SHARIA law will “inevitably” become part of the legal system and work should begin now to incorporate it into British law, a leading barrister said last night.
Stephen Hockman, QC, former chairman of the Bar Council, spoke at a meeting organised by the website Islam4UK, where another speaker was Anjem Choudary, former head of banned fanatical group al-Muhajiroun.
Sharia law has become associated with executions, stonings and hands being cut off.
But Mr Hockman told the Daily Express: “Given our substantial Muslim population, it is vital that we look at ways to integrate Muslim culture into our traditions.
“Otherwise we will find that there is a significant section of our society which is increasingly alienated, with very dangerous results.
Note that no one is worried that Viet Namese people will be "increasingly alienated, with very dangerous results". Nor are we worried that Chinese people, African Christians, South Americans, or any other people will be "alienated, with increasingly dangerous results".
No, we're only worried about Muslims. And, why is that? Because Muslims are increasingly dangerous. The more Muslims there are, the more dangerous they are. And, their alienation is built into their religion, as they are taught from verses in the Koran that they ought not make friends with non-Muslims.
So, the "QC" is attempting to solve problems which can not be solved by appeasing Islam. That is the definition of dhimmitude.
An Anonymous commenter says:
The article at the Sunday Express link has posted the following statement at the end of it:
"Have Your Say" is unavailable for this story.
Imagine that.
Yet, people continue to wonder why support for the BNP is growing exponentially.
The queen may as well abdicate her throne as she recklessly posits her royal responsibility to the C of E by designating traitorous QC's and maintaining Rowan Williams as it's arch bishop (more like arch traitor) intentionally undermining the Church of England.
It's gonna get real ugly in the UK.
14 comments:
The article at the Sunday Express link has posted the following statement at the end of it:
"Have Your Say" is unavailable for this story.
Imagine that.
Yet, people continue to wonder why support for the BNP is growing exponentially.
The queen may as well abdicate her throne as she recklessly posits her royal responsibility to the C of E by designating traitorous QC's and maintaining Rowan Williams as it's arch bishop (more like arch traitor) intentionally undermining the Church of England.
It's gonna get real ugly in the UK.
This is happening faster than expected, and if Charles takes over from Elizabeth it will become an avalance. If they incorporate it into British law, do they propose to confine stonings to Muslims or is that going to be across the board? And why does that not count as "very dangerous results"?
And if they don't want to include the honor killings, stonings, beheadings (sure, not new, but Henry VIII has been dead a long time) and amputations, how do they plan to exclude them without "alienating" that "significant section of our society" even more?
Madness.
Madness.
Yet, people continue to wonder why support for the BNP is growing exponentially.
The queen may as well abdicate her throne as she recklessly posits her royal responsibility to the C of E by designating traitorous QC's and maintaining Rowan Williams as it's arch bishop (more like arch traitor) intentionally undermining the Church of England.
It's gonna get real ugly in the UK.
Yet, people continue to wonder why support for the BNP is growing exponentially.
The queen may as well abdicate her throne as she recklessly posits her royal responsibility to the C of E by designating traitorous QC's and maintaining Rowan Williams as it's arch bishop (more like arch traitor) intentionally undermining the Church of England.
It's gonna get real ugly in the UK.
Yet, people continue to wonder why support for the BNP is growing exponentially.
The queen may as well abdicate her throne as she recklessly posits her royal responsibility to the C of E by designating traitorous QC's and maintaining Rowan Williams as it's arch bishop (more like arch traitor) intentionally undermining the Church of England.
It's gonna get real ugly in the UK.
YES, YES, YES.
UGLY ONE WAY OR ANOTHER:
WITHER THEY FOIGHT TO KEEP THEIR NATION BRITISH,
OR THEY BECOME MUSLIMS - IDEOLOGICALLY AND THEN RACIALLY.
DITTO EUROPE.
This Hockman guy is a joke! One would expect at least a modicum of intelligence from a QC. This dickhead shows none!
As Anonymous wrote: It is amazing that on such an important question, the Sunday Express saw fit to stop all comments.
Shut the people up and we will have revolution on our hands, revolution one way or the other.
By the way, Pastorius, I'm going to post this story on my website. I'll give you the hat tip, of course.
These are bad developments. when will the UK fight back?
felix, the UK won't fight back. It is too far into dhimmitude. Even its foolish prince-who-would- be king sides with islam against his own country. If there were to be a fight, we would have seen signs of it already. But what we see is a resignation, a giving up on the part of the British kafirs.
The islamic invasion of the UK has been successful so far. And an on-going, living lesson for other countries, who don't seem to be heeding the message rather well.
The UK is committing suicide.
I tell you, it gets harder and harder every day for me to read the web. No wonder I'm so depressed.
HO HO you are forgetting this little porkie
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1031611/Sharia-law-SHOULD-used-Britain-says-UKs-judge.html
The most senior judge in England yesterday gave his blessing to the use of sharia law to resolve disputes among Muslims.
Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips said that Islamic legal principles could be employed to deal with family and marital arguments and to regulate finance.
He declared: 'Those entering into a contractual agreement can agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.'
In his speech at an East London mosque, Lord Phillips signalled approval OOOps lets hold it here.
The East London Mosque is situated in Bangla Town, an area of London formerly know as Tower Hamlet.
The main religions followed or practiced in Tower Hamlets are Christianity and Islam. There are 75,783 people who identified themselves as Christians (38.6%), and 71,389 people who are Muslims (36.4%). The Muslim community are mainly of Bangladeshis and Somalians.
There was a time not so long ago Tower Hamlets had 140 Jewish synagogues all but four of these have now closed
Spitalfields Great Synagogue in the famous Brick Lane, 1975 it became London Jamme Mashid, then the largest mosque in the East End, used primarily by the Bangladeshi community.
Now back to East London Mosque, it was built with help from the King of Saudi Arabia.
The mosque has been described as "sharing the ideology of the Jamaat-e-Islami"
Jamaat-e-Islami (Urdu: جماعتِ اسلامی, "Islamic Block" Jamaat, JI) is an Islamist political party in Pakistan. It was founded in Lahore, India, by Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi on 26 August 1941,[1] and is the oldest religious party in Pakistan.[1] Today sister organizations with similar objectives and ideological approaches exist in India, Bangladesh, Kashmir, and Sri Lanka, and there are "close brotherly relations" with the Islamist movements and missions "working in different continents and countries", particularly those affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
One more piece of Trivia I have just deduced from searching for some facts for this comment
Over the years many distinguished personalities were associated with the London Mosque Fund. Among them, the Rt. Hon. Earl Winterton who at the Evian Conference in 1938
said
.It has been the traditional policy of successive British Governments to offer asylum to persons who, for political, racial or religious reasons, have had to leave their own countries…But the United Kingdom is not a country of immigration. It is highly industrialised, fully populated and is still faced with the problem of unemployment. For economic and social reasons, the traditional policy of granting asylum can only be applied within narrow limits…. His Majesty's Government are also carefully surveying the prospects of the admission of refugees to their colonies and overseas territories. The question is not a simple one…. Many overseas territories are already overcrowded, others are wholly or partly unsuitable for European settlement….No thickly populated country can be expected to accept persons who are deprived of their means of subsistence before they are able to enter it. Nor can the resources of private societies be expected to make good the losses which the emigrants have suffered."4
Winterton put forward the prospect of settlement for some refugees in Kenya with the possibility of adding Northern Rhodesia. Only after criticism from Jewish organisations and the press, especially in the USA that he had not mentioned Palestine in his opening address, did he refer to it in his closing speech. He explained that it was a delicate situation with intense problems, which made it necessary to curb Jewish immigration whilst awaiting an investigation into the possibilities of partitioning Palestine.
And we all know what happened then.
Please do not blame Her Majesty. The appointment of the Archbishop is done by the government, she merely has to sanction it. Same for Q.C.s. Charlie may be a nutter, the Queen is definetely not.
. . ."she merely has to sanction it." . .ciccio?
What, does she have a gun to her head or a f'n sword at her throat?
Did her royal highness ever think to say 'no'?!
SHE IS RESPONSIBLE . . .for maintaining the stature of the Church of England.
Anonymous,
does she have the backbone to say no?
So far, Damien, she has said no to permitting her son to ascend to the throne.
But how much longer can she hold on?
If she doesn't recognize Islams threat to the Church of England, whether or not she can hold on to her throne is of little comfort.
People of Britain - remember the Battle of London! Pull up! Reach out for your precious freedom and hold on fast. Churchill was not a myth, not a composite historical character of fading legend. He really did live and breathe among you.
Find yourselves another Churchill. There will surely be a few modern variants available. Find them.
Run a television contest if you must. Call it "Leader Search" or "Maximum Defender", or "Heads on First" or whatever.
Get creative and find out how to make an end run around your dhimmified, suicidal media's asphyxiating information blockade.
That's funny, Anonymous. Britain could have a talent search tv show to find a leader, and Simon Cowell and his cohorts can host it, and sit there and criticize the speeches offered.
Hilarious.
And then, when the season is over, and the leader is picked, he can arrest Cowell for dangerous display of public idiocy and have him put in prison until the war is over and it is ok to be an idiot again.
;-)
Post a Comment