Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Mark Levin: I'm convinced that Obama is seeking to destroy Israel


Mark Levin: I'm convinced that Obama is seeking to destroy Israel

Genocide is going on on his watch and he triggered it. He triggered it by the way he cut loose from Iraq. HE TRIGGERED IT!

 As I said a couple of weeks ago, he has blood on his hands and that big mashed-potato face, John Kerry, has blood on his hands and Biden has blood on his hands and Hillary has blood on her hands. THEY ALL DO! They all do.

 [PLAYS CLIP OF OBAMA TALKING ABOUT VIOLENT VICIOUS ZEALOTS WHO RANDOMLY SHOOT A BUNCH OF FOLKS IN A DELI IN PARIS]

There you go. Randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris. Do you know why he says that? He’s trying to protect the Muslim faith.

Do you know why he trashes Christians over the weekend, the National Prayer Breakfast? He’s trying to protect the Muslim faith. Do you know why they censor themselves and change the language in describing the enemy? Because he’s trying to protect the Muslim faith of his father…the Muslim faith he was around far more than the traditional Christian faith. If that’s Christianity they were practicing in Jeremiah Wright’s church, then I’m a Christian. And I’m Jewish.

I don’t think Barack Obama was ever taught about Christianity. He was taught about radicalism through a cereal box preacher camouflaged as a church. He was taught extreme radicalism rather than faith.

The one faith he had exposure to was his father’s faith.

‘Ah what’s he saying?’ I’m saying exactly what I’m saying. I don’t need interpreters. I don’t need spokes-idiots like Earnest and Psaki to say what I’m saying. I’m saying what I’m saying.

So Obama has an affinity for Islam far more than Christianity and Judaism. No question about it. No question about it. I’m not surmising, I’m not implying. I’m listening to him. I’m watching him. He’s telling us this.

If organized religion, if organized Christianity were going through a continent slaughtering Muslims and Jews, and anybody else who wouldn’t agree with them, I think Obama would point that out.

Obama already is seeking to destroy Israel. 

THAT’S RIGHT I SAID IT! He seeks to destroy Israel! Yes he does. He seeks to destroy Israel. This I am convinced of now to. Read more:

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

There! Finally somebody had the guts to say it openly.

I just listened to the clip, and although what he says is more than 100% truth, what he says gets degraded by the tone and delivery of the message. Even though he keeps a professional tone through good part of the message, his loud rants (?) diminish the powerful content.

Same with Alex ... (don't remember last name.) His message is always powerful and on point, but again, his tone and delivery take away from the impact it could have with a more measured and professional delivery.

These guys sound like crazed, radical nuts, and that is how the rest of the world (other than extreme individuals on the right)views them. I'm a conservative, and was born and raised under a dictatorship. I'm all too familiar with the rants of demagogues and nuts. And that is precisely how these people sound. Not the best way to reach the average American Anglo-Saxon, born and raised in a cool-headed, respectful, and sort of reserved environment.

Same when talking about the left. It's true, they associate with the Musloids because of similar values. But every time the left is linked to Islam, the core message (the deadly danger our society is facing,) gets lost or diluted. The message is viewed as the proverbial right/left conflict, and either is dismissed without reading, or ignored altogether.

If we are to win this conflict (which I sincerely doubt) we have to focus, and concentrate on the core message. The left will be exposed once we get the population to understand the existential threat we are living, not facing. We are already well within the danger zone.

Pastorius said...

Good comment.

I always think Levin sounds like a nut too, though I agree with his message.

The other problem with Levin, imo, is he is short on specifics and long on rants.

I wish he would be more specific and methodical.

Rush Limbaugh is better.

The best is Dennis Prager.

The problem with Prager, however, is he spends a lot of time on things that he considers important, which given the context of the times we live in are, IMO, not that important;

the male/female hour

the ultimate issues hour

The happiness hour

For God''s sake, we're in the beginning stages of WWIII here, and Prager is talking about how to discuss things nicely with one's mom at Thanksgiving dinner.

Help me.

Pastorius said...

The thing I don't like about Liimbaugh is he spends too much time on political tit for tat.

He ought to spend more time on Islam. Simple as that.