Under international law, would it be possible to try Dr. Fauci for genocide (a capital offense)? Well, yes. But you can't say so on Twitter

This Photo Does Not Depict a Real Execution

A friend just posted the following on Telegram:

My account has been suspended for a tweet which read: "So it sounds like there’s an excellent case to be made that under international law Anthony Fauci should be executed. . . ." 

As the text of my tweet makes clear, I was not calling for the execution of Dr. Fauci, but merely pointing out, on the basis of the claim in the tweet to which I was responding, that a case could be made under international law that he conducted himself criminally.  

My friend was responding to a tweet about this article:

Gates, Fauci, and Daszak charged with Genocide in Court Filing

The Twitter rule I am alleged to have violated reads: "You may not threaten, incite, glorify, or express a desire for harm or violence." I did not threaten violence against Dr. Fauci, nor did I incite it, nor did I glorify it, nor did I express any desire for harm or violence against him or anyone related to him. Rather, I simply pointed out, on the basis of the claim made in the tweet to which I was responding, that a LEGAL CASE COULD BE MADE that Dr. Fauci had conducted himself in a capitally criminal manner under international law. I merely voiced my personal opinion on a hypothetical LEGAL argument expressed within the tweet to which I was responding. I did not say such a case HAD been made, or that it was irrefutable, I merely pointed out that, on the basis of the news item to which I was responding, that it "SOUNDED" to me as if it "COULD" be made. 

GO READ THE WHOLE THING.