First, let's be clear. Yesterday's events in Charlottesville began because a group of Nazis got a permit to march.
As far as those of us here at IBA are concerned, Nazis are not Conservatives. Nazis want the government to control who can and can not be married, who can and can not be a citizen (based upon race), and who is and is not deserving of Equal Rights.
None of these ideas are Conservative. They are Leftist ideas. They are about top-down government control. That's Leftism. Not Conservatism.
Now,
QUESTION: Is someone attempting to make the Right look bad by repeatedly allowing "Right-wing" protestors to be physically attacked", even tacitly encouraging such attacks by stepping aside, or pushing protestors into crowds of violent counter-protestors?
First, some information from our Anonymous friend:
Counterterrorism vs Anti-terrorism and Other Fun Word Plays (Aug 12 2017) (cued up to quote)
8:44
Jason Goodman: "....find out what's up somebody already actually sent me an email from WikiLeaks from Sid Blumenthal to Hillary Clinton about wanting to create a race kind of riot and I wanted to look at that. . ."The court issued a permit for the protest and the police showed up in riot gear and cancelled it as a "Unlawful Assembly".
They attacked the protestors and pushed them into the ANTIFA thugs. The police said they were told not to protect any protestors.
Terry McAuliffe, McCabe, Charlotte Mayor, Antifa and Soros had a great opportunity given to them to have a huge incident that they could blame on "The Right" & "White Supremacists
As an example, the ACLU of VA tweeted:
"Clash between protesters and counter protesters. Police says "We'll not intervene until given command to do so." #Charlottesville"This is the day after the ACLU brought the city to court (and won) for trying to change the location of the approved and permitted protest/rally at the last minute.
The same tactics used by the City Council look awfully similar to the tactics used by Berkeley administration.
AND THEN THERE'S THIS:
Today's comments from Mayor Signer
"...blame lies at the doorstep of the White House"Via Reddit
"Unite the right" is a Soros funded honeypot psy-op which employs the "Pied Piper" strategy to damage the Republican brand - this is what Creamer and Democracy partners have been up to.NYT....are they/ can they begin to comprehend the monster they've created for themselves?
AND THIS, FROM THE GATEWAY PUNDIT:
For over a year at nearly every event NOT sponsored by Leftist Democrat and Black Lives Matter groups, the Police have stepped aside and allowed horrendous acts of criminal violence against event participants while rarely arresting anyone committing these heinous acts.These violent groups, like Facist Antifa, are now inciting murder at these events. Who is allowing this to happen? Will the FBI please investigate these groups and who is ordering the police to allow them to commit violence?
Yesterday at a white supremacist event in Charlottesville, Virginia, people were killed. Violent fascist rioters like Antifa were there en masse to shut down the event.
---(We at the GWP in no way support white fascists but we also do not support or condone violent acts against these same individuals.)---
One bold reporter by the name of Faith Goldy was neary five feet from where individuals were mowed down after being run over by a lunatic in a car. Goldy noted that the police were no where to be found when the incident occurred.
The white supremacists were told to disband and discontinue their protest but the Black Lives Matter and Antifa thugs were allowed to continue their protesting. Antifa and Black Lives Matter were still protesting when the car appeared out of nowhere and ran over people.
Before u speak!This is what really happened! https://t.co/PGuAGLyXaJ— delyla (@delyla100) August 13, 2017
Another question here at the end:
WTF IS THE ALT-RIGHT?
I don't know that anyone agrees on the definition of this term.
Who came up with it?
Who is and is not Alt-Right?
Am I Alt-Right, because I am a Trump Conservative, not a Repukian Party Conservative?
Is it possible that the term Alt-Right is being used to tar all non-Globalist Conservatives as racist, when there is no actual definition of the term itself?
Give me a real definition, and I will tell you whether I agree with it or not.
You will not define me by undefined terms.
9 comments:
Soros's Formula for Killing America: A Brief Guide, for America
Discover the Networks: Organizations funded by George Soros
The Hills facebook post with full coverage video of protest in Charlottesville. Notice @13:50 in video the "Diversity makes us stronger" banner spanning across the road hung between opposing utility poles. Who paid for it and placed it in anticipation of this permitted protest?
https://www.facebook.com/TheHill/videos/10155164288944087/
Sure smells of set up
Great must read tweet series. Charlottesville is being sued by ACLU for denying first and 14th amendment rights to Unite the Right. ALso subject to new DOJ civil rights violation investigation and more, links included.
https://twitter.com/ThomasWictor/status/896623195293335552
"Nazis want the government to control who can and can not be married, who can and can not be a citizen (based upon race), and who is and is not deserving of Equal Rights." This means you aren't conservative, you're a liberal.
What happened yesterday in Virginia was not the alt-right, at least not as it is described by people like Bannon and Milo and Breitbart et al.
Yesterday was the alt right infiltrated and co-opted by white supremacists which is too easy to do and why I said earlier that this is a hue disservice and dishonor to our way of thinking.
Essentially the alt right was born of young white conservatives who were tired of the affirmative action rules, we should be paying slave reparations nonsense, the cowtowing kiss assery and snively apologetics to non-whites that we were white. The idea that because we were white it was now our turn to be at the bottom of the heap just because we were white. And that no one was standing up for whites. They believe not that whites are better but that no one is better than the other and all are equal and are not afraid to say so.
Unfortunately this allows white supremacy to work it's vile way in.
Two good pieces: first Milo & Allum Bokhari writing about Breitbart giving the best description yet of the alt right a little over year ago.
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/
And this clip last night from Judge Jeanine interviewing Carol Swain who predicted the rise of this movement 15 years ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7zWQmIAotg
No, it means that, like most Nazis, you don't understand basic political theory.
Soros et al have been trying to attach Bannon and Trump to Richard Spencer via that article ever since.
That it is the original source of the notion that it is racist I agree with.
I'm just not sure the alt right -- the real alt right and not the co-opted one -- is racist.
The problem, though, is that no one, especially the media, will make any differentiation and we (Trump supporters) will ALL get tarred by this.
In the end I am just as confused as you by it. Like the Middle East and Northern Ireland if you think you understand the situation you have no idea what is going on.
One of my first comments on this was to let the White Nationalists "alt-right" and BLM types fight to the bitter end. Destroy each other. Then maybe we can talk.
Love Epa's piece on this today.
Right. I'm not sure the Alt-Right is racist either.
And that is because I am not sure what the Alt-Right is.
Sometimes I think it is simply Non-Globalist Conservatism that is opposed to SJW and Identity Politics.
And then sometimes, I see many racists who are involved in Alt-Right discussion boards and i think, well, maybe the Alt-Right is something other than my original thought.
And then I see the Left trying to pigeon-hole Non-Globalists anti-SJW/Identity politics people as RACISTS and I think, WELL, I CAN'T LET THEM DEFINE THE TERMS, OR ELSE I WILL ALWAYS BE TARRED AS A RACIST, because that is their knee-jerk reaction to anything they don't agree with.
But now, I think I will just do what I did in this article: Tell me what your definitions are and I will tell you whether I agree or not.
I'm not going to play their game anymore.
Pasto,
I am not sure what the Alt-Right is.
Sometimes I think it is simply Non-Globalist Conservatism that is opposed to SJW and Identity Politics.
And then sometimes, I see many racists who are involved in Alt-Right discussion boards and i think, well, maybe the Alt-Right is something other than my original thought.
All of this is headache-inducing for me!
Post a Comment