Tuesday, February 27, 2018

David Hogg's Timeline Is A Little Off, Perhaps?



FWIW...here is a report of an original video of CNN's student prodigy propagandist, David Hogg, allegedly taken during the Parkland H.S. massacre.

It was posted to The Los Angeles Times

http://www.latimes.com/visuals/video/95939817-132.html

Caption under video: "Student David Hogg filmed this video while his Florida high school was on lockdown because of an active shooter on campus Feb. 14. "Thousands of people have died from gun violence and it's time to take a stand," Hogg said, citing the need for stronger gun control laws. Seventeen people were killed in the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. "


ROUGH PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT of 03:48 length video:
David Hogg
Student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School
(whisper) "So, right now we're in school with an active shooter. It's not a drill and it's currently, it's 2:52. I heard gun, heard one gunshot. We thought it was a drill initially, and it's not. (unclear) hopefully....??
Clearly at this point in the video, it is edited with a break - improved, less grainy visual.
(continued)
"At around 2:30 we heard a gunshot in my AP ? science class and we initially thought it was a drill and we heard multiple, we heard more gun shots. And that was when we realized this was not a drill. 
fades and then continues
This was life or death. So, it's now 3:13 and we've heard supposedly it's a senior, not confirmed at all. The senior is believed to be Nik Cruz (and shows photo) - this has not been confirmed. This is the latest information that we have, though. We still believe that the person has been neutralized but we're still currently on lockdown.
Camera focuses on another student,

Isabelle Robinson Student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School
"Um, we're on lockdown because there was an active shooting. We thought it was a fire drill and went outside and then people starting running because there were shots. I didn't hear them personally and then I started running. I really don't think there is anything you could say but there shouldn't have to be because if you looked around this closet and saw everyone just hiding together, you would know that this shouldn't be happening anymore and that it doesn't deserve to happen to anyone and that no amount of money should make it more easily accessible to get guns. Um, and that's that.

Break in video
end of rough partial transcript
continue video at link
--------
Two more video clips with time stamps by David Hogg indicate he was creating his video report before the actual shooter event. The first video states "This is Alex View, this recording is taken at 9:32 on February 14,2018

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK6pLq-6zls

The second video is a clip - allegedly of one of the females in the closet during the active shooter event, elucidating her conversion from 2A supporter to an anti-gun advocate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5w5dxx8mGo


The above link to the LATimes video clearly has edits/cuts from one interview to another...and these two conflict with the time of recordings though claim to originate from Hogg.
He's quite the propagandist.
Imagine identifying the shooter while it's happening or...before during the drill.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5w5dxx8mGo
-------
An LATimes article posted the day after the Parkland massacre features student, David Hogg's video. The article was posted Feb 15, 2018 | 2:46 PM.

Note: Hogg applies his own time stamps to video segments which he states were filmed while he and two female students were sheltering in place in a school closet during the Parkland Valentines Day massacre.

---------------------------------------

The LATimes posts David Hogg's nearly 4 minute long video which begins with David claiming it is 2:52 p.m. He states he "heard" one gun shot. He DOES NOT state that he saw the shooter.
He updates the video at 3:13 p.m. stating he's been updated...by whom?...states the shooter was a senior named Nik Cruz and was neutralized - with the caveat that his information has not been confirmed...again, confirmed by whom?

Also, the day after the shooting, in a Feb.15 2018 NYT report, the shooting arrest record is posted with the following details...
"On Wednesday Feb.14,2018 at approx. 2:23 PM, multiple 911 calls were received..."
Hogg claims it is 2:52 PM when he is in closet.
The NYT published police report also states:
=====>Approximately one hour later, a subject fitting the description of the shooter was contacted at the 1400 block of Windham Lakes Blvd. South, Coral Springs by CS units and identified as Nikolas Cruz W/M DOB: 9/24/98"<=====
So, according to the NYT published police report, 911 calls began at 2:23PM, Hogg begins his report at 2:52PM. The NYT published police report states approximately one hour after the 911 calls began, @ approx. 3:23PM the Coral Springs police locate and identify Cruz.
Yet, somehow at 3:13PM – ten minutes before the Coral Springs Police locate and identify Cruz, Hogg pronounced unconfirmed reports of a neutralized shooter with the identity of Nikolas Cruz.
How is it possible that Hogg knew the police had neutralized Cruz, by name, before the time recorded in the police report?

Also note the two additional clips of Hogg's video tape he has one or two females making gun control statements while sheltering in place during the massacre...that is some remarkably instantaneous community organizing!

One of the female students in Hogg's video is identified as Isabelle Robinson as seen in the LATimes published video clip. A rough transcript of her statement follows:
=====>">"Um, we're on lockdown because there was an active shooting. We thought it was a fire drill and went outside and then people starting running because there were shots. I didn't hear them personally and then I started running. I really don't think there is anything you could say but there shouldn't have to be because if you looked around this closet and saw everyone just hiding together, you would know that this shouldn't be happening anymore and that it doesn't deserve to happen to anyone and that no amount of money should make it more easily accessible to get guns. Um, and that's that."<=====

to be continued
-------
continued from above:
Another voice on a dark screen at 0:22 continues with "spontaneous" anti-gun editorializing - captioned (Student) =====>"I personally have rallied for, you know, gun rights and less control -- not necessarily less control, but this experience has definitely changed my viewpoints. I wanted to be a junior NRA member, I wanted to learn how to hunt, I was always fascinated by guns as a young girl, but this experience was so traumatizing to the point where now I can't even fathom the idea of a gun in my house. I did have plans for my 18th birthday to go to Nexus Gun Range and learn how to shoot, but at this point, I don't even want to be behind a gun. I don't want to be the person behind a bullet, because I don't want to be the person to point a bullet at someone, and to have the bullet pointed at me, my school, my classmates, my teachers, my mentors -- it's just, it's definitely eye-opening to the fact that we need more gun control in our country, because for this to happen, and for people to be so neutralized to it...I even texted my sisters, "Shooting at my school, I am safe." They both responded with, "OMG, LOL, you're funny." Now that's a problem in society, and it's a bigger problem in America, and it needs to be fixed, and I believe the most definite way to fix it is by changing our laws when it comes to gun ownership."<=====

Yet another posting of Hogg’s video to YouTube, culled from WMSD-TV via Storyful ....starts with Hogg asking Isabelle =====>“So, what’s your message?”<===== before Isabelle begins at the 0:51 second mark with =====>“I really don’t think...”<=====
*see partial transcript of the LATimes video for remaining text.
Notice this culled video has an intro question prompting for Isabelle’s message while the LATimes video of the same clip of Isabelle doesn’t include Hogg’s prompt. The LATimes clip instead has Hogg editorializing with his update about shooter being neutralized, a shooter who he hasn’t seen but can identify WITH Cruz’s photo despite Hogg’s caveat
“unconfirmed”. 

******

Note: David Hogg’s father is retired FBI. His mother, Rebecca Boldrick is outspoken about her anti-Trump views ...comments in this Heavy.com link state that Boldrick’s pinterest page states both she and her husband were FBI and now are teachers.
Online suggestions that Boldrick is a CNN VIP are likely not true. These rumors are based on photos of Hogg seated behind the CNN news desk on a “VIP tour”. Turns out the VIP tour is available to anyone
http://tours.cnn.com/# as seen in this screen cap https://i.imgur.com/c69AE5H.jpg
-------
http://www.latimes.com/visuals/video/95939817-132.html
03:48

David Hogg
Student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School
ROUGH PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT:
=====> (whisper) "So, right now we're in school with an active shooter. It's not a drill and it's currently, it's 2:52. I heard gun, heard one gunshot. We thought it was a drill initially, and it's not. (unclear) hopefully....??<=====
Clearly at this point in the video, it is edited with a break - improved, less grainy visual.
(continued)
=====>"At around 2:30 we heard a gunshot in my AP ? science class and we initially thought it was a drill and we heard multiple, we heard more gun shots. And that was when we realized this was not a drill. <=====
fades and then continues
=====> This was life or death. So, it's now 3:13 and we've heard supposedly it's a senior, not confirmed
at all. The senior is believed to be Nik Cruz (and shows photo) - this has not been confirmed. This is the latest information that we have, though. We still believe that the person has been neutralized but we're still currently on lockdown.
<=====
Camera focuses on another student, Isabelle Robinson Student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School
=====>"Um, we're on lockdown because there was an active shooting. We thought it was a fire drill and went outside and then people starting running because there were shots. I didn't hear them personally and then I started running. I really don't think there is anything you could say but there shouldn't have to be because if you looked around this closet and saw everyone just hiding together, you would know that this shouldn't be happening anymore and that it doesn't deserve to happen to anyone and that no amount of money should make it more easily accessible to get guns. Um, and that's that.<=====
Break in video

5 comments:

Pete Rowe said...

Another FBI set up like the Garland "Draw Muhammad" event when the FBI almost got a bunch of people killed.

Pastorius said...

Pete,
I respect your opinion.

Do you really believe the FBI was in on this?

Do you believe the FBI was in on placing Hogg and other spokepeople are ground zero Parkland?

Anonymous said...

Ponder this possibility: Cruz was an FBI set-up who slipped the leash.

Most of the FBI's highly publicized busts of wanna be "terrorists" caught right before the act have been set up, some might say entrapped, by the FBI itself. Bevis and Butthead types found spending significant hours at FBI monitored websites then groomed, supplied, and guided. Then busted and paraded before the cameras. Big headline: "FBI Arrest Trio Just Days Before Planned Attack!"

FBI obviously knew about Cruz. They had been informed on multiple occasions. Perhaps they thought they were going to set him up for a school shooting, then take him down prior to the act, with great fanfare and accolades. But somehow Cruz jumped the gun, slipped his minders, called an UBER, and slaughtered a bunch of children.

Notice how the media has tried to suck all of the oxygen out of the news cycle behind CNN's manufactured Children's Crusade for Gun Control. Notice how the high profile spokesman - and conveniently placed school journalist - of this bunch is FBI (and anti-Trump) connected. Notice that the focus of any actual investigation has been on the Sherriff's Department with barely a mention on the FBI after the first couple days.

Remember, Federal Law Enforcement gave us Fast and Furious. I don't believe it a stretch that they would try to pull something like this. I won't go further here but there are other dots that connect rather neatly to this theory that are worth exploring.

Pastorius said...

Given what we know about Garland, that is a distinct possibility.

Pete Rowe said...

I am just throwing it out there for discussion. Seems that there is a group of folks in the FBI who do not work for the American people and have their own agenda.