The death of Osama bin Laden

I theorize that Osama Bin Laden was ultimately killed because he wasn’t going to play along with the master plan designed by the Muslim Brotherhood decades ago. The United States knew where Osama was for several years prior to his assassination in Pakistan and did nothing about it, until it became paramount to kill him to further their plans for the further toppling of Middle Eastern countries by dethroning leaders in Syria, just as they have blatantly and openly done in Iraq, Egypt and Libya. Osama wanted to do this with his own people, devout Muslims, just as he had offered to defend Saudi Arabia during the first Persian Gulf War with his al Qaeda force around twenty years ago. Instead Saudi Arabia had chosen the US for its protection which really upset Osama Bin Laden as he wanted absolutely nothing to do with the US as an ally, having learned his lessons about dealing with the US Intelligence apparatus in Afghanistan in the early 80’s. He hated the west.

The killing of Osama Bin Laden became necessary as he was going to cause serious problems for the Muslim Brotherhood and Barack Hussein Obama. His killing was to settle the problem in the al Qaeda ranks since al Qaeda is the useful tool of the United States and the Muslim Brotherhood and only as long as al Qaeda operates according to the rules set forth by their masters. This is why there has been no al Qaeda sanctioned attacks in this country since 9/11. Al Qaeda is on our payroll overseas as rebels in countries we want to topple. Look at the photos. Pay attention. 

Building the Islamic Caliphate

In the building of the Islamic Caliphate, the Muslim Brotherhood has chosen to use the United States as useful idiots, under the leadership of their own Manchurian candidate Barack Hussein Obama to topple leaders in the Middle East. Osama Bin Laden would have and obviously did object vehemently to this idea as he hated the United States and their allies within the non-Muslim western world. So Osama Bin Laden was finally taken out, which should have happened years before and for different reasons other than he was the thorn in the Muslim Brotherhoods side and his charismatic leadership was creating a huge divide in their plans to topple leaders using the United States and NATO to do it.

This issue of the United States, under the direction of Muslim-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama interfering in Middle East politics is causing a huge riff in the ranks of al Qaeda, much more than most terrorist groups in the region.

The leaders in these countries that have been toppled primarily in Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya and soon Syria were bad guys, granted, but they kept the Islamic militant terrorist types under control with the exception of Afghanistan who had no control over militant Muslims within their borders. These leaders were what I would deem as the lesser of the two evils i.e. dictators that controlled the dangerous Islamic elements in their countries as opposed to Muslim Brotherhood who is promoting the dangerous ones and building an Islamic Caliphate, a central control of all things Muslim and ultimately will attack Israel. These leaders also would not have wanted to lose their power or sovereignty to a conglomerate of Islamic countries under one rule, surrendering their rule or dictatorships. So they had to be removed. And amazingly, the US and NATO are using al Qaeda in each instance to bring this about.

What about Iran?

Once Syria is toppled, the western powers, primarily the United States will be in a position to topple a few more countries such as Pakistan or less likely candidates such as Jordan and Saudi Arabia (since they are New World Order friendly). At that time the decision will be to attack Iran and destroy the Iranian leadership as they are the only Islamic state standing in the way of the New World Order. The US has military air bases in Afghanistan and Iraq which puts us in striking range easily of Iran and if we topple Syria and have a military ground presence there, courtesy of the Muslim Brotherhood, everything that is needed to successfully attack Iran or have the upper hand on Iran is finally in place which will result in an ultimatum to Iran. The UN (a/k/a NWO) and the US with NATO could possibly then push Iran into accepting their terms or face total destruction.

This is the tricky part. Since this is all part of bringing the world under one government eventually, one control, under the New World Order, then bringing all of the Muslim countries united under one umbrella is necessary in order to implement this New World Order later date. Iran is a different phenomenon unto itself as the leaders in Iran consider themselves to be the Islamic authority in all matters Islam and firmly believe that the world should indeed be under one rule that rule being Islam with no exceptions. This is not a guarded secret or even a theory as they have made it quite known.

The question will be- Will Iran go along with western demands or have to be brought down by military force in order to complete the concept of an Islamic Caliphate which is how the NWO designers can reel in that part of the world? The Islamic Caliphate is only a concept at best because eventually it too would have to submit to the New World Order. However, if there is only one ruler in the Middle East, the ruler of said Caliphate, it will be much easier to bring all the Muslims under this New World Order umbrella as they are used to being told what to do in every aspect of their lives anyway. If the top Imam or whoever the top cleric ruler at that time says it is to be, the Muslim population will submit as their religion is one of total submission as dictated to them by their religious leaders.

There are other monkey wrenches in the plans of the New World Order; one might be Israel and the possibility that they may attack Iran at any time with or without the west’s permission. Israel is just watching right now, waiting to see what happens next. If I were a leader in Israel, I’d be very concerned about these country’s leaders being toppled and the Muslim Brotherhood making their way into power.