From the New York Times:
The future of war:
WASHINGTON — President Obama said Monday that he was revamping American nuclear strategy to substantially narrow the conditions under which the United States would use nuclear weapons, even in self-defense.Discussing his approach to nuclear security the day before formally releasing his new strategy, Mr. Obama described his policy as part of a broader effort to edge the world toward making nuclear weapons obsolete, and to create incentives for countries to give up any nuclear ambitions. To set an example, the new strategy renounces the development of any new nuclear weapons, overruling the initial position of his own defense secretary.
Mr. Obama’s strategy is a sharp shift from those adopted by his predecessors and seeks to revamp the nation’s nuclear posture for a new age in which rogue states and terrorist organizations are greater threats than traditional powers like Russia and China.
It eliminates much of the ambiguity that has deliberately existed in American nuclear policy since the opening days of the cold war. For the first time, the United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons or launched a crippling cyberattack.
Those threats, Mr. Obama argued, could be deterred with “a series of graded options,” a combination of old and newly designed conventional weapons. “I’m going to preserve all the tools that are necessary in order to make sure that the American people are safe and secure,” he said in the interview in the Oval Office.
White House officials said the new strategy would include the option of reconsidering the use of nuclear retaliation against a biological attack, if the development of such weapons reached a level that made the United States vulnerable to a devastating strike.
That's a bad insult, especially in Israel.
ReplyDeleteMaybe I ought to retitle this post, "Bitchslap Warfare".
It's pretty crude, but I think it works, given your positioning the video with Obama's eunuch approach to war. Who, when it comes to it, would dare attack a nation of women such as those? It's disgusting to the average man. I think, after all this time, that Obama really is a genius. No one would lay a hand on us. Yuck.
ReplyDeleteGood point, Dag.
ReplyDeleteHey, where'd your comments go?
What comments? I refuse to acknowledge anything I say unless it's sensible. That's pretty rare.
ReplyDeleteP,
ReplyDeleteTo Nuke or not to Nuke?.. hmmm... Before you start Nuking anything, can we let the Hutaree settle scores for us with the Hamas (or any other Jihadists) ?? With luck, all the extremists (from both sides) will be gone, and we can live happily ever after.. What do you think?
You think Hutaree has enough people to take out Hamas and Hizballah?
ReplyDeletePerfectly consistent with the new "proportional force" doctrine that the world wishes to impose upon Israel. Of course, one must also take into account that ANY response to agression is always considered disproportionate. Therefore, we roll over and die.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous,
ReplyDeleteAll progress is the result of disproportionate force.