Cities across the country are dealing with an exploding problem of homelessness, but places like Los Angeles and San Francisco in California are among the worst.
In a shocking turn of events, an audit has found that California has spent $24 billion on homeless programs yet the problem persists and in some places is getting worse.
Would California have seen better improvements if they just gave this money directly to homeless people? Could the outcome have been any worse?
Perhaps modest footprint communities of tiny homes with a green belt, dog park, and convenience store situated a bit more in a rural area would work.
ReplyDeleteStart with the geriatric population. Start with U.S. veterans.