Pages

Thursday, April 22, 2021

Unbelievable: Secret Unit Inside the US Post Office Is Monitoring Americans' Social Media Usage

 

The law enforcement arm of the U.S. Postal Service has been quietly running a program that tracks and collects Americans' social media posts, including those about planned protests, according to a document obtained by Yahoo News.

The details of the surveillance effort, known as iCOP, or Internet Covert Operations Program, have not previously been made public. The work involves having analysts trawl through social media sites to look for what the document describes as "inflammatory" postings and then sharing that information across government agencies.

"Analysts with the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) Internet Covert Operations Program (iCOP) monitored significant activity regarding planned protests occurring internationally and domestically on March 20, 2021," says the March 16 government bulletin, marked as "law enforcement sensitive" and distributed through the Department of Homeland Security�s fusion centers. 

"Locations and times have been identified for these protests, which are being distributed online across multiple social media platforms, to include right-wing leaning Parler and Telegram accounts."

A number of groups were expected to gather in cities around the globe on March 20 as part of a World Wide Rally for Freedom and Democracy, to protest everything from lockdown measures to 5G. 

"Parler users have commented about their intent to use the rallies to engage in violence. Image 3 on the right is a screenshot from Parler indicating two users discussing the event as an opportunity to engage in a 'fight' and to 'do serious damage,'" says the bulletin.

"No intelligence is available to suggest the legitimacy of these threats," it adds.

The bulletin includes screenshots of posts about the protests from Facebook, Parler, Telegram and other social media sites. Individuals mentioned by name include one alleged Proud Boy and several others whose identifying details were included but whose posts did not appear to contain anything threatening.

The government's monitoring of Americans' social media is the subject of ongoing debate inside and outside government, particularly in recent months, following a rise in domestic unrest. While posts on platforms such as Facebook and Parler have allowed law enforcement to track down and arrest rioters who assaulted the Capitol on Jan. 6, such data collection has also sparked concerns about the government surveilling peaceful protesters or those engaged in protected First Amendment activities.

ACE OF SPADES COMMENTS:

Notice how they contrast the rioters of January 6 -- who are insurrectionists who need to be surveilled -- with the rioters of antifa and BLM, who have been burning down cities and terrorizing people for daring to use the public roads they paid for or have a meal in a restaurant for a fucking year, which are presumably the "peaceful protesters or those engaged in protected First Amendment activities."

3 comments:

  1. If you use social media, consider your words a postcard to the world. Only contemplation kept inside the noggin' is safe... for now. This will also one day change. sigh

    ReplyDelete
  2. And for those with an interest: I have always considered Facebook a Trojan horse.

    https://thelastenglishprince.wordpress.com/2021/01/12/the-american-experience-trojan-horse/

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The law enforcement arm of the U.S. Postal Service..."

    That's the problem right there. Why does every governmental agency have a "law enforcement arm"? Even a quasi-governmental agency like USPS has got gun totin' agents? maybe even their own SWAT teams? Who knows?

    When I was a boy the Police were regarded as "Officers of the Peace". Today they are "Law Enforcement". The difference is huge. A Law Enforcement officer will think nothing of tasering Grandma and beating her to a pulp for not wearing a mask since: "she's breaking the law, by God!" Would a Peace Officer be likely to do the same? I doubt it.

    ReplyDelete