Netanyahu and Protocol violation … vs 2nd Holocaust

When the Washington Post comes out against a D president’s CENTRAL IDEA- ATTENTION MUST BE PAID

WaPo:

The emerging Iran nuclear deal raises major concerns

By Editorial Board February 5 at 7:40

THE Obama administration pushes to complete a nuclear accord with Iran, numerous members of Congress, former secretaries of state and officials of allied governments are expressing concern about the contours of the emerging deal. Though we have long supported negotiations with Iran as well as the interim agreement the United States and its allies struck with Tehran, we share several of those concerns and believe they deserve more debate now — before negotiators present the world with a fait accompli.
The problems raised by authorities ranging from Henry Kissinger, the country’s most senior former secretary of state, to Sen. Timothy M. Kaine, Virginia’s junior Democratic senator, can be summed up in three points:

●First, a process that began with the goal of eliminating Iran’s potential to produce nuclear weapons has evolved into a plan to tolerate and restrict that capability.
●Second, in the course of the negotiations, the Obama administration has declined to counter increasingly aggressive efforts by Iran to extend its influence across the Middle East and seems ready to concede Tehran a place as a regional power at the expense of Israel and other U.S. allies.
●Finally, the Obama administration is signaling that it will seek to implement any deal it strikes with Iran — including the suspension of sanctions that were originally imposed by Congress — without seeking a vote by either chamber. Instead, an accord that would have far-reaching implications for nuclear proliferation and U.S. national security would be imposed unilaterally by a president with less than two years left in his term.

READ IT ALL

The first objection GUARANTEES a mid east war, AND a nuclear arms race unrestrained on the other side of that war by both Israel and the Arab nations (who will have learned a valuable lesson about the voting public in the USA) - who will STAND ASIDE, or try, or clandestinely aid Israel in what will end up as an ALL OUT, every weapon, war against the mullahs right up to BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS. Obama is ENSURING THIS WAR. This WILL happen unless Israel is CONVINCED beyond anything I can imagine that IT has defensive weapons which will allow it to stop cold any attack from Iran, IRGC, Hezballah. Can YOU imagine this guarantee?

The second objection is Obama’s idea of leaving order behind the American retreat from REALITY that cannot be escaped from, even by arrogant self identified geniuses

The third objection GUARANTEES that if a republican president is elected this entire agreement will end up trashed, perhaps amid an avalanche of military aid to Israel.. OUR ACTUAL ALLY, on the other side of the coming conflict

It is one thing for the racist and freakish mullahs to be sure among each other that they will NEVER give up the only weapon guaranteeing they won’t end up like Qaddafi or Saddam, it is quite another to read stories of the USA BEGGING FOR A DEAL to legitimize a weapon to fulfill the INFINITE desire of Iran’s mullahs to KILL THE JEWS.

Yet amid this we see the Congressional Black Caucus so INWARD LOOKING, and lock step loyal to a man BECAUSE OF HIS COLOR as to place the survival of our ally and its people above the speech of few minutes to explain all that, and to aid OUR ENEMIES who regard us as SATAN to gain power directly at our expense.

Yet amid this we see Nancy Pelosi via convoluted logic and winks and nods, that there is no boycott of Netayahu, but a lot of representatives, 100% of whom are Democratic might be TOO BUSY to attend.

SHAME

The president, in marshaling these kind of resources over this issue is CONTRIBUTING to a polarized people (that IS who he IS) edging ever closer to outright enmity HERE.