Millions of Americans at home and abroad will celebrate Independence Day come Monday, the fourth of July. That doesn’t mean, however, that fourth of July is actually Independence Day. Or that it should be.Ugh. This man is so shameless with the starting line, and doesn't get much better as it goes on. While it's true that the declaration of independence from Britain was on the 2nd, and the first celebration was a week after, Belonsky seems more intent on attacking the celebration, and goes on to say:
Even back in the revolutionary days, when the colonies were still euphoric over the news, Independence Day was an arbitrary affair, being celebrated willy-nilly with no unified plan: in 1779, for example, the 4th was on a Sunday, and the burgeoning nation celebrated on the 5th of July, not the 4th we all hold near and dear.I don't comprehend this. It sounds to me more like he's distorting everything, to sound more as though Americans shouldn't respect the laws created to help declare their independence from Britain. What is he saying, that nobody even appreciated George Washington, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, who went on to become America's first presidents?
That’s because, unlike today, the revolutionaries weren’t bogged down by the Declaration. They were celebrating not the act of independence, but the idea.
And after presenting the writings of Pauline Maier, he says that she:
...provides a road map for how we should treat Independence Day in the 21st Century: it’s not simply that we declared our freedom from colonial rule, it’s that we created an entirely new system of government, one that has inspired liberation struggles from the French Revolution to the anti-Apartheid movement in South Africa to this year’s Arab Spring.Okay, when he starts using the "Arab spring" as a comparison, that's when he stumbles. Because the one in Egypt, if anywhere, is not so much a wish for independence if all that results is the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, which has recently been working on anti-semitic films too (via Europe News). And with savages like these in Egypt, how can they truly be springing if they hang onto those backwards ways?
Independence Day isn’t simply about us, the United States, but about universal ideals that should be celebrated on a daily basis, not simply the fourth of July.
And is he suggesting some kind of multi-culti alternative to the 4th?!? If he is, it figures someone like him would be so shameless to suggest America's Independence Day should be "merged" with everything else instead of being able to stand on its own. All that would do is take away all meaning, and nobody would know where certain positive ideals came from.
It's a real shame, but no surprise, that there are some leftists out there who'd try to shamelessly and subtly spoil everything, but that's the way the left has become today.
Update: Lee Edwards on Big Peace asks why liberals detest the holiday.
Ok, as any school kid paying attention would --scratch that -- should know, July 2nd is the day the Continental Congress voted for Independence, July 4th the day they adopted the document that made it so.
ReplyDeleteAs for when t was signed even that is up for debate. Broadsides were printed and sent about to be sure, but many believe that not all the signers were even there on the Fourth and were slipping in and out of Philly all summer long (keeping in mind their was now a price on their heads and a noose waiting fro them in England).
And then how should Independence Day be celebrated?
"The Second Day of July 1776, will be the most memorable Epocha, in the History of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated, by succeeding Generations, as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more."
-- John Adams To Abigail Adams July 3, 1776
The liberals have come out of the educational system with a "revised" American history. Maybe this is where we can beat them. We should emphasize early American history. Liberals don’t know that to celebrate on a Sunday would have been unacceptable because everyone preferred to go to church.
ReplyDelete"It was wonderful to see the change soon made in the manners of our inhabitants...From being thoughtless or indifferent about religion, it seemed as if all the world were growing religious, so that one could not walk through the town in an evening without hearing psalms sung in different families of every street."
- Benjamin Franklin, Philadelphia, 1730's, on the effects of George Whitefield's preaching
Here are the words of one of their favorite "unbelieving" founding fathers.
ReplyDelete"To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense he wished any one to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others."
- Thomas Jefferson