Wednesday, January 09, 2008

A Society Trapped In Its Own Assumptions

The following is an excerpt from a book review of Serge Trifkovic's book, Defeating Jihad. The reviewer is Brian Mitchell. You can read the entire review here. Here's the excerpt:

There are a lot of things that are very popular with the people but absolutely impossible for their elected representatives...and a crackdown on Islam is one of them. It isn’t that Muslims are already so influential in America that our pols must pay them attention. Rather, our own political principles make it virtually impossible to define Islam as an alien influence.

If the “War on Terror” must be compared with the Cold War, we should see ourselves not as the hard-core anticommunists of the pre-McCarthy era but as the desperate Soviet ideologues trapped in their own failing system. Trifkovic himself makes the connection: The problem of centrally planned economy could not be solved because the solution remained outside the ideological parameters of the decision-making community. To consider capitalism as an option was illegitimate, as it would have demanded a paradigm shift that could not stop short of altering the system as a whole.

“The debate on Islamic terrorism in the United States has the same Soviet quality,” Trifkovic continues. “It rarely touches on the fundamentals of policy or history” but merely quibbles over possible applications of our obligatory assumptions. Judging by the long lines at airport-security gates, we can only conclude that our soviets are working harder to save our assumptions than to save our selves.

The first fatal assumption is the belief that religion does not really matter, that wealth and freedom can fully satisfy the yearnings of the human heart, and that people only need religion when they do not have iPods. Reasoning in this manner, we must conclude that Islam is not to blame for our present conflict, and pointing out that our enemies are all Muslim (and not all poor or uneducated or even Arab) is therefore divisive, unhelpful, and un-American.

A second assumption is that any conflict between Christianity and Islam is Christianity’s fault. Only historical ignorance and anti-Christian animus can account for this assumption, but our ruling elites lack neither. It is telling that the first major film to capitalize on post-September 11 passions (Kingdom of Heaven) depicted the Christians as the villains.

From these assumptions come liberal Europe’s odd tolerance of illiberal Islam and sense of moral obligation to Muslim immigrants. The combination amounts to a civilizational death wish, unprecedented in history. “No other race subscribes to these moral principles,” writes Jean Raspail, “because they are weapons of self-annihilation.”

The evidence Trifkovic adduces for this death wish is appalling. Shortly after September 11, British Prime Minister Tony Blair welcomed Muslim leaders to 10 Downing Street to tell them, “What happened in America was not the work of Islamic terrorists, it was not the work of Muslim terrorists. It was the work of terrorists, pure and simple.” Imagine Winston Churchill assuring Oswald Mosley that the Blitz was not the work of German aviators or even Nazi aviators, but aviators, pure and simple.

Europe’s sympathy for Islam has deeper roots than most Americans might imagine. Enlightened libidos eager to cross the bounds of Christian morality were attracted to the legendary licentiousness of the harem and the Turkish bath. (Trifkovic reports that, in England, homosexuality became known as the “Persian” or “Turkish” vice.) At the same time, Islam itself was admired for its simplicity and austerity, in contrast to Christian weakness and decadence. Gibbon openly sympathized with the manly Muslim Turks against the effeminate Christian Byzantines caricatured in his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1776-88), while Montesquieu assumed a Persian perspective to satirize French society in his Persian Letters (1721).

Trifkovic relates this early anti-Christian, pro-Muslim bias to the sympathy of such European leftists as Bernard-Henri Levy for Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo. The Jewishness of Levy and many other European intellectuals only adds to the left’s chronic Christophobia. Even amid a surge in attacks on Jews by Muslims in Europe, European leftists have preferred to point the finger at the usual suspects— “young, disaffected white Europeans, often stimulated by extreme right-wing groups,” according to Beate Winkler, head of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia.

Recently, in the wake of attacks in Europe by outright terrorists, European nations have taken modest steps to defend themselves. But simple demographics appear ready to finish what Europe’s feminist, multicultural, anti-Christian elites have started. Birthrates of Europeans throughout Europe are barely half of what is needed for replacement, while the Muslim population of Europe, now 50 million, is expect to double in 20 years. By 2025, Muslims will account for one third of all births in the European Union.

The situation in the United States is more hopeful. There are far fewer Muslims in America (less than two million), and there are many more Christians. Trifkovic writes that, in France, Holland, Belgium, and Germany, more people worship in mosques on Friday than in churches on Sunday, whereas over 80 percent of Americans still call themselves Christians...

Unfortunately, we Americans have our own useful idiots eager to absolve Islam of any blame. There are the editors at Houghton Mifflin who (by my own count) tell schoolchildren ten times in a two-volume set that Muslims are “tolerant,” and ten times in the same set that Christians “persecute” people. There are the producers at PBS who do not question Muslim claims in the miniseries Mohammad: Legacy of a Prophet but make skepticism toward the central tenets of Christianity the basis of the documentary From Jesus to Christ. And there are the politicians (some actually in politics) whose only hope is to con us all, Muslims included, into believing that Islam is a religion of peace and that jihad is only for heretics.

3 comments:

Ray Boyd said...

Excellent article but with a somewhat depressing outcome if it is correct.

Anonymous said...

As a near-lifelong atheist with an Objectivist philosophical background I have no trouble identifying a religion as a source of danger. And being possessed of a minimum of common sense I can spot the fact that the religion is Islam rather than Christianity. Had I been steeped in Marxism and multiculturalism since childhood and been fool enough to believe it and dishonest enough to ignore the evidence, I might think as the Leftards do.

And isn't it interesting that Christians so often get blamed for "persecuting" religions such as that of the Aztecs with their bloody temples and sunrise human sacrifices? No wonder liberals are so good at ignoring things like clitorectomies and honor killings and the beheading of apostates. There was a time, centuries ago, when critizing Christianity could get you killed. Now it is an easy and safe mark, and the Left knows it. The Muslims, on the other hand, are liable to kill you. And is there not a certain attraction for the militant Left in the spectacle of an ideology that will not hesitate to use lethal force against the innocent to further its ends? Is this not one reason they view Islam as an ally in their dream of destroying Western Civilization, not only Christianity but individualism, capitalism, freedom of thought and expression?

Before I forget to mention it, where can I get one of those signs?

Citizen Warrior said...

Most liberals I know are sympathetic to Muslims because they think Muslims are the underdog, the weaker, poorer people who are being oppressed by the domineering West.

They think of those of us who wish to protect our freedoms as somehow bigoted or racist, or something like that. If they thought about it for two seconds, they would know neither of those labels apply, but they just think there is something inherently wrong with criticizing another culture or religion except our own because it doesn't seem like a nice thing to do. It feels arrogant to them.

Part of our job is to get people like that to understand that Islam is a real political danger and it is not racist or bigoted to say so. We need to get them to see it is reasonable and sensible to criticize a political ideology if it is dangerous to everybody, including Muslims themselves.

By the way, I don't think anyone is marketing those signs, but I think they would sell!