The Obama Intifada *** - Treason Manifest In Baltimore

My opinion:

These riots in Baltimore are organized by the same people who organized the riots in Florida, and in Ferguson, Missouri, and the same people who organized the Occupy Wall Street riots as well.

These are not protests. They are organized incursions by people who want to overthrow the Constitution (and the government under that Constitution) of the United States of America.

Their purpose is, through repeated onslaught, to degrade and destroy the will of the people of the U.S.

Their purpose is to break off pieces of the mountain of faith and fortitude that it takes to keep this nation going.

These people are organized in pursuit of Treasonous activity.

The activity of protesting police is not Treason. The activity of rioting, while illegal, is not treason.

But the activity of organizing a group of people to repeatedly riot in response to any given offense, no matter how disparate in nature; THAT IS TREASON.

These people should be rounded up, placed under arrest, tried, convicted, and hanged until dead.

*** Credit to Reliapundit at Astute Bloggers.

UPDATE - Let us not forget that many of these treasonous acts are being performed in concert with the very people who are supposed to be maintaining order:

ANARCHISTS PLAN TO TAKE DOWN EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AT RNC

Perhaps Someone Should Shut Down Lisa Fithian's Communications Structure

From Breitbart:

Yesterday, I interviewed my co-worker Brandon Darby as he was traveling toward the Republican National Convention in Florida. The interview focused on strategies used by anarchist protesters at the 2008 Republican National Convention and how those strategies will be used once again next week by the Occupy movement.

In addition to trying to shut down bridges to prevent delegates from reaching the convention center next week, Brandon has learned that a subgroup of Occupy is looking to shut down EMS communications throughout the city.

The video that goes along with this interview is one Brandon took at the RNC convention while working undercover for the FBI in 2008. Some of it is a bit jumpy, but you'll see some of the street blocking tactics as well as several instances of individuals throwing items onto a freeway from an overpass.

Both the audio and video have been edited for content and brevity. What follows is the seven minute interview/video and a complete transcript of Brandon's comments as they appear in the clip:

Brandon Darby: The video I gave you is interesting because it’s a video surveillance I took of one section of the Republican National Convention welcoming committee. Several of the clips of video were used in the prosecution of David McKay and Bradley Neal Crowder.

What happened at the Republican National Convention in ’08 is that the overall liberal, Democratic protests were organized by a group called United for Peace and Justice. Now these were the mainstream liberal protesters, not the ones who would violate the law or violate a police order or anything crazy. Now what was interesting is that the same group of people organizing the mainstream liberal protests also organized a breakaway group called the RNC Welcoming Committee and it was 500 to 1,000 anarchists. And their goal was to shut down the Republican National Convention by any means necessary.

Now they had meetings for a long time before and what they ultimately decided to do—and it was folks like Lisa Fithian leading the training, and I know because I was in the training…undercover —but what they did is they mapped out the city, maps with corporate targets, business leaders home addresses, and Republican delegates home addresses, and also where the hotels were the delegates were going to be staying in. And they handed out these maps and then they showed people videos of Molotov cocktails and various other criminal behavior and asked everyone to be creative and feel free to use what they called a diversity of tactics and to make sure the Republican National Convention can’t occur, you know, can’t happen.

In a later planning session they mapped out the area around the convention center; they divided it into several sections. Then each group of anarchists of their RNC Welcoming Committee—which we now call Occupy—each group was responsible for a different sector. They had organized everyone into three groups of people. There was the red, the yellow, and the green. What they decided was that the yellow group was going be the group that would be arrestable. They were the ones who were going to get arrested. They were going to chain their arms and hands together in PVC pipe so that the cops couldn’t cut ‘em out without injuring them. But they were going to chain themselves across the major arteries so that the delegates could not get to the convention center.

Now, Lisa Fithian and the organizers, they realized that the police were not going to allow a group to set up and do that, allow the yellow group to do that. So they figured they could use the green group, the green group being the mainstream liberal and Democratic protesters who would never violate the law intentionally. So the organizers would manipulate the green group to get into the street and protest. The green group’s not realizing that they’re being used to cover illegal behavior that’s interfering with the rights of other Americans to assemble. And then when the police told the green group to get out they would slow the green group down and try to keep them from getting out of the road. Well eventually the green group would get out of the road. And if that didn’t give the yellow group enough time to finish locking down across the road, then the red group—which are the black mask wearing anarchists would come in—and the red group would actually begin to attack police.

Last time they made riot shields that they had made out of stolen traffic barrels and the riot shields had protruding sharpened deck screws from them. And they had their signs where, their protests signs were made out of heavy, heavy sticks so they could actually have a weapon against police but police couldn’t take them or else they were violating their rights to free speech.

And they would send the red group in to attack the police and then the red group would flee and then that would give the yellow group enough time to lock down and shut the RNC down. Well what was interesting about it, is that when the red group fled then the police would treat the protesters—because they’re all one protest—they would treat them as though they had just been attacked, because they had been. Well then the green group would look like they were innocent protesters who were getting attacked and in their minds they were because they didn’t realize that Lisa Fithian and the leaders were using them as part of this effort to violently attack police and attack conservatives.

So the buses that did get through when they were held up by the yellow group, then the red group would come back and the red group threw bricks and flagstones through the windows, they slashed the tires of the buses, they threw bleach and urine in the delegates faces and they attacked the buses and the people on the buses. And that’s what they’re going to do this time.

So that was…the red, yellow, green concept is very important for people to realize that that’s what’s occurring. So people have to remember, this isn’t a bunch of unorganized and disorganized kids. This is Lisa Fithian, she’s the one who led the unions and the anarchists to shut down Seattle at the ’99 World Trade Organization protest in Seattle. It’s not something to play around with because when this is all said and done the FBI informants will have stopped bomb plots just as they and I did last time. And when that happens conservatives need to rally around because the left media and the entire left establishment who claims they have nothing to do with these anarchists, they will defend them and dirty the name of anybody who exposes them just as they did to me and just as they did to Andrew. They will defend their darlings and attack the character of anyone who holds them accountable and calls them out. 

And that’s what’s going to happen this time. We need to stand up as a movement, recognize what the threats are, and we need to defend the people who are keeping us safe and hold accountable and demand accountability for the people who are trying to interfere with our rights to assemble.

The other thing that they’re trying to do is that they have a coms group—and this is breaking news you need to know this—they have a coms group that is trying to shut down the EMS communications structure for the city. That’s really happening. They’re trying to shut down the communications structure for the city for law enforcement and emergency medical personnel.

People don’t realize that these demonstrations, they have a sophisticated communications structure. Like before they have one of these demonstrations, whether it’s this one or whether it’s WTO or whether it’s, whatever it is, whether it’s IMF…When these people when this global movement of anarchists that protests these things they have to rent space and have extra cooling systems and have massive cable networks and they have to have to have a lot of communications equipment, a lot of computer equipment. It’s not like a bunch of people are going to show up and talk on their cell phones. They have some massive computer equipment and their goal is to shut us down.

And no, they’re not going to do the same thing at the DNC, that’s the thing, is because the radicals feel like the average liberal is confused but they have dehumanized completely the conservative. And so they feel they are entitled to take our rights away when they’re not going to do that at the DNC. That’s the difference.

Who is Lisa Fithian?

From Mother Jones:

In 1983, after graduating from Skidmore College, Fithian spent a year following Abbie Hoffman, founder of the anti-war Youth International Party (a.k.a. the Yippies), tending his garden and "picking his brain." Three years later, a coalition of activists outraged by the CIA's covert wars in Central America hired her to organize a blockade of the agency's Langley, Virginia, headquarters that ended with 600 arrests. She hit the streets with fellow protesters—including the black-clad anarchist kids she calls "the smashy smashies"—to disrupt the World Trade Organization's 1999 meeting in Seattle. And in 2005, she teamed up with fellow radicals and former Black Panthers to launch Common Ground Relief, a group that rebuilt houses while clashing with police in the devastated Lower Ninth Ward of post-Katrina New Orleans. "When people ask me, 'What do you do?' I say, 'I create crisis,'" Fithian told me. "Because crisis is the leading edge where change is possible."

(Pastorius comment: SOUND FAMILIAR? - "Never let a crisis go to waste")

EDITORIAL: The Civil War of 2016

U.S. military officers are told to plan to fight Americans

From the Washington Times:

Imagine Tea Party extremists seizing control of a South Carolina town and the Army being sent in to crush the rebellion. This farcical vision is now part of the discussion in professional military circles. 

At issue is an article in the respected Small Wars Journal titled “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future.” It was written by retired Army Col. Kevin Benson of the Army's University ofForeign Military and Cultural Studies at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., andJennifer Weber, a Civil War expert at the University of Kansas. It posits an “extremist militia motivated by the goals of the ‘tea party’ movement” seizing control of Darlington, S.C., in 2016, “occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council and placing the mayor under house arrest.” The rebels set up checkpoints on Interstate 95 and Interstate 20 looking for illegal aliens. It’s a cartoonish and needlessly provocative scenario. 

The article is a choppy patchwork of doctrinal jargon and liberal nightmare. The authors make a quasi-legal case for military action and then apply the Army’s Operating Concept 2016-2028 to the situation. They write bloodlessly that “once it is put into play, Americans will expect the military to execute without pause and as professionally as if it were acting overseas.” They claim that “the Army cannot disappoint the American people, especially in such a moment,” not pausing to consider that using such efficient, deadly force against U.S. citizens would create a monumental political backlash and severely erode government legitimacy.The vision is hard to take seriously. As retired ArmyBrig. Gen. Russell D. 

Howard, a former professor at West Point, observed earlier in his career, “I am a colonel, colonels write a lot of crazy stuff, but no one listens to colonels, so I don’t see the problem.” Twenty years ago, then-Air Force Lt. Col. Charles J. Dunlap Jr. created a stir with an article in Parameters titled “The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012.” It carried a disclaimer that the coup scenario was “purely a literary device intended to dramatize my concern over certain contemporary developments affecting the armed forces, and is emphatically not a prediction.” 

The scenario presented in Small Wars Journal isn’t a literary device but an operational lay-down intended to present the rationale and mechanisms for Americans to fight Americans. Col. Benson and Ms. Weber contend, “Army officers are professionally obligated to consider the conduct of operations on U.S. soil.” This is a dark, pessimistic and wrongheaded view of what military leaders should spend their time studying. 

A professor at the Joint Forces Staff College was relieved of duty in June for uttering the heresy that the United States is at war with Islam. The Obama administration contended the professor had to be relieved because what he was teaching was not U.S. policy. Because there is no disclaimer attached to the Small Wars piece, it is fair to ask, at least inCol. Benson’s case, whether his views reflect official policy regarding the use of U.S. military force against American citizens. 

The Washington TimesUPDATE: The standard Defense Department disclaimer was added to the article after The Washington Times drew attention to the omission.

More Evidence White House Is In Bed With Occupy Wall Street

Occupy Wall Street are the Brown Shirts of the Obama Administration

Records Show Obama White House Told GSA To “Stand-Down” And Not Arrest Occupy Protesters

   

Documents obtained by Judicial Watch confirm that somebody in the White House told officials with the General Services Administration (GSA) to “stand down” and not arrest Occupy Portland protestors who may have broken the law last year.

Former GSA Public Buildings Service Commissioner Robert Peck told a senior Department of Homeland Security official that the federal housekeeping agency had been instructed by the Obama White House to go easy on the Occupy protestors.

In a Nov. 6, 2011, DHS/National Protection and Programs Directorate Chief of Staff Caitlin Durkovich asked GSA’s Peck if it was true that his agency had asked Federal Protective Service officials not to take action against the Occupy Portland protestors.

“Yes, that is our position,” Peck responded. “It’s been vetted with our Administrator and Michael Robertson, our chief of staff, and we have communicated with the WH [White House], which has afforded us the discretion to fashion our approach to Occupy issues…The arrests last week were carried out despite our request that the protesters [sic] be allowed to remain and to camp overnight…”

Keep reading…

Check Out THIS Quid Pro Quo!

See Sam Huntington's essay published today at my web site, and learn about Brookfield Asset Management. Worth your time.

Government corruption abounds! And the mainstream media are complicit.

The Entitlement Mentality

Listen to this erudite "majorette" in drama (hat tip to TOTUS).

Spew alert!


She actually said this:

"They don't have a lot of cuts and stuff for everybody."

"Cuts"? As in "I want my share of the loot"?

In Albemarle County, Virginia

Of all places! Usually, this area is more conservative than to allow the following:


Lyrics:

Some people have it all
But they still don’t think they have enough
They want more money
A faster ride
They’re not content
Never satisfied
Yes — they’re the 1 percent

I used to be one of the 1 percent
I worked all the time
Never saw my family
Couldn’t make life rhyme
Then the bubble burst
It really, really hurt
I lost my money
Lost my pride
Lost my home
Now I’m part of the 99

Some people have it all
But they still don’t think they have enough
They want more money
A faster ride
They’re not content
Never satisfied
Yes — they’re the 1 percent

I used to be sad, now I’m satisfied
’Cause I really have enough
Though I lost my yacht and plane
Didn’t need that extra stuff
Could have been much worse
You don’t need to be first
’Cause I’ve got my friends
Here by my side
Don’t need it all

I’m so happy to be part of the 99

See the pamphlet HERE.

OWS At The 2012 Rose Parade

Idjits:

Occupiers And Homeless Shelters

From Newsbleat:

The Occupy movement has announced that it plans on occupying homeless shelters across the nation to prevent the homeless from gaining access. In this way they hope to force the Obama administration to put all the homeless on the government payroll. A scientific Rasmussen survey has concluded that up to 24% of the homeless will die of freezing and starvation during the planned siege but the Occupy leaders state that “This is reasonable collateral damage if it succeeds in ending homelessness. It’s time the government gave these people jobs and the Wall Street rich paid their wages.”

When asked what would be done with those homeless who prefer the lifestyle and don’t want jobs, Occupy leaders said that “They’ll be given job titles and salaries anyway as it isn’t really expected that the newly employed homeless will actually work. After all, they’ve been unemployed so long that making them work would be too traumatic and could cause them undue stress.”...

Occupy Black Friday?

More information HERE.

Recently, Obama stated to a group of Occupiers heckling him in New Hampshire:

Obama acknowledged the Occupy protest movement again, saying: “You are the reason I ran for office.”

Van Jones: Spokesperson And Leader of the Occupy Movement

A bad penny always turns up:

...President Barack Obama's former “Green Czar,” Van Jones, who describes himself as a “rowdy black nationalist” turned communist has found a job as the official spokesperson and leader of the national movement to end economic segregation and social injustice in the United States.

[...]

Leading the Occupy campaign is President Obama’s good friend, civil rights lawyer Van Jones, the highly-touted “Green Czar” who was booted amid controversy over his radical history.

A Yale Law School grad, Jones became a communist after the 1992 Rodney King riots in Los Angeles and says he loathes capitalism because it exploits nonwhite minorities worldwide. Jones is a committed Marxist-Leninist-Maoist who became a revolutionary after meeting “young radical people of color” in jail and views police officers as the arch enemies of black people, according to the Judicial Watch blogger.

Jones’s proudest moments include publicly supporting convicted cop killer Mumia abu-Jamal, signing a petition suggesting the U.S. government had a hand in the 2001 terrorist attacks, accusing “white polluters” of “environmental racism” for steering poison into poor black communities and referring to Republicans in vulgar terms unbecoming of a presidential advisor, according to the Law Enforcement Examiner....

Clearly, Obama wants to harness the "momentum" of the Occupiers.

THE INHUMANE OCCUPIERS

As one whose spouse is wheelchair bound, I find the following action by the Occupiers disgusting (hat tip to Conservative Hideout 2.0):


More information about the "Occupods" HERE at Conservative Hideout 2.0. As Matt points out:

In essence, is this not illegal restraint? They are blocking the doors, and not allowing people to leave. And, isn’t blocking the exits to a building illegal? What if there was a fire, or other emergency?...

And what about a non-emergency? Anyone who travels via the paratransit system we have here in the Washington, D.C. area and who misses the return ride home is trapped in such a situation. Miss the ride home, and you're stuck for hours, possibly overnight, where you are.

Today, Mr. AOW will be using his scooter, a machine that we cannot transport with our sedans, to travel today via the paratransit system. The Occupiers are forcing Mr. AOW and others using MetroAccess to consider whether or not to go on local outings because of the disruptive actions of Leftist loons? OUTRAGE!

Mr. AOW and I can only hope that nothing happens on his outing today, an outing planned and arranged over a week ago. He will be traveling alone, but after I do the grocery shopping, I'll be coming along later in my own car to assist Mr. AOW with his bathrooming. More worries today for both of us: that I might not be able to get inside to assist him or that he'll miss his paratransit ride back home!

"To see living memorials to King, visit the 'Occupy' protests"

So opines Robert McCartney in today's Washington Post:

...Is there any doubt that King would be marching today with the demonstrators in the Occupy Wall Street movement, urging liberal reforms of the U.S. economy? That he’d be supporting the protesters who have erected camps in two squares in downtown Washington, as well as in New York and other cities?

Although King achieved fame by leading the fight against racial segregation, he also was deeply committed to economic justice....

[...]

Of course, the new movement is only in its infancy. It must overcome significant obstacles before it can dream of achieving the success King had with the civil rights effort.

[...]

If the activists in the parks can find a way to connect with the poor in the job-placement hall, then they could build a movement that would honor Dr. King as much as the new statue on hallowed ground between the Lincoln and Jefferson memorials....

Meanwhile, commenting on Obama's speech today at the dedication of the memorial to Martin Luther King, the Washington Post states as follows:

...In a speech that at times seemed to link King’s own struggles for civil rights with Obama’s political struggles during the economic downturn, the president said the nation was still encountering many of the same challenges that King saw when he made his “I Have a Dream” speech that helped to galvanize the civil rights movement in 1963.

Obama told more than 10,000 spectators and dignitaries who helped unveil the King monument on the national Mall that in many communities little has changed.

“In too many troubled neighborhoods across the county, the conditions of our poorest citizens appear little changed from what existed 50 year ago,” he said.

“There are neighborhoods with underfunded schools and broken down slums, inadequate health care . . .violence. Our work is not done.”

“So on this day when we celebrate a man and a movement that did so much for our country let us draw strength from those earlier struggles,” Obama said.

Making changes that might rock the status quo, as King and other civil rights leaders attempted with civil disobedience, sit-ins, and marches, is no easy task, the president said. And that lesson, he said, could be applied today....

Here comes the big tent approach? The race card in play, too?

There is also the following in the article above:

“Let us draw strength from those earlier struggles,” said Obama, adding that the nation today is “more fair and more free and more just” than the one King addressed.

King was attacked for his activism, labeled a communist and accused of lacking patriotism, but he also encouraged reconciliation among those who disagreed with one another, a path that Obama said the nation should follow today.

“I know we will overcome. I know there are better days ahead,” Obama said to applause. “Let us keep striving, let us keep struggling, let us keep climbing to that promised land of a nation and a world that is more fair and more just.”

As Obama began to speak, the crowd drowned him out by shouting “four more years,” but then fell quiet....

Clearly, Obama is playing two (or more sides) in his speech today.

Listeners to and readers of Obama's speech will perceive Obama's words according to the listeners' and readers' viewpoints of the present economic and political situation.

We are watching Obama the demagogue attempt to consolidate his power and secure his own re-election: by appearing to unite while really dividing and conquering.

Excerpts from Obama's speech today:

Portland Protesters Sing "Fuck the USA!"

From Verum Serum:

What A Group!

With a hat tip to Beamish:


As I said at Beamish's site: They sound like those I went to college with from 1968-1972.

"A consensus for a consensus to start up a committee?" My professors sounded like that too.

Nobody talked back then about occupying foreclosed properties, of course. Rather, they were going to take over the establishment.

My neighbor's Leftist son in town. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that he's here for Occupy DC. He's driving his parents' hand-me-down Saturn station wagon; he doesn't believe in buying himself a car but has no problem whatsoever with living off his parents. My neighbor's son is 41 years old and has been unemployed for over three years. Doesn't want to work for "the capitalistic establishment," as he puts it.

Protests Force Closure of Air and Space Museum

October 8, 2011, Washington, D.C:



Article HERE.

The museum had to be closed as a result of the protests.

The Media Love Occupy Wall Street

From ABC News, dated October 8, 2011:



If you read THIS by Bill Ayers, you'll see that the Occupy Wall Street Movement has a big tent. Excerpt:

They have taken our houses through an illegal foreclosure process, despite not having the original mortgage.

They have taken bailouts from taxpayers with impunity, and continue to give Executives exorbitant bonuses.

[...]

They determine economic policy, despite the catastrophic failures their policies have produced and continue to produce.

They have donated large sums of money to politicians, who are responsible for regulating them.

[...]

They purposefully keep people misinformed and fearful through their control of the media....

I read excerpts from the list to a conservative friend the other day. She gasped! In her words, "Well, there is a lot there that I agree with."

It's no surprise that the mainstream media are promoting Occupy Wall Street.

And it's easy to write off these protesters.

But...

if the group manages to get out a big-tent theme, people who wouldn't ordinarily join in WILL join in.

Brush fires of discontent are popping up all over the place. From the Left, the Right, and the Center.