Shoebat: Anti-Muhammad film the result of Muslim Provocateurs? Via Shoebat: The Innocence of Muslims and the spark of an Islamic revolution can be linked to a handful of culprits. The mystery is unlocked when we review the original YouTube page of one named Sam Bacile (the same name attributed to the filmmaker at one time). Bacile forgot to cover his tracks, leaving two links to three very crucial videos. On the “Feed” tab are two of those videos. One features a Muslim named Wisam Abdul Waris, uploaded to YouTube on September 9th (linked from the Bacile page no later than September 10th). Wisam’s video was uploaded to Bacile’s page because Bacile commented on the video. Yet, when one attempts to view the comments, all have been scrubbed and the comment feature disabled, though the comment allegedly made by Sam Bacile appears on the “Feed” tab, just above the video. The second video on the Sam Bacile “Feed” tab is none other Nader Bakkar, from as far back as May of 2012. This video was added to Bacile’s YouTube page as a “Favorite” about one week prior to the embassy attack in Cairo on 9/11. The third video is on the “Likes” tab of the Sam Bacile YouTube page. It consists of an interview with an English speaking western woman who converted to Islam. Why would a supposed Christian filmmaker “like” this video? Who are these two named Wisam Abdul Waris and Nader Bakkar? Waris and Bakkar, the two main interests on Sam Bacile’s YouTube channel, were the two men we identified back on September 13th as being the two primary culprits behind the Cairo riots on 9/11. These two have been conspicuously absent, all along, from all western media narratives. For example, days after the attacks in Egypt and Libya, Reuters reported an incomplete narrative that the “flashpoint” of the violence was when Sheikh Khalid Abdallah on Al-Nas TV in Egypt aired portions of the film Innocence of Muslims. The clip Reuters is referring to (uploaded September 9th) was a TV interview on al-Nas, where Sheikh Khalid Abdallah interviewed an activist named Mohammad Hamdy, who was engaged in a blatant form of guilt by association, creating a link between the Copts in Egypt and the Copts in the Diaspora. He blamed all Copts worldwide, not just the ones involved in the film. Then came these two on September 9th, Wisam Abdul Waris, a Salafist who announced the formation of a new organization, the Coalition of Dar al-Hekma, an activist group wanting to enforce blasphemy laws worldwide and especially in the West. Nader Bakkar was the head of the Nour Salafist party, who gladly announced his new membership in the coalition on the day these two condemned the film. Contrary to what Reuters reported, what caused the riots was when Waris called in to Khalid to promote them. Khalid simply asked for the date and accepted the invitation. The details and evidence of how the riots erupted by these two was explained here. The rest is history. The conclusion is that all evidence reveals a small circle of predators—the filmmaker and two individuals prominently displayed on the Sam Bacile YouTube channel. Wisam and Bakkar planned and executed the riots. Read it all. There's a lot more...

Shoebat: Anti-Muhammad film the result of Muslim Provocateurs?

Via Shoebat:

The Innocence of Muslims and the spark of an Islamic revolution can be linked to a handful of culprits. The mystery is unlocked when we review the original YouTube page of one named Sam Bacile (the same name attributed to the filmmaker at one time). Bacile forgot to cover his tracks, leaving two links to three very crucial videos. On the “Feed” tab are two of those videos.

One features a Muslim named Wisam Abdul Waris, uploaded to YouTube on September 9th (linked from the Bacile page no later than September 10th). Wisam’s video was uploaded to Bacile’s page because Bacile commented on the video. Yet, when one attempts to view the comments, all have been scrubbed and the comment feature disabled, though the comment allegedly made by Sam Bacile appears on the “Feed” tab, just above the video.

The second video on the Sam Bacile “Feed” tab is none other Nader Bakkar, from as far back as May of 2012. This video was added to Bacile’s YouTube page as a “Favorite” about one week prior to the embassy attack in Cairo on 9/11.

The third video is on the “Likes” tab of the Sam Bacile YouTube page. It consists of an interview with an English speaking western woman who converted to Islam.

Why would a supposed Christian filmmaker “like” this video?

Who are these two named Wisam Abdul Waris and Nader Bakkar?

Waris and Bakkar, the two main interests on Sam Bacile’s YouTube channel, were the two men we identified back on September 13th as being the two primary culprits behind the Cairo riots on 9/11.

These two have been conspicuously absent, all along, from all western media narratives. For example, days after the attacks in Egypt and Libya, Reuters reported an incomplete narrative that the “flashpoint” of the violence was when Sheikh Khalid Abdallah on Al-Nas TV in Egypt aired portions of the film Innocence of Muslims.

The clip Reuters is referring to (uploaded September 9th) was a TV interview on al-Nas, where Sheikh Khalid Abdallah interviewed an activist named Mohammad Hamdy, who was engaged in a blatant form of guilt by association, creating a link between the Copts in Egypt and the Copts in the Diaspora. He blamed all Copts worldwide, not just the ones involved in the film.

Then came these two on September 9th, Wisam Abdul Waris, a Salafist who announced the formation of a new organization, the Coalition of Dar al-Hekma, an activist group wanting to enforce blasphemy laws worldwide and especially in the West. Nader Bakkar was the head of the Nour Salafist party, who gladly announced his new membership in the coalition on the day these two condemned the film.

Contrary to what Reuters reported, what caused the riots was when Waris called in to Khalid to promote them. Khalid simply asked for the date and accepted the invitation. The details and evidence of how the riots erupted by these two was explained here. The rest is history.

The conclusion is that all evidence reveals a small circle of predators—the filmmaker and two individuals prominently displayed on the Sam Bacile YouTube channel.

Wisam and Bakkar planned and executed the riots.

Read it all. There's a lot more...

"Innocence Of Muslims" - Welcome to Pallywood II

"Innocence Of Muslims" - Welcome to Pallywood II

By W.Shoebat.

When it comes to the film Innocence of Muslims, our government and the media uses a narrative mired in contradictions and false statements provided by the filmmaker, who himself is an untrustworthy source. 

If we stick to what can be proven we might obtain the possibility that terror supporters produced the film. Muhammad Al Dura and Pallywood are two cases in point showing the type of stunts used by Palestinian terrorists. 

So lets examine facts instead of the filmmaker’s fiction. Court documents reveal that Nakoula Bacile Nakoula, producer of the movie Innocence of Muslims, partnered in a scheme with Eiad Salameh, my first cousin. 

Eiad is a Muslim terror supporter and is not an Egyptian Copt. He comes from Beit Sahour, Bethlehem and is well known by the FBI and the Arab community as a conduit for Middle Easterners who can obtain authentic, legitimate identifications, from passports to credit cards that include many nationalities. 

He then places these forms of identification into the hands of dubious characters that are not the real identity.

In fact, I revealed Eiad Salameh way before this whole fiasco erupted—in 2008 and the first reporting on the connection between Eiad and Nakoula was revealed on September 14th, 2012 by the Smoking Gun, which published court documents that prove these two were connected in 2009, as part of a major financial fraud scheme. The narrative that circulates the media fails to address crucial questions about the mystery of this film.

The results of this entire Innocence of Muslims fiasco will not be the apprehension of terrorists, but the continual chipping away at our First-Amendment freedoms.

Get the rest of the story at THE OTHER NEWS.

Walid Shoebat Says, "Innocence of Muslims Film was Made by Terrorists."

AND STILL, THE MAN HAS THE RIGHT TO DO WHAT HE HAS DONE.

IT'S CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

IMPORTANT QUOTE FROM THE SHOEBAT ARTICLE:

So who funded the film? Nakoula claimed that he produced the film with money ($50,000 to $60,000) that came from his wife’s family in Egypt.

None of this has been proven.

What has been proven is that he embezzled millions with Eiad. The money must have come from these scandalous operations, which our government finally admitted is linked to terrorist activity.

Whoever made this film claimed Jews funded him and that he was a Copt, and obviously intended to do harm to his real enemies—Israel and the Copts.

From Will at The Other News:
By Walid Shoebat.

There is more to the story of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula than what we are told by the media. Court documents revealthat Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, producer of the movie Innocence of Muslims, partnered in a scheme with Eiad Salameh, my first cousin, a Palestinian Muslim from Beit Sahour in the Palestinian district of Bethlehem.  

To prove my claim, I revealed Eiad Salameh long before this whole fiasco erupted—in2008 and the first real reportage of Eiad and Nakoula was revealed on September 14th, 2012. 

Now do I have your attention? 

The narrative that circulates the media fails to answer crucial questions behind the mystery of this film. For example, to date, no one has stepped forward or can confirm for certain that whoever holds an identity by the name of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is that man’s true identity.  

In the Middle East, if a man by the name of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula indeed exists while being blamed for creating a mess of international proportions—which included the anger of over one billion Muslims—it would not be that difficult to find the entire family in Egypt, including brothers, cousins, aunts, siblings wife, wives, ex-wives, mistresses, pets and all.  

In the Middle East, no one can hide. Egypt is where the demonstrations that have taken place all over the Middle East and Asia were sparked. Yet, it cannot produce this man’s background? 

Besides, why would Nakoula, who claims to be a religious Coptic activist, have extensive connections with Eiad? My cousin hated Copts with a passion and is well-known in the Middle East as a master schemer, probably one of the best the Middle East has produced. He also has multiple contacts with terror networks.  

Eiad is from Beit Sahour, Bethlehem. He is a dubious individual who was well known in the Arab community as the main contact for obtaining authentic, legitimate identifications from passports to credit cards, under many nationalities. He then places these identifications into the hands of dubious characters whose names are not the names written on the passports.  

Eiad is a Muslim terror supporter and is not an Egyptian Copt. Both my cousin Eiad and whoever this man is who pretends to be Nakoula, had multiple, fraudulent identifications and the two connected for a decade in multiple scheming operations—the type that usually links to terrorism.

Read the full story here.

From the Daily Mail:

Californian behind Mohammed movie that has Middle East in flames is a meth-making federal informer... and the director made soft porn films

• Jailed for bank fraud in 2009
• Charged with intent to make methamphetamine in 1997
• Film prompted protests across Egypt and Libya that led to four U.S. deaths 
• Producer claimed he was an Israeli Jew living in California named Sam Bacile but there is no record of that being a real name
• Man named Nakoula Basseley Nakoula found at address where phone number was listed - but denied he was Bacile
• Nakoula was jailed for fraud convictions and has used multiple aliases
• Director Alan Roberts has background in making soft porn movies
• Cast and crew distanced themselves from film saying they were 'misled'

The California man who produced the anti-Islam video that has caused outrage across the Middle East is a federal informant who avoided spending longer in jail by telling investigators about an elaborate bank fraud scheme he was involved in.

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula opened a string of bank accounts under assumed names, transferring money between them with bogus cheques and withdrawing cash before they bounced. 

He was jailed for 21 months for the scheme after being caught by the FBI in 2009. The sentence was a year less than the punishment sought by prosecutors, and was handed down after Nakoulou gave investigators information about the ring leader of the $800,000 scam, according to the Smoking Gun.

It has also been revealed that Alan Roberts, the film's director, is an experienced editor who has directed a number of low-budget soft porn movies

The father-of-three explained how Eiad Salameh, a notorious fraudster on the run from authorities for more than a decade ran the scheme and recruited Nakoula as a 'runner'.

CNN's Word Games

Shilling for dhimmitude:


As pointed out by the Walid Shoebat Foundation Blog:

CNN is apparently willing to include the words “honor killing” and “conservative Afghan” in its news reports but is unwilling to say that the honor killing was mandated by Islamic teachings or even mention that the murderers were Muslims. Instead, the word “conservative” has the effect of comparing such nasty people with the Christian right in America.

The most tragically ironic aspect of this story is that the man who murdered his daughters and tried to cover it up, said that he killed them because they “betrayed kindness.”

This CNN news report is a must-see for the network’s bias. It fits right in line with the network’s history of running interference for Islamists.

Walid Shoebat All Fired Up At Six Flags

Must see video.

9/11 MOSQUE IMAM BOASTS, "Obama's historic speech in Egypt came from me!"


UPDATED AND BUMPED TO THE TOP FOR NOW - SCROLL DOWN FOR NEWER POSTS

Image from Time Magazine

Pamela comments:

One might think that Imam Feisal was merely showing off to the Arab media: the braggadocio of a conceited megalomaniacal man with delusions of grandeur -- so grand, in fact, that he intends to build of mega mosque on the thousands of graves of innocent Americans slaughtered in the largest Islamic attack (or any attack for that matter) on American soil.

But it is not braggadocio. In audio tapes I am currently reviewing, Imam Rauf's power reach is at the highest levels imaginable. He is a grand jihadist, a master classman, operating at the apex of power. The "blueprint" Imam Rauf refers to, is essentially the US MUSLIM ENGAGEMENT -- Changing the Course", This is a large-scale effort by the US government to open areas of cooperation (dhimmitude) with the Islamic world in the political, cultural and economic spheres. 

Pamela is right. And, if you think about it, what we are seeing here, on the part of the Obama Administration and the State Dept., is the Amerabia Project; the equivalent of the Eurabia Project (the Euro-Arab Dialogue) which Bat Ye'or writes of in her important work, Eurabia.


How is it that our government has decided that America needs to be Islamicized/Arabized? What is the theory behind this movement? Is this Amerabia Project merely "reaching out" to our enemies?  Or is it the appeasement of our enemies by giving away what belongs to us; our land, our nation, our culture, our dignity?

The fact of the matter is, we are at war with Jihadist Muslims, Muslims who rightly believe the Koran tells them to convert or kill Infidels until Allah's Kingdom is established across the face of the Earth. This does not mean we are at war with all Muslims, but it does mean that all Muslims, who will not renounce Jihad against the Infidel, are at war with us.


I will repeat that, ALL MUSLIMS WHO WILL NOT RENOUNCE JIHAD AGAINST THE INFIDEL ARE AT WAR WITH US.


We can't avoid this. If another entity, or nation, or people, declare they want to kill you, you can not simply wish away reality. You can not stop someone from wanting to kill you by imagining a world where their murderous thoughts do not exist.


Children get the worlds of Wish/Imagination and Reality mixed up. Adults are supposed to grow out of such thinking.


Our State Department, our Executive Administration, and our de facto State Media (see the Time Magazine Image above), have not grown up. They are children. They still believe that, if we would only reach out, with an "unclenched fist", to our would-be murderers, they would stop wanting to kill us, stop wanting to destroy our civilization.


And, our government seems willing to give away our civilization so that Muslims will not kill us.


We are the Sudetenland. 

Our government is in the beginning stages of planning to force the American people to cede it's very culture in order to appease Muslims.


At least Neville Chamberlain only gave away OTHER people's land. He was not so stupid as to insist the British people actually give away their own nation and culture.

Can you imagine if Roosevelt had proposed the idea of winning World War II Nazifying America? Can you imagine if Churchill had sought Goebbels help in writing his speeches?


When a government begins to turn against it's people in this manner, when it ceases to work for our interests, then we are back to where this nation started; Taxation without Representation.


It may be true that our government believes it is doing the right thing. They may believe reaching out to the Islamic world will help, eventually, to bring about peace.


But, this is an absolutely unproven strategy in the annals of war. And, we have not approved this strategy. 

In fact, the American people are making it clear that we absolutely disapprove of this strategy. 


The faultline manifesting this disapproval is the Ground Zero Mosque. We will not provide such an accommodation to Muslims on the graveyard of our own battlefield. If our government will not recognize the will of the people, then it is our government that is in trouble, not the people. 


We will not be moved. We will not provide sustenance to our enemies. We will not let our government become our slavemasters. We will not become the serfs of our own property. 


We own ourselves, and we own our government. And, it is time for our Representatives to understand that, or get out.


So, for now, the message to our pathetic and wayward Representatives is, we will meet you on hallowed ground. You have the choice to stand with us, or stand against us. The choice is yours.

QUESTION: So who really was speaking on that historic day of June 4th 2009 in Cairo, Egypt? President Obama or the Imam of the proposed Ground Zero Mosque, Feisal Abdul Rauf?

ANSWER: Feisal Abdul Rauf! (Link to audio excerpt of Raul interview at bottom of page)

The Shoebat Foundation has obtained a shocking audio recording of Rauf's own voice boasting in Arabic that Obama’s historic speech in Cairo was provided by the Imam's work with the Cordova Initiative in what the Imam called “The Blue Print” which, according to him, was the solution to the Islamic-American divide. Rauf claimed that Chapter 6 of the Imam’s work engineered by the Cordova Initiative was the construct for the entire speech:

“This is an example of the impact of our work in a positive way to be used by the President.”

"The blue print," Rauf elaborated, included everything from U.S. policy to Jewish and Christian relations with Muslims.

For an Imam in New York to be involved in the orchestrating U.S. foreign policy is quite the claim. In the recording dated February 5th, 2010 Rauf boasted that:

“We have to look at it [as] how to engineer solutions. At the Cordova Initiative we think of ourselves as an engineering shop. Yes. We have an analytical approach. Our work has been that. IN THE BOOK CHAPTER 6, I WROTE ABOUT THIS BLUE PRINT as to WHAT HAS TO BE DONE BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, what has to be done by the Jewish community, what has to be done by the Christian community, what has to be done by the Muslim community, what has to be done by educators, what has to be done by the media. For example, IN MY BOOK IN THE ARABIC VERSION page 293, what did I write? WHAT ARE THE THINGS THAT THE UNITED STATES NEEDS TO DO. IF YOU EXAMINE THIS CHAPTER YOU WILL FIND THAT THE OBAMA SPEECH IN CAIRO WAS ALL TAKEN FROM THIS SECTION [Section 6]. When you do a job that is very complicated. You ask yourself, what have you accomplished. All these problems can be solved but requires the will to solve it. It requires political will, resources and the right focus. The signs of how to go to the moon was known 200 years ago, but the political will and financial will for it happened during 1960-1961. When John Kennedy said that we will send an American to the moon before the end of the 60’s, he established the financial resources and the political will.”

The story was even collaborated in a written article in an interview with Hani Al-Waziri of Egypt. The clue was revealed while Rauf was answering a question regarding President Barack Obama’s speech in which Rauf replied:

“The speech was wonderful and wise in his choice of words, the Prime Minister of Malaysia after the speech disclosed to me that it is now easy for any president of a Muslim country to establish good relations with America, and I AM NOT GOING TO HIDE FROM YOU THAT ONE OF THOSE WHO PARTICIPATED IN WRITING THE SPEECH, TRANSFERRED ENTIRE PARTS OF MY BOOK ‘A NEW VISION FOR MUSLIMS AND THE WEST’, which he referred to U.S. interests being compatible with top interests of the Muslim world”.

Rauf did not disclose the name of this speechwriter that included Rauf’s work in president Obama’s historic address to the Muslim world. It is crucial to note that the Arabic version of Feisal Abdul Rauf’s book was published in Malaysia titled “A CALL TO PRAYER, FROM THE WORLD TRADE CENTER RUBBLE: ISLAMIC DAWA (SUMMONS TO ISLAM) IN THE HEART OF AMERICA POST-9/11."

Go read the whole thing.

Controversy Brewing Over Three Prominent Apostates

Ergun Caner, Walid Shoebat, and Kamal Saleem - three names I rarely see in the mainstream media.

From this article in the Washington Post:

Liberty University is expected to release a report [this] week on whether Ergun Caner, president of the school's Baptist Theological Seminary, fabricated or exaggerated his account of being a former Muslim extremist rescued by Jesus.

Caner is no ordinary ex-Muslim. His story has made him a favorite in conservative Christian circles, and many credit the charismatic preacher with helping boost enrollment at the school founded by the late Jerry Falwell.

At the same time, some critics say Caner is just the latest charlatan in a line of supposedly ex-Muslim terrorists who have found an audience among Christian fundamentalists seeking to attack Islam.

[...]

Other avowed terrorists-turned-Christians have drawn scrutiny as well, including U.S. citizens Walid Shoebat, author of "Why We Want To Kill You," and Kamal Saleem, who has worked for Focus on the Family and recently wrote "The Blood of Lambs." Like Caner's book, their books purport to be insider explorations of radical Islam.

[...]

Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Caner, Shoebat, Saleem and others like them belong to an "industry" that is often perpetuated by fundamentalist Christians.

"The people that are doing this do it to make money or get converts or to get some personal benefit," Hooper said.

Muslims and non-Muslims alike are troubled that these avowed former terrorists have been welcomed as experts. They have appeared on CNN and Fox News and spoken at Harvard Law School. In 2008, they were speakers at a terrorism conference sponsored by the Air Force Academy, the findings of which were to be distributed at the Pentagon and Capitol Hill.

The WaPo article has garnered few comments thus far. Read the entire article HERE.

FakeExMuslims.com and Ministry of Reconciliation have brought into question the veracity of Ergun Caner's story.

Previously, Walid Shoebat has answered the charges of his being a fake.

I note that the mainstream media refuse to address apostates' criticism of Islam but rather prefer to discredit the apostates themselves. That said, if any apostates of Islam, particularly prominent ones, are definitively determined to be fakes, the anti-jihad will suffer a severe blow to our credibility and go a long way to promoting the whitewash of Islam as a religion of peace.

Walid Shoebat

I liked his comment in an interview about the film, Islam: What the West Needs to Know. By the way, has anyone discovered whether he is the real thing or not? He sure is accurate in his portrayal of Islamic principles. Anyway, here is his comment:

At another speech, one Rabbi critiqued the New Testament as “riddled with violence,” I had no problem with his right to state this, yet when I confronted him I asked “Why do you feel free to critique the New Testament, but afraid of critiquing Islam’s well documented violence?” to which he could not reply.

It didn’t matter that I stated in my speech that a Jew had the right to critique Christianity, a Christian had the right to critique Mormonism and Islam, and a Muslim had a right to critique the Bible and Christianity, I was still accused of racism and bigotry against Islam. One can say almost anything against any other religion but Islam. Why?

Our basic religious freedom is at stake. We might be going on the same road as I witnessed in England while doing interviews in the media. In one Christian TV show, the interviewer stated that he cannot critique Islam in fear of closure. Only the interviewee can do so. He feared a shut down of his Christian station.

The other dangerous trend is that all fundamentalists are being lumped as fanatics. At the BBC in England during one interview the interviewer stated to me that “the problem with today’s world is fundamentalism” to which I responded “Christian fundamentalists give the world a headache, I confess, but Muslim fundamentalists will whack your head right off your shoulders, sir” I was quickly thanked and escorted out of the BBC.

Radio Show: The Weekly Gathering Storm Report

For those who couldn’t listen in to yesterday’s Weekly Gathering Storm Report Radio Show with Always and WC because of time constraints or simply because it was broadcast in your country at an inconvenient time, here’s a direct link to the show:

Walid Shoebat and Yours Truly as Guests of Always and WC
Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

The Gathering Storm Report

Microphone courtesy of Google Images
Walid Shoebat and I (Mark Alexander) will be Always On Watch and WC’s special guests on this week’s ‘Gathering Storm Report’ on Friday March 14, 2008. The show will be broadcast between 3pm and 5pm, EST. Please don’t forget to tune in. We’re looking forward to your company. Just click on the microphone to take you there.

Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)

Walid Shoebat Strikes A Nerve

From this source:

Air Force grants equal time to critics of alleged ex-terrorists

February 28, 2008

AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. – The Air Force Academy has invited three speakers to give their vision of Islam after remarks made by three self-described former terrorists that some in the audience believed were condemnations of all Muslims.

Mikey Weinstein, head of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, former U.S. ambassador to Niger Joe Wilson and Islamic expert Reza Aslan, a research associate at the University of Southern California's Center on Public Diplomacy, will speak to cadets April 9 at a forum on terrorism.

Academy officials invited the three amid criticism of the appearances of Walid Shoebat, Kamal Saleem and Zachariah Anani at a Feb. 6 forum on the topic, “Dismantling Terrorism.”

Although academy spokesman Johnny Whitaker said this was not in response to the criticism, he acknowledged that it occurred only after the complaints were made.

Academy officials insisted that Shoebat, Saleem and Anani, who claim to have abandoned terrorism after converting to Christianity, are genuine.

Maj. Brett Ashworth, academy spokesman, said the three had been checked out by Air Force intelligence. Ashcroft disputed reports that the three had pushed a Christian agenda during the February forum and had insisted in advance they would not be proselytizing on behalf of Christianity.

[...]

An Air Force task force also concluded there was no religious discrimination at the academy but noted some cadets and staff were insensitive. In February 2006, the Air Force adopted new guidelines cautioning top officers about promoting their religious views.

Shoebat has published an online autobiography describing his journey from membership in the Palestine Liberation Organization to Israeli sympathizer. Saleem says he also is a former member of the PLO, and Zak Anani describes himself as a former member of several Lebanese terrorist groups. The three appear together regularly.

The Washington, D.C.-based Council on American-Islamic Relations criticized the speakers, saying one of them, Shoebat, has said that “Islam is the devil.”

[...]

The only member of the three self-described former terrorists who could be reached this week defended his credibility. He said he could “not really” speak for the other two.

“I am who I am,” said Shoebat.

Asked if he gave up terrorism after converting to Christianity, Shoebat said, “Absolutely.”

His publicist, Keith Davies, said Shoebat never killed anyone but had once tried unsuccessfully tried to lynch an Israeli soldier. Davies said Shoebat tossed a bomb at an Israeli bank that injured no one, and that Shoebat was jailed by the Israelis but released because he is a U.S. citizen.

Davies also said Shoebat has been in hiding because of what he called threats from Arabs.

HERE is Mr. Shoebat's rebuttal to those challenging his "credentials." His web site is HERE.

On March 14, 2008, Mr. Shoebat is the scheduled guest for The Gathering Storm Radio Show, which WC and I cohost. We will, of course, be addressing for a few minutes the recent "challenge" to Mr. Shoebat's identity and allow him on-air time to state his position on that matter and, for most of the hour, on material from his book Why We Want to Kill You: The Jihadist Mindset and How to Defeat It. An outstanding book, in my view, and recommended reading for all infidels here at IBA.

Anti-Dhimmitude At The US Air Force Academy

Finally! Some good news for this Sunday morning!




From this source:

THREE Former Terrorists Invited By US Air Force Academy to speak about their experiences

They have practiced hatred against Christians, Jews and Americans! They have rioted, bombed and maimed! One of them actually killed 223 Arabs in gang warfare. They have recruited and trained others to hate! They have been part of sleeper cells in the USA, while hiding among us!

The U.S. Air Force Academy has invited Walid Shoebat, Kamal Saleem and Zak Anani to address their annual political forum held at the Academy during the first week of February so that the cadets can better understand the Islamic mindset in our war on terror. Each of the former terrorists will speak to cadets on February 6th 2008 beginning at 8:30 AM MT.

"We are delighted that the United States Air Force has recognized the brave stand these men take in educating the American people on the real causes of terrorism. The fact that the Academy has invited our speakers is an important step as to understanding the issue of terrorism and the issues surrounding the problems of the Middle East." says Keith Davies, the director of the Walid Shoebat Foundation.

[...]

Walid Shoebat, Kamal Saleem and Zak Anani are former Islamic terrorists. The three men have spent the past couple of years on speaking tour across America, providing insights into the minds of terrorists. They share their personal experiences and stress the dangers that the Western world faces today, as Islamic Fundamentalism grows with fervor around the globe.

This is the first time that the 3-X terrorists have spoken at a military academy.

Will the dhimmis at the Pentagon invite the three ex-terrorists to address our Department of Defense? Probably not. That would be too much anti-dhimmitude to hope for.

Video: Walid Shoebat: A Palestinian's Journey

If the video won't play, go to this YouTube Link, and click on "Confirm your birthdate":