DPW - Here We Go Again!
As many of us have heard, DPW is poised to insert its influence over the operations of 21 (not the six we usually hear about) U.S. ports. The relationship will include, according to DPW's dhimmi Senior Senior Vice President Michael Moore (not THAT Michael Moore!), an obligatory "interface" with security operations.
But wait! There's more!
Dubai is also considering the purchase of Doncasters, a venerable British company, that has subsdiaries in the U.S., Mexico, and the UK. Doncasters' website announces that it manufactures precision components, often in difficult-to-work materials, for its customers.
Its customers include defense contractors such as Boeing, GE, and Pratt-Whitney.There we go! The Panama Canal and the Long Beach deep-water port are "managed" by the Communist Chinese; DPW will soon "manage" many terminals in 21 ports, including those through which military materiel is shipped, and which processes hundreds of thousands of containers. Now DPW is making a move on Doncasters and by extension, defense contractors in the U.S.
Oh, goodie!
But wait, there's more!
Polls indicate (surprise!) a shift towards support for the DPW port deal.
I'm not paranoid, they really ARE against me!
I show that 17% of U.S. likes the deal
ReplyDelete17% of US are OK with DP World deal
do you have anything showing a higher percentage?
inochi,
ReplyDeleteIt looks as if the opposition to the DPW deal is fading fast. It's so dispiriting. People like Bush have sworn an oath to protect and defend and they are doing neither.
Papa Bush made a big deal out of the globalists' "New World Order," and I think it's a hereditory defect. Given 43's actions, there can be no serious doubt that he is one of those "One World" guys - it would sure 'splain a lot. Maybe it would even 'splain everything.
The problem with the big business guys is that instead of dealing with an impartial, fair, hands-off capitalist government, they've had to give Congressmen/Senators and a lot of other corrupt government officials all sorts of pay-offs and kickbacks in order to keep from being targeted by rotten, vindictive legislation.
Most of the businesses, no matter what the political affiliation of their CEOs etc. may be, donate to both parties just to cover their butts.
Eventually, the need for defensive tactics like this make integrity all but impossible; if a business behaves in a principled way, it will bring down the wrath of whichever politician felt "offended."
I wish it weren't so, but it's about the only way that businesses can actually stay in business.