest of us woefully misguide...But don't let the rest of us woefully misguided gentiles stand in your way.midnight riderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18438029111428393889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-60963006382229426072011-07-21T19:12:56.115+01:002011-07-21T19:12:56.115+01:00Super Samson -- Epaminondas IS Jewish, you arrogan...Super Samson -- Epaminondas IS Jewish, you arrogant ass.midnight riderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18438029111428393889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-3865704192942492332011-07-21T19:02:53.636+01:002011-07-21T19:02:53.636+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Super Samsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01666330144641541874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-66454756903427277212011-07-21T17:53:52.400+01:002011-07-21T17:53:52.400+01:00I am not interjecting my personal philosophy. I a...I am not interjecting my personal philosophy. I am only trying to explain to you how the law works. <br /><br />The MSM does not become a government actor and therefore subject to the First Amendment just because it is a big entity with a large viewership and a nationwide reach. The MSM may be subject to laws and FCC regs that limit what they can broadcast, but they cannot violate the First Amendment unless they are somehow government actors.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-30992832707835720262011-07-21T17:38:26.609+01:002011-07-21T17:38:26.609+01:00Yes, but I am talking about a major media corporat...Yes, but I am talking about a major media corporation using the public airwaves to violate the First Amendment rights of a whole group of people, by threatening to murder them for exercising their Freedom of Conscience.<br /><br />I think you are answering my question according to your Conservative ideals, rather than how these issues are actually dealt with.<br /><br />Is that possible?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-8441172278715158112011-07-21T17:24:05.262+01:002011-07-21T17:24:05.262+01:00The First Amendment limits governmental power. In...The First Amendment limits governmental power. Individuals cannot violate the First Amendment. Private entities cannot violate the First Amendment.<br /><br />Here is an example of the First Amendment's Freedom of Speech:<br /><br />1. Anonymous poster offends the IBA's Pastorious with incoherent rants and mean-spirited attack on President Obama in the comments section. However, nothing illegal was done or said. It was just a troll being a troll.<br /><br />2 (a). Pastorious, as private citizen, removes troll's nonsense. No First Amendment violation.<br /><br />2 (b). Flag-at-Whitehouse-dot-gov picks up that Obama is being trashed and uses electronic wizardry beyond my comprehension to remove the offending comment. First Amendment violation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-3419554105860378692011-07-21T17:10:59.630+01:002011-07-21T17:10:59.630+01:00I could be operating under a false assumption. Doe...I could be operating under a false assumption. Does not the First Amendment cover Freedom of Conscience?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-54306314806565588482011-07-21T17:08:57.334+01:002011-07-21T17:08:57.334+01:00"BAN RITUAL SLAUGHTER" .. you just took ..."BAN RITUAL SLAUGHTER" .. you just took out Judiasm as wellEpaminondashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04811906954763827459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-66683748486888880692011-07-21T17:08:09.289+01:002011-07-21T17:08:09.289+01:00If FoxNews advocated the murder of apostates on th...If FoxNews advocated the murder of apostates on the public airwaves, then it may be in violation of of some statute or FCC regulation. But, FoxNews would not violate the First Amendment by calling for the murder or death of apostates.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-89319588881337705362011-07-21T17:03:22.070+01:002011-07-21T17:03:22.070+01:00Another point, Anonymous, to the extent that News ...Another point, Anonymous, to the extent that News Corp. does function on public airwaves, I believe they could be deemed to be violating the First Amendment by advocating the murder of Apostates.<br /><br />Nonetheless, if I have that wrong, it is pretty clear we would allow no major media outlet to advocate the murder of an entire group of people.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-50545408046827328792011-07-21T16:46:15.377+01:002011-07-21T16:46:15.377+01:00I think Anonymous' points are valid. However, ...I think Anonymous' points are valid. However, it seems pretty clear to me that we would tolerate no such proposals from any other major social institution in our nation.<br /><br />That's why I offered Fox/News Corp. by way of comparison. <br /><br />If Fox/News Corp. was proposing the same kinds of ideas, targeting another group of people like this, we would certainly, as a society, come down on Fox with a hammer blow.<br /><br />Do you disagree with that?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-35090104238982401042011-07-21T16:04:19.798+01:002011-07-21T16:04:19.798+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.Super Samsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01666330144641541874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-67818655527345816572011-07-21T15:38:21.996+01:002011-07-21T15:38:21.996+01:00Just a few points:
1. Only the government can vi...Just a few points:<br /><br />1. Only the government can violate the First Amendment (or any other Amendment except the Constitutional provision against slavery/forced labor). So, when private people preach stoning of apostates and gays, they are not breaking a law unless the speech leads to an imminent change in the listener's behavior. In fact, in absence of a change in behavior by those hearing the speech, the speaker's speech is protected by the First Amendment.<br /><br />2. Preaching the subjugation of women or enslavement of the infidel is protected by the First Amendment. However, taking action to actually enslave someone is not.<br /><br />3. Preaching jizya or dhimmi tax is protected. Attempting to collect it through threats, coercion, blackmail, etc... are criminal violations.<br /><br />4. Preaching Zakat as a part of the United States' economic system is protected by the First Amendment. Actually trying to use the government in order to compel Zakat would be a violation of the First Amendment.<br /><br />Let's not minimize this issue. There are laws that deal with some of the objectionable aspects of Islam and/or Sharia. But, more laws are needed to deal with this metastasizing threat that is a relative newcomer to our shores and legal and political systems.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com