How To Behead An Infidel

I found this by chance, thought it might come in handy, or more to the point confirmation that the only way of dealing with Islamists is to be as ruthless as they are. Guantanamo - keep it going. Extraordinary rendition - whatever. Torture - bring it on. I'm not sure my tongue is in my cheek, and neither are you so don't flame me over that:

Islam Online, a website that has mass popularity throughout the Muslim world has published a gruesome poem detailing how to behead a human being.

Here is exactly what the group posted, which is still up on its own page within Islam Online’s ‘Arts & Culture’ section: Click the link to see it.

How to Behead

Hold him
Tie the arms behind his back
And bandage his legs together
Just by the ankles
Blindfold the punk
So that he won't hesitate as much
For on seeing the sharp pointy knife
He'll begin to shake
And continuously scream like an eedyat
And jiggle like a jelly
Trust me–this will sure get you angry
It’s better to have at least two or three brothers by your side
Who can hold the fool
Because as soon as the warm sharp knife
Touches his naked flesh
He'll come to know what'll happen
It's not as messy or as hard as some may think,
It's all about the flow of the wrist.
No doubt that the punk will twitch and scream
But ignore the donkey's ass
And continue to slice back and forth
You'll feel the knife hit the wind and food pipe
But don't stop
Continue with all your might.
About now you should feel the knife vibrate,
You can feel the warm heat being given off,
But this is due to the friction being caused.
.............
We had the Bomb. We had the Allah Akbar Knifing attempt. I wonder how long before some Maldivian "misunderstands" and attempts a beheading in Maldives.

I found the beheading item on this site which appears to be a Maldivian's site. it seems that the Maldives has been forcibly turned into an Islamic regime, much against the will of the inhabitants. I didn't know that.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Did Terrorists Bring Down the Boeing 777?

A catastrophic and complete loss of power in both engines of the Boeing 777 that resulted in a crash landing at Heathrow yesterday. The Boeing 777 is capable of flying, indeed recovering from an aborted landing on one engine. For two engines to fail is unknown for this, one of the safest aircraft in the world. Was this brought down by Muslim terrorists? More Here>> Remember you saw it here first.

And how about the normal human will to live and the Islamic love of death. A truly amazing story here.

Confused? I am.

Yes, as an Englishman I am confused as to the stance the Presidential hopefuls might be taking on the Islamist threat to the world. Not only me it would seem. On "Question Time" (BBC TV) last night all the politicians on the panel, and that's Labour, Lib Dem and Conservative, thought Barack Obama was the best thing since sliced bread.

Why don't they know what we know about his dubious connections with the Kenyan opposition, the church, and his very Muslim background? That's because they are either stupid, or not into the blogosphere or they are all part of the media conspiracy - is there one? - to keep quiet.

My theory - knowing nothing about American politics - is that the Republicans would welcome Obama as the Democratic nomination. Once that happens then there will be an explosion of revelations. They are just keeping their powder dry. And then, what with the dirty advertising that happens at these times, then surely, surely he'll be wasted. I hope.

In the meantime the excellent Robert Spencer has released a new vid about what the candidates have said on the Islamic threat to western society. It seems that Mitt Romney is the only one that has a grasp of the problem OR is prepared to speak about it. As for Obama and Clinton - oh just watch the video:



(cross posted with Commonsense)

Politicians Always Out of Step

I can only speak for the UK but it seems to me that our politicians are always out of step with public opinion and commonsense. For instance David Miliband, our foreign secretary has been strongly promoting Turkey for EU membership ... and most of the Muslim North African countries ... Doh!

Then we have Nick Clegg, leader of the Liberal Democrats backing the call for the amplification for call to prayer in Oxford plus denying that there are "no - go" areas in Britain. As for the Conservatives, well, they are saying nothing as usual.

Now we have our Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, writing in a Pakistani newspaper : “A strong, representative democracy in Pakistan will defeat terrorism and extremism,”

Patrick O'Flynn writing in the Daily Express says:

A Prime Minister too chicken to seek his own democratic mandate at home is trying to foist an early election upon a country which is on the brink of anarchy after the assassination of one of its main party leaders. Priceless. Or should that be worthless? Because that’s the term which would better describe British foreign policy as regards Pakistan.

Under Mr Brown and rookie Foreign Secretary David Mili­band the simplistic notion that a move to “democracy” will magically sort out Pakistan’s many problems has taken root. Mr Miliband has claimed that democracy will lib­erate the voice of the “moderate majority” in this Islamic state.

It doesn't take more than a nano second of thought to realise that democracy at this time will only result in chaos and bloodshed, well, more than there is at the moment. The greatest danger is that once the Islamists gain power through the ballot box then democracy will be abolished, in the usual way.

Seems to me that military dictatorship, when opposed to Islamic Fundamentalism, is the lesser of the two evils because either way there is no democracy. Of course, it is always possible that normal politics could prevail, but not just yet.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Mention of the Word Bible is Unclean

A MUSLIM store worker refused to serve a customer buying a children’s book on Christianity because she said it was “unclean”.

Shopper Sally Friday felt publicly humiliated at a branch of Marks & Spencer when she tried to pay for First Bible Stories as a gift for her young grandson.When she put the book on the check-out counter, the young assistant refused to touch it, declared it was unclean and summoned another member of staff to serve instead . . . .

. . . . “I am not racist but I have vowed never to let a person wearing a headdress serve me again. It will be a long, long time before I shop again at M&S.”

Mr Davies, Conservative MP for Shipley, west Yorkshire, said: “I find it unbelievable. We are a Christian country. I’m afraid it is no good for people to work in Marks & Spencer and not serve their products.

“For M&S to put one of their customers in that position is totally unacceptable. If a Christian lady had refused to serve a Muslim on religious grounds there would have been hell to pay.“In fact, I am sure someone would be sacked if it had been the other way round. But that won’t happen this time, will it? These kind of things do not do anything for community cohesion. In fact, they damage it.”

Seems to me that she should have been made to accept re-training or dismissal. It has got to be totally unacceptable that Muslims can be employed in positions where they can refuse to serve customers because of their religious beliefs. The list is growing. Muslims have refused to serve alcohol, tobacco, and contraceptives so far and now a childrens book that "mentions" the bible.

Sainsbury’s said it was keen to accommodate the religious beliefs of all its staff.

I wouldn't mind betting that what that really means is that Sainsbury's is keen to accommodate the beliefs of it's Muslim staff and only Muslim staff. If a CHRISTIAN girl said the KORAN WAS "UNCLEAN" and refused to touch or sell it, there would be flag burning in the streets.

A source close to the shop assistant claimed there had been a misunderstanding.“I think there was some confusion over what the customer heard,” she said.

Aaargh!! They would say that wouldn't they?

Read More>>

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Update on Bacon & Wine Policeman

Further to the previous posting by pastorius there is now more information courtesy of the Daily Mail. It seems that the policeman concerned was not offended and he said this:

"I told her I knew it was meant as a joke and did not want to make a formal complaint. I just took it on the chin. But someone else in the room must have thought it was a racist incident, and reported it."

My point is if the object of a joke or insult chooses not to be offended then should that not be the end of the matter? What right has someone else to be offended when they are not the subject of the joke/insult. If "someone" calls me an "infidel pig" and I am not offended for whatever reason but some body else overhears the insult and reports that "someone", surely there is no case to answer.

It seems to me to be a case of PC well over the top and "out of it's box". Read the whole story here.

An Alien In My Home Town

Bishop Nazir-Ali certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons when he started the no-go area controversy over a week ago. Most of the MSM has been rumbling on about this ever since. Even Dhimmie -in - chief, Gordon Brown got involved when he denied the existence of no - go areas. The Telegraph has come up with a great piece today and it cannot be denied, what we all know to be true, despite what the "useful idiots" and the "useless idiots" have to say:

"I feel like an alien, like I'm on a street in Karachi," Mr Carbin says, awkwardly.

"I don't feel I have anything in common with this area. It's like I've never been here before. I knew it would be different but I knew, too, that I would feel uncomfortably like I don't belong."

He now lives just 10 miles away, in the north of Bradford. He hasn't returned because Oak Lane, like so many similar areas of so many northern cities, is now an almost exclusive Asian Muslim community.

Mr Carbin is far from a racist, however. Well educated and widely travelled in Muslim countries, he has the utmost respect for the Islamic religion. What is worrying him is that Britain's increasing espousal of multiculturalism has led not to an integrated society but, instead, to ghettoisation, with white-only and Asian-only communities existing cheek by jowl but with little or no common ground. And that, he believes, could have an ominous outcome.

He is, clearly, one of those about whom Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester (Britain's only Asian-born bishop), wrote in The Sunday Telegraph last week: the increasing number of native white Britons who believe many of their streets have now become "no-go" areas.

The Bishop believes that one of the results of the resurgence of Islamic extremism has been to alienate young Muslims from this country and to view adherence to this ideology as a mark of acceptance.

This, he says, means many Christians and those of other faiths find it difficult to live or work here because they feel there is hostility towards them.

Britain's "novel philosophy" of multiculturalism, he believes, has caused Muslims to lead separate lives, in separate areas, speaking their native languages.

His views have angered many in Muslim communities but, equally, they have struck a chord with many like Mr Corbin. Read it All>>

No Honour in Murder

Honour killings are are all over the MSM in the UK at the moment particularly this latest case when Coroner Ian Smith hit the nail on the head when he said, "These are just basic fundamental rights and they were denied to her."

High profile cases like this are undoubtedly undermining anything the "useful idiots" on both sides might say and the message comes out loud and clear that Islam is actually all about denying human rights not just for infidels but Muslims also.

Mr Smith said: "Shafilea was the victim of a very vile murder. I'm convinced of that because of the way in which the body was disposed.

"It had been hidden and she had been taken many miles away from home. There's no evidence before the court as to who did it.

"Her ambition was to live her own life in her own way. To study, to follow a career in the law and to do what she wanted to do.

"These are just basic fundamental rights and they were denied to her."

He said the concept of an arranged marriage in Pakistan was central to the circumstances leading up to Shafilea's death.

"She did not want to be married, full stop, at this point. She did not want to marry someone she did not know or may not like." Read it all here >>

Frederick Forsythe on Islam

Frederick Forsythe, novelist and columnist for the Daily Express, makes the point that when the IRA were bombing Britain the British did not turn on the many thousands of Irish living amongst them because they recognised that it was the extremists and not the majority of Irish that were responsible. The Irish joined in denouncing the extremists.

The difference between then and now is that as soon as we mention Islam in even a small but well deserved negative way then their own "useful idiots" indignantly pop up and attack us with calls of islamophobia and racist. The silence of the moderates is deafening and only adds to the impression that in fact all Muslims are the same:

THE two self-styled spokesmen of the Muslim community who laid into the Bishop of Rochester did themselves and Islam in Britain no favours.

The Ramadhan Foundation and the Islamic Society of Great Britain claimed again that anyone criticising even the most extreme proponents of the poison that beyond any doubt exists inside the Muslim “umma” in our country is criticising all Muslims. This is simply not true and one suspects these “spokesmen” secretly know it.

Bishop Nazir-Ali of Rochester made absolutely plain that he was referring to the extremists and to suggest no such maniacs exist is ludicrous. We all know they do and sensible, peace-loving Muslims who want to live in harmony with the rest of us know it also.

These spokesmen would be wise to study the relationship of the broad masses of non-Irish people inside England with the resident Irish through the 30 years when the IRA was shooting, bombing and maiming innocents right here in England. We never turned on the whole Irish community because its genuine leaders made plain they had no time for the IRA and all its violent works.

The leaders of “moderate Islam” in the UK have simply lost control of their own ultra-extreme faction

The IRA killed and were themselves killed: they were tracked, ambushed and arrested. They were denounced from Parliament and pulpit. But the true Irish leaders in Britain never screamed that we, the natives, had turned on all the Irish. They recognised that our denunciations only referred to the murderous fanatics – and they added their own denunciations as well.

I say this with deep regret. There is a growing belief among the secularists, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs and Jews, who despite all the fuss still make up 95 per cent of the British people, that the leaders of “moderate Islam” in the UK have simply lost control of their own ultra-extreme faction.Read it all>

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Barack Hussein Obama a Fraud?

Sorry to piss on your fire my American friends but I have my doubts about Obama and am somewhat dismayed the way the American public and media are falling for him hook, line and sinker.

More important by a long way rather than my view is the view of "ExMuslimExposeIslam" on YouTube. He knows more than I do and he knows what sort of important questions to put to a "so called ex Muslim". And as I write this I just hear he may have won New Hampshire by a convincing margin over Hilary Clinton. Oh, America, what are you doing?



(cross posted with CommonSense)

The Perfect Plan

The perfect plan is being enacted by the Pakistani Muslim population of England. The young men get married early before they are 20 years old. They won’t choose a bride from the English born Pakistani girls because they regard them as whores.

No, their British born sisters wouldn't do. The fact is they are probably too intelligent - having been brought up in a civilised country - to conform in a way that the male retards require. No, they obtain their brides from the home country. Poorly educated, simple minded village girls who will submit in every way according to the teachings of the Quran.

They all thought that a wife’s job was only to bear children and clean the house. Many probably never had a proper conversation with their wives. The wife was almost like a domesticated animal. The thought of love was rubbish to them

If the retard male doesn’t actually like his bride then that’s allright he can murder her in any way he wishes because his family will most likely approve and certainly wouldn’t cooperate with the police should he be found out.

The end result is that for each Pakistani Muslim child born here one is imported from Pakistan - and that applies to the girls also, they choose their husbands from the homeland.

Now we have doubled at one stroke. Within 10 years they will likely have at least 4 children. At that rate they will undoubtedly be the majority in many cities and as each major city has many MP’s they could well out vote the rest of us.

There is one thing we can do now. Take away their right to import their wives/husbands from Pakistan. After all, there are many English men that seek to marry women from overseas who find that there are all manner of obstacles put in their way.

Why do the Muslims have this right. It’s ludicrous. If they had to find someone to marry from within their own community then with any luck they would fail to breed in the profligate way that they do now. Better still they would fail in their quest and remain single. This importing of brides is a privilege that should be taken from them.

As I write this BBC TV news reported on the inquest of a 17 year old girl that was forced to marry after a trip to Pakistan. She was not happy about it and ended up dead by a river in Cumbria. I wonder how many have been murdered without detection so far. I know I shouldn't say this but they won't be breeding.

On a lighter note it would seems that some British born Muslim women have a more rebellious spirit than their retard brothers.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Take A Raincheck On This Folks!

The blogosphere is going crazy over a posting on this site where someone called Lionheart, based in the UK has stated that he is about to be arrested under the “Race and religious hatred bill” for something he has written on his blog site.

On the comments on his site he has been advised to flee to the US and claim refugee status, others have said that the US should break off relations with the UK and other nonsense statements.

I would advise caution at this stage. I am sure I read somewhere that the bill had not been enacted and indeed a google search does not bring up any date for the enactment of this piece of legislation. As for the public order act, then whatever has been written would have to be really heavy stuff, not just the sort of things we bloggers write about. From a local government website I found this:

”The Bill is aiming to ensure freedom of speech and the right to practise religion without fear are protected by maintaining the right to engage in debate about religion and providing a clear difference between criticism of a religion and the criminal act of inciting hatred against person(s) on the basis of their religion.

The legislation will not prevent people telling jokes about or making fun of religions, causing offence to followers of a religion, trying to convert somebody to one’s own religion or urging followers of a different religion to cease practising theirs or expressing antipathy or dislike of particular religions or their followers.”

Let’s wait for more information on this one. I know that we all like to dummify our dhimmi politicians but England has a very long established justice system. Hell, they can't even deport convicted terrorists.

The first case under such a bill is unlikely to succeed in my view, they couldn't get Nick Griffin on racial hatred under the public order act for saying that Islam was a cruel and wicked religion - or words to that effect.

If anyone can find a source that states the enactment date of the race and religious hatred bill I would be grateful. In the meantime maybe it's a case of I don't want to believe this and it would be a good thing if I am right.

(cross posted with CommonSenseAgainstIslam)

Useful Idiots

I cannot understand why we have useful idiots in the West. Surely anyone with a just a couple of brain cells can see that Islam is not a good thing. If the Muslims are happy with their lot in Muslim countries, fine, but why would any non Muslim want to encourage them to propagate their vile, barbaric beliefs in the West?

It doesn’t take more than a minute or two to discover that Islam is not a religion of peace, it would only take a page or three from the Quran to confirm that truth. Then there’s the history. I mean the real history, not the airbrushed version. The history of the conquests, massacres, genocides, slavery, cruelty, domination, subjugation and all of those labels that can be truthfully applied to Islam.

One of the prime useful idiots is Ken Livingstone who has been praised by Muslim leaders for “his continued support of a multicultural society and for protecting Muslim communities against racism and Islamophobia”.

So who is there to protect the rest of us against Muslim suicide bombers and the extremists who promise to Islamise our country and impose sharia law? Is that why we are described as Islamophobes? Are we, the ordinary people who are concerned about the threat to our very freedom and democracy the one’s that Livingstone is protecting the Muslims from?

Surely the people of London will vote the Livingstone idiot out of office at the mayoral elections. Perhaps not, he only does it for votes and they will vote him back. London today, England tomorrow, so to speak. The man should be hanged for treason.

When ex-Muslims, who have experienced the horrors of a full blown Islamic regime, like this Iranian exile, we should listen especially when they warn us of the useful idiots:

Muslims are taught deception and lying in the Quran itself—something that Muhammad practiced during his life whenever he found it expedient. Successive Islamic rulers and leaders have done the same. Khomeini, the founder of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, for instance, rallied the people under the banner of democracy. All along his support for democracy was not a commitment of an honest man, but a ruse. As soon as he gathered the reins of power, Khomeini went after the Useful Idiots of his time with vengeance. These best children of Iran, having been thoroughly deceived and used by the crafty phony populist-religionist, had to flee the country to avoid the fate of tens of thousands who were imprisoned or executed by the double-crossing imam.

Almost three decades after the tragic Islamic Revolution of 1979, the suffocating rule of Islam casts its death-bearing pall over Iranians. A proud people with enviable heritage is being systematically purged of its sense of identity and forced to think and behave like the barbaric and intolerant Muslims.

Iranians who had always treated women with equality, for instance, have seen them reduced by the stone-age clergy to sub-human status of Islamic teaching. Any attempt by the women of Iran to counter the misogynist rule of Muhammad’s mullahs is mercilessly suppressed. Women are beaten, imprisoned, raped and killed just as men are slaughtered without due process or mercy.

The lesson is clear. Beware of the Useful Idiots who live in liberal democracies. Knowingly or unknowingly, they serve as the greatest volunteer and effective soldiers of Islam. They pave the way for the advancement of Islam and they will assuredly be among the very first victims of Islam as soon as it assumes power.

Why can’t we bring back hanging for traitors? After all Ken Livingstone would be among the first to be hanged in Trafalgar Square - by means of a crane, as in Iran - when he achieves his wish for an Islamic state here in England.

(cross posted with Commonsense Against Islam)

Gordon Brown's Xmas Message

In an excellent display of "Brown Nosing", Gordon Brown's sickmaking performance must surely qualify him for the "Dhimmi of The Year" title. And if there isn't one maybe we should create it.



(Cross Posted on Common Sense Against Islam)

Dhimmi Dummies Strike Again

Catholic church under fire for promoting a hard line on 'immoral' teaching in schools

If I hadn't seen it myself after a very rare excursion into The Observer - Sunday paper of choice for the leftie liberals - I wouldn't have believed it. So, where's the level playing field then? It's OK for all the state sponsored Muslim schools to teach that Jews are monkeys and Christians are pigs AND to push the most extreme fundamentalist brand of Islam.

Why don't the MP's have them in front of a powerful committee of MP's? Oh, I forgot, they are Muslims. Musn't upset the Muslims, don't ya know.

Roman Catholic bishops are to appear in front of a powerful committee of MPs amid fears that they are pushing a fundamentalist brand of their religion in schools. Bishops have called on parents, teachers and priests to strengthen the role of religion in education . . . .

. . . .Barry Sheerman, chairman of the parliamentary cross-party committee on children, schools and families, said he had heard of other cases and felt that behind the scenes there was 'intense turmoil' about the future of Catholic education. 'A group of bishops appear to be taking a much firmer line and I think it would be useful to call representatives of the Catholic church in front of the committee to find out what is going on,' he said. 'It seems to me that faith education works all right as long as people are not that serious about their faith. But as soon as there is a more doctrinaire attitude questions have to be asked. It does become worrying when you get a new push from more fundamentalist bishops. This is taxpayers' money after all.' Read it all

I haven't any time for the Catholic Church, after all we used to burn Catholics at the stake but this just made me say WTF is going on here, to put them in front of a powerful committee of MP's, a fate worse than burning? Are we really ruled by dhimmi dummies? I'm afraid so, and there's confirmation on a daily basis. It is so fxxxxxg frustrating!

(cross posted on Common Sense Against Islam)