Never Again and Again
and Again and Again

click.jpg

Saturday, April 05, 2008

UC Irvine: Hotbed of Islamic Anti-Semitism

Muslim anti-Semitism is so bad a UCI that the US Senate Judiciary Commitee has demanded that the Dept. of Education Investigate the problem.

But, that doesn't stop the Orange County Register from denying there is anti-Semitism at UCI:


The following is a sample of what a Jewish or pro-Israel student could potentially experience during daily campus life at UC Irvine and the Muslim Student Union's quarterly anti-Jewish, anti-American, and anti-West programs:
1. The desecration of Israeli flags with swastikas and blood stains.

2. Intimidation and abuse while practicing student journalism and protest during Muslim Student Union events. This has included the use of photo capture of the faces of Jewish or pro-Israeli students for the use of future intimidation; pushing, shoving, and shouting in the faces of Jewish or pro-Israeli students; and assault with hurtful objects such as rocks by Muslim Student Union Members.
3. Muslim speakers who express their desire for Israel to be wiped off the map.
4. Muslim speakers who express their hatred towards Jews involved in politics.
5. Muslim speakers who blame Jews on undesirable social conditions.
6. Muslim speakers who tell Jews to get out of their ghettos.
7. Muslim speakers who boast that Jews are afraid to get on buses in Israel out of fear of the "freedom fighters" who strap bombs to their bodies.
8. Muslim speakers who assert that "Jews are the new Nazis."
9. Depictions of Jews with hooked noses in exhibits.
10. Plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty meant to demonize Jews.
11. The intimidation of Jewish and pro-Israeli speakers by members of the Muslim Student Union.
12. Programs hosted by the Muslim Student Union titled: "Holocaust in the Holyland," "Genocide in Gaza," and "Israel: The 4th Reich."
13. Posters on campus suggesting that Israeli soldiers target Arab children to shoot on sight.


Here's video of the vile Jew-hatred which exists openly on the campus at UCI:


Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 16 Comments

Storm Track Intimidation: An Afghan Girl Defies the Islamists

A teenage Afghan girl refuses to be intimidated by the religion of peace and tolerance – including death threats because she wants to compete in the 2008 Olympics.

Mehboba Ahdyar, a shy 19-year-old from Kabul, will face the worlds best 1,500-metre runners in August wearing a veil and a baggy tracksuit. While she is unlikely to mount the winner's podium, few of her opponents will have endured such a perilous training regime to get them to the Games.

Training for Mehboba begins after nightfall. At 8.30pm, when Kabul residents are transfixed by the daily episode of the country's most popular soap opera, a racy Indian drama named ‘Because a Mother-in-Law was Once a Daughter-in-Law Too’, Mehboba slips out of her house in a poor suburb and starts running.

She runs up and down the streets for the duration of the programme. It is the only time when, as a woman, she can supplement her official training sessions without threats or harassment.


That’s interesting. A soap opera so compelling that the fundamentalists are at home watching TV and not on the streets? Still, there’s other ways to harass her.

Read the rest at The Gathering Storm.
Bookmark and Share
posted by WC at permanent link# 0 Comments

Attention All Muslims - We Are So Sorry We Are Hurting Your Feelings

Wow! What a powerful video.

Warning; graphic imagery, and brutal truth.





Thanks to Jihad In Malmo
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 2 Comments

Saudi Woman Killed By Her Father For Chatting With Man On Facebook

Women are just property. They are like a car on a car lot. If they accumulate too much milage from test drives, then they can no longer be considered a new car. If they are not a new car, then their bluebook value is severely decreased, leading to a loss of profit for the family.

This man on Facebook attempted to testdrive a new vagina without notifying the owner of the car lot.

Who can blame the father for being angry?

From the BBC (with thanks to Rolf Krake):


A debate is rising over “honor murder” following a case that belatedly revealed that a young Saudi Arabian woman was killed by her father for chatting on the Internet social network site, Facebook.

British daily Telegraph quoted Monday’s Middle East news sites including al-Arabiya as saying, “Social networking sites, like Facebook, are causing social strife in the Islamic nation and the incident is an example.”

According to the report by al-Arabiya, a Saudi woman was beaten and shot by her father after being caught while chatting with a man on Facebook.

This is a typical case of honor murder whereby a woman, discovered to associate with another man, is murdered by her family members as punishment for “denigrating the honor of family.” Punishable acts, once limited to offline relationships, such as having a kiss, sleeping together, and sharing a table, have now expanded to online relations.

The tragic incident,

(Pastorius note: Murder is a "tragic indident")

which had remained concealed for some time, was revealed to the media when Saudi preacher Ali al-Maliki began criticizing Facebook, claiming the network as a “door to lust.” Maliki said, “These days, young women and men are spending more on their mobile phones and the Internet than they do on food." He went on to argue that those sites that destroy Islamic culture should be shut down to stem social strife. He sternly warned women frequenting Facebook to stop visiting the site.

Facebook is now estimated to have more than 30,000 users in Saudi Arabia. A majority of them use nicknames and post drawings on their pages instead of photographs. Because of this, some have dubbed this the “Faceless” network.

Islam religious leaders blame social networking sites for becoming a hotbed for homosexuals and a place for obscene material. Following Syria’s lead, which banned access to Facebook last November, some Islamic countries have stepped up Internet censorship and are cracking down on those operating the sites.

Muslim women, however, are standing up against these harsh measures. One female journalist said, “The Internet is an outlet where women let out their pent-up emotions and an avenue where they can associate with youth around the world to learn diverse cultures.” She added, “Though authorities ban access to Facebook, we will continue to visit similar social network sites.”


One would never want a vagina to let out its pent-up emotions, or for a vagina to learn about diversity.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Driving While Muslim: UK Court Rules Speeding Is Necessary For Muslim


Bend over, grease up, and let Allah invade you eternally. Islam is the perfect excuse for any sin and/or rule-breaking. And, we Infidels, we just have to enjoy it (from the Daily Mail):


When it comes to avoiding a ban for speeding, the courts hear every excuse in the book.

But yesterday one motorist offered what must be a unique reason why he should keep his licence.


Mohammed Anwar said a ban would make it difficult to commute between his two wives and fulfil his matrimonial duties.

His lawyer told a Scottish court the Muslim restaurant owner has one wife in Motherwell and another in Glasgow - he is allowed up to four under his religion - and sleeps with them on alternate nights.

He also needed his driving licence to run his restaurant in Falkirk, Stirlingshire.

Airdrie Sheriff Court had heard that Anwar was caught driving at 64mph in a 30mph zone in Glasgow, fast enough to qualify for instant disqualification.

Anwar admitted the offence, but Sheriff John C. Morris accepted his plea not to be banned and allowed him to keep his licence.

Instead, he was fined £200 and given six penalty points.

Lorna Jackson, from the road safety charity Brake, called the decision "astonishing".

She said: "Regardless of the number of wives or businesses this man drives to, he broke a law which is there to protect everyone.

"Travelling just a few miles over the limit in a 30mph zone can be the difference between life and death if you hit someone, let alone driving at more than twice the speed limit.

"Drivers know the law, and they know the punishment they could face when they break it.

"For the courts to allow someone to keep their licence when they have so blatantly flouted the law and put peoples' lives at risk, on the basis of an excuse such as this, is astonishing."

Anwar, wearing a suit and an open-neck shirt, had made no comment during his five-minute court appearance, apart from confirming his identity.

But last night, speaking from his restaurant Sanam, he said: "It is true I have two wives.
"Muslim men are allowed up to four. But I am not a religious leader and it is not my place to comment.


"As a matter of respect to my wives I would not comment on my home life.

"The sheriff did not ban me because I need my licence to run my business, although my wives were also part of the decision."

The court had heard that Anwar was on his way home from Falkirk to his Glasgow wife on August 21, 2007, when he was caught by city police using a hand-held speed camera.

His lawyer, Paul Nicolson, said: "He realises his licence is at risk, but this is an unusual case and is very anxious to keep his driving licence.

"He has one wife in Motherwell and another in Glasgow and sleeps with one one night and stays with the other the next on an alternate basis.

"Without his driving licence he would be unable to do this on a regular basis.

"He is also a restaurant owner and has a restaurant in Falkirk, which he has had for the past 30 years.

"He has had a clean driving licence until now, and on this particular evening was on his way home after a busy evening at his restaurant."


Amazing that a UK court accepts his testimony that he does, in violation of United Kingdom law, have two wives.

And, not only does the court accept this testimony (which amounts to an admission of guilt in itself), but the court takes it under advisement and rules in his favor because of the excuse.

And, once again, his excuse is that HE WAS BREAKING THE LAW IN ANOTHER PART OF HIS LIFE.

I'm sorry I was breaking the law, you Honor, but I felt that I must, because I was breaking the law in another manner, and how could I go on breaking the law, if I weren't breaking the law.

Get it? Got it?

That's Islam.
Throw the guy out of the country. He doesn't want to live under the laws of the UK. He wants to live under Sharia. Send him to Saudi Arabia.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 9 Comments

Silencing the People

IT IS axiomatic that freedom of expression is the foundation of human freedom and progress. When people are not allowed to express themselves freely, there can be no debate or inquiry. It is only due to free debate and inquiry that humanity has progressed from the Dark Age to the Digital Age. This is why the first act of every would-be tyrant is to take control of the marketplace of ideas. - Caroline Glick, The Jerusalem Post

It has recently been reported that Susan Winter, a politician (Stadträtin) in Graz, Austria has been indicted for "Incitement and Degradation of Religious Symbols". If found guilty, she faces up to two years in an Austrian jail! Why? Because she had the temerity to speak her mind, she had the chutzpah to speak the truth as she saw the truth to be. After all, she believed, rightly in my opinion, that she lived in a European country which upheld the right of free speech. Not so, it seems.

She stated that the prophet Muhammad was a Kinderschänder, child molester, or paedophile. She also stated that Muhammad was a warlord. There were videos of her speech on YouTube, and even on my own website, but they all appear to have been removed! (God knows who removed them!)

That a person in Europe is now no longer able to express himself/herself freely, and with impunity, augers badly for our future here in Europe, for however repugnant a person’s ideas are, that person should be allowed to express them freely. As Caroline Glick stated (above): "It is axiomatic that freedom of expression is the foundation of human freedom and progress."

One thing that differentiates the world of the West with the Muslim world is this: Until now, we Westerners were allowed to express ourselves freely, without fear of reprisals from the law. The same cannot be said about people’s rights in Muslim nations. Is it, then, any wonder that the West has moved from the Dark Ages to the Digital Age, whereas the Muslim world has not? Whatever vestiges of the Digital Age the Muslim world enjoys can be attributed directly to the progress made by Westerners. For without Western civilization, Muslims would still be riding around on their camels, and would be living in tents.

One must therefore ask oneself one simple, but one very important, question: Is it the intention of European politicians to take western Europe back to the Dark Ages? Or are they just too yellow to speak up for Judeo-Christian civilization, the civilization which has brought the West so much in terms of human progress and development?

Do these weak, wimpish, excuses for politicians not realize that this wonderful civilization is not theirs to give away? Don’t they realize that we are merely custodians of this civilization?

Another recent example of the cowardliness of Western politicians is in their recent reaction to Geert Wilders’ wonderful, short film, Fitna. In that short little video, he managed to encapsulate all the dangers that Islam – yes Islam, not Islamism – poses to the till yet free, Western world.

Yet what has he got for his labours in return? Nothing but a blasting! European politicians, almost to a man, have denigrated this courageous Dutch politician for telling the people what they don’t want to know, but need to know if they are to be able to continue living in liberty.

Balkenende, the prime minister of the Netherlands, is probably the example par excellence of a politician without gonads. Before the film’s release, he had been running around like a headless chicken, trying to minimize the expected fall-out from the release of the excellent film.

If the Dutch government had been able, legally, to silence the brave and courageous Geert Wilders, then there is absolutely no doubt that it would have done so.

So where is all this leading to? Well, the answer to this simple question is quite simple: To no good place!

First of all, it should be stated that it is no good talking the talk without walking the walk. Western politicians are very adept at talking up the benefits of democracy and freedom. But to all but the blindest among us, it should be obvious that they are also adept at taking people’s liberty and democracy away from them! They are running scared; and they are hell-bent on avoiding conflict with an enemy – Islam – which is implacable. But there is a word in most languages for this. In English, it is called appeasement. In French, it is called apaisement, in German, Beschwichtigung. Whichever word you use in your language, it amounts to the same thing: Weakness!

It should be obvious to all that the West has not come to this wonderful place without struggle and strife. In each and every age, we will find our enemies and detractors. In the twentieth century, people had to live with the dangers of Nazism, for Hitler was the enemy of the day. But people back then had a backbone, and they had principle, too. And they were willing to fight for those principles; indeed, they were willing to die for them. They were most unlike the current bunch of excuses for statesmen we have leading us today! Think of them: Brown, Verhagen, Balkenende, Bush, ex-prime minister Blair. The list is endless. They are all wimps; they are all cowards, they are all unworthy of leading the free world.

We should all get one thing straight: Islam is not in the West to be equal to any other faith; rather, it is here to become dominant. Muslims will not rest until the laws of the land are supplanted by the laws of the Qur’an, by the so-called Sahri’ah laws that their god – Allah – is supposed to have sent down to them.

Shari’ah law is anathema to all the West stands for. It tolerates no equality between the sexes. It tolerates no rights for homosexuals. It tolerates no diversity of belief; and it certainly doesn’t tolerate disbelief. If Shari’ah gets the upper hands, we shall all be praying in the direction of Makkah, we shall all be Muslims then.

It is time for Westerners to re-assert their commitment to Judeo-Christian culture, to Judeo-Christian civilization, to liberty, democracy and all that our wonderful, superior civilization has given us. It is also high time for the people to stand up and tell their leaders that we will not be silenced.

As Geert Wilders said, the hour is late. There is little time to lose. If we lose this battle, we shall surely be taken back to a ‘New Dark Age’. No kidding!

©Mark Alexander

All Rights Reserved

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Mark at permanent link# 4 Comments

Radical Islam Taking Over Europe

This video is at least as frightening as Fitna.


Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 3 Comments

But they'd never train Al Qaeda..does that sound like hope?

GERTZ: Iran trains Hamas operatives to reverse-engineer rockets

GAZA CITY -- Palestinian sources said Iran has completed training of at least 50 Hamas operatives in missile and rocket development and production.

The sources said the operatives, who came to Teheran with technical skills, were taught how to reverse-engineer the advanced rockets smuggled into the Gaza Strip over the last year.

BM-21 Grad rocket
"The training is how to take the components of one rocket and use it to improve an existing model, or simply how to reverse-engineer a rocket so you can produce it yourself," a Palestinian source in the Gaza Strip said. "This has become a key area of expertise for Hizbullah."

The sources said the Iranian effort was meant to overcome obstacles by Hamas in enhancing its Kassam-class missile arsenal. Hamas has encountered difficulties in extending the Kassam past the current range of about 17 kilometers.

Another difficulty addressed by the Iranians was how to produce the BM-21 Grad rocket. In February 2008, Hamas fired its first salvos of Grads into the Israeli city of Ashkelon, which contains strategic sites.

The sources said Hamas operatives worked in rocket production facilities in Teheran and were taught how to execute blueprints and technical diagrams. They said Iran also identified ways to enhance the Kassam missile.

Iran has already trained Islamic Jihad to produce the Quds rocket, said to have a range of 18 kilometers. The rocket, capable of striking most of Ashkelon, has a smaller warhead than Grad.


Now, HAMAS and PIJ are both the most sunni, and salafi of organization, both having sprung from the source of the Muslim Brotherhood. HAMAS IS the MB. And so is Zawalhiri.

"The standard has become the Grad," the source said. "Besides its extended range, it is much more powerful than the Kassam."

The sources said Hamas has become alarmed by the Egyptian crackdown on smuggling from the Sinai Peninsula to the Gaza Strip. In March, Egypt destroyed several weapons tunnels that spanned the divided city of Rafah.

Iran has sought to smuggle the Grads as well as its variant, Nour, from Lebanon to either the Sinai city of El Arish or the Gaza Strip. But the sources said the size of the shipments were regarded as too small to sustain any conflict with Israel.

In February, at least 200 Hamas operatives trained in Iran returned to the Gaza Strip via Sinai. The sources said Iran has trained Hamas and Hizbullah fighters in the same facilities to increase interoperability. Iran has also trained the Syrian-sponsored Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command.

Teheran has also trained Hamas in asymmetrical warfare, meant to block the advance of a much larger Israeli military. The sources said Hamas fighters were instructed in the use of anti-tank guided missiles, improvised explosive devices, anti-aircraft weapons and night fighting.

Movements such as HAMAS, PIJ, Al Qaeda, and all it's offshoots CANNOT SUCCESSFULLY EXIST without the support, succor and training of nation states. These organizations and the few states which will support them WILL ALL WORK TOGETHER.

The press recently jumped all over McCain for the 'faux-pas' of thinking that Iran would train Al Qaeda. They are naive fools to treat such an event as so impossible as to make it an exceptional news item. WE ARE THE MAIN ENEMY. WE, to them are SATAN. Differing physical means of praying, differing ideas about who should have succeeded Muhammad, veneration of individuals, and cross accusations of lack of different purities will not stop the mullahs like Mesbah Yazdi, Jannati, and Khameinei from cooperating witht the 'sons' of Qutb, Al Banna or Maududi.

Depend on it


Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 0 Comments

Obama And MLK

From the Wall Street Journal, via Atlas Shrugs:



OBAMA AND KING
Juan Williams

Figures such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have tried to claim his place on the American stage. But at most they have achieved fame and wealth. What separated King from any would-be successor was his moral authority. He towered above the high walls of racial suspicion by speaking truth to all sides.

Now comes Barack Obama, a black man and a plausible national leader, who appeals across racial lines. But to his black and white supporters, Mr. Obama increasingly represents different things.

The initial base of support for Mr. Obama's presidential campaign came from young whites – who saw in him the ability to take the nation to a place where, to quote from King's "I Have A Dream" speech, "we shall be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood."

Black voters rallied to Mr. Obama after whites in Iowa and New Hampshire showed they were willing to vote for him. Mr. Obama spoke directly to charges that he was not "black enough," that he was not a child of the civil rights movement because he grew up in Hawaii and has an Ivy League education, that he is too young, it is not his time, and even that his campaign is too risky because white racists might kill him.

Mr. Obama, his wife Michelle and supporters such as Oprah Winfrey make the case to black voters that he is the fruit of the struggles of King and others. They argue that this generation of black Americans does not have to wait for their turn to reach for the ultimate political power of the presidency.

Mr. Obama has carried a message of pride and self-sufficiency to black voters nationwide, who have rewarded him with support reaching 80% and higher. His candidacy has become, as the headline on Ebony magazine put it, a matter of having a black man as president "In Our Lifetime."

Among his white supporters, race is coincidental, not central, to his political identity. Mr. Obama is to them the candidate who personifies the promise of equal opportunity for all. But as black support has become central to his victories, this idealistic view has been increasingly at war with the portrayal, crafted by the senator to win black support, of him as the black candidate. The terrible tension between these racially distinct views now surrounds and threatens his campaign.

So far, Mr. Obama has been content to let black people have their vision of him while white people hold to a separate, segregated reality. He is a politician and, unlike King, his goal is winning votes, not changing hearts.

Still, it is a key break from the King tradition to sell different messages to different audiences based on race, and to fail to challenge racial divisions in the nation.

Mr. Obama's major speech on race last month was forced from him only after a political crisis erupted: It became widely known that he'd sat for 20 years in the pews of a church where Rev. Jeremiah Wright lashed out at white people. The minister cursed America as worthy of damnation, made lewd suggestions about the nature of President Clinton's relationship with black voters, and embraced the paranoid idea that the white government was spreading AIDS among black people.

Here is where the racial tension at the heart of Mr. Obama's campaign flared into view. He either shared these beliefs or, lacking good judgment, decided it politically expedient for an ambitious young black politician trying to prove his solidarity with all things black, to be associated with these rants. His judgment and leadership on the critical issue of race is in question.

While speaking to black people, King never condescended to offer Rev. Wright-style diatribes or conspiracy theories. He did not paint black people as victims. To the contrary, he spoke about black people as American patriots who believed in the democratic ideals of the country, in nonviolence and the Judeo-Christian ethic, even as they overcame slavery, discrimination and disadvantage.

King challenged white America to do the same, to live up to their ideals and create racial unity.

He challenged white Christians, asking them how they could treat their fellow black Christians as anything but brothers in Christ.

When King spoke about the racist past, he gloried in black people beating the odds to win equal rights by arming "ourselves with dignity and self-respect." He expressed regret that some black leaders reveled in grievance, malice and self-indulgent anger in place of a focus on strong families, education and love of God. Even in the days before Congress passed civil rights laws, King spoke to black Americans about the pride that comes from "assuming primary responsibility" for achieving "first class citizenship."

Last March in Selma, Ala., Mr. Obama appeared on the verge of breaking away from the merchants of black grievance and victimization. At a commemoration of the 1965 Selma-to-Montgomery march for voting rights, he spoke in a King-like voice. He focused on traditions of black sacrifice, idealism and the need for taking personal responsibility for building strong black families and communities. He said black people should never "deny that its gotten better," even as the movement goes on to improve schools and provide good health care for all Americans. He then challenged black America, by saying that "government alone can't solve all those problems . . . it is not enough just to ask what the government can do for us -- it's important for us to ask what we can do for ourselves."

Mr. Obama added that better education for black students begins with black parents visiting their children's teachers, as well as turning off the television so children can focus on homework. He expressed alarm over the lack of appreciation for education in the black community: "I don't know who taught them that reading and writing and conjugating your verbs were something white. We've got to get over that mentality." King, he added later, believed that black America has to first "transform ourselves in order to transform the world."

But as his campaign made headway with black voters, Mr. Obama no longer spoke about the responsibility and the power of black America to appeal to the conscience and highest ideals of the nation. He no longer asks black people to let go of the grievance culture to transcend racial arguments and transform the world.

And he chooses not to confront the poisonous "thug life" culture in rap music that glorifies drug use and crime.

Instead the senator, in a full political pander, is busy excusing Rev. Wright's racial attacks as the right of the Rev.-Wright generation of black Americans to define the nation's future by their past. He stretches compassion to the breaking point by equating his white grandmother's private concerns about black men on the street with Rev. Wright's public stirring of racial division.
And he wasted time in his Philadelphia speech on race by saying he can't "disown" Rev. Wright any more than he could "disown the black community."
No one has asked him to disown Rev. Wright. Only in a later appearance on "The View" television show did he say that he would have left the church if Rev. Wright had not retired and not acknowledged his offensive language.

But when Barack Obama, arguably the best of this generation of black or white leaders, finds it easy to sit in Rev. Wright's pews and nod along with wacky and bitterly divisive racial rhetoric, it does call his judgment into question. And it reveals a continuing crisis in racial leadership.

What would Jesus do? There is no question he would have left that church.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Friday, April 04, 2008

Now they've done it...Gazans Slaughter endangered turtle (guess how) ..Reuters appalled !



Rare turtle slaughtered in Gaza



Apr. 4 - Palestinian fishermen catch and kill a giant sea turtle, thought to be a Leatherback, an endangered species.



The rare giant sea turtle caught on a beach near Gaza City was slaughtered and eaten by Palestinian fishermen who said its blood was an aphrodisiac, among other therapeutic qualities. A Reuters cameraman said the fishermen collected the giant turtle's blood and gave it to children suffering from trauma and adults with back problems.

PETA retaliation expected


Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 0 Comments

HAMAS grabs Al Azhar University


I've always said the strong horse are socially 'pure' muslim brotherhood quranically guided morally untrammeled conscienceless genocidal racists murderers as opposed to mafia like holocaust minimizing slightly more secular genocidal racist murderers

World Trib: GAZA CITY -- The Hamas regime has sought to control one of the last Fatah-dominated institutions in the Gaza Strip.

Palestinian sources said the Hamas regime has sent operatives to take over Al Azhar University. The university, located Gaza City, has been a Fatah stronghold for nearly 30 years and resisted the Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip in June 2007.

"Hamas sees Al Azhar as the last bastion of Fatah in the Gaza Strip," a Palestinian activist said. "All the other Fatah institutions have either been destroyed or went underground."

On March 31, Hamas sent operatives to storm Al Azhar and capture the student administration.

I'm sure it was just like Columbia in 68.

Witnesses said members of the Hamas-sponsored Islamic Bloc raided the university, detained security guards and assaulted teachers and students.

Bodes well for academic freedom.

At that point, the operatives began decorating the university with Hamas flags and posters to memorialize Hamas founder Ahmed Yassin, assassinated by Israel in 2003.

Al Azhar vice president Jaber El Da'our said he and several aides responded to the Hamas takeover. When they arrived on campus, El Da'our said, the Hamas operatives began harassing the university administrators.

"The teachers and I decided to stay away from them and their ceremony,"

Thumbnail image for joe-horses_ass03_copy.jpg

El Da'our recalled.

Effing A right, I bet.

"However, they pursued us again and started to assault us till we left campus. We demonstrated near the main university entrance; however the police came and beat us and insulted us using gas to disperse us."

Maybe you should start a kids show with a rabbit and have him kill Khaled Meshal with a rabbit sword.

A university woman student said she was attacked by Hamas operatives on campus. The student said she required hospitalization after she was sprayed with chloride.

Hamas police acknowledged that university teachers and students were attacked by officers. Hamas police commander Gen. Tawfiq Jaber said the Fatah-aligned staffers and students had been blocking a main artery outside the campus.

The Palestinian Center for Human Rights (don't ever tell me there's no humor in Islam) said the Hamas raid was part of its campaign against the opposition Fatah movement. The center urged the Hamas regime to maintain academic freedom in the Gaza Strip.

"PCHR calls upon all parties to keep universities and educational institutions out of the ongoing power struggle between Fatah and Hamas," the group said.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 6 Comments

Wall Street Digging Own Grave With A Sharia Shovel?

From National Review Online and also posted at Northeast Intelligence Network , this important article spotlights what is possibly the most dangerous Trojan Horse vehicle for the legitimization of Sharia law in the West: sharia-compliant "halal" investing.

Jihad Comes to Wall Street

By Alex Alexiev

...For the growing army of its acolytes, who salivate at the prospect of tens of billions of dollars in transaction fees from the burgeoning industry, sharia-compliant finance is seen as little more than a cuddly Islamic version of socially conscious investment — with ethical strictures forbidding usury and sin industries, and emphasizing charity. Indeed, a conference on the subject last Fall co-sponsored by the Wall Street Journal was titled just that: “Islamic Ethical Investment.” According to this rosy interpretation, sharia finance is a windfall for capital markets — allowing Wall Street to skim some foam off the ocean of petrodollar liquidity in the Middle East, and put it to good use.

Other interpretations are possible, of course. Critics see sharia finance as a massive subversion campaign by radical Islam designed to legitimize sharia in the West, to undermine our markets, and ultimately to imperil our free-enterprise system and national security — all the while exposing banks to financial risks that make the sub-prime fiasco look like a walk in the park. For its proponents and ideological enablers — such as the well known suicide-bombing advocate, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi — sharia finance is nothing less than “Jihad with money.” As al-Qaradawi explains, “God has ordered us to fight enemies with our lives and with our money.” Unfortunately for Wall Street, it’s hard to argue with the good sheikh on that score. Far from being a guide to ethical investment, sharia finance is indistinguishable from sharia itself. Sharia is a reactionary-to-the-core medieval Islamic doctrine that claims control over every aspect of every Muslim’s life. It imposes such “ethical” mandates on Muslims as the obligation to discriminate against women and non-Muslims; to kill homosexuals, adulterers, and apostates; to establish and maintain Muslim rule around the world; and to carry out violent offensive jihad against infidels. Notably, for those Muslims who cannot engage in physical jihad using force of arms, sharia requires that they support jihad financially. This is what sharia finance is all about. Far from being a legitimate investment vehicle, sharia finance facilitates religiously sanctioned support for terrorist organizations — as well as providing radical Islamists with highly paid sinecures as sharia-finance board advisors in the sanctum sanctorum of capitalism, all the while that they are pursuing a subversive campaign to destroy it.

Predictably, none of this is even remotely disclosed by any of the dozens of Western banks promoting sharia finance today, which obviously exposes them to huge non-disclosure risks ranging from fraudulent misrepresentation, to material support for terrorism...

Read it all. As Alexiev warns, the same Wall Street "masters of the universe" who brought us the recent sup-prime debacle are welcoming "malignant Islamism" into our capital markets with open arms and eyes wide shut. Alexiev calls it fraudulent misrepresentation of investment risk. I'm sorely tempted to call it treason.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
posted by revereridesagain at permanent link# 2 Comments

Darrell Issa (Hizbollah's Favorite Congressman): 9/11 "Simply" A Plane Crash

I've been travelling this week, so I haven't had much time to blog. However, I saw this on CNN last night (in the hotel room) and simply couldn't believe what I was hearing (thanks to Michael Travis):


By Debbie Schlussel

I've been on the case of gazillionaire GOP Congressman Darrell Issa a/k/a "Jihad Darrell", since just after 9/11, when he praised Hezbollah as a "humanitarian" group of "farmers" and went to Ramallah to become Yasser Arafat's personal taste tester (not kidding).

Since then, Issa's continued to fete the Assads of Syria, the Hezbos of Lebanon, the Fatah-niks of the so-called Palestinian authority, and has called Israel an "apartheid" state a la Jimmy "Jimmuh" Carter. Nancy Pelosi's got nothin' on Jihad Darrell.

That's not to mention Issa's lengthy criminal and marred military record, and the sickening way Issa stole a company out from under his boss and went on to make millions by stealing patents and litigating everyone out of business.

As readers know, I've repeatedly written about Issa in the New York Post and elsewhere, and the thing that most galls me is the way the GOP gloms onto this guy, rather than disowning him the way they did David Duke in the Reagan days.

But things are changing, and I hope it's a trend.

Last year, after I wrote a NYPost column about the San Diego Republican's bid to become House Republican Policy chief and about his record of pandering to America's Islamic terrorist enemies, the article was circulated among House Republicans. And Issa was defeated by a more than 2-1 margin. Since then, though, top Republicans--like the retiring Rep. Tom Davis--have been pushing Issa for key Republican posts, like budget czar and procurement chief.

But Issa's antics, this week, may finally shut the lid on his ambitions.

On Wednesday, Issa called the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America "'simply' a plane crash."

He made comments like this in House hearings regarding continuing federal assistance to 9/11 first responders, many of whom are stricken with life-threatening ailments because they inhaled the fumes of the attacks or were otherwise seriously injured.

The New York Daily News reports that Issa

suggest[ed] the federal government had already done enough to help New York cope with "a fire" that "simply was an aircraft" hitting the World Trade Center.

That any American Congressman--no less, a so-called conservative Republican--would say such a thing about the largest, most outrageous attack on American soil, is disgusting.

... the GOP has had several years and ample opportunity to learn Issa's pan-jihadist views, it's about time they asked him to step aside and resign from office, altogether.

They did so with David Duke. And Issa is far scarier, since he has mainstream respect and a following that the fringe-character Duke never had.

I hope Republicans will take the words of two of Issa's GOP colleagues to heart:

"It seems that with the passage of time, something happened along the way where the scope of the problem and the real extent of the problem has not drifted out to California," fumed Staten Island GOP Rep. Vito Fossella. . . .

"New York was attacked by Al Qaeda. It doesn't have to be attacked by Congress," added Long Island Rep. Pete King, a Republican.

"I'm really surprised by Darrell Issa," King added. "It showed such a cavalier dismissal of what happened to New York. It's wrong and inexcusable."

But, since his pan-Islamist antics have been legion since 9/11, none of Issa's actions should surprise these men.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 1 Comments

Storm Track Infiltration: Britain – On the Road to Cultural Suicide

Just when you think that Britain can’t stoop – or is it bend over – any lower to Islam, this comes out.

Daily Express: “STATE schools should be forced to open their doors to Islamic preachers teaching the Koran, the largest classroom union demanded yesterday. The National Union of Teachers’ conference also said existing religious schools – almost all of them Christian – should have to admit pupils from other faiths.

The union’s general secretary Steve Sinnott said that allowing Muslim imams to preach in schools would be a way to reunite divided communities.


Yep. Unite right under the banner of Islam. And these are teachers. They’re supposed to be educated!

Read the rest at The Gathering Storm.
Bookmark and Share
posted by WC at permanent link# 3 Comments

The New Pyramid Builders

Guest Commentary by Edward Cline:

A mile-high tower will rise in a desert port town, and Americans will be helping to finance its £5 billion construction cost. It will rise in the town Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, halfway up the length of the Red Sea.

At 5,250 feet, it will be twice the height of another tower being erected in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, on the Persian Gulf. A few miles north up the Sea from Jeddah is Rabigh, where about 40,000 workers are constructing the world’s largest petrochemical plant as part of King Abdullah Economic City, itself part of a $500 billion plan to turn Saudi Arabia into a “powerhouse” industrial giant. Other massive construction projects are underway in Kuwait and other Persian Gulf countries.

“By the end of the year,” reported The New York Times in an article, “The Construction Site Called Saudi Arabia,” on January 20,

this massive city of steel at the edge of the Red Sea will take its place as a cog of globalization: plastics produced here will be used to make televisions in Japan, cellphones in China and thousands of other products to be sold in the United States and Europe. Construction costs at the plant, which spreads over eight square miles, have doubled to $10 billion because of shortages in materials and labor. The amount of steel being used is 10 times the weight of the Eiffel Tower.

The Times article also reports that,

Abu Dhabi is planning to spend close to $1 billion for a new museum with the help of the Louvre, in Paris. Dubai’s latest grandiose idea is to build a small-scale replica of the French city of Lyon, complete with residential housing, a museum, a culinary school and a soccer club.

Americans will be helping to finance these and other massive projects in Saudi Arabia and in the Persian Gulf fiefdoms through their gas and heating oil prices. One important thing to remember about these projects is that they are not strictly “private” undertakings; every one of them is a government project. Strictly speaking, neither Saudi Arabia nor any of the other medieval kingdoms or satrapies in the Mideast has a “government,” representative or otherwise.

Their legislative bodies are purely artificial fictions beholden to ruling families. The only persons who have billions to invest in these new pyramids are related or closely connected to those ruling families. Michael Corleone’s Mafia crime family pales in comparison to these Middle East oil oligarchies, which have their own tribal codes of loyalty, justice and silence, a morality that boasts its own “whacking” policy against Muslims who “rat” on Mohammed or take Allah’s name in vain, or who abandon the tribe completely, and an inbred contempt for and mistrust of all non-Muslim outsiders.

A similar arrangement exists in Mainland China, in which most of the cadres of the ruling Communist Party own and control the “private enterprises” behind China’s own economic boom. That arrangement is by definition fascist, and accounts for the censorship, brutal repression, and absence of any civil liberties there. In Saudi Arabia and its Islamic neighbors, the arrangement is much more primitive, and intractably religious.

Such as Prince al-Walid bin Talal, planner of the mile-high tower, who bought the prestigious Savoy Hotel in London for £1.25 billion in 2005, reports the London Daily Mail of March 31. Bin Talal is the Saudi who offered former Mayor Rudy Giuliani a $10 million check after the World Trade Center was destroyed by fellow Saudis in 2001. Giuliani promptly returned the check. Bin Talal also is an enabler of Islam in the West, building dozens of mosques in it every year and giving $20 million to Harvard and Georgetown Universities to establish schools of “Islamic studies.”

One can imagine bin Talal’s mile-high tower is his extravagant way of giving a Bronx cheer to the U.S., the World Trade Center, and all those who died in the attack. Two British firms, Hyder Consulting and Arup, will tackle the tower project in a joint venture with bin Talal’s firm, Kingdom Holdings. One supposes that is a kind of reward to the British for wanting to de-emphasize the Holocaust and the Crusades, or not teach the subjects at all, in history lessons in the presence of British Muslim students, for allowing Islamic Sharia law to creep up to equivalence with British secular law, and for many other concessions to Muslim “sensibilities.”

Saudi Arabia is the world’s biggest oil exporter. “The Persian Gulf countries earned “$1.5 trillion in oil revenue from 2002 to 2006,” reports the Times article. Saudi Arabia and its religious/political rival, Iran, another oil exporter, together are the chief enablers of Islamic jihad against the West.

But vertical pyramids and other vanity projects are not the sole means employed by billionaire Arabs to engineer a hostile takeover of the West. The Times article reports that,

“Last year…a fund controlled by the government of Abu Dhabi bought a stake in Citigroup for $7.5 billion, while another run by Dubai’s ruler bought a large share in Sony, the Japanese consumer electronics giant. Sabie, a major Saudi petrochemical company, bought the plastics division of General Electric for $11.6 billion, and the Kuwait Petroleum Corporation bought half of Dow Chemical’s commodity-plastics unit for $9.5 billion….In recent weeks, other big banks plagued by losses from the mortgage crisis, like Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley, have raised tens of billions of dollars from a variety of Middle Eastern and Asian funds, including ones from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.”
The American Congress for Truth reports an April 1st Human Events article, in “America for Sale to Sharia Sovereign Wealth Funds,” that

In December 2007, Bourse Dubai, the world’s first and largest Islamic equity exchange, bought 20% of NASDAQ, the biggest U.S. electronic stock market, and ‘rebranded’ it as part of Dubai’s company. The Bourse also got NASDAQ’s 28% of the London Stock Exchange (LSE). In addition, Qatar acquired a 24% LSE stake, giving the two Gulf nations control over nearly 52% of the London exchange. On March 15 [2008], Iran, which now dominates the leading 100 Islamic banks – followed by Saudi Arabia, Malaysia and the UAE – announced plans to list a $90 billion energy holding company on the Dubai International Financial Exchange, which is wholly owned by Bourse Dubai.”

This article, incidentally, was co-authored by Rachel Ehrenfeld, an American, who was sued in a British court by Saudi billionaire Khalid Salim bin Mahfouz for writing a book, Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It, which, among other things, revealed Mahfouz’s role in promoting the Islamic conquest of Britain and Europe. The British court ordered her to pay “$225,000 in damages and legal fees to Mahfouz, as well as apologize and destroy existing copies of her books,” according to ACT for America on April 1st. Mahfouz is a professional libel “tourist,” or terrorist who prefers to extinguish his victims with costly litigation instead of with planes or bombs on vests or in backpacks.

New York State’s Court of Appeals declined to protect her from the alleged defamation suit, claiming it did not have jurisdiction over suits originating overseas, thus jeopardizing the efficacy of First Amendment freedom of speech guarantees in the U.S., while implicitly conceding that Americans could be subject to the libel and defamation laws of other nations. On March 31, the New York State legislature unanimously passed the Libel Terrorism Protection Act, which deemed foreign defamation judgments null and void in New York, home of many publishers and writers. Governor David Paterson is expected to sign it into law.

Mahfouz, however, has already made significant inroads by practicing censorship by lawsuit. The most notorious instance to date was his 2007 suit against Cambridge University Press for publishing Alms for Jihad, by J. Millard Burr and Robert O. Collins, also Americans, who detailed how Islamic charities are simply money laundering fronts for terrorists. CUP, as a defendant under British libel law, had to refute the accusations and also limit itself in terms of what evidence it could employ in its defense. Rather than face a sea of Saudi petro-pounds in court costs and legal expenses, which it would probably have been ordered to reimburse Mahfouz, CUP caved in to him, withdrew the book from sale and circulation, agreed to shred all existing copies of it, asked libraries to return their copies to be destroyed, and apologized to Mahfouz.

That whole shameful episode of censorship by lawsuit by Islamic billionaires is reminiscent of the John Wilkes affair of 1763, when Wilkes, a member of the House of Commons, said that the king indeed could do wrong, and was promptly charged with libel by the government and expelled from Parliament. He fought back, however, eventually won over his enemies, and his name became synonymous with freedom of the press.

But, to return to the pyramids and the financial subornation of Western capitalism, what must be understood is that these chunks of ownership cannot be likened to investments by the Al Capone crime syndicate, nor even to a Michael Corleone-style ruse of investing a gang’s takings in “legitimate” business (see “The Godfather, Part II,” for that tactic), although the root causes are similar. These are aggressive moves by a united political/religious bloc, Islam, to influence the course of Western civilization by acquiring financial leverage over banks, lending institutions, major corporations and investors, and finally over Western political institutions, solely and ultimately to advance the Islamization of the West.

And, as statist regulations and controls foster the growth of organized crime at home and abroad (resulting in such programs the U.S.-directed “war” against the drug cartel in Colombia and tribal poppy-growing enterprises in Afghanistan), irrational foreign policies have fostered the growth of regimes and tyrannies fundamentally hostile to the West. Western policies permitted Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members to seize private oil producing property, and, in conjunction with that inaction, the West at home established prohibitive controls on the development of oil producing resources as part of environmental and “conservation” policies. This has resulted in the West’s perilous dependency on the production whims of OPEC and the transfer of enormous wealth to those regimes and tyrannies.

As Nikita Khrushchev once promised that the Soviet Union would ‘bury” the U.S. as an industrial power, Saudi Arabia and its Persian Gulf neighbors are promising to bury the U.S. as a global competitor. Instead of demanding that it acknowledge the “superiority” of communism, they will require that the U.S. become a deferential handmaiden of Islam, if not an Islamic province itself.

Of course, all those billion dollar projects are undertaken on the premise that the U.S. and the West will not commit economic suicide by “going green” or by becoming fascist, that they will remain viable, productive realms. If the U.S experiences an economic collapse, the Treasury notes, mutual funds and other government instruments held by Mideast financiers will be as worthless as the ones owned by private American investors and speculators.

Ancient Egyptian kings and pharaohs built over ninety pyramids to house them at death. The new pyramid builders seek to bury the corpse of the West in their own. No one should doubt that Islam – including its kings, emirs, princes, mullahs, imams, its billionaires, its countless mind-stunted manqués, and its homicidal killers – wishes to eviscerate the West, and especially the U.S.

The U.S. and the West should act now to ensure that those mile-high towers, high- rises, and plants remain empty monuments to vanity, by rediscovering the necessary virtues of self-preservation and self-interest.

Crossposted at The Dougout
Bookmark and Share
posted by Grant Jones at permanent link# 3 Comments

China's Got The Cancer Too!

Yes, China has the cancer of Islamism. We may be concerned about human rights in China and how they are brutally suppressing the Tibetans but they have a growing problem with Muslims as do the rest of the world. We all know that the koranic led Islamists have an agenda that is counter to our values of freedom and democracy.

On the other hand we are aware that our freedom and democracy can not and will not take the necessary steps to stop them and ultimately we will be enslaved to Islam.

Many of us on these infidel sites have said that undemocratic means to deal with the problem are the only solution. We only hint at the methods to be employed. Perhaps the methods employed by the Chinese are what we are hinting at.

I for one find I cannot criticise the Chinese for cracking down on their Muslims because I know that nothing else will work. and a Muslim dominated China would be a disaster for the world. On the other hand am I employing double standards if I criticise them for their policy in Tibet? Watch this developing news with my bolding:

SHANGHAI — Chinese officials said Wednesday that they were grappling with ethnic unrest on a second front, in the northwestern region of Xinjiang, where Uighur Muslims protested Chinese rule late last month even as Tibetans rioted in the southwest.

One Uighur demonstration, which appears to have been quickly suppressed, took place in the town of Khotan on March 23, at the same time China was deploying thousands of security forces across a broad swath of its southwest to put down Tibetan unrest.

Officials said the protest was staged by Islamic separatist groups seeking to foment a broader uprising in Xinjiang. China often blames any ethnic disturbances on what it calls splittists and terrorists. Human rights groups say that Chinese Uighurs, like Tibetans, have fought for greater freedom to practice their religion as well as more autonomy from Beijing.

The news of the protest in Xinjiang underscored the breadth of China’s problems with ethnic and religious minority groups in the country’s vast western regions, where there is a long history of unhappiness with Chinese rule. Ethnic groups Beijing has sought to pacify with economic development programs and suppress with heavy police presence appear to be using the upcoming Olympic Games, to be held in Beijing, as an opportunity to press their grievances and attract international attention to their causes.

“A small number of elements tried to incite splittism, create disturbances in the market place and even trick the masses into an uprising,” a statement published on the Web site of the Khotan government said in the first official acknowledgment of the disturbances.

Uighur residents of Khotan reached by telephone either claimed not to understand Chinese or refused to talk about recent events there. But Han residents said that as many as 500 Uighurs protested in the center of the city. Some reports have said the Uighurs, who are Muslim, were objecting to restrictions on wearing Islamic scarves and head coverings. Some interviewees, however, said the protesters were seeking independence. The demonstrators were quickly arrested by security forces who took control of the area.

Zhu Linxiu, a senior police official in Khotan, declined to comment in detail about the incident, saying it was “inappropriate to publicize.” He refused to confirm the number of protesters or arrests, but said the demonstrators were “instigated by bad elements.”

Two weeks before the reported protest in Khotan, China announced the discovery of what it called a terrorist plot in Xinjiang, which it said involved the smuggling of combustible liquids onto a commercial airliner by a Uighur woman who had spent time in neighboring Pakistan.

Doh! They have the same Muslims as we do.

Officials called the incident part of a terrorist campaign by a radical Islamic independence group, the East Turkestan Islamic Movement. Uighur groups have denied the reports, and called them part of an effort to justify heavily stepped-up security in the region and the suppression of dissent before the Olympics.

In recent days, Beijing has also accused supporters of the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, of plotting a suicide bombing campaign against China, as part of a separatist campaign.

On Tuesday, Amnesty International criticized the government for its crackdown on protest in Tibetan areas of China, and said the country’s efforts to silence dissidents before the Olympics violated Beijing’s pledges to improve human rights before it hosts the games in August. “The Olympic Games have so far failed to act as a catalyst for reform,” the international human rights groups said in a statement. “Unless urgent steps are taken to redress the situation, a positive human rights legacy for the Beijing Olympics looks increasingly beyond reach.”

A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Jiang Yu, denounced the Amnesty statement as “biased,” saying “anyone planning to use the Olympics to threaten China, or planning to put pressure on China, has miscalculated.”

Like Tibetans in Tibet, Uighurs have historically been the predominant ethnic group in Xinjiang, which is officially known as the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region. In both Tibet and Xinjiang, indigenous groups have chafed at the arrival of large numbers Han Chinese, the country’s predominant ethnic groups, who have migrated to western regions with strong government support.

Uighurs, like Tibetans, have complained that recent Han arrivals now dominate their local economies, even as the Han-run local governments insert themselves deeper into schools and religious practices to weed out cultural practices that officials fear might reinforce a separate ethnic or religious identity. In telephone interviews, Han residents of Khotan and nearby areas said there was a long history of distrust and tension between Han and Uighur communities. Some Han migrants insisted the atmosphere remained volatile, and said that the Uighurs had been inspired by the recent Tibetan unrest.

Interesting that the Chinese employ Muslim tacticts; mass immigration to swamp the indigenous people.

“Some of jobless people here have heard about the situation Tibet, and they also want to make trouble,” said Wang Guoliang, a Han grocery store owner in Khotan. “They want independence and they want to expel the Han, whom they dislike. Most of the main cadres in the Party, from counties and the cities to the provincial level are all Hans, while the local level officials are Uighur.” Mr. Wang called the purging of Uighur officials several years ago after a previous bout of tension “the root of the protest.”

Another Han, a clerk in a local bank who would only give his name as Chen, said there had been a long history of discontent in the region, and that people had been “on the lookout” since mid-March. At his bank, Mr. Chen said there had been grumblings over the restrictions on Muslim headgear, which he disagreed with, saying: “It is their national custom and we should respect it.”

(cross posted with CommonSense)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Ray Boyd at permanent link# 7 Comments

2,996

Bookmark and Share
posted by Bosch Fawstin at permanent link# 0 Comments

Anti-Semitism is on the Rise in Europe (videos)


(Hat tip: Democracy Broadcasting News)


Anti-Semitism is on the rise worldwide, but its especially noticeable in Europe. There is a definite connection between hatred of Israel and hatred of Jews in general-- both inflammed by media coverage that is strongly biased against Israel.
The EU says Muslims are responsible for half of all attacks on Jews in Europe...

"The French are using the Muslims, allowing the Muslims, to express this vicious and violent, murderous Jews hatred, and they get a free ride on their old fashioned anti-Semitism," Poller said.

"The whole Lebanon war was shown from the Hezbollah point of view. Israel was the villain. And Hezbollah were the innocents who were suffering. So all the Muslims in France got another dose of Jew hatred."

And when Israel invaded Lebanon in 2006, anti-Semitic violence in Europe surged...

A senior Dutch politician told me a few months ago, "Look, the Jews have to understand that in the Netherlands, they have no future," he said.

"In large part because Israel lost the media war in Europe long ago, and the Jews are still paying for it."
Learn more:

1. How the new left and radical Islam have joined forces-- ConceptWizard's excellent online slideshow presentation about the "New" anti-Semitism: Pipeline of Hatred.

2. Video: How anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry and intolerance are being preached in mosques in the U.K.-- reporters sneak cameras into British Mosques. Undercover Mosque.

3. Video: How anti-Semitism and anti-Christian bigotry and intolerance are being taught in a Saudi-sponsored school in the U.K. The King Fahd Academy

4. Video: A very thorough video on the increase of anti-Semitism in the U.K. Anti-Semitism in Britain 2007, Part 1; Part 2; Part 3; Part 4; Part 5.

5. Video: Then And Now, Part I, Shocking similarities between past Nazi propaganda and current day Islamic propaganda.

6, Videos: A list of 25 selected videos re: Israel and also re: anti-Semitism.

7. More links to related articles & videos-- on Newsvine: Anti-Semitism, Islamic extremism, Israel, Media, Media bias, Videos.

(Cross-posted on
A Deeper Look)

Digg!

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Krishna109 at permanent link# 2 Comments

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Youth Gang Torments Nursery School

What makes these kids think they can get away with this kind of behavior day after day? Do you think they are getting some sort of encouragement from their elders?

Thanks to Her Royal Whyness for sending this in:


From The Copenhagen Post

A group of ethnic minority kids has been terrorising a nursery school in the Nørrebro district of Copenhagen, throwing rocks at teachers, parents and even the young children at the facility.
Day care facility Midgård lies next to council estate Mjølnerparken, from which five or six 10 to 12-year-old boys have been making life for the nursery school's personnel and patrons a living hell for the past two weeks.


Although harassment from estate kids to a lesser degree has been tolerated by the facility's staff and administration for some time, the incidents over the past couple weeks have now crossed the line, said Annette Zahle, Midgård's administrative director. 'We're used to a lot but this is simply too egregious,' Zahle told Nyhedsavisen newspaper. 'We're naturally deeply concerned, especially because these kids probably don't realise their actions can have serious consequences if one of our children were hit in the head.'

A mother was recently struck in the leg by a projectile thrown by the young troublemakers, who also attempted to enter the building last week, threatening the staff with crowbars.

On Tuesday, a child at the nursery school was nearly struck by a large rock thrown by one of the youths.

'The day care workers have started telling me they're afraid to send the children out to the playground, which is a very disturbing development,' said Zahle.

The district police are taking the situation very seriously, said officer Søren Wiborg.
I’m sorry Miss Zahle but you are seriously deluded if you think that these young thugs don’t realise the seriousness of their actions. A 4 year old might throw a stone and not realise that someone would be hurt if it hit them. Boys of this age with rocks and crowbars will know exactly what they are doing and they must be stopped. Zero tolerance! It’s now the only way.
Also of note is the delicate way the thugs frightening tiny children are described as “ethnic minority kids”. I found this report from
AMUCK – A Mentoring Project in Nørrebro, Copenhagen which is a project working with teenage boys. Extracts below :-

People from more than 30 nationalities lives in ‘Mjølnerparken’. Less than 10 % of the apartments are occupied by ethnic Danes. Approximately 60 % of the inhabitants come from Arabic speaking countries (Palestinians, Lebanese and Iraqis) (from a separate article in Danish I get the impression that another common language is Urdu) . . .

The main part of the boys either has a Palestinian or Arabic background; some few have a Somalian background. . .

The following shows some of the objectives the boys/mentors has worked with – and obtained:

· Getting up in the morning
· Getting a job


Somehow I don’t believe that it is Greenlanders attacking toddlers and their Mums.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 12 Comments

Sex, Poop, and Gaza ..no Israelis in sight for this one


Mediabistro-

On Tuesday, a protest was held by Hamas supporters in the Gaza Strip where sheep, camels and donkeys where paraded before journalists (with some farm animals wearing Hamas headbands!) alongside signs reading "Save the Children of Gaza" in a protest against Israel's decision to blockade the Gaza Strip. Israel blockaded all non-essential items from entering Gaza after several Israeli towns were hit by Palestinian rocket attacks.

camelsex.jpg

Hamas allegedly paid Gazan farmers $28 each and transportation costs to attend the rally. Fatah supporters refused to participate.

But there was only one problem -- The Hamas-garbed farmed animals wouldn't stop defecating into the street and having sex with each other during the protest. From the always-excellent Popbitch:

In Gaza this week there was a demonstration by animals for human rights. Eight camels bearing "Save the Children of Gaza" signs; two dozen donkeys, including one in a Hamas headband; 10 horses and nearly 100 sheep were brought to the UN building. After a few minutes the beasts started a dirty protest. Some defecated in the streets, while the donkeys started shagging each other. Journalists found it almost impossible to do a straight piece to camera without some animal porn behind them.
Maybe there is a god and he/she has a really great sense of humor
Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 1 Comments

The ultimate environmental problem.


It always was.
Ted Turner, at least, admits it

If steps aren't taken to stem global warming, "We'll be eight degrees hotter in 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow," Turner said during a wide-ranging, hour-long interview with PBS's Charlie Rose that aired Tuesday.

"Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals," said Turner, 69. "Civilization will have broken down. The few people left will be living in a failed state -- like Somalia or Sudan -- and living conditions will be intolerable."

One way to combat global warming, Turner said, is to stabilize the population.

"We're too many people; that's why we have global warming," he said. "Too many people are using too much stuff."


Ted, no voluntary child limit is ever going to work.
No one nation or group of nations is going to voluntarily sink their economies to be enlightened.
Nobody is going to ride a bike to work in Feb while their family freezes in the dark to make a better world.

Let's just have a big fat war if we're too many rats in the cage, Ted.
Of course we could just turn all the surplus food into fuel and starve about 2 billion people,as well.
What a faithless moron!
They call it SCIENCE, Ted.
This is same interview in which he likened the 'insurgents' in Iraq to modern day Ben Franklins, and Sam Adams'. Yeah I remember seeing the protraits of ole Ben sawing people's heads off for not being Christian enough, or patriotic enough, and running around in gangs kidnapping everyone's children to run out and buy some more muskets. I guess he just spent too much time with ex wife and her pals
Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 0 Comments

Storm Track Appeasement: Minneapolis To Muslim Cabbies: Tough Shiite

We all remember the Muslim cabbies in Minneapolis who refused to carry riders who had alcohol or a dog in their possession. Well, the issue has finally made its way through the bureaucracy of the Minneapolis Metropolitan Airport Commission and they have given their decision to the Muslims cabbies.

Tough Shiite!

Read the rest at The Gathering Storm.

Bookmark and Share
posted by WC at permanent link# 0 Comments

Should You Need To Do Your Wudhu, Could You?


Even if no one understood you?



Catering for the growing demand for multi-faith facilities in the UK, Nigel Bromilow’s company has launched the WuduSeat - a single, purpose-built unit that enables Muslims to undertake their cleansing ritual ‘Wudu’.

"The demand for multi-faith facilities in both corporate and public buildings is growing every day," says Nigel Bromilow, MD of the Specialist Washing Company who launched the WuduSeat last December, "There is a jungle of legislation which points to the fact that as a multicultural country, we are going to have to start accommodating Muslim practices."

Aside from the Employment Equality laws, the Race Relations Act of 1976, the Human Rights Act of 1998, Bromilow points out there are also numerous pieces of Health and Safety legislation which suggest that it will most likely become mandatory for workplaces and public buildings to provide facilities like the WuduSeat so Muslims can fully undertake their prayer ritual.

Bromilow says he first realised there was a need for the WuduSeat after carrying out some market research which showed that a number of organisations are already committed to putting in multi-faith facilities. "Most hospitals and airports already provide multi-faith facilities such as prayer rooms, but when it comes to facilities for Muslims to undertake the Wudu ritual – generally they are expected to put their feet in wash basins!"

Made from sanitary-grade acrylic so that it is hardwearing and easy to keep clean, the WuduSeat retails between £400-£700 and the company has already sold 26 of the high-end seats, netting them sales of £18,200.


Oh, for God's sake.

I must note, when I look at the photo of the man in the Wudhu seat, you know what occurs to me? Isn't that the same position they put Infidels in for beheading?

Is this a duel-practice Wudhu seat designed to serve both Muslims and the Infidels who don't like them very much?

Hmmm.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Absolut War


Absolut Vodka declares war on the United States in the name of Mexico.

This is, apparently, a real ad for Absolut Vodka.

I don't know about you, but I will never mix a drink with Absolut ever again in my life.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 1 Comments

Is Barack Obama the Messiah?

This is all getting to be a little too freaky?































"a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany ... and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Obama"
Barack Obama Lebanon, New Hampshire. January 7, 2008.
















The Messiah who associates with the hate speech of Jeremiah Wright.















How does one explain the contradiction in terms?
























The REAL Obama must be completely flushed out!

But how?

Through his EGO.

The quote above shows that he is vulnerable to believing this stuff.

His EGO will betray him.



Mohammed, Jesus and Barack.

The Trinity made manifest in the physical.

Or maybe it should be Barack, Mohammed and Jesus!



Check out the Messiah's website here.

H/T: American Thinker via LGF
Bookmark and Share
posted by JMJ at permanent link# 11 Comments

Then I guess they don't misunderstand, they're insane


FLASH - hundreds of millions of muslims INSANE, not violent, or misinterpreting the Quran and Hadiths

Seattle Post Intelligencer:

'This guy must pay,' potential juror wrote

He and others rejected as jury selection begins for Haq murder trial

naveed_haq.jpg

By TRACY JOHNSON
P-I REPORTER

One man thought that whoever opened fire at the Jewish Federation offices was "an anti-Semitic, Islamic coward" and was fuming because the chaotic episode stranded him in downtown Seattle for hours.

Another believed that the insanity defense was just something "put up by defense lawyers to get their client off the hook."

Both men were kindly thanked for their time Wednesday -- and then sent on their way -- as attorneys began questioning potential jurors for the trial of Naveed Haq, a 32-year-old Tri-Cities man who is charged in the deadly July 2006 shooting.

Judge Paris Kallas plans to have 12 jurors and two alternates chosen before April 14, when the trial is expected to begin in King County Superior Court.

Indiscreet reminders:

After bursting in to the Seattle Jewish Community Center (instead of blowing it up as Hizballah and Iran conspired to do, AND DID in Buenos Aires in 1994), we get his personal analysis....
"This is about the Jews and what they are doing. The Jews are running the country. This is about getting the U.S. out of Iraq. I am an American and I got no problem with America but we have to get out of Iraq. But we give bombs and guns and bunker-buster bombs to Israel and we shouldn't be doing it, it's got to stop, that's what this is all about."
"I'm upset at your foreign policy."
Of course, he is a pakistani by heritage and an american by birth, so what's the the 'your'?
Stephen Schwartz:
Reporting in the mainstream media (MSM) has notably underplayed this terrible incident, which should be taken as a wake-up call for Americans, especially American Muslims.
Naveed Haq is of Pakistani origin, which points to an unfortunate but undeniable reality: the Pakistani-American Sunni Muslim community is dominated by radical Islamist ideology. Pakistani clerics in Sunni mosques are well-known for their extreme teaching. In the Seattle area alone, a Sunni mosque has been the scene of sectarian conflict with Iraqi Shia Muslims - an importation of terrorist rhetoric from tormented Iraq. The latter has been documented by the Center for Islamic Pluralism.
Of course this is the key question, if violence and hate and racism incite those of weak mind OR NOT (and Haq is demonstrably weak in that area), to commit such acts, then those who create such incitement ARE responsible in civil law.
By the way, his father works or worked at the Hanford, Washington nuclear weapons facility, "as do many members of the area's Muslim community" according to another article in the Post-Intelligencer. Want to know about that imam?
All workers at Hanford must have federal security clearance, which includes a background check. Maybe they all hate the salafis and the mullahs and Maududi ..but it would be irresponsible to simply avoid knowing.
Maybe it's no sweat, but wouldn't it be cute if he sounded like Jeremiah Wright? Or Khaled Meshal?
Or, as a fellow named Oscar Hammerstein once wrote "you've got to be carefully taught".

Back to the jury selection.

For now, 75 of the approximately 130 prospective jurors are being brought in to the courtroom individually to discuss thoughts on religion, mental illness or personal matters without their comments tainting the whole jury pool.

Of 13 who showed up Wednesday morning, the judge excused about half of them and will have the rest return for further voir dire questioning next week.

Some candidates had concerns about the idea of insanity -- which Haq's attorneys will try to prove -- and whether it's a free pass for committing a crime.

"It's just because I can't relate to it," said one man. "I understand the difference between right and wrong, and I don't know how someone couldn't."

The jury panel that is selected will be given lengthy instructions about the definition of insanity but little information about what it would mean if Haq is found insane -- that he would almost certainly be confined to a state mental hospital until a judge finds that he is not a danger.

Until when?


Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link# 0 Comments


Older Posts Newer Posts