Rollins Muslim Professor who suspended Christian student defended Jew-hatred and aided lover In radicalizing kids

Areej Zufari - Rollins Professor and former director of communications and media for the Islamic Society of Central Florida

From the Central Florida Post:

Middle Eastern & Muslim Humanities(WTF?) Professor Areej Zufari’s past includes allegations of radicalizing her lover’s two sons, fundraising for a man connected to the WTC bombing in 1993, and defending “Death To All Jews” statements. 

On Saturday, the Central Florida Post reported on the suspension of Rollins College student Marshall Polston, who clashed with Professor Zufari over radical hate speech uttered by another student during class. 

Polston says that (he) was responding to a question posed about how Sharia Law should be interpreted. 

“He said it should be followed to the letter. Whatever punishment was just for anything from homosexuality to stealing, it was to be followed and interpreted as such. It was very concerning to hear,” reiterated Polston. 

Weeks before this incident, Zufari had given Polston a failing grade without explanation, after the two disagreed over Zufari proclaiming during the first class that the Crucifixion of Christ was a hoax… as was the idea that Jesus’s disciples did not think he was “divine.” 

Polston reached out and demanded an explanation from the professor, but she instead reported him to the Dean of Safety for making her feel “unsafe.” 

The straight-A student would ultimately be suspended on March 24th and then face outlandish allegations by Zufari, later that day. 

She accused him of skulking around in the brush outside the classroom, but video surveillance from a Dr. Phillips restaurant and neighborhood gate cameras prove Polston was nowhere near the school at the time. 

Now the Central Florida Post has uncovered a lawsuit filed in Orange County, FL in 2007 that contains bombshell allegations against Zufari and provide insight into her radical Wahhabi leanings. 

SEE THE LAWSUIT

AND THEN THERE'S THIS, FROM THE LAST ENGLISH PRINCE:

Rollins College: Denial of Rights for Fair Representation 

Rollins College has both a legal and a public image problem. The student requires vigorous advocacy against a professor engaged in jihad of the tongue. 

Perhaps you are paying for jihad indoctrination on your child’s college campus? If your progeny expresses a concern, listen to them carefully. And then take it a step further. 

If able to do so, attend class with them. You are paying for education and not indoctrination. This goes for other ideologies too beyond that of the Islamic jurisprudence. 

Islam is a code of conduct and law. Within the code are religious duties. But do not confuse the order of operations regarding Islam. 

Islam is law: Submission to the law of a foreign god named Allah. 

He is foreign to the JudeoChristian tradition. The law dictates family court applications, economic allowances, Hadd penalties (the rights of Allah over man), government structure and Hizbah (maintenance of public order). 

The law also dictates Ibaadah – the manner of proper worship, and conversely, what qualifies for idol worship. 

Religion is also a law. 

Religion is not a freedom. It is bound by law. 

Democracy binds religion to human spirit. Therein, lies the difference. 

Islam is a law with applications in opposition to principles of Democracy. Until we are willing to express the same and express it clearly the ship of state will continue to flounder upon the rocks of Islam. Islam shipwrecks Democracy. 

Practice saying it with me. “I do not hate Muslims. But Islam is not a religion. It is a code of law. This code of law is not compatible with the core principles of Democracy which are human liberty and free moral agency. Therefore, I resist the seduction of Islam.”

Pastorius cutting in here:

I am not clear on what The Last English Prince means by

"Religion is not a freedom. It is bound by law."

In my opinion, that is a clear contradiction to the First Amendment of the Constitution - unless TLEP is making some fine distinction that I am not understanding.