First we are supposing that the wikileaks emails etc are TRUE, and I think they are because if you listen you cannot find ANY democratic party human or anumal who has been questioned about what they said who has responded to say the information is FALSE and their emails forged. Of course, maybe they erased all their mails now so they can’t compare, but the non denial and the attitude that the emails are irrelevant since they are stolen is at odds with the reality expressed in some.
Such as Donna Brazile’s email in which, well, in Feb …and in PRIVATE to Podesta
“I think people are more in despair about how things are—yes new jobs but they are low wage jobs. HOUSING is a huge issue. Most people pay half of what they make to rent.”
In July and in public:
“15 million new private-sector jobs, 20 million people now have health care and the auto industry just had its best year ever.”
It’s this PURPOSEFUL DECEPTION OF THE VOTER which has been revealed by wikileaks.
Had there been no systematic, left to right, and top to bottom deception, then there would be no emails leaked of any value to anyone.
More, by engaging in a deception so broad and deep it ENABLED the Russians, if that’s who the hackers are, to be the dispensers of truth.
THAT’S the real issue.
I have not see anything like this since the days of early Vietnam. The complete lie of the Gulf of Tonkin, the body counts, the lies over progress, until one fine day in 68-69 too many of the people suddenly realized they were getting more reality about the actual events from the propaganda arms of the Viet Cong and NVA than LBJ and Nixon. Then it was all confirmed in 1971 with the publishing of the pentagon papers.
But’s let’s be clear. As we sit today amid a MASSIVE DDOS attack on the American DNS infrastructure, if this is some dry run to attack the US election in any way, IT WILL BE AN ACT OF WAR, and Obama should be making this clear.
NOW.
A good analogy to the Vietnam War deceptions.
ReplyDeleteBig difference today is that the democrats are telling their voters that the material is suspect because it was "stolen" and their voters are buying it.
When the PP were unveiled the democrat voters believed every word and even blamed the deception on Nixon who had nothing to do with it.
I really doubt the Russians are responsible. It sounds like a riff on Hillary's VRWC: blame Russians and tie them to Trump. But Hillary has far closer ties to Russia than Trump does. She actually brokered the uranium deal with Moscow while Trump has done little more than seemingly regard Putin as a capital fellow and a man he could deal with.
I'm more inclined at this juncture to believe the leaks are coming from that part of the "deep state" that fears a Hillary presidency. She screeched the other night that all 17 US intelligence agencies have been comprised by Russia (why the hell do we have 17 intelligence agencies, how smart is that?). That seems like a task beyond the capabilities of even the Russians and, if true, the logical question should be: how fast can we get off line and go back to paper?
Following up on what the above commenter said, Hillary was Sec of State when Obama promised Putin more flexibility.
ReplyDeleteHillary and Obama must have let Putin down somehow, because he truly hates them now. I have always suspected his hatred is born of the kind of contempt for a weak enemy that is inspired in very macho men. It could be, however, that they deceived him, but if they did, it is likely their deception was not a brilliant strategic bluff, but an outright and pussified lie.
Still, as the above commenter above said, I don't think there is any evidence this was "the Russians."
And, what if it was? Here's another important question. If it was the Russians, surely, as Sec of State, HIllary ought to have known the Russians would be up to some pretty tricky espionage. That is their history. She was SecSTate. And yet, she used this lame private server?
How irresponsible is that? Try explaining your stupidity to the American people Hillary.
Instead, she attempts to make Trump look like he's in collusion with our enemies.
She is the enemy.
"Hillary and Obama must have let Putin down somehow, because he truly hates them now."
ReplyDeleteUkraine. Doing the bidding of the EU. Moving NATO ever closer to mother Russia. Destabilizing the ME from the "revolution for the hell of it" handbook. It's Russia's backyard, we can always leave our mess and go home. They live there and have to live with the consequences of our actions. A series of truly thoughtless provocations.
As Putin once asked at the UN: "Do you understand now, what you have done?" No they don't and they won't. President Peace Prize will ultimately be responsible for a whole lot more unnecessary mayhem. Sooner rather than later.