tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post8392881182658797541..comments2024-03-28T14:32:19.334+00:00Comments on Who Would Have Believed The Singularity Would Be So Stupid?: The Shit Is Starting to Fly -- This is MAGNITUDES Worse Than WatergatePastoriushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-19713610188013073402017-03-09T23:43:44.149+00:002017-03-09T23:43:44.149+00:00Has anyone noticed that NO ONE IN THE 16 AGENCIES ...Has anyone noticed that NO ONE IN THE 16 AGENCIES ARE COMPLAINING?<br /><br />PENSION-SWILLING UNION ORCSPastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-27952105396571293762017-03-09T23:28:26.099+00:002017-03-09T23:28:26.099+00:00As one of OBama's final acts as POTUS he autho...As one of OBama's final acts as POTUS he authorized/commanded Lynch to extend intel to/between all 16 intel agencies. We all know these agencies, hell, the entire government has been heavily infiltrated by nefarious interests of the ME kind. What if O did this anticipating the battle ahead to keep his imagined legacy intact and allowed this broad spectrum of intel to purposely fall into enemy hands?<br />He didn't succeed in flooding this nation with war capable ME/No.African migrants to his satisfaction, perhaps he is thinking he can call up his brethren to create electronic misery too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-42180952330534065292017-03-09T20:49:39.235+00:002017-03-09T20:49:39.235+00:00Because of this paragraph (and several like it) th...Because of this paragraph (and several like it) the frame is a "business as usual" script. In other words, "Yawn... you can all go home now. Nothing to see here."<br /><br />"There also was evidence of Russian-friendly figures trying to curry favor with those close to Trump, something that happens at all levels when a new president is poised to take office."<br /><br /><br />The article reads too soft and not hard hitting. It is conciliatory and seeks to be convincing.<br /><br />thelastenglishprincehttp://thelastenglishprince.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-35364072340630752092017-03-09T13:30:26.868+00:002017-03-09T13:30:26.868+00:00The information Hannity provides at the beginning ...The information Hannity provides at the beginning of the video, about "Minimization procedures", is very importan.Pastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-63189178968056008562017-03-09T13:06:16.146+00:002017-03-09T13:06:16.146+00:00Sorry, credibility is in short supply - this CYA f...Sorry, credibility is in short supply - this CYA from the same FBI that would/could not bring charges against Hillary despite illegal personal server while SoS.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-48694412641166225292017-03-09T12:58:44.403+00:002017-03-09T12:58:44.403+00:00This article appears to me to be a bald attempt by...This article appears to me to be a bald attempt by the FBI to deflect all blame for the leaks and to justify the techniques they used. <br /><br />In other words, it is saying, it's all Obama's fault, we had nothing to do with it.<br /><br />Additionally, it attempts to say, we have no CURRENT evidence against Trump or his people.<br /><br />In this sense, the article appears to be the FBI's attempt to back off and say, "hey, look, if you leave us alone, we will not fight anymore, but if you don't leave us alone, WE MAY FIND EVIDENCE ON YOU."<br /><br />This article doesn't seem to be informational so much as to be a case of very public CYA by the FBI - probably to explain all the "Fake news" and to deflect blame for the information that has been attributed to their agency.Pastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-85342645018622324872017-03-09T12:53:19.288+00:002017-03-09T12:53:19.288+00:00AND THIS PART:
Currently, no evidence against Fly...AND THIS PART:<br /><br />Currently, no evidence against Flynn<br />There was also a discussion of a possible conference about Kazakhstan the next month, they added. To date, the FBI has not found anything that rises to criminal activity in the Flynn conversations, though the ultimate decision will reside with prosecutors in the Justice Department, the sources said. Pastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-32406411875622765712017-03-09T12:52:20.399+00:002017-03-09T12:52:20.399+00:00Read this part, for instance:
The sources said Fl...Read this part, for instance:<br /><br />The sources said Flynn exchanged a handful of calls or text messages to the Russian ambassador in December, including holiday wishes and condolences for recent Russian tragedies.<br />Some involved more substantive policy issues, something the FBI flagged for the larger intelligence community because Obama was still in power and Trump was not yet in power.Pastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-29919533064273298592017-03-09T12:52:01.966+00:002017-03-09T12:52:01.966+00:00I don't know whether to believe this article, ...I don't know whether to believe this article, for the following reasons:<br /><br />1) it claims the FBI had the authority to surveil communications between Russians and American citizens, whoever they may be - apparently these are any kind of incoming or outgoing communications, even if one of the parties is a member of the incoming administration --- THIS MAY OR MAY NOT BE TRUE, i would have no idea<br /><br />2) it sounds like it could be an attempt to coverup wrongdoing after the fact<br /><br />3) the article claims that of all the information the FBI gained through it's surveillance of Russians and their communications with various Trump administration officials, it has gleaned no information that should have been damaging to Trump<br /><br />4) it claims that Obama (in his last days in office) loosened regulations on who such information is distributed to - we already knew this - <br /><br />IN OTHER WORDS, IT SOUNDS LIKE THIS ARTICL IS AN ATTEMPT BY THE FBI TO DO TWO THINGS<br /><br />1) declare it did nothing wrong<br /><br />and <br /><br />2) blame everything obviously wrong on Obama<br /><br />Pastoriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-33514436411175414872017-03-09T06:37:24.915+00:002017-03-09T06:37:24.915+00:00It seems to me we have two (at least) different se...It seems to me we have two (at least) different sets of leakers here. The first intent on destroying Trump leak the Flynn info The Sessions info etc. The second set leaks the wiretap info and then the how they did it info to Wikileaks.midnight riderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18438029111428393889noreply@blogger.com