Pages

Saturday, November 04, 2006

The Infidel Bloggers Alliance "Uncovered Meat" Contest

In honor of the Australian Imam who, the other day, proclaimed that women who do not wear the veil are like "uncovered meat", and thus deserve to be raped, we here at IBA have decided that it would be prudent, at this juncture, to celebrate our Western freedoms.

Therefore, we introduce The Infidel Bloggers Alliance "Uncovered Meat" Contest.

Send in photos of your wives or girlfriends in various stages of undress. Or, if you are a babe, just set up the camera and time it to stike a pose. Keep them relatively clean, but make sure that there is plenty of carne visible. We need to judge the quality of the victuals.

Submission #1 "REDACTED" (You can try calling on the Freedom of Information Act, but I don't think it will help.)

(Thanks to Pim's Ghost for coming up with this great idea. She tells me she is going to submit a photo of herself. Now, that's the kind of female submission we Infidels like to see.)

Submission #2: Pim's legs. Wowzers.









Submission #3: Amber's boot and fishnet fetish photo. This ought to get us some interesting google searches.
















Submission #4: Bequila's Naughty Niqab.

21 comments:

  1. Thanks for providing some context for the photo. I thought that girl, like me so often, was searching for a lost contact lens. Now that I know what's going on I'll send az photo of my nekked self. Just as soon as I find my contact lens.

    ReplyDelete
  2. OT
    I have tried to send mail to ibloga(at)hotmail.com twice recently and have had it returned with
    ibloga(at)hotmail.com
    SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:ibloga(at)hotmail.com>:
    host mx1.hotmail.com [65.54.245.8]: 550 Requested action not taken:
    mailbox unavailable
    cheers
    Paul

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dag,
    That could be what is happening here. I have no idea. If so, then I would be more than willing to get down on the ground and help her.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No lost lens.

    She was simply posing for her favorite photographer.

    I sure do love photography!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Damn,it ain't only that we fear muhammedans for that kind of exposure! You know what would happen if I sent that photo? Let's just say, my better half wouldn't be quite so understandin and all . . . you get the picture?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ack, now the pressure is on. I can't compete with anything shot by JoeC. I will send in some legs, unless Joe wants to take a road trip to do some extra photo shoots.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If you look carefully you can just barely see her left testicle sticking out of her bikini.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think Anonymous is conflicted. Dude, do those look like the legs of the guys you date?

    ReplyDelete
  9. PG,
    You most certainly do compete with this photo. Make your subission.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I thought about photo-shopping her bikini tie out of the pic, anonymous.

    Butt it goes against my ethics.

    Post it like you take it.

    The 1 meg full size pic can be seen in my
    Thong archives.

    Come on PG, submit your picture! It will help prevent submission in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Is that Grace Park? mmmmm, Boomer/Athena

    ReplyDelete
  12. I have a feeling Pamela would object to this contest.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Unless I can dig up a 30-year-old snapshot of me in that lacy crochet bikini I am SO not going anywhere near this...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Oh God, Revere Rides Again, I sure do hope you find that photo.

    Yes!

    ReplyDelete
  15. You better believe it. I spent about 3 summers with a flower-patterned tan on my a$$.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Revere--my poin t was to reveal any part of you that you find sexy, that would "provoke" men to these uncontrollable feelings. To protest against this Imam in Australia. To say, "Oh yeah? WE are the ones forcing the men and inciting them to rape?!?!"

    I was thinking of things as simple as a nice black and white shot of hands on feet even. Paint your toenails and take a pic. The nape of a neck. Anything. Anything in protest. And anything wives would do for it.

    The point for me is rather to not have it seem quite so much like a home-made porn contest. And why not old pics? Heck, if I REALLY wanted to be nasty about protesting this I'd put a teen pic up just for the sake of Mo's thing for younger chicks!!

    But I almost think that a parade of close-ups on different parts of the female body would work better. Sorry guys, I know that's not what you want to hear. But let's face it, we're talking about a man and his followers who consider an exposed ANKLE to be too provocative. It needn't be anywhere as exposed as JoeC's pics (no offense meant Joe, I love em). Just stating my intention when I came up with the idea. I was going to do it on my blog just to be ornery, actually!

    ReplyDelete
  17. RevereRidesAgain,
    That definately qualifies as "Uncovered Meat."

    ReplyDelete
  18. PG,
    I'm definately in for fetishizing various parts of the female body.

    And, if someone puts just their feet on here, our google search hits will go way way up.

    ReplyDelete
  19. No offense taken, PG.

    I actually shoot and use pictures of that type all the time.

    For example, this picture
    was used just yesterday.

    I think a good mix is a fine idea, but thats just me.

    The bikini picture IS a bit racier than I usually post. However, at no point in time would it occur to me that this beautiful
    woman should be treated with anything other than respect.

    The close-up shots, or specific shots are a great idea, as is the full shot format.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Here is my imput. Brought back my "Banned in Pakistan" side-blog just for it. Peas be upon you.

    She isn't my wife or girlfriend - but is welcome to apply.

    ReplyDelete