Pages

Thursday, December 28, 2006

It's the Joooos!

We constantly hear how the biggest enemy of Christianity and America are Muslims.

The truth is that although Muslims do not share all Christian beliefs, Islam is far closer to Christianity than Judaism. I already quoted the obscene attacks made on Jesus Christ by the Jewish Talmud. How many American Christians even realize that the Holy Qur'an of Islam actually defends Jesus Christ and His mother Mary from the hateful slanders of Judaism? As I pointed out earlier, the Talmud claims that the Gospels lie about the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. The Talmud actually boasts that the Jews and not the Romans were the ones who actually nailed Jesus to the Cross. These Talmudic Jews hate Jesus so much that they want to take all the credit for his murder. Amazingly, the Islamic holy book, the Qur'an disputes this Jewish lie and actually defends the truth of the gospel.
http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/12/134969.php

Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
****

Dr. David Duke, author of that fine piece of journalism above, is a contributor to indymedia. Who'd have thought it? Well, we here think that fairly often, like when we post indistinguishable snippets of David Duke and Ken Livingstone as one piece. There is no dichotomy, Left and Right. There are fascists and primitives on the one side, neo-feudalists, philobarbarists, and dhimmis; and there are those who are mostly afraid to speak out against the Left dhimmi fascist conformity that rules our pubic discourse, those being the people I refer to perhaps idiosyncratically as Revolutionary Modernists. I know I'm not like David Duke. I'm not like Ken Livingstone. But they are like each other. The Klansman and the Trotskyite. Iranian hate-fest and indymedia. Me. Maybe you.

8 comments:

  1. They all converge in their hatred of the Jews, don't they?

    All evil seems to turn on that one center.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dag, I hope you saw this in the comments at JW. . .

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014598.php#c326235

    AND THE WORLD IS SILENT

    By Ben Dror Yemini

    It's a rather long piece but worth the read.

    [ , , ]
    =\o/= AnonYmouse

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm "dagged" at Jihad Watch so I don't frequent it as obsessively as I did. I'll go tomorrow and follow up. Thanks for the tip.

    I use the word "dagged" since learning of it from Truepeers who read it at Flares Unto Darkness, coined by someone I don't know of. My reputation precedes me by such a distance I only hear of myself by rumor.

    Yes, I was also banned a long time ago from Stormfront. What can I say? I think being obnoxious must be half my charm. Many of the contributors here who have also banned me from contributing to their sites wouldn't agree that I have any charm at all. I haven't been banned from here, though, have I, Pastorius?!

    ReplyDelete
  4. No.

    Who here has banned you, or are you kidding?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dag, banned at Stormfront...hahahahahahaha...you joooo, you !

    That's great.

    Now try Omanforum. Bring salexa

    I didn't even know it was possible to get banned at Stormfront ..what a badge of honor

    ReplyDelete
  6. Perhaps it is a case of mistaken identity. I associated your nic 'Dag' with the nic "SonofWalker" at JW.
    http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/006898.php#c104811

    Woops?

    ReplyDelete
  7. No, he is also Dag, Son of Walker. You're not mistaken.

    ReplyDelete
  8. No, I didn't write that I was banned from IBA. I was talking recently about the sites I have been banned from or that moved and left me standing without a platform, a number of places so large that I was laughing as I recounted my history to Truepeer. He said in his usual casual and calm manner that someone at a site he frerquents has coined the term "dagged" to describe those banned from many sites. I don't take that too seriously. I do, in fact, think it's funny.

    Yes, I'm Dag Walker, "sonofwalker." Robert Spencer had me banned a year ago or so after i twice upset him with my presentations. Having made that point, I am in some sympathy with his position regarding my absence there. I write as I please at no dhimmitude, and I am still on good terms personally with Spencer, whom I admire and respect deeply.

    I was not banned here, instead I stormed off in a huff, only to be graciously asked to return, which I gloatingly accepted and never tire of telling strangers on the streets and at aeroports and in foreign diners.

    Likely to the edismay of many here, I was quite popular at Stormfront among their European boards, which lead to a number of requests that I stop writing on topics concerning jihad. Finally, I was banned. Later I recieved an anonymous critique of the fascist mind of Dukes generally, which is worth a search for those interested in such, it being sensitive, intelligent, and remarkable.

    Today I suffer theh slings and arrows of some readers who missed the irony of a recent piece I wrote on Canadian Tire, a retail store in Canada, a store I was thrown out of.

    So, since I'm so unwelccome most places it turns out I am free to have dinner many other places; and if you wish to have me over, perhaps for a week or so, not likely more than a month on your couch, please let me know. Ah, I'm a bit of a fussy eater, so I'll let you know in advance each day what to cook for me. And my room will need a few not terribly expensive alterations.

    Looking forward to seeing you soon.

    Dag, Son of Walker.

    ReplyDelete