Pages

Thursday, March 05, 2015

UPDATED --- About Hillary's Private Email Server Built to Erase Messages (But Not For Security) ... Yeah, You Guessed It, It's Owned By a Muslim Company

The Demons Aren't Protecting Me Anymore

First, there's this:

Clinton’s E-Mail System Built For Privacy Not Security, Along With The Ability To Erase Messages Completely

AND THEN THERE'S THIS:
To summarize: according to DomainTools.com, the domain clintonemail.com has been hosted by Confluence Networks since 12/22/2011, more than three years. Confluence Networks, based out of the British Virgin Islands, has only existed as a domain (confluence-networks.com) since April 2011, appears to be closely related to a Dubai-based media advertising firm, and has always had its domain name managed by PrivacyProtect.org, a registration privacy firm that lists addresses out of Luxembourg and Australia, but gives a phone number apparently out of Denmark, and that shows up repeatedly in connection with fraud, scam, and spam-related domains. 
No, no questions or issues there.
UPDATES ---

You think by any chance Huma would use the same E Mail server?

My guess is negotiations over what I will call "The Huma Initiative" were the reason for this Private Server.

-----


Tie this in with the essays "The Betrayal Papers" over at Gates of Vienna...RICO and TREASON are the first words that come to mind...unfathonable treason which Jekyll Islanders couldn't achieve alone, may actually succeed with Muslim Brotherhood tactics.

-----

22 comments:

  1. This is should finish off Hillary's chances to run for POTUS in 2016. But will that finishing off really happen? The Clintons always squirm out of accountability.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tie this in with the essays "The Betrayal Papers" over at Gates of Vienna...RICO and TREASON are the first words that come to mind...unfathonable treason which Jekyll Islanders couldn't achieve alone, may actually succeed with Muslim Brotherhood tactics.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You think by any chance Huma would use the same E Mail server?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Source: Obama counsel not aware of Clinton's email practice.

    Obama warms up the bus ...Hillary to be latest shoved under it?
    Read more at http://www.wral.com/clinton-emails-inject-obama-s-administration-into-2016-fray/14491676/#WkA1Ot7Gr1GGeGwo.99

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, Will, my guess is the Huma Initiative was the reason for these Servers in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Politico: Hillary Clinton Breaks Silence On Email Controversy. (Politico photo suggests she is not looking as polished these days)

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is starting to get interesting. Let us see her squirm out of this one.

    ReplyDelete
  8. “I want the public to see my email,” she tweeted after spending the night at a gala for her family’s foundation. “I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/hillary-clinton-breaks-silence-on-email-controversy-115783.html

    *****
    vs. Hillary's bluff

    Hillary's Emails From a Government Insider...
    "I work for the G. I work in the Office of the Executive Secretariat in a SMALL government agency. I'm sure many people are coming forward claiming some kind of insider knowledge, but trust me when I tell you that (low level that I was) I was one of 4 people in my agency with access to our Administrator's emails. I went through every day and sorted the emails with a color code.

    Here's the thing; our Administrator, in our puny agency, averaged over 250 incoming emails each and every single day, 365 days per year.

    If I read correctly, Hillary has THIRTY-SEVEN!!!!!! per day (55,000 divided by four years). "

    ReplyDelete
  9. via UKDailyMail:

    "A security expert who spoke to Bloomberg News warned that in maintaining her own server, Clinton retains the power to wipe all her data without a trace.
    You erase it and everything’s gone,' Matt Devost, the president & CEO of global cybersecurity firm FusionX, said.

    Another expert, threat intelligence analyst Alex McGeorge told Bloomberg that Clinton's encryption system was misconfigured and could be hacked.
    "

    ...
    "Cause of Action, a conservative watchdog group, accused Clinton on Thursday of 'selectively' turning over her correspondence to State, which it said is 'disingenuous and entirely inadequate.'

    Clinton's request that State make public her emails 'does nothing to address the key questions of whether official communications were deleted or whether sensitive classified information was put at risk,' the group's executive director, Dan Epstein, said in a statement.

    'Americans deserve a full investigation into whether evidence exists that official communications weren't being reported for public records, but there may be no way to know for sure,' Epstein said.

    'This is exactly why this kind of behavior is against the law. It belies the spirit of openness and transparency in government. It keeps the public in the dark, and it raises serious national security concerns.'

    ReplyDelete
  10. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3264012/posts?page=74#74

    “...There are several email addresses associated with Abedin’s name in records maintained by Lexis-Nexis; one of them is huma@clintonemail.com. An email sent to that address today went through without bouncing. ...”

    ReplyDelete
  11. is [Hillary]leaking all these controversies to give herself cover when she declares her non-candidacy, with which the left-wing media are feverishly cooperating? So what's her plan instead of elective politics? Same as it has always been: money. She has opened her coffers to foreign donations for one simple reason: she wants the money, the more the better.

    Hillary will not run for president in 2016 and never intended to. And when she surveys the rubble and wreckage President Obama and she have wrought in his first term, worsened since then, she is glad to have millions of dollars to retire from elective politics and get on with the senior stateswoman act, which will have it's own financial rewards.

    ReplyDelete
  12. After reading several threads on Hillary's e-mail controversy, it does appear that 'the-powers-that-be' have decided they want Hillary to bow out of 2016 presidential election bid.


    Several articles mention Elizabeth Warren as the 'chosen' one to succeed Obama.

    So, why Warren? It's certainly not based on any achievements or charisma - political or otherwise - on Warren's part. I'd venture a guess that Warren is an easier push-over than Hillary.

    Given the extensive infiltration of Muslim Brotherhood operatives/interests (see Betrayal Papers, Part 3 of 5), a Warren candidacy eliminates many political issues/connections/decades of political experience a Clinton candidacy would pose.

    Of all the potential candidates the dems could position, the Clintons are most formidable.

    Push them out of the way now and any other candidate will be easier to manipulate/eliminate to further entrench the enemy within.

    Should Warren manage to take the dem nomination, anticipate a Muslim (Keith Ellison) or Islamophile to be her running mate...perhaps even Michelle Obama...then expect she will meet with a most unfortunate accident...thrusting the power of the oval office into the lap of yet another muslim brotherhood sympathizer or operative.

    ReplyDelete