Pages

▼

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Jethro Tull
Ring Out These Bells (Solstice Bells)

at No comments:

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Suspect in Terror Attack on German Christmas Market is Saudi Activist Who Helped Migrants Flee to Germany — Once Featured in BBC Interview Renouncing Islam

The suspect in the Magdeburg terror attack is understood to be a migrant from Saudi Arabia by the name of Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen.

While details about the killer's identity are still being investigated, Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen was reportedly granted asylum in Germany in 2016 after fleeing from his native Saudi Arabia because he longer believed in Islam.

In an interview with the BBC back in 2019, Taleb explained how he had set up a website to help people flee Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia and move to Germany.

"Hi, my name's Taleb," he said in the video currently circulating across social media. "I'm from Saudi Arabia. I'm an activist. I created a website to help people seeking asylum, especially from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf region."

Some of my own considerations:

1. Vehicular jihad is a well-established practice going back years. ISIS has called for it. It is not a common practice among any other criminal or terrorist sector.

2. Saudi Arabia, where the Magdeburg perpetrator is from, is a hotbed of jihad activity.

3. Islam has doctrines calling for warfare against unbelievers. See Qur’an 8:39, 9:5, 9:29, etc. etc.

4. Islam has doctrines calling for deception under certain circumstances. See here: jihadwatch.org/2022/06/niger-

5. Jihad groups have been calling for attacks on German Christmas Markets.

6. Several jihad plots against Christmas Markets have already been foiled.

7. Muslims recently marched through a German Christmas market screaming “Allahu akbar” and “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet.”

8. It seems that the perp has been claiming to be an ex-Muslim — and a Zionist! — and has contacted several anti-jihad media figures, asking them to interview him. This leads to several possibilities.

a. That he was a sincere ex-Muslim and Zionist, and decided to attack a target of jihadis in a manner in which jihadis often attack, for no clear reason.

b. He was lying, in preparation for his jihad attack.

c. He was a genuine ex-Muslim, but in a moment of personal crisis returned to Islam, and realized that he had to do a great deed to outweigh his apostasy on Allah’s big judgment scales (Qur’an 21:47). Muhammad teaches that no deed is greater than jihad, so he went for a jihad attack.

d. Or alternatively, he just snapped, has some psychotic episode, etc. In that case it’s noteworthy that his desire to seek “revenge” led him to emulate a common practice of the warriors of the religion he professed to have left.

Of those four possibilities, the first one is the least likely. Why? Because if he was an ex-Muslim who went mad, he would be much more likely to have targeted Muslims, rather than choosing a favored target of the very jihadis he despised. The establishment media will be insisting that he is an ex-Muslim and never consider the possibility of deception or a return to Islam. That’s because they don’t know about those possibilities and because they always do whatever they can to distance Islam from the violence done in its name and in accord with its teachings. But their claims in this case are quite flimsy.

at 2 comments:

Dr. Byram W. Bridle Returns To His Office After 3 1/2 Years of Banishment From University For Being Right About COVID Vaccines

It has been 3 years, 4 months, and 23 days (1,243 total days) and I am finally back in my office at the university that employs me. I was banished from my workspaces almost 3.5 years ago following a radio interview in which I expressed concerns about the systemic biodistribution of COVID-19 shots throughout the body. I disclosed scientific data that aligned with the long history of lipid nanoparticle technology, but contrasted with the dominant global narrative that existed at that time. My ‘controversial statements’ are now well-accepted facts in the scientific literature.

In response, some of my colleagues participated in a well-coordinated global defamation campaign against me. I found myself the target of chronic harassment that has not ceased to this day. Rather than tackle my message, they chose to repeatedly attack the messenger. 

I sought some kind of restoration of formerly productive working relationships with four of these colleagues. Instead, they formally expressed feelings of fear should I be allowed to be anywhere in their vicinity. This purported fear was initially limited to the university campus boundary, and then shrunk to the building housing my office and laboratory, despite only two of the four complainants being in that building. 

I was prohibited from accessing my workspaces due to ‘feelings’ expressed by my colleagues. Their feelings were catered to; mine, which were based on experiencing tangible and chronic harassment were ignored. Campus and municipal police investigated the situation and consultants were hired by the university to conduct further investigations. 

Every report (or summary thereof) that I have seen has concluded that I never represented a ‘real and present danger’ to my colleagues. They even state that the complainants themselves have admitted that I never presented as a ‘real and present danger’. In fact, documentary evidence that I have seen shows that at least one of them amplified their actions against me with an intent to drive me to the point of such frustration that I would feel compelled to contact the police for help. 

You know that a person is feigning fear of the bear when they make it their goal to keep poking the bear until a negative reaction is elicited. 

As a consequence of my colleagues making their request to have their feelings appeased I was banished from my laboratory and office for 3.5 years. In recognition of the fact that I never presented as a ‘real and present danger’, my banishment has officially been deemed to be a ‘non-disciplinary’ action. But my research program has now been utterly destroyed and I have suffered irreparable harm to my professional reputation. So, if this was ‘non-disciplinary’, I would hate to see what ‘discipline’ would have looked like. 

So, I now have access again to my office. However, and remarkably, I am still not allowed to enter my laboratory. Don’t ask me why because I have yet to be presented with a rationale, especially when everyone that has been consulted has defined me to be a non-threat. Even now, I cannot fully commit to initiating the rebuild of my research program. I had a bad experience after obtaining funding when I was told (for the umpteenth time) one year ago that the return to my lab was imminent. I was accused by my administration of failing to conduct the research that I had proposed to do. This was dropped when I explained that I did not conduct the research that I had promised to do because the administration would not allow me to do the research that I had intended to conduct because they had banished me from my lab. They agreed that it seemed unreasonable to expect me to perform the research when I was not allowed to perform my research. After this utterly ridiculous scenario played out there was agreement that I should not even seek more funding until I find myself physically present in my lab again; so that wait continues.

GRTWT. 

at No comments:

Big News! Nissan Is Ending A LOT of Woke Policies

at No comments:

High School In San Diego County Holds Gay Seance, Apparently, Part of Their Normal Curriculum

at No comments:

Friday, December 20, 2024

Man From Saudi Arabia Plows Through a German Christmas Market at a Very High Speed, Sending People Flying Like Bowling Pins, Killing an Unknown Number

From Ace:

Again.

This happens every year.

I know how to stop it -- ban the AfD! Stop them from spreading their Nazi rhetoric about unassimilatable hostile foreigners waging a guerilla warfare campaign against the native population and making life unlivable!

Whatever you do, don't ask any questions about immigration!

at 1 comment:

EXACTLY! Thank You For Saying It, Elon

at 1 comment:

Trans Siberian Orchestra
Old City Bar

at No comments:

BRUNSON VS ADAMS, ET AL: Will The Supreme Court Determine That Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Michael Pence, and 382 Other Sitting Congressmen and Senators Are Guilty of Treason?

Have any of you heard of Brunson vs Adams, et al?


Above is the link to the 18 page filing. I have never seen anything like this before. The history behind this case: Two brothers, Loy Brunson and Raland Brunson, both filed a court case in Utah. Loy’s case is still pending in Utah, but Raland’s case has now made it to the Supreme Court docket. As most of you probably know, getting a case docketed with SCOTUS (while it is still undecided in the 10th circuit court of appeals) is odd. How did it get here? 

Their case hinges on constitutional amendment violations of the right to due process. When an election has concerns of fraud, constitution allows for a 10 day investigation to look at the potential fraud questions and determine if fraud did or did not occur. 

This case is NOT one of election fraud, it is about congress and the senate NOT doing their oath of office and violating Amendment I to the constitution, Article VI of the constitution, the 14th Amendment of the constitution, section 3, the 5th and the 9th Amendment of the constitution, as well as a couple of Utah State Constitution articles. Most pertain to due process, the right to investigation, and not performing the 10 day investigation when questions of election fraud were presented to congress. 

It began in the state of Utah, then transferred to federal court when there were originally 3 defendants listed, Biden and Harris as well as Nancy Pelosi, and then 381 other defendents AND over 100 Jane/John Does to the defendent list. All are Federal Government members that are named so far. 

The case was filed in early 2021, it was granted a motion to dismiss by the Federal Government, and it was refiled on Appeal to the 10th circuit court. In August 2022, they realized that they did not have to wait for a decision from the 10th Circuit of Appeals. The SCOTUS Rule 11 allowed them to bypass the 10th Circuit and go straight to the SCOTUS. 

For more about Rule 11, look here.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/rule_11 What is rule 11? 

“A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court.” Hmm. This case qualifies as imperative public importance to deviate from normal appellate practice and requires immediate determination? 

Here is where it gets interesting. At this point, SCOTUS will usually dismiss back to the 10th circuit appeals waiting a decision from them. Essentially kicking the can down the road. But that did not happen. Appeals court is where most cases like this die out and get dismissed yet again. 

What is outlined below is reported by the Brunson family on their website for this court case: (keep in mind Raland Brunson is acting Pro=Se, he does not have an attorney representing him). 

September 23, 2022 the Petition for Writ of Certiorari Received.

September 28, 2022 Raland received A phone call from SCOTUS. The Clerk of the SCOTUS calls Raland requesting for a revision of the Petition that would include more information on the lawsuit and wondering how soon they could get it. 

October 17, 2022, Raland gets a 2nd phone call from SCOTUS
Clerk. She asks "how are you doing on your revision of the Writ with the additional information that we need?" Raland said "We're working on it as we speak" She said "how soon can we get it?" Raland said "Right away"

October 20, 2022, the Revised Petition shipped to the SCOTUS. 

October 24, 2022, Petition docketed. The clerk of the Court tells Raland that they have everything they need. The U.S. Attorneys have until Nov 23, 2022 to respond showing why the Supreme Court of the United States should not move on this case. This means that SCOTUS agreed that this case met the Rule 11 criteria or it would not be docketed. It would have been denied and punted back to Circuit 10 appeals court and await a decision. 

So guess what happened on November 23rd?? The United States did not respond. Instead, this happened: 

November 23, 2022: The Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice replaces the U.S. Attorneys. Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of United States, the official attorney on record for the defendants, and in behalf of the 388 defendants, waived their right to respond to this lawsuit, thus allowing the SCOTUS to move forward. 

What does THAT decision mean? That means that the United States decided that SCOTUS justices can hear this case at any time, in conference, and if 4/9 or greater vote yes, it will be moved on to a hearing. Or, they can decide themselves to rule on the case if they choose. The waived right to respond essentially puts all control in the hands of the 9 Supreme Court Justices.

If you want to follow along, the Brunson brothers have a page dedicated to this SCOTUS adventure. http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html 

So the meat and potatoes of this case. We start here. Who are the “et al” in this case? 385 named people, and 100+ John/Jane Does. The 385 named people? Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris, Michael Pence, and 382 other sitting house members and senators. Each of them are listed in the above docket. Have a gander to see if your state rep/senator is listed! 

Why was this court case filed? The allegation is this: “for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.”. This is in reference to the 2020 election. When the case came before congress to investigate the allegation of fraud put forward by 100 members of congress, the other 380+ members voted no. The senate did nothing to stop the certification without the 10 day investigation period either. 

The oath of office they broke? “"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..." 

The question at hand: How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims from from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully manipulated the 2020 election. 

Is this lawsuit about a “rigged” election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. 

Was this a clear violation of their oath? 

YES. 

So lets back up just a little bit and remember what day this was. January 6th, 2021. Everyone knows “that day”. There were 100 members of congress set to request a 10 day investigation into possible election fraud. A few members spoke on the house floor, and then “January 6th” happened. 

When the congress reconvened late that night, they voted down the investigation into fraud that was introduced, they stated that no further election fraud concerns would be heard “in light of the days events”, they were pushing through to certify the election. And that is what they did. 

What remedy are they seeking? They are asking that all 385 defendants be charged with Treason for failure to uphold the US Constitution, they be incarcerated for a period no less than 5 years, be fined no less than $10,000, they be removed from their government seat, and banned from ever holding a political position ever again.

GO READ THE REST. 

at No comments:

TRUMP ISN'T EVEN PRESIDENT YET, AND HE'S HITTING CONGRESS WITH SHOCK AND AWE

GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN Looms, Trump & Elon Will END Any GOP Reps Who Vote YES On Continuing Resolution
at No comments:

Gladys Knight
Do You Hear What I Hear?

at No comments:

Thursday, December 19, 2024

In Other Words, "JOB WELL DONE, GEORGE! KEEP LYING!

 

ABC News Rewards George Stephanopoulos With ‘Multi-Year Contract’ – Days After Trump Inflicted Humiliating Libel Loss

at No comments:

OMG: DHS Under Secretary For Policy Reveals Biden’s Mental Decline ‘Accelerated 12 to 24 Months’ Into Biden’s Presidency

at 2 comments:

Humpday Blues

Albert King
Santa Claus Wants Some Lovin'

at No comments:

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

BREAKING NEWS: Trump Takes Question After Question From Reporters At Mar-A-Lago Press Briefing

at No comments:

Van Jones: “Donald Trump Is Smarter Than All Of Us!”

at No comments:

Police Arrest 14 People From Aurora, Colorado, Apartment Complex Taken Over By Tren de Aragua Gang – ‘Tortured’ Residents Found Tied Up and Stabbed

 

Police in Aurora, Colorado, say the overnight armed home invasion at a local apartment complex that resulted in 14 suspects being detained was “without question a gang incident.”

Just before 2:30 a.m. on Tuesday, police were called to The Edge at Lowry Apartments in the 1200 block of Dallas Street for a reported armed home invasion in which victims were kidnapped and assaulted, the Aurora Police said.

Aurora Police Department Chief Todd Chamberlain said during a Tuesday news conference that 13 to 15 people, mostly males with some females, entered an apartment where two people were inside. Police say the suspects took the migrant victims to another apartment at the same location, where the victims were “threatened and bound.”

One of the victims, a man, sustained a stab wound but is expected to survive, police said. Both victims are still at the hospital for treatment of their injuries.

at No comments:

Blackmore's Night
We Three Kings

at No comments:

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Notice Anything?

Now the explanation. Leftists will howl in all places and all formats how the lack of diversity makes Poland insufferably racist, and they must make amends by bringing in lots and lots and lots of people who have no connection to Polish history, culture, or ethnicity and make them represent Poland. 
In other words, the Polish people must destroy themselves like France did. 
But if Nigeria had a photo like that and the winner was a white woman of European heritage, then she would be attacked as a colonialist and a dozen other cancel words.

MORE HERE. 
at No comments:

Syria: Christians beheaded, shot in the Valley of the Christians, video circulates telling Christians to leave

Syria: Christians beheaded, shot in the Valley of the Christians, video circulates telling Christians to leave

Will there now be an ethnic cleansing of Christians in Syria as there was in Iraq during the reign of the Islamic State? It is a distinct possibility.

“SYRIA: Greek Orthodox Christians beheaded, shot in the Valley of the Christians,” by Paul Antonopoulos, Greek City Times, December 16, 2024:

Two Greek Orthodox Christians in Wadi al-Nasara (Valley of the Christians) were murdered in their home during a reported “burglary.”

Samaan Satme and Helena Khashouf from the village al-Jamasliyye in Syria’s Homs province were brutally murdered in their home.

Although the murder was initially reported as a burglary gone wrong, it later emerged that Samaan was beheaded and Helena shot, indicating that there were other motives.

at No comments:

Why Bomb Syria After Assad's Fall? Israel Hit a Weapon's Depot and The Resulting Earthquake Was a 3.0 on The Richter Scale

From Vlad Tepes:

So I asked Chat GPT what size bomb is required to create a 3.0 magnitude on the Richter scale:

What size bomb would be required to create a 3.0 on the richter scale
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

The size of a bomb required to create a 3.0 magnitude event on the Richter scale depends on several factors, including the bomb’s energy yield, how it’s detonated, and the geology of the area. Here’s a general idea:

Energy Equivalent

A 3.0 earthquake releases approximately 2 gigajoules (2 billion joules) of energy. This is roughly equivalent to:

  • 500 tons of TNT or
  • A small tactical nuclear bomb (0.5 kiloton yield).

Factors Influencing the Effect:

  1. Type of Explosion: Underground explosions are much more efficient at generating seismic waves than above-ground detonations.
  2. Depth: Shallow explosions generally cause higher seismic readings.
  3. Geology: Softer ground will absorb more energy and reduce seismic effects, while harder rock transmits energy more efficiently.

Historical Comparison

  • The largest non-nuclear bomb ever detonated, Russia’s FOAB (Father of All Bombs), has a yield equivalent to ~44 tons of TNT, which would not reach a 3.0 magnitude.
  • A 3.0 magnitude seismic event is more in line with a small nuclear explosion, such as early nuclear tests like the Trinity Test in 1945 (~20 kilotons), which registered as high as 5.0 magnitude on seismic readings
at No comments: