Wednesday, September 10, 2025

THE DANCING NURSES

 


1. The Performance of Power

In March 2020, as governments worldwide declared states of emergency and citizens huddled in their homes awaiting updates on overwhelmed hospitals, something bizarre began appearing across social media: choreographed videos of medical staff dancing in apparently empty hospital corridors. These weren't grainy phone recordings of spontaneous celebrations—they were elaborately produced performances, often set to popular music, featuring synchronized routines by groups of nurses and doctors in full PPE. From Jerusalem to New York, from London to Melbourne, medical professionals performed coordinated dance numbers while the world was told that healthcare systems faced unprecedented collapse.

The dissonance was immediate and jarring. Official messaging insisted hospitals were war zones, that medical systems teetered on the brink of collapse, that healthcare workers were exhausted heroes barely holding the line against an invisible enemy. News broadcasts showed refrigerated trucks allegedly storing bodies, field hospitals being erected in Central Park, and somber warnings about rationing ventilators. Yet simultaneously, these same hospitals produced what amounted to music videos—not one or two, but hundreds, appearing with suspicious synchronicity across the globe. 

The Rockefeller Foundation's 2010 "Operation Lock Step" scenario had imagined a pandemic leading to authoritarian control through citizen compliance with emergency measures. That document described how "citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability." But even that prescient document hadn't predicted this particular form of psychological operation: the weaponization of absurdity itself. The dancing nurses represented something beyond traditional propaganda—they were a demonstration of power through the deliberate creation of cognitive dissonance. 

Paul Linebarger, in his seminal work on psychological warfare, wrote that effective propaganda must maintain internal consistency to be believed. But here was something different: propaganda that flaunted its own contradictions, that dared the public to notice the impossible juxtaposition of crisis and celebration. When citizens pointed out the obvious—empty hospitals while we're told they're overwhelmed, dancing staff while we're told they're exhausted—they were met not with explanation but with gaslighting. To question the videos was to be labeled a conspiracy theorist, to dishonor healthcare heroes, to spread dangerous misinformation. 

This technique appears to draw from what Michael Hoffman calls "revelation of the method"—the cryptocracy's practice of revealing their operations in plain sight, knowing that public inaction in the face of such revelation produces a demoralizing effect. The message becomes: "We can show you the contradiction between our words and actions, and you will do nothing. You will accept both the lie and the evidence of the lie simultaneously." It's a form of humiliation ritual that operates not through concealment but through brazen display. 

The dancing nurses weren't meant to convince anyone that hospitals were actually functioning normally—they were meant to demonstrate that power could make citizens accept two mutually exclusive realities simultaneously. This wasn't merely about controlling information; it was about breaking the public's confidence in their own perception of reality, creating what Soviet dissidents once called "the fog" where nothing could be known for certain.

2. The Architecture of Humiliation

The concept of ritual humiliation in psychological warfare operates on a principle that predates modern propaganda: forcing the subjugated to participate in their own degradation. Ancient conquerors understood this when they made defeated peoples crawl beneath yokes or prostrate themselves before victors. 

The dancing nurses represented a sophisticated evolution of this technique—not humiliating the healthcare workers themselves, but rather the public forced to witness and accept the spectacle. 

Consider the specific elements of these performances. Healthcare workers, the designated "heroes" of the pandemic narrative, engaged in frivolous entertainment while wearing the very PPE we were told was in critically short supply. 

They gathered in groups while citizens were arrested for attending funerals or visiting dying relatives. They demonstrated that hospitals had both the space and the staff availability for elaborate rehearsals while the public was told that medical systems faced imminent collapse. Each element compounded the insult, creating what researchers of psychological operations recognize as a "humiliation cascade"—where each accepted contradiction makes the next easier to impose. 

Peter Pomerantsev, in his analysis of modern propaganda, describes how contemporary information warfare doesn't aim to convince but to confuse, to create what he calls "censorship through noise." But the dancing nurses went beyond confusion—they represented something more akin to what happens in abusive relationships, where the abuser deliberately creates situations that force the victim to deny their own perceptions. "That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, it's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it."

GO READ THE WHOLE THING

No comments: