Is Obama seeking to bind the USA to a UN-Iran Resolution/Treaty?

See the DAILY SIGNAL

I don’t think the Daily SIgnal has gone far enough in their thinking on the consequences of this path.
If an R president, and R Senate and and R House find American law, i.e.-CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES have been purposefully violated, we IMMEDIATELY have UN processes asserting superiority over US sovereignty in an undisputed way.

 Tehran has come out “the winner”.     Change of administration does not in any way relieve the next administration from international obligations undertaken by its predecessor in a possible agreement about Iran’s peaceful nuclear program I wish to enlighten the authors that if the next administration revokes any agreement with the stroke of a pen, as they boast, it will have simply committed a blatant violation of international law.

We would all then immediately see a former president as CONNIVING this into being.
Since a new govt here which held 2 branches of govt WOULD ACT, and void the resolution by an act of Congress, and then see it signed into American Law, this would immediately END the validity of any UN resolution as binding on ANY nation.
Any democrat speaking in favor of allowing UN sovereignty over American would INSTANTLY feel the results. This would (as everything this president has done) establish a divide in the USA of those FAVORING submission of US LAW, THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF IN THIS CASE, TO INTERNATIONAL LAW and those who reject the entire idea of the UN as having lead to this fateful divide.
But the practical results would CERTAINLY FREE Iran from anything but military force since no UN resolution or sanction would bind it, and they would KNOW IT, having seen the USA crush this, and certainly Rus and China would work with them unless a president made it clear this was all leading to war, and maybe even then.

There is a large argument going on as to whether this administration is incompetent/naive (as the Obamacare-State Exchange SCOTUS case, wording argues) or purposefully destructive to the idea of America as NEARLY every president has seen it (as the support for the Muslim Brotherhood EVERYWHERE argues VERY EFFECTIVELY).

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani described his country’s diplomacy with the United States as an active “jihad” that is just as significant to Tehran’s advancement as the slew of new weapons and missiles showcased by the Islamic Republic’s military.

If these people in the Administration are THIS STUPID I have nothing to say except we get the govt we deserve. If they are right and we do NOTHING in the face of this executive effort to VOID THE VOTES OF THE PEOPLE VIA FOREIGN ENTANGLEMENTS, it’s all over here here and the void in moral force, morale, and patriotism in this nation will see an astonishingly rapid decline.