Iraq better off under Saddam, says Blix
Former United Nations chief weapons inspector Hans Blix on Wednesday described the United States-led invasion of Iraq as a "pure failure" that had left the country worse off than under the rule of Saddam Hussein.In unusually harsh comments to Danish newspaper Politiken, the diplomatic Swede said the US government had ended up in a situation in which neither staying nor leaving Iraq were good options.
"Iraq is a pure failure," Blix was quoted as saying. "If the Americans pull out, there is a risk that they will leave a country in civil war. At the same time, it doesn't seem that the United States can help to stabilise the situation by staying there."Blix said the situation would have been better if the war had not taken place.
"Saddam would still have been sitting in office. Okay, that is negative and it would not have been joyful for the Iraqi people. But what we have gotten is undoubtedly worse," he was quoted as saying.
Blix led the UN inspectors that searched for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before the US-led invasion in 2003. He came under heavy fire from Washington when he urged US President George Bush to allow the weapons inspectors and the International Atomic Energy Agency to continue their work as a way to stave off a war.
Imagine if someone like this had been a world leader in 1942.
"Yes Hitler would still be in his office, and that would be somewhat unpleasant for those hebes, homos, retards, and gypsies, but look at all the dead now !"
Great article. I love your blog. Count me as one of your allies!
ReplyDeleteHeard standing at the lines at Sam's Club gas pumps last summer many times....(in a blue state)...'why don't we just TAKE ALL THE OIL, they hate us and want to kill us anyway?'
ReplyDeleteIt has a certain attractiveness in a perversely satisfying way, doesn't it?
One word describes Blix:
ReplyDeleteSlithering Treacherous Pusillanimous Dhimmi