All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Title of this post "I'll follow you into the dark" seems appropriate for this off topic set of linked stories. First, from American Thinker, an intro into the second by Daniel Greenfield:
NYPost: Did Hillary’s rigging at the DNC push Biden out of the race? DNC rigging kept out Biden. Obama wouldn't back him because Hillary paid off his DNC debts. ***** Oh...and just by the way....Donna Brazile did not support Hillary during the primaries...as illustrated in this video clip here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPbG4y4B3qE
Internet researcher Katica (Twitter GOPollAnalyst) may have found the hidden thread that unravels a much bigger story within the Uranium One-Clinton-FBI scandal.
In an otherwise innocuous FBI FOIA FILE Katica located a notice for preservation of documents sent by an FBI special agent to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on August 28th, 2015. What is interesting about the preservation request(s) are the recipients, their attachment to CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States), and the timeline of events surrounding the agent’s notification. The time-line here is very important as it might change the perception of exactly what the FBI was investigating as it relates to Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. Therefore a backdrop to understand content and context is important. Up to now the general perception of the FBI’s involvement surrounding the Clinton emails has been against the backdrop of using a personal email server to conduct business, and the potential for unlawful transmission of classified data.
Additionally, the circumvention of official information technology protocols was the narrative most often discussed. The headlines were “Clinton used bad judgement” etc.
In essence, throughout 2015, 2016, 2017 the arguments, including FBI legal probes, were thought to center around “process“. However, Katica’s discovery re-frames that argument to focus on the subject matter “content” within the emails, and not the process.
Regarding the above 11:02 ConservativeTreehouse link.... Consider also the timeline coincides with the date on the Benghazi Report - line item was April 23, 2015.
Could Benghazi connect to buying / selling uranium in some way to Iran?
Title of this post "I'll follow you into the dark" seems appropriate for this off topic set of linked stories. First, from American Thinker, an intro into the second by Daniel Greenfield:
ReplyDeleteMaking sense of the MSM business strategy, Daniel Greenfield explains much more
FrontPageMag: Story Laundering: Fusion GPS, Fake News, Russians and Reporters by Daniel Greenfield
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kip2w-DceV0
ReplyDeleteLink to visualization of mass marketing of laundered news
NYPost: Did Hillary’s rigging at the DNC push Biden out of the race?
ReplyDeleteDNC rigging kept out Biden. Obama wouldn't back him because Hillary paid off his DNC debts.
*****
Oh...and just by the way....Donna Brazile did not support Hillary during the primaries...as illustrated in this video clip here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPbG4y4B3qE
The Conservative Treehouse: Uranium One: Previously Undiscovered FOIA Documents Could Be Game-Changer in Investigation…
ReplyDeleteInternet researcher Katica (Twitter GOPollAnalyst) may have found the hidden thread that unravels a much bigger story within the Uranium One-Clinton-FBI scandal.
In an otherwise innocuous FBI FOIA FILE Katica located a notice for preservation of documents sent by an FBI special agent to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on August 28th, 2015. What is interesting about the preservation request(s) are the recipients, their attachment to CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States), and the timeline of events surrounding the agent’s notification.
The time-line here is very important as it might change the perception of exactly what the FBI was investigating as it relates to Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. Therefore a backdrop to understand content and context is important.
Up to now the general perception of the FBI’s involvement surrounding the Clinton emails has been against the backdrop of using a personal email server to conduct business, and the potential for unlawful transmission of classified data.
Additionally, the circumvention of official information technology protocols was the narrative most often discussed. The headlines were “Clinton used bad judgement” etc.
In essence, throughout 2015, 2016, 2017 the arguments, including FBI legal probes, were thought to center around “process“. However, Katica’s discovery re-frames that argument to focus on the subject matter “content” within the emails, and not the process.
Regarding the above 11:02 ConservativeTreehouse link....
ReplyDeleteConsider also the timeline coincides with the date on the Benghazi Report - line item was April 23, 2015.
Could Benghazi connect to buying / selling uranium in some way to Iran?