'cookieChoices = {};'

‘The American Intelligence Community has finally
done to the USA
what they have been doing all around the world’.


Monday, June 13, 2016

The Word Radical Islam Doesn't Cut It

Now that the words Radical Islam is being bounced about more and more in more quarters, I propose that the words are not good enough.

Jihadism is fine. It defines the ACT of violent beliefs in Islam. But the word Radical Islam is not enough. It doesn't cover enough ground.

The apologists will sooner or later - when we are hit again and again - accept and use the words Radical Islam. But in doing so, they will use those words to protect their cherished narrative. Most Muslims are not radical and do not hold the jihadist beliefs. If we continue to use the words Radical Islam we will give cover to those apologists who want  to say that mot Muslims are moderate ignoring the polls of Muslims who support the basic tenets of Islam and use them to advance a POLITICAL AGENDA - otherwise known as the Political Jihad that IBA has been covering for years and is worse than the violent jihad - because it is invisible and the apologists cover it up and defend it in a number of ways. Political Correctness is one of them.

So I propose the word religious fundamentalism which is defined as:
A usually religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adhere to those principles, and often by intolerance of other views and opposition to secularism.

We should stop using the term Radical Islam and use instead FUNDAMENTALIST ISLAM. That term covers both the violent jihad and the political jihad that is just as dangerous and does not give shelter to the 'moderate' Muslims who adhere to the fundamental tenets of Islam and at any moment - could tun into jihadis. And if they do, they hold values and mores in opposition to our Christian-Judaeo and Constitutional way of life. 

This would be the litmus test. Are you as a Muslim a fundamentalist? How many of the tenets of Islam do you hod? Sharia Law? 

What do people here think.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by WC at permanent link#


Blogger midnight rider said...

I like it. Always felt a little strange using radical Islam. Even adding political was losing punch.

Monday, June 13, 2016 9:49:00 pm  
Blogger WC said...

On a side note, When we had IQ on our show we discussed reforming Islam. IQ said that Islam has had its reformation. It's called ISIS - buck to the fundamentals of pure Islam. So Islamic Fundamentalism is a good word and doesn't provide apologists with cover for their so-called moderates.

Monday, June 13, 2016 10:23:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I like it for now ... The truth is Islam is the ideology described by Erdogan. There is no moderate Islam, there is no radical Islam. There is just Islam.

But that will never be accepted by those who see Islam as a door into world dominance and a NWO.

The fools don't have a clue as to what they are dealing with ...

Monday, June 13, 2016 10:23:00 pm  
Blogger Always On Watch said...

Anonymous is right:

The fools don't have a clue as to what they are dealing with ...

I wonder if it was like this when the Moors first arrived to Spain.

Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:08:00 am  
Blogger Epaminondas said...

Agree Islamic Fundmentalism

Tuesday, June 14, 2016 11:59:00 am  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Older Posts Newer Posts