"Disciplined" like a wayward school child, I'm sure they mean. And don't we all know that Iran is purely an innocent victim that's being bullied around by a belligerent Uncle Sam for no reason at all, I tell you, none!US already started World War IV, say experts
PUTRAJAYA: The threat of war on Iran is very real and nuclear weapons will be used, say experts at the Global Peace Forum 2006. They are unanimous in the view that the fourth World War has already started and that the United States should be disciplined for starting a war.
Prof Francis A. Boyle, a scholar in international law and human rights, said there were documents to show that a US attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities was imminent.
“The attack will not start with nuclear weapons, but aerial bombardment,” said Boyle, one of five speakers at the forum organised by the Perdana Leadership Foundation yesterday. “If for some reason things get out of control, they are willing to use tactical nuclear weapons.
“I kid you not, the plans have already been drawn up. It is here in our documentation.”
Ah, the good professor is now an 'expert' on military matters? And I'd love to see their, ahem, 'documentation' or whatever. Dan Rather had 'documentation' too before he got canned from CBS--I mean before he retired. Moving on...
The other speakers were former United Nations assistant secretary-generals Denis Halliday and Hans von Sponeck, nuclear expert Dr Helen Caldicott and University of Ottawa Prof Michel Chossudovsky.It's a veritable who's who of dhimmis and terrorist apologists!
Actually, it's not a 'new' policy...it's always been US policy to use nukes if its allies or interests were attacked with WMDs. But such facts are merely going to muddy up these folks' argument, wouldn't it?Foundation chairman Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (AKA Dr. Moonbat himself--ed.) said there seemed to be a determined move to go to war with Iran.
“That war can be disastrous because now there is a new policy with the US that under certain circumstance they can use nuclear weapons.
“Many of us believe the fourth World War is already on, the third was the Cold War. Although we are free from attacks, there are lots of people who face the possibility of being killed in the war,” he said.I suppose the piles of dead infidels in New York, Bali, London, Madrid, Israel and elsewhere don't count.
"Fake but accurate" records, I'm sure.Dr Caldicott said a war would lead to the bombing of uranium enrichment plants.
“This will scatter uranium all over the Middle East, even reaching Pakistan and India. Uranium can cause cancer of the bone, blood and lungs,” she added.
Chossudovsky denied that the panel was being alarmist, saying that what they had revealed was based on records.
That could be classified as "The pressure is on them now". Good news.
ReplyDeleteNo, no, really, there is documentation, written in George Bush's own hand. The documents says, "We must use nukes on Iran. The Jews told me to do it."
ReplyDeleteThe United States and NATO have always agreed to the use of tactical nukes to prevent Europe from being overrun by the Soviets and their overwhelming numerical superiority. That was the prime reason why the USSR never invaded Western Europe and sought to expand their infusions through proxy wars on their periphery.
ReplyDeleteOur enemies should also understand that the US is the only nation in history to use nukes in anger. We’ve already crossed that boundary. Making the decision again if we feel our survival is threatened would not be hard to do.
I'm going to start keeping track of how many times you use the word "moonbat".
ReplyDeleteThere will be military contingency planning done involving the use of nukes. These plans must exist. Not to do so would be a failure on the part of the armed forces, the decision on what if any plan to use is a matter for the civillian politicians.
ReplyDeleteTo the military a nuke is a really good and effective explosive device. Only to a politician is it a doom bringing instrument of mass destruction that will announce the arrival of the apocalypse.
The military's job is to present options to the national command authority, not to advocate any. I think someone's been watching too many Hollywood leftist yarns again.
ReplyDeleteWhoever said that "to the US military, nukes are just nifty explosive devices" is so far out of it, and so completely ignorant of the truth, I don't know where to begin. Nothing could be further from the truth. The US military places the nation's nuclear assets behind exhaustive safeguards, using codes, procedural failsafes, and mind boggling amounts of security. It's a level of security that mere conventional assets don't warrant and don't have.
No human devised system is perfect, but the nuclear safeguards that have been in place since 1945 have (so far) a perfect record.
At least they got the war part right. It started on September 11, 2001.
ReplyDeleteI don't expect to live long enough to see it finished.