Monday, July 15, 2013

Labor Unions: Obamacare Will 'Shatter' Our Health Benefits, Cause 'Nightmare Scenarios'


From Forbes:
Last Thursday, representatives of three of the nation’s largest unions fired off a letter to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, warning that Obamacare would “shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits, but destroy the foundation of the 40 hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class.” 
The letter was penned by James P. Hoffa, general president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters; Joseph Hansen, international president of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union; and Donald “D.” Taylor, president of UNITE-HERE, a union representing hotel, airport, food service, gaming, and textile workers. 
“When you and the President sought our support for the Affordable Care Act,” they begin, “you pledged that if we liked the health plans we have now, we could keep them. Sadly, that promise is under threat… 
We have been strong supporters of the notion that all Americans should have access to quality, affordable health care. We have also been strong supporters of you. In campaign after campaign we have put boots on the ground, gone door-to-door to get out the vote, run phone banks and raised money to secure this vision. Now this vision has come back to haunt us.”‘ 
Unintended consequences’ causing ‘nightmare scenarios’ 
The union leaders are concerned that Obamacare’s employer mandate incentivizes smaller companies to shift their workers to part-time status, because employers are not required to provide health coverage to part-time workers. 
“We have a problem,” they write, and “you need to fix it.” 
“The unintended consequences of the ACA are severe,” they continue. “Perverse incentives are causing nightmare scenarios. First, the law creates an incentive for employers to keep employees’ work hours below 30 hours a week. 
Numerous employers have begun to cut workers’ hours to avoid this obligation, and many of them are doing so openly. The impact is two-fold: fewer hours means less pay while also losing our current health benefits.” 
What surprises me about this is that union leaders are pretty strategic when it comes to employee benefits. It was obvious in 2009 that Obamacare’s employer mandate would incentivize this shift. Why didn’t labor unions fight it back then?
I don't think the "consequences" were "unintended".

Other than that, yeah.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

So I was wrong. I thought this was Juan Peron style "change" that Obama was trying to bring about. But Juan Peron had a strong "worker" support behind him. Obama's actually screwed sh*t up for himself.

Its like Hitler (no this is not your classic "Hitler" comparison. I'm just pointing out flaw in strategy), deciding to fight a war on two fronts.

This is good stuff.

Nicoenarg

Pastorius said...

It seems this is some of the most specific criticism yet to have come from his side.

Anonymous said...

The more they're open to seeing that he screwed them (and everyone else) over, the better it is for everyone.

I don't think conservatives can really do anything anymore. They're too divided in their "no he's not Christian enough" or "no he said 'f***', I can't vote for him..." or "I'm not voting for a Mormon so I'm gonna sit at home on my ass all day".

The easiest way to undo what Obama's done or is doing is from within.

Nicoenarg