Goldsmith Speaks Again

Lord Goldsmith has spoken again. The last time he opened his trap on the public stage was to tell us that we should change the words of the National Anthem to make it more inclusive. He got a good thrashing then and it looks like he will get another thrashing not for stating the bleeding obvious - which he has - but for suggesting teenagers should swear allegiance to the Queen.

So what other point has he missed, the one that must not be spoken? It's easy, Muslims are unlikely to swear allegiance to the Queen in their Muslim schools, their only allegiance will be to Muhammed, and if the Islamists get their way their will be no place for monarchy in an Islamist state. Price Charles should take note.

BRITAIN is losing its national pride and mass immigration is among the causes, Gordon Brown’s key adviser on citizenship admitted yesterday.

Former Attorney General Lord Goldsmith said there is less “belonging” than recent years.

He also revealed one in 10 now reject British identity.

That's because because Britishness has been soiled by Muslim terrorist bombers and miscellaneous other foreign criminal scum. We former Britishers would rather be known by our real identities i.e. English, Scottish and Welsh.

Lord Goldsmith unveiled measures to boost pride in a major review of citizenship, including plans for a National Day, children swearing an oath to the Queen and tax incentives for community work.

But critics attacked some of the proposals as “half-baked” and “empty gestures” and insisted Britons did not need “synthetic patriotism” to feel a part of their country.

So what's the difference between Nationalism and Patriotism and why is any hint of English Nationalism viewed with horror? After all it's alright for the Scots and Welsh to have their own nationalism and their own nationalist political parties and parliaments. I shall be answering these questions very soon and in particular why English Nationalism is going to be necessary for our very survival.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Death Threats? I'm Not Surprised!

If some churchleader were to back the Muslim call to prayer dirge in my backyard I too would want him "gone". What Barack Obama called "the sweetest sound on earth" is in fact to a non Moron Muslim "one" of the most horrible sounds on earth.

It's the sound of domination and slavery, and was throughout the centuries for those who were slaves or dhimmis. Indeed it still the sound of domination and slavery in some parts of the Islamic world.

Obama must be a Moron Muslim to think it is the sweetest sound on earth. There must be a lot more sounds that would fit that bill even to a Moron Muslim. Source:

The Bishop of Oxford has been sent death threats after backing plans for a Moron Muslim call to prayer in the city.

Having in principle backed plans for mosque leaders to make the loudspeaker call, the Rt Rev John Pritchard said the "dark underbelly of British society" made a number of threats against his life.

He said: "I received extraordinary mail. One said, 'resign' six times in a large font. One called for me to be beheaded and another said: 'I wish I lived closer so I could spit on you.' The dark underbelly of British society was coming out."

A spokesman for the representatives from Oxford's Central Mosque have repeatedly stated their wish to be able to play the muezzin's (caller's) traditional message to the Muslim faithful from speakers on a minaret.

Dozens of residents near the mosque, in Manzil Way, have urged the council to reject the plan, claiming it will turn the area into a "Muslim ghetto".

I can only think that the beheading threat was from a Muslim who also hates the call to prayer sound because only Muslims love beheadings.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Appeasing Islam

PASTORIUS NOTE: I think we ought to leave this at the top for awhile. I'm almost inclined to say this video says all that needs to be said.

Pat Condell has just uploaded his latest vid and it is his most powerful message against Islam so far. It's a pity it couldn't be aired on TV, everyone who doesn't want to be Muslim should watch this.




An Anonymous commenter has been so good as to transcribe the entire Pat Condell video. This will be a great help to those who have dialup.

Here it is:

According to a recent opinion poll, many muslims say that the way for the West to have better relations with Islam, is to show it more respect. And who said, 'Muslim's don't have a sense of humour'?

Given that Islam is above criticism in the west, it's hard to imagine how we could give it any more respect . . .short of closing down all of the pubs, growing beards and beating up women who don't want to dress like nuns.

Ah, yes, of course. Silly me.

I think many people in the West, are now realizing that Islam has already been given far too much 'respect'. Especially here in Europe where according to another poll, people now see it as a threat to their culture. They carry on accomodating it's every demand of course, but this is not because Islam is welcome in Europe. Far from it. It's because people have been conditioned by the lie of multiculturalism to believe that what they SHOULD think is more important than what they DO think.

So, although people will criticise Islam in private, they know that to do so publicly, in other words to be honest about their feelings would instantly make them racists and Islamophobes and nazis and disgusting imperialists, ethno-centric-fascist bastards grinding their jack boots into the faces of the innocent and the weak - so, best not make a fuss.

You want to beat your wife and mutilate your daughter? Be our guest. We'll even subsidize it - because we want to be your friend. What's that? You want to destroy our corrupt society? Well that's our fault. Not yours. Here, have some more money.

This film that's coming out in Holland shortly, which has got the whole country in a state of heightened terrorist alert, is yet more proof that everything in Europe now needs to be measured against the possiblity of Muslim violence. Every play, every film, every art exhibition, every magazine article . . .in fact, our whole culture is now subject to Muslim approval. But then, this is Europe and we have a history of appeasment and caving into threats.

Radical Islam knows this and is playing us like a violin. They KNOW that Islam will never get blamed for anything in Europe, no matter what happens. So that, for example, when the Danish press reprinted the cartoons recently, which was followed by a week of rioting by Muslim 'youths', Copenhagen's Chief of Police refused to admit that it had anything to do with the cartoons. He said it was because they were 'bored'.

Yes, that's right. They all rushed out and set fire to the city every night for a week 'for something to do'.

If only they had a table tennis club!

The whole thing happened because three Islamic fanatics were caught planning to murder the cartoonists. Imagine how 'bored' THEY must have been!

Oh, yes. Also. A news flash for European journalists. An anti-semitic attack by Muslims on Jews IS NOT a 'conflict between communities'. In case you haven't noticed, Islam HATES Jews. Even if Israel didn't exist, Islam would still HATE Jews. Their holy book tells Muslims that they should HATE Jews. So, I think you'll find that what is happening is NOT a 'conflict between communities' at all, but a violent unprovoked racist attack by Muslims on Jews - because they're Jews. Just thought I'd clear that one up for you so that you can report it accurately next time if you bother to report it - at all.

If we were serious about respecting Islam we would give it an HONEST REALITY CHECK. Islam needs to adapt to Europe. Not the other way around. Now, I know a lot of Muslims actually agree with this and they make an effort to adapt and to rub along with everybody else, which is great and it's very welcomed.

But we all know that a lot of others don't. Which is why many European cities have large Muslim ghettos controlled by religious bigots, where indigenous law and values are increasingly unwelcome.

Places full of people who have no intention of integrating and who want nothing less than the end of our civilization while we pander and defer to them thanks to a biased press and a complacent judiciary and the kind of politicians you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy. Actually, you probably would. And this situation is as much a threat to the freedom of ordinary Muslims as it is to everybody else. And it's a clear indication of what we need in Europe now is NOT more respect for Islam. It's less respect for Islam, and MORE RESPECT FOR OURSELVES.

We need to stop pretending because thats what we are doing.

We're pretending that all cultures are equal. Well we can clearly see that they're not. Islamic culture is NOT equal to Western culture. It encourages violence against women, against Jews and homosexuals. It sanctions polygamy and marrying old men to young children in a disgusting travesty of human relations. Anyone in the West advocating these kind of values would very quickly find themselves in jail.

It's NOT equal. It's inferior. And given radical Islam's openness about it's totalitarian agenda, this is NOT something that should be encouraged in ANY WAY.

It should be discouraged by firm legislation and by rigorous enforcement of the law.

Remember, "the law"?

Now, I know that I'm going to be accused of racism and Islamophobia by the usual self-righteous pinheads but I don't mind because those words have no value in this context. One has been neutralized by repeated dishonest disuse and the other is just a bare faced lie concocted by the political left in tandem with the religious right in a marriage of convenience which is, well, quite simply beneath contempt.

A phobia is an irrational fear. Resisting Islam is not irrational. Pandering to it is irrational. Indulging the lie that Islamic culture is somehow equal to Western culture - while ignoring the victims of that culture - is more than irrational. It's downright criminal.

And if you really want to talk about racism, then look no further than the poisonous fiction of multiculturalism, a devisive and patronizing racist ideology. And the governments of Europe who promote it are racist governments. The civil servants who pander to it are racists. The university lecturers who encourage it are racists. The journalists who lie about it are racists. And the ordinary people who say one thing in private and another in public are cowardly racist hypocrits.

If we can't bring ourselves to say what's in our hearts when it truely matters, then we have already given up our freedom and with it the freedom of future generations - which is something that we have no right to do. We didn't earn this freedom. It was handed to us on a plate by people who DID earn it with their lives. We don't own it. We're custodians of it. It's not ours to give away.

So, it's time to speak up Europe. It's time to stop whining and belly aching about the Americans for five minutes and show a little back bone for once. Just once! Or, do we want to spend the rest of our lives cowering like frightened mice from a handful of violent bigots who think they have a right to poke a finger into our chest and tell us how we are allowed to live. . . what we can and can't do, say and think. Well, I don't know about you but anyone who asks me that question is going to get a very short answer. I'll give you a clue, it won't contain the words 'allah' or 'akbar'.

Peace, wouldn't that be nice?

Rivers of Blood: It Started Here

For my US friends who may not know about British 1960's politics here is some background. In 1968 there was a Labour government. it was at this time that the Asian immigration started.

One man who happened to be a prophet for our time tried to warn us of the consequences. He was Enoch Powell. He was a cabinet minister in a previous Conservative government. Now in opposition he stood for leadership of the Conservative party. Unfortunately for the future, he lost to Ted Heath, who became prime minister in 1970 until 1974.

In 1968 Enoch Powell made a speech about immigration that is now known as the "Rivers of Blood" speech. He had huge backing from the British public and if there was a general election with Enoch Powell as leader he would have won a landslide victory. He was reviled and exiled because of his speech because this is when the first buds of political correctness where forming.

He was right in everything he said in general except in hindsight it can be said that the Hindu's, Sikhs and Jamaicans were not the problem as such. It was the hordes of Pakistani Muslims who have become the major problem for our civilization some forty years later.

He derides the archbishops and the MSM for sweeping the problem under the carpet.

He says that the indigenous population will become discriminated against.

He talks of immigrants (Muslims) agitating and unifying against the rest of the population

He tells of the indiginous people unable to get hospital beds and housing because of immigration

He said all this in 1968. If he knew what it is like today he would be spinning in his grave

The BBC have been running a season of programmes called "White". They pieced together his speech for the first time - we only saw fragments before - together with a commentary from mainly left wing dhimmis.

I have taped the full hour and have condensed the first half hour into just under ten minutes, the second half hour will follow. I removed the comment from others - the dhimmis - and concentrated on the speech and comment from the time. It was quite a job doing this and exercised my editing skills to the full. I have just uploaded it to YouTube. In order for it to get maximum showing it is necessary for it to get maximum viewing in the next 24 hours - that's the way YouTube works - and that's why I haven't embedded it.

I implore you all to go and watch this important piece of history, it is quite fascinating how accurate Powell was in his prophesies. Please "rate" it, and please make it "favourite" if you like it. These all help to get it "listed". If you haven't signed in to YouTube please do so, you can't rate or make comments unless you are a member. You only have to submit an e-mail address and a password in the usual way, nothing else is required. Here it is:

Enoch Powell: Rivers of Blood

Oh, BTW, Enoch was NOT a racist. He made other speeches that confirm that.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Kosovo, Albanians Are The Villains

This article from America's Daily fills in the knowledge gaps we may have and puts into perspective the danger of allowing Albanians into Europe or indeed the USA - where there are significant numbers.

Here is some historical evidence to show that Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence is illegal. Many people not only in the US but also in Europe are grossly misinformed on this issue. An independent Kosovo is a dangerous situation for the cultural and social integrity of Europe.

Has the world gone crazy or is there a master plan that the super powers have in mind so intricate that the common people cannot comprehend? This is the question I have been asking myself during the last couple of weeks while following closely the development of the drama in Kosovo. The opinion that Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence is illegal is shared by many countries in the world since it blatantly defies international agreements.

For some inexplicable reason, the US and the big West European countries embraced the self proclaimed independence of this province in the Balkans inhabited by clans of ruthless terrorists. I am sure that many people are raising their eyebrows right now so I will provide some historical evidence to back my judgment since I know for a fact that many people not only in the US but also in Europe are grossly misinformed on this issue. Read the rest at CommonSense>>

Turning Back The Tide

The Danish King Canute may have failed in his attempt to turn back the tide circa 1000 a.d. but the plucky modernday Danes are the only Europeans making an effort to turn back the poisoned tide of Islam.

In a defiance of Muslim attacks against free speech they republished the notorious cartoons a week ago after Kurt Westergaard was the subject of a foiled Muslim murder plot. As a consequence morons Muslims demonstrated all over again worldwide.

This last crisis was not instigated by the Muslims. It was instigated by the Danes saying we are going to do what we have always done, print what we like, and you can go to hell if you don’t like it.

The Danish politicians are uniting in their stand against Muslim demands. This from Gates of Vienna:

Helle Thorning-Schmidt demands united EU front against Islamic pressure

The chairman of the Social Democrats encourages the Danish government to raise the problems with Islamic pressure on a European Union level.

In several European countries there are cases where freedom of expression is challenged by offended Muslims. This is completely unreasonable, says Social Democrat chairman Helle Thorning-Schmidt, who requests the government to raise the problem with the European Union. “Within the last week we’ve heard of problems in Belgium, Netherlands and now Germany, where extremists demand that things be closed or removed.

It is utterly unreasonable that we are repeatedly threatened when we use our freedom of expression. This has to stop,” states Thorning-Schmidt.Then there's the issue of deporting Islamic terrorists and preachers of hate.

Only this week in the European Court of Human Rights has ruled hate preachers such as Abu Qatada should stay in the UK.

Britain could be stuck with more than a dozen international terror suspects after a devastating ruling by the European Court of Human Rights.

Judges said the right of a fanatic to be protected from torture in his homeland was "absolute".

Compare the meek acceptance of Britain to the spirited defiance of a Danish member of the ruling coalition on this issue:

If the European human-rights convention prevents Denmark from expelling Tunisian terror suspects, Denmark must reconsider whether we should continue to endorse them. Thus says Venstre’s foreign affairs spokesman Søren Pind.

Several experts in human rights believe that a current ruling from the European Human Rights Court means that it will be difficult for Denmark to deport the two Tunisians who are under suspicion for wanting to kill the Mohammed cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, since Tunisia uses torture against prisoners.

However, that is an insult against Denmark, says Søren Pind, who calls for a rebellion against the conventions. “It makes our affiliation of the European Human Rights Convention a parody. It enforces us an obligation to protect people who want to kill us,” writes Søren Pind on his blog.

If the judicial interpretations are correct, then the consequence, according to Søren Pind, could be a Danish showdown against the convention.

As Baron Bodissey from Gates of Vienna rightly says:I try to write about other things besides Denmark. I really do. But then more good news keeps coming from the Danes, and I can’t just ignore it, can I?

It seems that the whole of the Western World is asleep. “Don’t bother us — it’s a nice pleasant flower-strewn meadow, this multicultural dream we’re having. Don’t wake us up.”

But for some reason Denmark, alone among Western nations, has decided to wake up. Holger Danske has one eye open, and the other one will be popping open soon enough.

Talking about eyes I think Denmark is well worth keeping an eye on, what with the sparsly reported riots, and this latest stand. Thanks to Gates of Vienna for writing about Denmark, no need to apologise because very few blogs see fit to mention the Danes and as for the MSM, well it's zilch. It's almost as if they are afraid that the Danish stance is a contagion and they don't want it to spread.

Islamist Policy To Create Disunity & Violence

We are all pissed off (English expression) with Muslims increasingly demanding special treatment in our lands.

• The female health workers in the NHS refusing to uncover their forearms for scrubbing up.


• Insistence on wearing the veil in public places


• Demands for sharia law


• Special provision for prayer rooms for Muslims in public places


• Refusal of taxi drivers to carry guide dogs


• Shop workers refusing to handle alcohol


• Social Housing built especially for Muslims so the toilets DO NOT face Mecca


• The instant ability to take offence whilst offending the rest of us with their insults and death threats to all Jews and infidels

And then there's a call for American Muslims to stir up racial tension between African-Americans and whites in the U.S. by spreading inflammatory materials on the Internet.

It is part of a plan put together by the Muslim Brotherhood for the Islamic takeover of the West. And because the Quran has laid out the plan in no uncertain way then it must be obeyed. The idea is to infiltrate all sections of society - which they have done - and constantly piss us off in the hope of provoking a violent backlash:from this site:

What does Islam teach as far as violence is concerned? Looking at the Qur'an, we see quite a lot taught about this subject. Muslim apologists will often point to Surah 2:190-193 as proof that Islam teaches only defensive warfare, but eschews offense.

"Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have Turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they first fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them.

Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. But if they cease, Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression."

These verses, it is said, admonish Muslims only to fight against those who oppress or persecute Muslims, and only until the offenders have stopped oppressing Muslims.

However, there is a catch to all this. The Qur'an also teaches for Muslims to enter into exile in lands where Islam is not the dominant force, and to stir up trouble, so that this persecution will come as the natives in those lands protect the integrity of their sovereignty.

"Those who believed, and adopted exile, and fought for the Faith, with their property and their persons, in the cause of Allah, as well as those who gave them asylum and aid,- these are all friends and protectors, one of another.

As to those who believed but came not into exile, ye owe no duty of protection to them until they come into exile; but if they seek your aid in religion, it is your duty to help them, except against a people with whom ye have a treaty of mutual alliance. And remember Allah seeth all that ye do.

The Unbelievers are protectors, one of another: Unless ye do this, protect each other, there would be tumult and oppression on earth, and great mischief." (Surah 8:72-73)

In this passage, “adopted exile” is translated from the root form hjr, which has as its primary meaning the ideas of containment or confinement, and can carry the connotation of being quarantined or compartmentalised.

The idea garnered from this verse seems to be as follows: adopt exile in a foreign land, voluntarily confining yourself in a non-Muslim society. Eschew assimilating into the culture and way of life of the host country, and instead agitate for Islam. When opposition arises, join together and give aid and fight for Allah against the unbelievers, since voilà, persecution has arisen!

Hence, what is touted as a defensive doctrine is in reality carried out in an offensive manner.

So there you have it. The plan is working.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

As Crazy As It Can Get

You have to see it to believe how they are brainwashing their kids to become as crazy as they are as Hamas Bunny Assud Urges Boycott of Danish Goods and Threatens to Kill Danes over Muhammad Cartoons. What a bunch of morons.

Go Tell It To Achmadinejad

An international group of Muslim leaders have sent a letter to the world's Jewish community appealing for better relationships between the faiths.

The unprecedented letter, which is being seen as a significant gesture of reconciliation, said: "Many Jews and Muslims today stand apart from each other due to feelings of anger, which in some parts of the world, translate into violence.

"It is our contention that we are faced today not with 'a clash of civilizations' but with 'a clash of ill-informed misunderstandings'."

Taqqiya at it's best. "Clash of civilizations" is spot on. There's little to misunderstand about the Quran and it's exortations to "kill the Jew, wherever he is".

Signatories of the letter include Professor Akbar Ahmed, a former High Commissioner of Pakistan to Great Britain, who also signed a similar statement earlier this year from Muslim scholars to Christian leaders around the world.

The new letter said: "Deep-seated stereotypes and prejudices have resulted in a distancing of the communities and even a dehumanizing of the 'Other'. We urgently need to address this situation. We must strive towards turning ignorance into knowledge, intolerance into understanding, and pain into courage and sensitivity for the 'Other'."

There's nothing like cutting a persons head off in the same way they would slaughter an animal as a method of dehumanizing

It added: "There is more in common between our religions and peoples than is known to each of us. It is precisely due to the urgent need to address such political problems as well as acknowledge our shared values that the establishment of an inter-religious dialogue between Jews and Muslims in our time is extremely important.

Shared values? Give me a break. Kill the apostate; Islam is superior; no tolerance for the beliefs of others; free speech banned, it goes on. What shared values?

"Failure to do so will be a missed opportunity. Memories of positive historical encounters will dim and the current problems will lead to an increasing rift and more common misunderstandings between us."

That's because immigrant Muslims in the West are deliberately provoking us with ever more ludicrous demands in order to provoke a violent backlash.

One signatory, Sheikh Michael Mumisa, a Cambridge University lecturer, said the letter was the first in modern times sent to the Jewish community with the backing of scholars and Muslim leaders.

"The message in this letter conveys to the Jewish community a genuine desire for mutual respect, for dialogue and deeper understanding," he said.

Why don't they try putting that into practice. As for us respecting them first they should give us a reason to respect them since everything they do only deserves contempt, ridicule, loathing.

The Ultimate Sacrifice

Ronald Barbour aka Ronbo of The Freedom Fighter's Journal has committed suicide. Barbour announced the planned suicide in a blog entry posted at his website on February 17. He said that the suicide would be to protest America's failure to oppose the spread of Islam. He planned to leap off an un named building to his death:

I understand the ______ building is more than 150 feet tall. At the time of my last recon I noticed easy access to the roof that would allow someone to leap to their death to the parking lot below. I'm not an expert in these matters, but if I recall from my physics classes in college at 100 feet a falling object reaches a speed of about 100 MPH. This means that the falling man would hit the pavement at a speed great enough to cause instant death.

I understand that over the years since the construction of this building several persons have died by jumping from this structure.I plan to make such a leap. I do this in memory of the several hundred victims on 9/11 who jumped off the World Trade Center as a means of avoiding burning to death, and the over 3,000 American soldiers killed fighting Islamofascism in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A parallel reason is a protest against the American Left and the Democrat Party who have stabbed the Armed Forces in the back in the early stages of what is shaping up to be The Third World War . . .

. . . We must accept that we're on a war footing, and do what a people at war must do to survive: expel our putative enemies from among us and confine them where they can do us no further harm.

Europe's policy has been the reverse. India's policy has been inanition. America's policy defies elucidation. This cannot continue if we wish to survive as free men.

Quarantine or genocide. There are no other options.

Although there is a death notice there is no evidence of cause of death amd there is always the possibility of a hoax. If someone had jumped off a tall building in the Cleveland area surely there must be a mention somewhere in the MSM or don't they bother anymore?

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Mosques. Command Centres For War?

Surprise, surprise? It seems that 75% of the mosques in the US are hotbeds of anti-Western extremism. No doubt the same applies to mosques in the UK and Europe too. The form of extremism is such that it would be extremely foolish to allow them to exist. Seems to me that they ought to be redesigned in the horizontal format as an artistic collection of disconnected brick and concrete. Here's an extract:

Sermons that preach women are inferior to men and can be beaten for disobedience; that non-Muslims, particularly Jews, are infidels and inferior to Muslims; that jihad or support of jihad is not only a Muslim's duty but the noblest way, and suicide bombers and other so-called "martyrs" are worthy of the highest praise; and that an Islamic caliphate should one day encompass the U.S.

Though not all mosques in America are radicalized, many have tended to serve as safe havens and meeting points for Islamic terrorist groups. Experts say there are at least 40 episodes of extremists and terrorists being connected to mosques in the past decade alone.

Some of the 9/11 hijackers, in fact, received aid and counsel from one of the largest mosques in the Washington, D.C., area. Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center is one of the mosques indentified by undercover investigators as a hive of terrorist activity and other extremism.

It was founded and is currently run by leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood. Imams there preach what is called "jihad qital," which means physical jihad, and incite violence and hatred against the U.S.

Dar al-Hijrah's ultimate goal, investigators say, is to turn the U.S. into an Islamic state governed by sharia law.

I then found a long, and hard to read article from Summer Patriot, Winter Soldier which is ostensibly about the history and architecture of mosques. I have extracted some of the relevant paragraphs. They serve to remind us what Mosques ARE REALLY about:

. . . in short and as a matter of fact, the mosque has always been a fulcrum of conquest, as the mosque serves the role of military and political conquest, religious indoctrination and education, and political and religious administration of conquered areas and populations.

It has done so by the artifice of an advanced outpost of trade and economic relations if you must deal in current parlance; it has done so by the direct adjunct of military conquest; and it does so now as the adjunct and fulcrum of demographic conquest in western europe, and as the operational base for worldwide terror and the jihad wherever the mosque is found.

No distinction can be drawn between Islam, muslims, mosques, madrasa’s and any of the arms and accoutrements of Islam conquest in the 1400 years of Islam, and any distinction that would view the presence of a mosque in an american neighborhood as an innocent event is drawn by apologists, deceivers, or the very seriously delusional.

. . . Islam has been spread by the point of the sword, e.g., by conquest from the time of the beginning of the religion, nor for the fact that it is being spread by conquest now. why should there be? it is now as it was then, and that is the simple truth of the matter

. . . I am going to wrap this post up, as it is getting late and the post is far too long. this will be the last installment or post relative to the notion that mosques are forts. if you are not convinced at this point, nothing additional will convince you on this point.

. . . we need to start gathering intelligence on american mosques, to gain some appreciation of just how they have sought to establish these links, and with whom. and, we need to understand just how seemingly unrelated activities and organizations are linked up, and how centralized their planning is, and just how well they have their agenda’s mapped out.

. . . the examples of long range planning by the Muslim Brotherhood, their goals and agendas, and how they have implemented the same via a worldwide terrorist network, coordinated with a demographic attack on Europe, does not suggest that Islamic and arab interests in this country have been satisfied to sit around and do nothing.

. . . and it is, plain and simple, wrapped up in the communications network of the mosque. It has always been so, and there is absolutely no reason to believe that it should be otherwise in this country. the mosques are up and running and we know their agenda, because it has been the agenda of all mosques ever built: it is to expand islam.

There you have it. Get redesigning in the horizontal mode, but don't vote in Obama because he won't support such a notion.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

No, Not Obama. This is the One

If only this guy was what Islam was all about none of these infidel blogs would exist and we would all have to do something useful instead.

He is handsome and charismatic, and his velvety voice makes young women swoon. But his young female fans mostly wear headscarves, and while his gatherings look more fitting for a rockstar, they involve lessons from the Koran.

Moez Masoud, a 29-year-old Egyptian party-goer-turned-preacher, is sweeping the Middle East with his moderate Islamic message to love not just Allah but also others - and to play a full part in the modern world.

Read it all at CommonSense and see him on video

The Sound of Satan's Dwellingplace

The Muslim call to prayer is as alien in the west as UFO's in New Mexico - I mean real UFO's not stealth aircraft. This video shows the reaction of local people to the dreadful wailing of the Muslim call to prayer in a western city. It could be Oxford next. If it were to come to a city near you I would suggest a policy of pyrotechnic expansive deconstruction celebration would be appropriate. Watch it, it won't take up too much of your time.

Beware The Cuckoo In The Nest

I was curious about Kosovo declaring independence with the support of the USA and the UK and thought I would learn more:

Kosovo was a medieval Christian Serbian state until the middle ages. many churches and monasteries were built in the period. The enevitable encroachment of Islam reared it’s ugly head and Kosovo was conquered by the Ottomans in 1455.

Over the coming centuries control of Kosovo was passed between Muslim Albanians and Christian Serbs on a regular basis. At the beginning of the 20th century the Serbian reconquest of Kosovo was described as retribution for the 1389 Battle of Kosovo.

As a result of the World War II Axis invasion of 1941 the greatest part of Kosovo became a part of Italian-controlled Fascist Albania, and smaller bits by the Tsardom of Bulgaria and Nazi German-occupied Kingdom of Serbia.

During the fascist occupation of Kosovo by Albanians, until August 1941 alone, over 10,000 Serbs were killed and between 80,000 and 100,000 Serbs were expelled, while roughly the same number of Albanians from Albania were brought to settle in these Serbian lands.

Islam is now the predominant religion, professed by most of the majority ethnic Albanian population, the Bosniak, Gorani, and Turkish communities, and some of the Roma/Ashkali/Egyptian community, although religion is not a significant factor in public life.

Not until now. There won't be a long wait to see a sharia state.

Religious rhetoric was largely absent from public discourse in Muslim communities, mosque attendance was low, and public displays of conservative Islamic dress and culture were minimal.

Having looked at the history it clearly follows a familiar pattern. Originally a Christian country, conquered by the ever expanding Islamic “Religion of Peace”, legitimately re-conquered by the Christian Serbs and then conquered again by the mass immigration of Albanians. Sounds familiar doesn’t it?

It gets worse. The ethnic Albanians having moved to Kosovo, presumably for a better life, then demanded the country as their own. When the Christian Serbs objected NATO bombed them into submission. Now the interlopers have their way, independence from Serbia.

It follows therefore that when the two to three million Muslims who have moved to England for a better life decide that they want their own sharia law state, will NATO also bomb us into submission if we object?

The clear moral of this story is that Islam cannot co-exist peacefully alongside any other culture. There is no example in the world that I can think of where they do. It is deliberate on the part of Muslims to create conflict and tension wherever they are, whenever they are immigrants.

I can understand why the Serbs are angry at the surrender of their country to Islam after many centuries of history. The Serbs admittedly committed atrocities against the Kosovans in the 1990’s and NATO bombed them in order to protect them.

However, we do need to remember that the Albanian Kosovans were waging war against the Serbs at the time and committing equally atrocious violence against the Serb population in what was a classic Muslim tactic of stirring up resentment in the Kuffar population.

Where next? Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands? Capitulation in Kosovo has created a dangerous precedent wherever there are Muslim cuckoos in the nest.

Cuckoos are lazy, parasite birds that live off the proceeds of others. That sounds familiar.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Alien Phenomena?

I have oft referred to Muslims as the "Aliens From The Planet Islam" because you would be hard put to define some of the extremists as human. Their beliefs as laid out by the Quran, despite the lies that Islam is a religion of peace, are anti human in every way us normal human beings can figure out.

When you compare their religion to a cult such as Scientology it is quite obvious that Islam is little more than a cult also. A death cult. Both cults were started by somewhat demented characters with ridiculous claims. Hubbard claims he was taken into space by aliens and Muhamed claims that martyrs go to a paradise with 72 virgins.

In Europe their alien mosques are sprouting up like poisonous mushrooms, some of their followers are arrogant and dangerous. It reminds me of the description in the TV listings of a film I didn't watch; "The Chronicles of Riddick" starring Vin Diesel (2004); A planet hopping renegade is drawn into battle with a fanatical cult on a mission to kill or convert anyone in their way.

Sounds like Islam to me. So, what started me on this track? Well it was a posting today here on this site and the news that a Muslim country is taking steps to ban the "alien phenomena" of St Valentines Day. It's a one way track you see. If we object to their very alien mosques or loudspeaker calls to prayer that are Islamifying our English cities in a very visual and audial way then we are either Islamophobes or racists. Here's the original link

The problem is that would be too much fun and fun is not allowed in Islam, well, not as you and I would know it. Perhaps they get their fun in other ways. Beheadings, taking part in a good old stoning, watching the action on a hanging day, oh, and lots of other things.

ABC by Peter Hitchens

A thoughtful blogging from Peter Hitchens on the Archbish. It's long and rambling but I picked out the best bit:

. . . that's why I care about Rowan Williams, and his excursion into the subject of Sharia law. I may generally ignore Archbishop Rowan, as I have little time for his prose style, designed to conceal rather than reveal, in my view. And he seems to me to be a nitwit in worldly matters, having been a dupe of the disarmers back in 1985 - which rather devalues his later opposition to the Iraq war. My Church-of-England-in-exile continues to exist without him, and in spite of him and those like him.

But I am not sure it can survive indefinitely under such leadership. If parsons and bishops wish to rage against each other in factions, Catholic versus Evangelical, then that is a pity and I wish they would stop. There are better things for them to do. But if the man appointed to head the Christian Church in England declares that the adoption of some aspects of Sharia law "seems unavoidable" in this country; if he muses publicly about the possible recognition of Sharia courts in marital law, financial transactions and mediation (and he undeniably did both these things) then he is toying with something far bigger - the future of England (and Britain) as a Christian society.

For me, the main problem is not what he said, but that it was he who said it. A Muslim cleric, a Guardian leader-writer or a leading academic (perhaps Professor Howard Kirk, as he no doubt now is, Vice Chancellor of the University of Watermouth) might have mouthed this stuff ( and, yes, I have trudged and hacked my way through the whole verbal jungle) and that would have been that.

But for the Archbishop of Canterbury to do this is a clean different thing. Who else, in our ruling elite, is going to argue that we are and must remain a Christian nation, our laws based (as they are) on Christian precept? Crudely, Dr Williams is paid to defend the Christian faith. To say that something is 'unavoidable' is almost always to say that you aren't prepared to do anything to avoid it, or - worse - that you may actually favour it but daren't say so. Supporters of the European Single Currency would often claim that it, too, was 'inevitable, a very effective way of demoralising people who knew no better and didn't understand its importance. Most things are avoidable if you have the determination to fight them. Sharia law in Britain certainly is.

I also didn't like his attempt to say that only Muslim 'primitivists' held to the most worrying tenets of Sharia, or that worries about such things were 'dramatic fears'. This isn't so. Look how difficult it is to get Muslim spokesmen to denounce such things as the stoning of adulterous women, or Sharia's penalties for homosexuals. My discussion with Islamic scholars at Deoband a couple of years ago ( all calm, soft-spoken bearded scholars much like Dr Williams) left me pretty sure that they would never budge on things like the lesser position of women, or the death penalty for those who desert Islam. It couldn't be changed, they insisted.

So what is Dr Williams talking about when he speaks of "the free decision to be and continue a member of the umma" (umma being the Arabic name for the body of the Muslim faithful)?

Islam has many doors, but no exits. You cannot leave. This is regarded as non-negotiable by every Muslim cleric I have talked to. So what's this free decision to continue, that Dr Williams talks about?

There's nothing to be gained in calls for Dr Williams to resign. He's not the Home Secretary, and he serves under different rules from those that govern politicians. In any case, it would do no good unless he were replaced by someone better. That can only happen if the people of England decide to take back possession of their national church, and the church, revived, begins to find a new leadership less interested in faction and modernisation, and more interested in the reconversion of England to Christianity.

But, as I've warned before, if the Christian church doesn't take advantage of the approaching religious revival, which I think cannot be long delayed, someone else will. And that someone will argue much more powerfully for Sharia law than Rowan Williams ever did. And I can't see the Muslims, if they become a great force in Britain, paying much attention to the maintenance of a separate Christian law. They are serious and determined people, who believe staunchly in their religion and hope for its ultimate triumph. So, no, I don't think the Church of England should be allowed to die. We need it more than we ever have.

Read it All

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Forget Curry, Eat Mexican Instead

They want to import curry house workers from Bangladesh because of a shortage. What this means is more Muslims. For each and every curry house worker imported there could be a wife and several kids. Then the kids grow up and import a spouse from the sub continent and then they have several kids. Before you can shake a stick at McDonald's you're up to your ears in curry house workers. From the BBC website:

The Home Office is being urged to ease restrictions on migrant workers entering Britain from Bangladesh, to avert a crisis in the curry industry.

Curry houses are struggling to fill thousands of kitchen staff vacancies, says the Immigration Advisory Service.

For years, many staff in the UK's 9,000 curry restaurants have been recruited directly from Bangladesh.

But restrictions on the workers have been tighter since eastern Europeans were given employment rights.

In a further threat to the UK's curry industry, the cost of rice - one of the staple ingredients in the cuisine - is soaring on world markets.

Alex Waugh, director of the Rice Association, said prices had risen 60% year-on-year.
He said: "If you are a restaurant owner and you are buying a lot of rice you either reduce your margins or you put your prices up.

"A cost increase of that magnitude is going to feed through, and this will probably see the price of a curry increase."

It is thought the curry industry in the UK employs at least 50,000 people, with the majority of restaurants Bangladeshi-owned.

According to the IAS, restrictions on lower-skilled workers from outside the EU are causing a labour shortage so severe it could cause "irreparable damage" to the curry industry. It argues that attempts to get eastern Europeans to work in curry restaurants have failed because they do not have the "cultural sensitivity" required.

The IAS has written to the Immigration Minister, Liam Byrne, asking for the rules to be relaxed for catering workers from Bangladesh.

But government officials said they had no plans to review the current arrangements.

Let's hope they continue to have "no plans to review the current arrangements". I say eat Chinese, Mexican, Italian and to hell with the curry houses. They must have imported workers in the past so they will just have to find their workers from the existing population.

On the other hand I suppose we must bear in mind that only 50% of the Pakistani's are economically active. The rest are sponging off the taxpayers.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Islamists have penetrated fabric of society

Many jobs in the UK are only open to ethnic groups, particularly Muslims because of positive discrimination. After this latest story in the Daily Mail I say lets have negative discrimination. Employ no Muslims unless their backgrounds are thoroughly checked. Thoroughly check those already entrenched in the system and kick them out if there are any doubts about their allegiances:

Islamist extremists have infiltrated Government and key public utilities to pass sensitive information to terrorists, the security services have warned.

Counter-terrorism officials say "insiders" or their associates are almost certainly working "undetected" in sensitive posts and are actively supporting the activities of extremists.

In some cases, lifelong relationships between friends or relatives are being exploited to obtain crucial information from those in sensitive posts.

The development is detailed in intelligence reports circulated to the Home Office, police and Whitehall officials.

The London Underground, Gatwick airport and BT are cited as examples of organisations which have been targeted by individuals linked to terrorists.

Officials say the idea of "penetrating the enemy is pervasive" for Islamic extremists.

It is understood a number of suspected jihadists working in Government departments and the public services are being monitored by the security services.

Details of the threat emerged months after the Daily Mail revealed fears that Scotland Yard has been infiltrated by individuals linked to extremist groups including Al Qaeda.

Several police officers and civilian staff are being monitored amid claims they are long-term sleepers trying to gain sensitive information of use to terrorists.

Several police officers and civilian staff are being monitored amid claims they are long-term sleepers trying to gain sensitive information of use to terrorists.

The London Underground, Gatwick airport and BT are cited as examples of organisations which have been targeted by individuals linked to terrorists

Some are even believed to have attended terror training camps in Pakistan or Afghanistan.
Fanatics who infiltrate the Government or the "Critical National Infrastructure" - vital utilities such as water, electricity, transport and communications - have a number of objectives.

These include trying to gain information on what the law enforcement agencies know about the activities of fellow Islamist extremists and how to evade the attention of police and the security services.

They may also try to obtain information or intelligence to help them to carry out acts of terrorism.

This involves getting access to premises or individuals "with the immediate purpose" of mounting an attack or obtaining sensitive information to facilitate a later atrocity.

The extremists might also seek information which is of "indirect use" to the planning of a terrorist attack - such as getting access to banking information to raise money through fraud, gaining insider knowledge about airport security and surveillance measures on the London Underground.

Security sources say there is evidence that UK-based terrorists have discussed the possibility of attacking national infrastructure targets with the help of a "sympathetic insider".

MI5 has warned in the past that suspects with "strong links" to Osama Bin Laden have tried to join the British security services and, in January last year, exiled radical Omar Bakri claimed that Islamic extremists were infiltrating the police and other public sector organisations.

College teachers must be "vigilant" in tackling the threat posed by violent extremists who attempt to recruit teenage students to terrorism, ministers said yesterday.

Al Qaeda supporters seek to "groom" impressionable young people and staff should be prepared to tell the police if they have concerns, draft Government guidance said.

The guidance, published for consultation, is aimed at colleges teaching students aged 14 and over, including more than 700,000 aged 16 to 18, and follows similar guidelines for universities.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Archbishop blames himself and the media for misunderstanding

The Archbishop of Canterbury admits his choice of words were clumsily expressed. The bonus is that he has brought the subject of sharia and Islamification sharply into the public focus.
Another CommonSense Video.

Pat Condell Savages The Bish

In another hard hitting to the point video Pat Condell takes the Bish apart and for good measure other aspects of Islam. Heavily criticised with a "Condell" classic are the "English Middle Class Bedwetters". I love this guy, he rocks as they say.