Corsicans Speak Out Against Islam: "If This Isn't Apartheid, What Is It?"
"Oh, Allah, Shelter Their Communities APART"
'cookieChoices = {};'

Footage shows car drivers forced to swerve around hundreds of migrants
Police closed the A16 highway until crowds of people could be dispersed
Calais port is a key destination for asylum-seekers from all over the world
Most hope to reach the UK via the Eurotunnel or by hitching lifts in lorriesGO READ THE WHOLE THING.
Muslims are boycotting Prevent, the British government’s anti-radicalisation programme, with community leaders accounting for less than a tenth of extremism tip-offs.
The vast majority of tip-offs are instead coming from public services, such as schools and hospitals, or the police.
The Times reports that although the figures include extremism of different varieties, including far right, they show the hostility in Muslim communities towards the so-called Prevent programme, and raise concerns that police are being denied information that could prevent terror attacks.
Earlier this month, the Waltham Forest Council of Mosques, which represents tens of thousands of worshippers in east London, said was boycotting the scheme, while Muslim leaders in neighbouring Newham accused the scheme of “spying on our young people”.
MEMRI video shows excerpts from an address given last week by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to an audience at Al-Azhar University in Cairo on the occasion of Mohammed’s birthday.
Gen. el-Sisi takes the opportunity to send Christmas greetings to Christians among his fellow countrymen. He calls for true religious freedom in Egypt, where citizens should be free to choose their religion without fear of physical or social coercion.
He tells the clerics in his audience that this is the message they should preach from the pulpits of their mosques. Watch as the camera pans across the audience, and you’ll see a lot of hats that look like truncated Santa Claus caps. These are badges of office worn by scholars who have been certified in their Islamic studies by Al-Azhar University, the most prestigious academic institution in Islam.
What President el-Sisi is telling them is contrary to the “consensus of the scholars”, that is, to more than a thousand years of universally accepted Islamic principle and praxis.
What he is calling for is, in effect, the rewriting of the basis of Islamic law. And his words are being spoken in the heart of Islamic scholarship and jurisprudence. It’s a remarkable moment:
Hundreds of anti-Arab demonstrators took to the streets of the Corsican capital Ajaccio, Sunday, for a third consecutive day of protest.
SOT, Cristophe, Demo organiser and activist (French): “This is a message to the prefect: there is no safety in poor neighborhoods. If the police don’t do something about it, we will solve the problem ourselves. People make the confusion between Muslims and scum. We’re at war against scum, no matter whether they are white, brown, red or yellow.”
SOT, Cristophe, Demo organiser and activist (French): “When there are problems, the police don’t enter the neighborhood because they’re afraid, but when they wanted to stop us they implement important security measures. This shows that the prefect neglects us.”
Security forces also cordoned off Ajaccio’s poor Jardins de l’Empereur housing estate, as Corsica’s administrator Christophe Mirmand told AFP that the ban would be in effect until at least January 4 and cover “all protests and gatherings”.Hundreds of protesters marched for a second straight day Saturday through several working-class districts of Ajaccio shouting slogans such as “This is our home!” and “Arabs get out”.The unrest followed a Christmas Eve clash in which two firefighters and a police officer were injured at the estate, home to some 1,700 people.Regional official Francois Lalanne said a fire had been “deliberately lit” in the neighbourhood in a ruse aimed at “ambushing” the emergency services.A firefighter told French television that “about 20 people armed with iron bars (and) baseball bats” had tried to attack them but were unable to smash through the windows of their truck.
... (Apparently) in a modern democracy, you are only allowed to protest things that advance the government agenda of total population replacement and destruction of our various cultures.
Surprisingly this report actually includes the actual event that sparked all this, the typical islamic tactic to create a muslim only no-go zone, the ambushing of state emergency services. It still downplays it but at least mentions it.
What it doesn’t say, is that the mosque that was attacked was operating illegally as in France, you cannot get government subsidies for religious buildings. They had licensed it as a gym or something similar and got state grants but operated it as a mosque.
Also the people associated with it were also believed to be involved in planning the ambush.Hundreds defy Corsica protest ban
Corsica’s administrator Christophe Mirmand announced a ban on all protests and gatherings until at least January 4 in the poor Jardins de l’Empereur housing estate, the epicentre of the violence.
The ban came after hundreds of people had marched for a second straight day Saturday through several working-class districts of Ajaccio shouting slogans such as “This is our home!” and “Arabs get out”. Two men aged in their 20s were held in custody as part of the probe into the unrest.
A Pakistani man from South Africa on his “dream vacation” to New York City was arrested for describing his suitcase as a “bomb” while checking in at a Sheraton hotel in Brooklyn on Tuesday.
According to New York Daily News, Jhanzaib Malik is facing criminal charges after he pointed to his suitcase and said, “There’s a bomb in there” when he got frustrated with the check-in process.
However, his lawyer, Roger Asmar, claims that Malik only referred to his luggage as “bomb”, slang for cool, to impress the female concierge.The gay-assed Scuzlim probably just wanted to punk some stupid Infidels.
The cleric acting as spokesman for the San Bernardino mosque where terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook worshipped claims he barely knew Farook and didn’t know his terrorist wife at all. But phone records and other evidence uncovered by federal investigators cast suspicion on his story.
The FBI has questioned the cleric, Roshan Zamir Abbassi, about his phone communications with Farook — including a flurry of at least 38 messages over a two-week span in June, coinciding with the deadly Muslim terrorist attack on two military sites in Chattanooga, Tenn.
Abbassi, a Pakistani, insists he had nothing to do with the shooting at a San Bernardino County government building five miles from the mosque.
While he confirms the text messages with Farook, he claims they were merely discussing food donations for his Dar-al-Uloom al-Islamiya of America mosque.
Abbassi maintained at a press conference that he didn’t know Farook any better than he knew the reporters in the room. But members of the mosque say Farook was a fixture there. He had been coming to pray and study at least three times a week for two years. In fact, he memorized the Koran at there, something you cannot do without learning Arabic, a subject Abbassi teaches.GO READ THE WHOLE THING.
I continue to read articles which shows signs of corruption with intermingling of research regarding Islamic State whilst combining an apologetic tone for a “true Islam”.
Here is my current selection:
Perspectives on Terrorism
I feel like I have been to a Masquerade party. There is an embedded apologist tone which is first signaled in the final sentence of the Abstract. And the signal is sent again and again throughout the writing. It is subtle, but it is there.
“While IS claims to represent true Islam, its cadres are in fact known for their ideologically twisted interpretation of Islam and ruthless treatment of fellow Muslims as well as subjugation of Christians and Yazidis.” (pp 96,97)
“trainers rely on twisted interpretations from the Holy Quran and from more or less well known Hadiths… violent interpretations of Islam…” page 104
My belief? You have to understand Islamic law to understand Islamic State.
As I read the work of the researchers I note elements of Fard -the obligatory commands of Allah, and Hadd applications – within Islamic State day-to-day operations.
Perhaps no place is this more glaringly apparent than in the story of the couple who were flogged because the man was allowed inside the outer gate of the home by the woman.
The Hadd penalties involve the rights of Allah over man, as opposed to the rights of man over his fellow man. So these penalties are much more harsh.
In the case of Arabic and the transliteration of Hadd for adultery the words are much different than the Judaic commands of the Ten Commandments which read, “Thou Shalt Not…”
With adultery, the Arabic sounds softer but it is actually a harder stance. “Do not come near to adultery” then translates to a man standing inside a gate but still outside of the woman’s home.
The couple “came near to” adultery, and must be punished.GO READ THE WHOLE THING.