"it is in the interests of the United States to engage with all parties that are peaceful, and committed to non-violence”

Huma Abedin’s boss:Hillary Clinton.

This post inspired by THIS, naive and truly stupid Stanley Baldwinesque gathering of gobbling gabble .. ending in meaning platitudes.

The focus of U.S. policy should be on assisting the process of economic and political reform to provide the foundation for strong, accountable, and transparent institutions-not on selecting the people who should run them.

Once upon a time, the Muslim Brotherhood, INDIVISIBLE from HAMAS, was recognized for what it was, as academic professional, NEUTRAL historic research confirmed it to be. Today, the wishful thinking of an exhausted, nearly desperate, progressive POLITICAL CLASS hoping against hope, that another Iran is not in the making, unable to recognize itself in the unconstitutional Libyan mission’s mirror, is controlled by their own lack of fortitude in failing to - at a minimum - TELLING THE TRUTH about the history, nature, and goals of the group whose goal is Allah and whose mission is to end any other religious ascendance, or any political ascendance which is not in line with Shariah.

The minions which NEED to support this progressive government insist the wolf is now a cocker spaniel. THEY MUST.

The progressive pundits MUST find or invent the tortuous logic to justify this government’s JIMMY CARTER ON CRACK actions or lack of.

There is no doubt that US influence is IRRELEVANT except as a negative force in the middle east (except, until this president, one nation). But the reason for this is NOT because we supported people in Egypt because they made and tried to keep peace with our only true ally. The reason is a compelling religious requirement of the EGYPTIAN PEOPLE regarding that ally, and all who DISDAIN THEIR RELIGIOUS/POLITICAL IMPERATIVE.

Just look at Pakistan, fools.

It is THUS in the interest of the United States, Mrs. Clinton, to exhibit a malignant, nearly militant DISREGARD toward all imperative religious parties ascending to potential power in other nations as a clear, unmistakable, non negotiable principle of foreign policy.

What the Egyptian people select is CERTAINLY up to them, and is, given the religious imperatives and desires of the people there probably well beyond our ability to influence, except to drive in the opposite direction of anything we seek.

But as someone once said, ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.

Unintended ones.