Reid says U.S. strike on Iran would be destabilizing

Isn't that the point, you moron?

Yes, Harry, what we want is a stable set of enemies to america, it's people and allies because then we are all safer.
Are they taking X before voting in Nevada?

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid rejected on Monday another prominent senator's call for a military strike against Iran, saying a U.S. attack would destabilize the Middle East.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut and chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, said over the weekend the United States should be prepared to use military force to stop Iran from training and equipping Iraqi militants blamed for the deaths of U.S. troops in Iraq.

Of course if correct this report means that Iraq is now Vietnam complete with safe havens for the enemies of our men. If this campaing is worth fighting then we should be prepared to WIN. Otherwise we have no business there. It's that's simple.

Iran has denied supplying Iraqis with armor-piercing munitions and U.S. officials say they cannot prove complicity on the part of the Tehran government. But Lieberman, appearing on CBS' Sunday program "Face the Nation," said the United States had "good evidence" that Iraqis were being trained to use the weapons at a camp inside Iran. He advocated a military strike in retaliation, saying much of the job could be done with air strikes.

Continue reading "Reid says U.S. strike on Iran would be destabilizing" »

Pastorius adds: I hope Epa won't mind that I cut in here. Everyone's gotta see Dennis Miller's verbal castration of Harry Reid. It's painful to watch a man publicly humiliated in such a manner, but it's necessary that pussies be exposed for what they are in a time of war.