Plaintiff Phil J. Berg filed two motions today seeking an expedited resolution in Berg v. Obama. (PDF's of the motions are attached below.)
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
This motion argues that the facts have been established that Barack Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be elected or serve as President of the United States, and that the Court should issue a summary judgment as follows:
That Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen.
That he is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States.
That the Democratic National Committee be enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot.
That the Democratic National Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency.
That Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States.
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION REQUESTING AN EXPEDITED RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This motion requests that the court:
Grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
Order that Defendants Response to Plaintiff=s Motion is to be filed and served upon Plaintiff by a specified date.
Order that a Ruling, Hearing and/or Resolution be set for a specific date
Obamacrimes.com
The other day, I was discussing this Berg case with a friend, who said, "If Obama is found not to be qualified for the office of President, he'll have to step down."
ReplyDeleteMy reply: "I doubt it. I wouldn't be surprised that a Constitutional amendment will be passed so as to accommodate Obama."
Sound farfetched? Maybe. Then again...
It appears the Democrats tried to change the “natural-born citizens” requirement for the President twice recently. The first one was introduced by Conyers on September 3, 2003. The second one introduced by SNYDER and SHAY.
ReplyDeleteProposing an amendment an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit persons who are not natural-born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 20 years, to be eligible to hold the Office
of President IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. CONYERS (muslim advocate) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit persons who are not natural-born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 20 years, to be eligible to hold the Office of President. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (twothirds of each House concurring therein)
SECTION 1. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
The following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
States:
`Article — A person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years shall be eligible to hold the Office of President.’.
109th CONGRESS 1st Session H. J. RES. 42
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit persons who are not natural -born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of President and Vice President.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 14, 2005
Mr. SNYDER (for himself and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit persons who are not natural -born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of President and Vice President.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States after the date of its submission for ratification:
Philip Berg will be my guest on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com Tuesday October 28 at 5 PM New York time.
ReplyDeletePlease go to www.garybaumgarten.com and click on the Join The Show link to talk to him.
Thanks.
Do me a favor, please? When you have Mr. Berg on line there, ask him if he'd tell us when exactly he was the Democratic Candidate for PA Governor? Some say that it was against Bob Casey (who later lost to Rendell) but, I cannot confirm. It's not that I don't believe him I merely can't find any record of him being so.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I am curious how he can be seen as the darling of the conservative right after he filed a RICO lawsuit against Bush and Cheney over 9/11? Wasn't that a terrible waste of legal/Court system resources? Or that, when this story about Obama first made rounds in the press back in August, it was seen by many on the right and left, as nothing but a ploy to sway the Dems towards nominating that Hillary chick. I'm just confused as to where this guy stands in his own party let alone the GOP.