'cookieChoices = {};'


The Right of the People to be Secure in their Persons, Houses, Papers, and Effects,
Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures,
Shall Not Be Violated

click.jpg

Thursday, August 17, 2017

BREAKING

BREAKING NEWS: At least 13 dead and dozens injured in Barcelona terror attack after van crashes into pedestrians in Las Ramblas tourist district before 'two gunmen take hostages at restaurant'

At least 13 people have been killed and dozens injured after a van in Barcelona ploughed into pedestrians before two men entered a restaurant with guns.
Pictures and video emerging from the scene show armed police and paramedics rushing to Las Ramblas, a busy tree-lined promenade in the centre of the city.  
Horrifying footage from the scene shows dozens of victims lying injured on the floor. 
Police have confirmed that 32 people are injured, with Catalonia's interior minister Joaquim Forn saying it is 'very possible' that the number of dead will rise because of the 'very serious' wounds to victims.
Gunfire was heard at the Corte Ingles store in the area after police announced a 'massive crash'. 
Police officers were said to be negotiating with two attackers in a Turkish restaurant where they have taken hostages. 
Officers were also searching for a second van the attackers may have hired as a getaway vehicle.
The civil guard has said the van used in the attack was rented by a man named Driss Oukabir, in the town of Santa Perpetua de la Mogada, El Pais reports.

Two armed men entrenched in Barcelona bar after van crash - Spanish media

MADRID (Reuters) - Two armed men have entrenched themselves in a bar in Barcelona's city centre after a van mowed down dozens of people, El Periodico newspaper reported on Wednesday.
El Periodico reported gunfire in the area of La Boqueria Market, although it did not cite the source of the information.
It was not immediately clear that the men were the drivers of the van.
 
=======
Follow-on attack against police:
per Fox a white Focus did not stop at a checkpoint, rammed a police officer, got out, fired at police, then took off.

Subway system in Barcelona shut down.

======================

Per Fox/Catherine Herridge the second van was supposed to be used in the attack as well but wasn't.
 
-----------------------------------
 
 
MADRID (Reuters) - A second van linked to an attack in Barcelona on Thursday has been found in the small town of Vic in Catalonia, local authorities there said on Twitter.
Police had cordoned off the area and were inspecting the vehicle, the city council said. Another van earlier mowed down crowds in a busy district in central Barcelona, killing at least 13 people according to local media.
Spanish media earlier reported that a second van had been rented as a getaway car by attackers.







Labels:

Bookmark and Share
posted by midnight rider at permanent link# 1 Comments

Math is hard

This is supposed to make Muslims look good:
So, out of 200 million white Americans, we had 62 lethal terror attacks. That's 0.31 attacks from every 1 million white Americans. Out of 3 million Muslims in America, we had 23 deadly terror attacks. That's 7.7 attacks from every 1 million Muslims in America.

This means that a Muslim in the US is 25 times more likely to commit a lethal terror attack than a white American.

Note that the above numbers ignore two vital details: 9/11 and the combined death toll.

Furthermore, in the USA:
  • Non-Muslims: 99%
  • Muslims: 1%
In terrorist attacks on US soil from 2000-2017, Americans murdered by:
  • Non-Muslims: 1.7% (54)
  • Muslims: 98.3% (3088)
So, 54 people were murdered in terror attacks by culprits who came from the 320 million infidel population of the US. That's 0.17 murdered in a terrorist attack from every 1 million infidels in America. 3,088 people were murdered in terror attacks by Muslims who come from the total 3 million halaal population of the US. That's 1,029 murdered in a terrorist attack from every 1 million Muslims in America.

When it comes to terrorism in America in the current century:

A) In simple terms, Muslims have murdered 57 times more people than non-Muslims.
B) In proportional terms, a Muslim is 6,100 times more lethal than a non-Muslim.

One has to ignore the numbers, deny reality, and pervert the truth to say that Whites or non-Muslims are the real threat in America.

(Originally posted at Isaac Schrödinger.)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
posted by Isaac Schrödinger at permanent link# 2 Comments

Industrial-strength deception

I'm sure that when Muslims all across the globe look at America, the first thought that pops into their heads is, "Wow, so super-Islamic!"
A country that is 1% Muslim is more Islamic than the one with a 97% Muslim population? We do live in the Age of Absurdity.

About that mythical Islamic religious freedom:
There is also a consensus by all four schools of Sunni Islamic jurisprudence (i.e., Maliki, Hanbali, Hanafi, and Shafii), as well as classical Shiite jurists, that apostates from Islam must be put to death. The process of declaring a person to be an apostate is known as takfir and the disbeliever is called a murtad.
More:
The contemporary (i.e., 1991) Al-Azhar (Cairo) Islamic Research Academy endorsed manual of Islamic Law, Umdat al-Salik (pp. 595-96) states: "Leaving Islam is the ugliest form of unbelief (kufr) and the worst.... When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostasizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed. In such a case, it is obligatory...to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed."
Why is it that so many of these religious scholars just can't seem to grasp the peaceful, tolerant nature of Islam?

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 260:
Narrated Ikrima:
Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn 'Abbas, who said, "Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, 'Don't punish (anybody) with Allah's Punishment.' No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.' "
What's truly amusing is that Qasim Rashid is an Ahmadi -- his sect is considered to be heretical by most Muslims. Therefore, Ahmadis are explicitly discriminated against in Pakistan and many other parts of Dar al-Islam.

Instead of understanding and comprehending the tyrannical and totalitarian roots of his gutter religion, this guy revoltingly claims that Islam guarantees universal religious freedom.

Greek democracy, Roman law, Christianity, and White English peoples. That is the foundation of America. Islam is utterly incompatible with it.

(Originally posted at Isaac Schrödinger.)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
posted by Isaac Schrödinger at permanent link# 1 Comments

Trump's Full Press Conference on Charlottesville, 8-15-2017

Listen to the clip at the 11:45 minute mark on. He makes all the distinction he ought to make.

The media is lying.

Whoever says Trump did not condemn Neo-Nazis is a liar.

Whoever criticizes Trump because he did not use soaring language wants another type of human being. He is a New Yorker, he is a businessman, and he is a Pragmatist.

He is telling the truth here, and any anger directed at his supposed hatred is a lie and a slander.

It's enough, my friends.

No more slandering.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 6 Comments

Humpday Blues

Royal Southern Brotherhood
Moonlight Over The Mississippi



Reach My Goal



Midnight Rider


Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by midnight rider at permanent link# 0 Comments

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Uh, Epa

Epa has been going on, for a very long time, about how GDP IS EVERYTHING.

Well:

Trump Factor: Federal Reserve of Atlanta Predicts Massive 3.7% GDP for Third Quarter

And while we're on the subject, I think it is time for us to stop quibbling over Trump's words, and whether he is clearly expressing the right message at the right time.

That is PUBLIC RELATIONS SHIT.

Here's my opinion: 

Make a decision, 

Is Trump a Racist, or not?

Does Trump have a vision you believe in for America, or not?

Does Trump have our back, or not?

We are in the middle of the beginning of the Second American Civil War. I call this war, The Racism War.

It is not a war of Racism. It is a war about Racism.

Who is a Racist, and who has a Racist vision for America? The Democrats, or the Republicans? The Globalists, or the Nationalists?

I believe the Democratic Globalist vision is racist. It believes that we ought to make a decision to de-accentuate the Western Vision. It believes, in fact, that the perpetuation of the Western Vision doesn't even matter, when taking in immigrants. It believes only in the cause of "diversity" for the sake of flooding out those of European heritage, who it considers to be the source of the evil at the root of Western Civilization.

The Globalist Vision does not believe in actually helping this world become a better place by growing the Western Vision. The Globalists do not believe the Western world has anything to offer the rest of the world except our money and the fruits of our "privilege".

The Left says we are the racists.

Who do you believe? Them or us?
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 6 Comments

This morning, MSNBC reported that...

...President Trump stated on Tuesday, August 15, 2017, that some of the torch bearers in Charlottesville were good people. The MSNBC report included the word torches in quotation marks.

I went to YouTube and listened to the entire speech:


Did President Trump state what MSNBC reported as mentioned in the first paragraph of this blog post?

He did say (emphases mine):
TRUMP:...If you take a look at some of the groups, and you see – and you'd know it if you were honest reporters, which in many cases you're not – but many of those people were there to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. So this week it's Robert E. Lee. I noticed that Stonewall Jackson is coming down. I wonder, is it George Washington next week? And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You know, you really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop?

But they were there to protest -- excuse me, if you take a look, the night before they were there to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee....

[...]

Reporter: Who are the good people? Sir, I just didn’t understand what you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly? I just don’t understand what you were saying.

TRUMP: No, no. There were people in that rally -- and I looked the night before -- if you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I’m sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day it looked like they had some rough, bad people -- neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest, and very legally protest -- because I don’t know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn’t have a permit. So I only tell you this: There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country -- a horrible moment. But there are two sides to the country....
Read the entire transcript HERE at the Washington Post.

The words torch and torches were not included in any words uttered by President Trump.

Questions now arise in my mind....

1.  On Friday night, August 11, were there people quietly protesting the removal of the statue and not carrying torches, or was the only group there that evening the torch bearers a la the KKK?

2.  Does anyone here know the exact route of those carrying torches on Friday night?

3.  Does anyone here know if there were people surrounding the statue on Friday night so as to protect it from possible vandals?  I ask this because in 2006, I participated in a protective ring around the Vietnam Veterans Memorial when Code Pink came to Washington, D.C., in a stated attempt to vandalize the Wall.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch at permanent link# 4 Comments

Pasto ..how many are you taking in

Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 6 Comments

Mr. Trump, WAKE UP

I heard your statements.
All 3 of them.
Your defense of your position is putrid.
Avail yourself of help in terms of the statement the ACLU made when the Nazis marched on Skokie in 1972-3 and the ACLU defended the right of the Nazis to do so.
Tell the nation:
In order to defend the rights of every American, INCLUDING BLM AND ANTIFA, including every disgusting political position invented, heinous to us all, it is necessary to defend the rights of the most obnoxious  among us. It is compulsory.
Tell the nation by ensuring the stupid, evil, and hideous Nazis can assemble and protest, you ensure that every American can do so.
Tell the nation THAT’S WHAT THE FOUNDER’S designed.
Tell the nation THAT’S WHAT THE COURTS HAVE DECIDED.
Tell the nation that ANYONE who obtains the local permissions to gather, may do so, and have the irremovable right to do so.
Tell the nation nothing can ever remove the stigma from those who appeared along side the KKK/NAZI/WHITE freakish ghouls, but those who did so, have the right to cover themselves with our public disapproval.
Tell the nation that if BLM or ANTIFA wish to get local permission to gather, and tell the nation that ALL LIVES MATTER is racist, or that cops should die (fry ’em like bacon) or that Republicans are Nazi slaveholders, or BURN ‘Blue lives matter’ flags, it is their protected right to do so.
Protected. Because by protecting their right we protect our own.
As for statues, that’s up to the people to decide locally. It’s not national policy.
If it comes to trashing George Washington, well, we’ll see about that. Jefferson has already been attacked.
At UVA.
In Charlottesville.
No doubt in applying today’s standards, these same people, while ignoring Lincoln’s thoughts on those non-white in America (Liberia anyone?), would also find that Muhammad is a pedophile, right?
I hear laughter.
THIS is the moment to express complete disgust for the White Ghouls, and also hold them free to express their freakish inner compulsions.
Just ask the ACLU which last week sued Charlottesville to prevent the city from moving the ALT-RIGHT extravaganza from the confines of the park where RE Lee sits to large park where police could better control the situation (which they OBVIOUSLY did not). The ACLU was successful in it”s suit to protect the right of these morons to be moronic where they wanted to be moronic.
It’s AMERICA.
Hello?
Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 10 Comments

FBI Reopening FOIA Request into Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Meeting

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Trump doesn't give an inch

I left the following comment yesterday in this post at Infidel Bloggers Alliance:
It would be a mistake for Southerners to give in and allow the removal of such statues and monuments.

The issue isn't slavery. The issue is power and control.

If these symbols are torn down, then we'll quickly see the following "debate":

[[
George Washington, the first US president, was a slave owner. It's deeply "problematic" that supposedly enlightened Americans today use currency which depicts the despicable face of that monster. Every time a Black person uses a quarter or a one dollar bill, he's reminded of the terrible oppression of his people. This is NOT OK!

Therefore, we NEED to melt and burn all the tyrannical currency which has Washington's diabolical face. Who gets to replace him? Why, Obama, of course!

Wait, you oppose that? Well, you must be a racist, slavery-loving, KKK member!
]]

Do not give an inch to these people. Their ilk at the University of London want Plato, Descartes etc. removed from the syllabus because those historical figures were white!

Just because someone from the past did something bad, doesn't mean that we have to delete them or their symbols from history. By that logic, Islam and Muhammad should get a serious ban hammering.
Today, the God Emperor stated:
“George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we gonna take down–are we gonna take down our statues of George Washington,” Trump asked a reporter.
“How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him? Ok good. Are we gonna take down his statue because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we gonna take down his statue?”
Wow! Trump comprehends the dangers of appeasing this lunacy.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
posted by Isaac Schrödinger at permanent link# 2 Comments

Freddie Hubbard
Red Clay


Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by midnight rider at permanent link# 1 Comments

The Stage-Managed Riots: Left Wants To Marinate The Image of Conservative Values in Violence So It Has An Excuse To Eliminate Free Speech


From Daniel Greenfield:

ONE EASY WAY DEMOCRATS CAN STOP NEO-NAZIS

Charlottesville is what happens when the Left empowers extremists.

In Dallas, a black nationalist activist shot and killed 5 police officers at a Black Lives Matter anti-police rally. Instead of condemning BLM, Barack Obama defended a racist hate group whose role model is Assata Shakur, a wanted black nationalist cop killer, at the funerals of the murdered officers.
The left killed civil rights and replaced it with black nationalism. The racial supremacism of black nationalism that killed those officers is everywhere.  Ta-Nehisi Coates and Ibram X. Kendi are lionized as brilliant thinkers instead of hateful racists, Amazon has ordered a black nationalist secessionist fantasy from Aaron McGruder and Showtime aired ‘Guerilla,’ a miniseries glamorizing Black Panther terrorism.
But racism is a two-way street. So is violence. Extremists feed into each other.
You can’t legitimize one form of racism without legitimizing all of them. The media may advance this hypocritical position. Obama used the shameful “reverse racism” euphemism that distinguishes between black and white racism. But propaganda and spin don’t change the physics of human nature.
Either all racism is bad. Or all racism is acceptable.
Charlottesville is what happens when you normalize racism and street violence. Every normalization of extremism equally normalizes the extremism of the opposite side. 
A civil society depends on a consensus. ‘Racism is bad’ is an example of such a consensus. If you normalize black nationalism, you will get more white nationalism. If you normalize leftist street violence against Trump supporters, you will also get more street violence against leftists.
Extremists want to eliminate the consensus of civil society. They want to destroy the idea that there’s any solution except violence through confrontations that show the helplessness of civil society.
That’s true of black nationalists and white nationalists, of Communists and Nazis, of Antifa and  Vanguard, of the tankies and hipster Nazis of the Alt-Left and the Alt-Right. They’re a set of evil twins and when you unleash one, you unleash the other. Their real enemies aren’t each other, but everyone in the middle. The bourgeois normies who don’t want to replace society with their totalitarian nightmare.
Street violence raises the bar so that only the violent will participate in protests. If you “no platform” campus speakers, then the only speakers you get will be those willing to face bomb threats, arson, and physical assaults. If you fire people for their views, political activism becomes the province of anonymous trolls and unemployed street thugs. Extremism limits political discourse to extremists.
If Democrats really want to stop the rise of Neo-Nazi violence, there’s a very easy way. Stop normalizing black nationalism and the Alt-Left. End the racist witch hunts for white privilege. Make it clear that street violence is unacceptable and that racism is bad no matter who it comes from. Allow people you disagree with to express their views without trying to destroy their lives.
But that’s the opposite of what the Dems will do. They don’t want fewer Neo-Nazis; they want more of them. They don’t want fewer attacks like Charlottesville and Charleston. They want more of them.
The Dems have become an extremist party run by the radical left. Obama, Holder, and Lynch made common cause with black nationalist hate groups against civil society. It began when Obama defended the vile racism of Jeremiah Wright and concluded with DOJ organized race riots. DNC boss Tom Perez addresses La Raza and his deputy Keith Ellison is a veteran of the Nation of Islam.
The radical left wants to see Neo-Nazis gain prominence on the right to polarize the country. It wants to see our values and norms drowned in violence so that it has an excuse to eliminate free speech. It seeks to eliminate democracy by making the other side appear nightmarishly dangerous. It plots to impose a totalitarian system on the United States by empowering extremists to destroy the current system.
And their opposite numbers waving swastika flags want the same thing. The difference is that they don’t control the Republican Party the way that the Alt-Left and black nationalists control the Democrats.
Charlottesville is what happens when civil society fails. And those who set the terms of permissive discourse, who control the media, academia and social norms, are responsible for the failure.
Conservatives don’t have that kind of power. It’s the left that does.
Liberals, if there are any left on the left, can shut down racism and extremism. Or they can continue normalizing it until it’s mainstream and meaningless.  
If you want to understand how we got to Charlottesville, the events at Evergreen State on the other side of the country are as good a place as any to start.
Evergreen’s President Bridges, the progressive who had called for safe spaces and allowed intersectional left-wing racists to terrorize his campus over their demands for racial segregation, was asked in an interview about accusations that he is a white supremacist.
Bridges replied that he doesn’t believe that he is a white supremacist. And then added, “It depends on what you mean by white supremacist.” He concedes, “I am a white person in a position of privilege.”

White privilege is how the intersectional left defines white supremacy. Any white people who aren’t allying with them to destroy Western civilization are defined as white supremacists. And even those who do, like Bridges, can always be accused of white supremacy for not destroying it hard enough.
When you spend enough time accusing everyone who doesn’t share your politics or even your race of racism, you make the term meaningless.
That’s what the left did over eight years of Obama. By the time the election rolled around, Hillary was defining all Trump voters as racists and sexists.
When you spend enough time crying wolf, eventually a real wolf appears. A real wolf showed up in Charlottesville.
The left spent eight years dismantling any meaningful definition of racism for political reasons. The practical effect of their actions was to eliminate social sanctions for actual racists.
And the real racists were happy to take advantage of the new climate.
When the left insists that everyone with white skin is part of white supremacy, that Shakespeare, Beethoven and all of Western civilization embody white supremacy, it’s echoing the actual talking points of white supremacy.
If you tell all Obama critics and Trump supporters that they’re racists often enough, some will decide that maybe they are racists.
If you tell a student who objects to racially segregated areas on campus that she is a white supremacist, she will be more likely to become one.
When you marginalize everyone to the right of you, some of the marginalized will accept the definition.
And when that happens, the left wins, the extremists win, and it becomes harder to maintain any kind of functioning civil society in which we settle conflicts through compromises rather than street violence.
Compromises are uncomfortable.
After the Civil War, the Union was preserved, but Southerners were allowed to honor their cause. It was an uncomfortable compromise, but it helped limit the violence from a conflict that had claimed the lives of 2% of the population. The Taliban campaign by black nationalists to tear down Confederate memorials was a deliberate effort at shattering a compromise that kept civil society working.
And that too led to Charlottesville.
Uncomfortable compromises are how we learn to live with each other. It means that there can be memorials of Robert E. Lee and streets named after Malcolm X. Tolerating people whose views we don’t like is one of the best ways to marginalize domestic extremists. When one set of extremists is empowered to wipe out the other, we end up with a civil war. Just ask Edmund Ruffin and John Brown.
Democrats claim a mandate from the “Right Side of History” to eliminate all the compromises. Catholic nuns must pay for abortions and birth control, Christian bakers and florists must participate in gay weddings, every white person must confess their racism, and every left-wing extremist must get their way.
That’s how you tear a society apart.
The Bill of Rights is an uncomfortable compromise. It says that we have to put up with people we don’t like. The Democrats, under the influence of the left, are rejecting that idea. But that goes both ways too.
You can have a liberal society or an illiberal one. But you can’t have a society that is selectively liberal when it comes to your bigotry, but illiberal of the bigotry of others, that believes you have the right to say anything you please without consequences, but that no one else does, that you can punch, but not be punched. That’s a totalitarian state. And the only way to realize it is through violence.
Democrats need to take an honest look at the street violence in Seattle, in Portland, in Berkeley and Charlottesville, and decide if this is what they really want. If they don’t, it’s time for them to stop normalizing left-wing extremism. If they do, then they are to blame for the next Dallas or Charlottesville.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 8 Comments

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Jason Kessler: Agent Provocateur?

From the Southern Poverty Law Center (emphasis mine):
...Rumors abound on white nationalist forums that Kessler’s ideological pedigree before 2016 was less than pure and seem to point to involvement in the Occupy movement and past support for President Obama.

At one recent speech in favor of Charlottesville’s status as a sanctuary city, Kessler live-streamed himself as an attendee questioned him and apologized for an undisclosed spat during Kessler’s apparent involvement with Occupy. Kessler appeared visibly perturbed by the woman’s presence and reminders of their past association.

Kessler himself has placed his “red-pilling” around December of 2013 when a PR executive was publicly excoriated [NYT] for a tasteless Twitter joke about AIDS in Africa.

Regarding the incident, Kessler stated '… so it was just a little race joke, nothing that big of a deal, she didn’t have that many followers, she probably didn’t think anybody was gonna see it,'

Regardless of Kessler’s past politics, the rightward shift in his views was first put on display in November, 2016 when his tirade against Wes Bellamy began....
The SPLC page also states:
...Arrest records indicate that Kessler was convicted in 2005 for shoplifting, obstructing justice and for a string of failures to appear and register, in addition to numerous traffic violations and citations....
On a different web page (August 14, 2017), Zero Hedge offers the following screenshot (Click directly on the image to enlarge it):


At the same post, Zero Hedge also offers the following:
Nothing smells right about any of this. In fact, Lee Stranahan has connected the “Unite the Right” rally to an identical Neo-Nazi movement in Ukraine supported by John McCain and Hillary Clinton.

POLITICAL THEATER!

And...

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch at permanent link# 0 Comments

Antifa Started Violence In Charlottesville, Police Directed White Nationalists To Disperse To Where Antifa Was

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments


Older Posts