Pages

Friday, December 26, 2008

Mumbai Terrorists Sexually Humiliated Victims Before Killing Them

From Gateway Pundit:

The Mumbai terrorists sexually humiliated their victims in the Taj before killing them.
Even the Rabbi and his wife at Nariman House were sexually assaulted and their genitalia mutilated.


The victims of the Mumbai attacks were sexually humiliated before they were slaughtered.

Disturbing photographs made available to this newspapers by police sources indicate that several of the guests at the Taj Mahal Hotel during the siege November 26 were sexually humiliated by the terrorists and then shot dead. 

Police sources confirm that even as the terrorists were engaged in a fierce combat with NSG commandos, they were humiliating their hostages before ending their terrifying ordeal. 

Foreign guests were their particular target. Eight of the 31 killed at the Taj were foreign nationals. 

Photographs taken by a police forensic team after the hotel was sanitised yield a gruesome picture of some of the guests in the nude. 

These bodies were found away from the hotel's swimming pool which makes it clear that they were not those guests who were taken hostage from the poolside. 

"Even the Rabbi and his wife at Nariman House were sexually assaulted and their genitalia mutilated," said a senior officer of the investigating team, not wishing to be quoted.

Anonymous comments:

Par for the course for these savages. Remember Beslan where they raped children and forced them to drink their own urine? 

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-121622939.html

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/003119.php 

3 comments:

  1. Par for the course for these savages. Remember Beslan where they raped children and forced them to drink their own urine?

    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-121622939.html

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/003119.php

    Show me a moderate
    Muslim and I'll show you a Muslim.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Indians warned to avoid Pakistan: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7800329.stm

    Isn't there a case for Dar al-Harb occupying the Islamic oilfields and expelling the inhabitants, then putting an electic fence round Dar al-Islam and letting nothing and nobody in or out?

    ReplyDelete
  3. My opinion? Yes, there is a case for it. But, in order to understand why I think there's a case for it, one must know that I BELIEVE the warnings from the United States Congress that IT IS INEVITABLE THAT WE ISLAMIC JIHADISTS WILL ATTACK US WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

    ReplyDelete