AUSTRIA'S RIGHT
The media calls any party who rejects immigration as "neo-nazi". Nowhere in the column, however, do we get any description of a vicious neo-nazi platform. What I am reading is the logical reaction a culture has when trying to react against the cultural relativists who ask for culturcide. These are men and women who understand the culture war against, in particular, Islam.
read the rest @ http://genycon.blogspot.com/2008/10/austria-right.html
Charging To The Right
Austria's far-right parties may have modulated their tone, but their message is increasingly familiar.
By Rod Nordland | NEWSWEEK
Published Oct 4, 2008
From the magazine issue dated Oct 13, 2008
Throughout Europe, the far-right parties have been largely banished, consigned to the dustbin of history. In France, the National Front is at its lowest ebb in years. In Germany, extreme-right-wing parties are marginalized and irrelevant in national politics. But in Austria, the far right is resurgent again. Last week two far-right parties—both stridently anti-EU, anti-United States and anti-immigrant—became the strongest such force in Europe, after national elections there gave them arguably the biggest share of the vote ever won by rightists in modern Western Europe.
Together they tallied 29 percent, only 30,000 votes behind the leading party, the center-left Social Democrats. SIEG ... was the pointed headline on the Austrian newsmagazine Profil, over a picture of the two right-wing leaders, newcomer Heinz-Christian Strache and Jörg Haidar, the longtime rightist politician. "Internationally, Austria is 'Naziland' yet again," said Die Presse in Vienna. And perhaps domestically as well, with the very real possibility that Austria's mainstream parties will be unable to form a government without turning to parties that directly or indirectly descended from the Austrian Nazi Party.
read the rest @ http://genycon.blogspot.com/2008/10/austria-right.html
Labels: Europe, radical islam
posted by sir_publius_platypus at
6:23:00 PM
4 Comments:
Well, there's the right, and then there's the right.
In america Pat Buchanan is actually racist. On the other hand, Thomas Sowell , Victor Davis Hanson, and Bill Kristol are not.
The movement to have a secure border is not a racist movement, but racists certainly support it.
Calling for an end to immigration is NOT racist, but racists will certainly support such a plan.
That is why is it HYPERCRITICAL in such movements that real racists be publicly excoriated and drummed out ..the way William Buckley did (John Birch Society), and the way Ronald Reagan (David Duke, and the KKK) did. They should not be allowed to take part. Donations should be returned and/or donated to charity, preferably MINORITY charities.
FROM UPI:"The Freedom Party became a member of Austria's governing coalition in 1999, prompting a diplomatic boycott by the European Union. Haider had publicly praised the SS and Hitler's employment policies. Israel withdrew its ambassador."
The year 1984 came and went, and then in the late 1980s the Soviet Bloc collapsed. Consequently, I began to regard Orwell's 1984 as an outdated novel of what might have been but didn't happen.
However, the last two or three years have changed my mind, and I now think that '1984' is one of the most brilliant prophetic books ever written. I'm only just realising that what Orwell was predicting was not a world where Soviet Communism had triumphed, but a world where tendencies inherent among the Metropolitan 'Fabian Intellectual' Elite of the Labour Party had reached their logical conclusions.
Not only do we now have a state apparatus for surveillance, thought-control, dumbing-down and bureaucratic micromanagement that in 1948 (when '1984' was published) only existed in Orwell's nightmares and Stalin's dreams. But we also have a social division which didn't exist in Stalin's Empire, yet was predicted by Orwell - that between the Party Members and the Proles.
Whatever their private views, the old-style communists always pretended to have a great respect and affinity with the working class. But in Orwell's dystopian Britain, the Party Members have an openly expressed contempt for the Proles, who are kept in a dumbed-down state of servitude by deliberately deficient education and a culture of 'prolefeed' - soap operas, soft porn etc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proles
This is exactly the condition we now find ourselves in. The Elite actually comprise not only the Labour Party leadership, but also the Metropolitan Elite of the BBC, who produce prolefeed for idiots, and maintain political correctness among those who might still have functioning brains and must be prevented from becoming thought-criminals.
If you need any more convincing that the NuLabour elite and the BBC detest and despise the proles, just bring to mind Jack Straw, Harriet Harm-men, and Andrew Marr:
"Harman is the embodiment of so much that is wrong with New Labour. Born into affluent privilege herself, Harman is that classic socialist type that regards the robust British working class with suspicion." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1020553/Why-does-Harriet-Harman-hate-marriage.html
"Beware the English - a nation with the potential for aggression and violence.
That's the warning from Home Secretary Jack Straw, who has aired his views on a BBC radio debate about what it means to be British." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/596717.stm
"And the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress...I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The police are first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Act will impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too." - Andrew Marr http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/1999/feb/28/lawrence.ukcrime4
As far as I know, there are far-right parties in Europe that are not anti-USA.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home