The IG report might have falsely claimed that there was no evidence of political bias in the opening of Crossfire Hurricane, but it found that all of Devin Nunes' claims about lies told to secure the FISA warrant were true, and all of Adam Schiff's counter-claims were false:
The memo from the Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee reported:
* A salacious and unverified dossier formed an essential part of the application to secure a warrant against a Trump campaign affiliate named Carter Page. This application failed to reveal that the dossier was bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.
* The application cited a Yahoo News article extensively. The story did not corroborate the dossier, and the FBI wrongly claimed Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier, was not a source for the story.
* Nellie Ohr, the wife of a high-ranking Justice Department official, also worked on behalf of the Clinton campaign effort. Her husband Bruce Ohr funneled her research into the Department of Justice. Although he admitted that Steele "was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president," this and the Ohrs' relationship with the Clinton campaign was concealed from the secret court that grants surveillance warrants.
* The dossier was "only minimally corroborated" and unverified, according to FBI officials. All of these things were found to be true by the Inspector General Michael Horowitz in his December 9 report. In fact, Horowitz detailed rampant abuse that went far beyond these four items. The Democratic minority on the committee, then led by Rep. Adam Schiff, put out a response memo with competing claims:
* FBI and DOJ officials did not omit material information from the FISA warrant.
* The DOJ "made only narrow use of information from Steele's sources about Page's specific activities in 2016."
* In subsequent FISA renewals, DOJ provided additional information that corroborated Steele's reporting.
* The Page FISA warrant allowed the FBI to collect "valuable intelligence."
* "Far from 'omitting' material facts about Steele, as the Majority claims, DOJ repeatedly informed the Court about Steele’s background, credibility, and potential bias."
* The FBI conducted a "rigorous process" to vet Steele’s allegations, and the Page FISA application explained the FBI’s reasonable basis for finding Steele credible.
* Steele's prior reporting was used in "criminal proceedings." Each of these claims were found by Horowitz to be false.GO READ THE WHOLE THING.
AND THEN THERE'S ALL THIS:
No comments:
Post a Comment