Pages

Saturday, November 26, 2005

In Defense of Western Civilization

The purpose of this blog is the defense of Western Civilization against the encroaching Jihad, Sharia, and anti-Semitism of the extremists Muslims, often called Islamists, or Islamofascists. This is the most important battle of our time. All else pales in comparison. Yet, the mainstream media refuses to explicitly tell us the truth of what is happening under our very noses.

Want an example?

Yesterday, a guy who calls himself "Hitler" was elected to the Palestinian Parliament. In addition, a man named Marwan Baghouti, who is a convicted mass-murderer, was also elected. These facts are mentioned in passing in the Associated Press articles, but they ought to have the headline.

Arab culture is so sick, and rife with anti-Semitism that men like David Duke are revered, and broadcast on National television as heroes.

The BBC publishes glowing, emotional eulogies about men like Yasser Arafat, who in his Palestinian National Charter, calls for the destruction of the entire state of Israel. Oh, by the way, that Charter is on the official United Nations website, so the UN is in on this blitzkrieg against knowledge.

Soldiers re-up because they believe in the war they are fighting, but the mainstream media does not report it. Instead, they broadcast on the national news about anti-war protests which only attract 12 people.

Our enemy is so evil, they rig children's toys with bombs, and yet it doesn't make the national news.

Did you know things like this were happening? No, because the media downplays this stuff. There is a sense in which we are live in an Orwellian reality. It seems possible that the media is made up of people who are anti-war by nature, and thus oppose America's war in Iraq because of Pacifism, not because it is an unjust war.

Pacifism is an illegitimate political philosophy. It is a beautiful personal philsophy. One ought to try to live peacefully. But, when whole nations of people are threatened, only people who are totally lacking in compassion would say that we shouldn't fight to defend them.

Should the Jews have sat back and let Hitler do what he did? Gandhi thought so. Here's a quote:

"I would like you to lay down the arms you have as being useless for saving you or humanity. You will invite Herr Hitler and Signor Mussolini to take what they want of the countries you call your possessions...If these gentlemen choose to occupy your homes you will vacate them. If they do not give you free passage out, you will allow yourselves, man, woman and child to be slaughtered, but you will refuse to owe allegiance to them."

"I am as certain...that the stoniest German heart will melt [if only the Jews] adopt active non-violence. Human nature...unfailingly responds to the advances of love. I do not despair of his [Hitler's] responding to human suffering even though caused by him."


That's right, Gandhi advocated that the Jews turn themselves over to Hitler. One must ask oneself, what would have been the difference in result if one follows the philosophy of Hitler or the philosophy of Gandhi?

The answer is nothing. Millions of people dead, either way. Gandhi's philosophy was irresponsible, and yet, he is held up as a hero in our culture. Once again, this is largely the fault of the media. Hollywood produced a glowing biopic starring Ben Kingsley, which depicted Gandhi as a devotee of peace. But, his peace would leave millions dead.

Arghhh!

Here's a couple more important posts:

A Muslim Member of Parliament has attacked the “Muslim reluctance to tackle the contradictions in Islam. The problem lies in the Quran itself”, he said. “There are contradictions in Quran; we have to stop avoiding them. If you find the Hadith literally, you can kill and maim as many people you can."

The Fu2rman has some very important questions for Muslims about the 72 Virgins they get for being martyrs. Read it, you will laugh. I guarantee it.

7 comments:

  1. You spell out the problem in a very efficient manner. 1)World discovers its Hitlerite potential in the tendency to war. 2)World criminalizes war.

    What is wrong with this logic? An inability to accept that we are all fallen and must pursue the lesser evil. Only when we accept that we are fallen can we find the true transcendence that is something other than a simple opposition to or inversion of the Hitlerite idea.

    Good luck with your new endeavors.

    ReplyDelete
  2. J,
    Thomas the Wraith, a very good writer, is interest in contributing, once or twice a week.

    I recommend him. I also recommend that you invite Dag along, if you haven't already. I think we should make it clear to everyone that the point is that the blog is not an essay blog, but instead a hub for important posts from various blogs.

    Go check out Thomas the Wraith. He's linked in my blogroll. He recently wrote an essay on the coming of Eurabia which was very good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gandhi has been a hero to two generations, but what you've presented here shows that he favored the belly-up philosophy in the face of totalitarianism. Bet we don't see much of this aspect relating to Gandhi in any history books nowadays.

    No wonder my father said that the movie version didn't present the whole story! Revisionist history, via Hollywood, huh? And the vast majority of audiences swallow the screen stories whole.

    ReplyDelete
  4. YOU SAY-"The purpose of this blog is the defense of Western Civilization against the encroaching Jihad, Sharia, and anti-Semitism of the extremists Muslims, often called Islamists, or Islamofascists. This is the most important battle of our time."

    I have to disagree with your statement a little.

    First, my position is that all Muslims, in fact anyone who follows "Islam" is our enemy.

    Second, Within the civilization of Islam, there are only believers and "true believers". The true believers will kill anyone, even within the believers group that do not follow the strict teachings of the Koran.

    Both are our enemies. One more so than the other but still can not be seperated in the coming battle of civilizations.

    The most innocent of the "believers" is our enemy in that they will not fight the "true believers".

    Jordan is a good example. Jordian citizens will talk and posture against "terrorism and extremists" but will not actually kill or imprison them. Their King might, but the average arab or persian will not and never will.

    Until Islam is completly wiped out as a "religion" or way of life, we will be at risk of our lives, our childrens lives and our grandchildrens lives.

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/
    http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/
    http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/
    http://librabunda.blogspot.com/
    http://cuanas.blogspot.com/
    http://rednecktexan.blogspot.com/
    http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/
    http://michaelyon.blogspot.com/
    http://austinbay.net/blog/

    The above are just a few that understand that we have to wipe out Islam on this planet.

    We need to get started killing because there are millions that need killing or imprisoned for the rest of their lives.

    Papa Ray
    West Texas
    USA

    ReplyDelete
  5. Congratulations on a very eloquent posting. And welcome aboard in the struggle that history has called on us to face. Western civilization is far from perfect, but it offers what is most essential: the chance for each individual to develop his mind, his character, and his spirit in his own way.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm looking forward to doing my small part to contribute to this successful effort. What a great challenge we can accept. As I see it, this is our chance to fight against Naziism, in our day that being Islam and Left dhimmi fascism.

    To be able to fight against evil and also to be able to fight for the Good, we are blessed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow This must truly be one of the more ignorat blogs on the internet. Congratz! "We need to get started killing because there are millions that need killing or imprisoned for the rest of their lives." Cheezus!

    ReplyDelete