Tuesday, June 09, 2020

Disgusting! DC Archbishop Gregory Knew About Trump’s Historic Visit to John Paul II Shrine a Week Before Event — Then Lied and Feigned Outrage to the Press


The Trump visit had been scheduled at least a week prior, in order to correspond with the signing of a bill on religious freedom. 

And the reason it was scheduled at St John's Church was to honor the memory of Pope John Paul II, who fought for religious freedom in Eastern Europe.

Washington DC Archbishop Wilton Gregory released a statement last Tuesday lashing out at President Donald Trump for visiting the John Paul II National Shrine. 
The White House said Sunday that Washington’s archbishop was invited to attend an event with President Donald Trump several days before it took place, amid media reports that the archbishop did not learn of the event until the night before it took place. 
White House deputy press secretary Judd Deere told CNA June 7 that “Archbishop Gregory received an invitation to the President’s event at the St. John Paul II Shrine the week prior to the President’s visit. He declined due to other commitments.” 
Correspondence between Archbishop Wilton Gregory's office and the White House indicates the same. In correspondence dated May 30th and obtained by CNA, Gregory’s office declined “the kind invitation to attend the event celebrating International Religious Freedom on Tuesday, June 2, 2020 at the Saint John Paul II Shrine.“ 
The correspondence further stated that the archbishop had “a prior commitment on his schedule at Catholic University and unfortunately must decline,” and added that Gregory had personally conveyed his regrets at being unable to attend when he spoke to a member of the White House staff directly on the evening of Friday, May 29. 
Crux reported June 7 that Gregory had not been told of the visit until June 1, when it was publicly announced by the White House. Trump’s June 2 visit to the shrine has been the subject of considerable controversy. 
On the day of Trump’s visit, the shrine said that the White House had “originally scheduled this as an event for the president to sign an executive order on international religious freedom.” 
The visit was cut into a shorter event following Trump’s controversial visit the night before to St. John’s Episcopal Church, adjacent to the White House. Trump stood outside that church in front of cameras holding a Bible in one hand in an apparent photo-op. The church had suffered fire damage during protests on Sunday night. 
On June 2, before Trump arrived at the John Paul II Shrine, Gregory issued a statement denouncing the visit. “I find it baffling and reprehensible that any Catholic facility would allow itself to be so egregiously misused and manipulated in a fashion that violates our religious principles, which call us to defend the rights of all people even those with whom we might disagree,” the archbishop wrote. 
“Saint Pope John Paul II was an ardent defender of the rights and dignity of human beings. His legacy bears vivid witness to that truth. He certainly would not condone the use of tear gas and other deterrents to silence, scatter or intimidate them for a photo opportunity in front of a place of worship and peace,” Gregory added. 
The White House soon responded to the archbishop; Deere told the Washington Post that “It’s shameful for anyone to call themselves a person of faith yet question the President’s own deeply-held faith or motives for going to mark an important milestone for Catholics.” 
"President Trump’s visit gave comfort and hope to Catholics in this country and all over the world that this President is a man of God who will always protect the sanctity of life and promote religious freedom.” 
On June 5, Gregory addressed the controversy during an online panel sponsored by Georgetown University. “That shrine is a holy place because of the man that it honors,” Gregory said, and it never should have been used as a “political statement.” 
After some Catholics criticized Gregory’s outspoken response, he said Friday that he found the reactions “reminiscent, in my mind, to the criticism that people gave to Catholic priests and nuns that they saw marching during the civil rights period.”
MORE.

No comments: