tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post3752911710673828311..comments2024-03-28T14:32:19.334+00:00Comments on Who Would Have Believed The Singularity Would Be So Stupid?: The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Has Ruled, Americans Have No Constitutional Right To Carry FirearmsPastoriushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03169561459129778670noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19209018.post-6197025810863916412021-03-25T15:13:45.962+00:002021-03-25T15:13:45.962+00:00The black robes of gov't can suck it.
ALL RIG...The black robes of gov't can suck it.<br /><br />ALL RIGHTS (endowed by our Creator as DECLARED [so we don't have to hem and haw about what our Founders were 'thinking'] in the Declaration of Independence, Para. 1) are Freedoms<br />F R O M [protections against]<br />Our government.<br /><br />Therefore government cannot also be the protector of those rights, nor the arbiter of who/how/what/or where the means of protection of those rights comes about.<br /><br />Further. Our Founders got rid of a bunch of their idiot ay-whole neighbors who needed a job (their "gov't" [England]), but knew the next batch of idiots that needed replacing would be coming along in the not too distant future (on into infinity) so they wrote into the Declaration (Para. 2) 2 x in the flesh language, that you should get rid of all of your idiot ay-whole neighbors who needed a job (your "gov't") "whenever" you deem necessary. One of those times states that it is your "duty" to. <br />They could not have written that, but yet still wanted you to have to ask, that gov't that needed replacing, for the means OR THE PERMISSION TO OBTAIN THE MEANS, to do so. NO f n WAY.<br />LOGICALLY then, the 2nd Amendment demands PARITY of "Arms" (not just guns) with our gov't, and it's not our fault what that parity might entail.<br /><br />Once again, the 9th, and all other black robes, can #NaCL on this, and they better get it straight.<br />Most Likely IIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17547186071763297076noreply@blogger.com