Thursday, August 06, 2015

Make Me Smile


The Look Of Love


Smooth


I Only Have Eyes For You
Stephane Grappelli w/ Julian Lloyd Webber


Rockin' Chair
The Band


Hang around, Willie Boy,
Don't you raise the sails anymore.
It's for sure, I've spent my whole life at sea;
And I'm pushin' age seventy three.
Now there's only one place that was meant for me:

Oh, to be home again,
Down in old Virginny,
With my very best friend,
They call him Ragtime Willie.
We're gonna soothe away the rest of our years,
We're gonna put away all of our tears,
That big Rockin' Chair won't go nowhere.

Slow down, Willie Boy,
Your heart's gonna give right out on you
It's true, and I believe I know what we should do.
Turn the stern and point to shore,
The seven seas won't carry us no more.

Oh, to be home again,
Down in old Virginny,
With my very best friend,
They call him Ragtime Willie.
I can't wait to sniff that air,
Dip'n snuff, I won't have no care,
That big Rockin' Chair won't go nowhere.

Hear the sound, Willie Boy,
The Flyin' Dutchman's on the reef.
It's my belief
We've used up all our time,
This hill's too steep to climb,
And the days that remain ain't worth a dime.

Oh, to be home again,
Down in old Virginny,
With my very best friend,
They call him Ragtime Willie.
Would-a-been nice just t'see the folks,
Listen once again to the stale jokes,
That big Rockin' Chair won't go nowhere.

I can hear something calling on me
And you know where I wanna be
Oh Willie, can't you hear that sound
Down In Old Virginny
I just wanna get my feet back on the ground
Down In Old Virginny
And I'd love to see my very best friend
They call him Ragtime Willie
I believe old Rockin' Chair's got me

I Only Have Eyes For You

Lester Bowie Brass Fantasy

Rockin' Chair

The Roy Eldridge/Gene Krupa Big Band

Little Wing


Humpday Blues

Walter Trout
Say Goodbye To The Blues
 


(& son Jon Trout)
Rock Me Baby



The Best You Got



Mercy


Wednesday, August 05, 2015

ISIS Publishes Sex Slave Catalog – Exports Women and Children to Affluent Middle Easterners


From Zee News:
In another despicable revelation, the extremist group ISIS is said to be publishing pamphlets with price list for captured women and kids who are sold to fighters and affluent Middle Easterners. 
According to a report in The Bloomberg, a UN envoy named Zainab Bangura claimed having seen a copy of the ISIS price list in April on an Iraq trip, that showed for how much the extremists sell captured women and kids. Zainab revealed that the kids as young as one-year-old, fetch the highest price, while girls over 20 are sold for lesser price. 
The barbaric jihadist group has pegged the prices for boys and girls aged 1 to 9 are equal to about $165 in Iraqi dinars, while adolescent girls are worth $124 each, Bangura said Bangura, who is the UN special envoy on sexual violence in conflict, has ascertained the veracity of the pamphlets which were definitely circulated by the ISIS and show real transactions. 
“The girls get peddled like barrels of petrol…One girl can be sold and bought by five or six different men. Sometimes these fighters sell the girls back to their families for thousands of dollars of ransom,” the Bloomberg quoted the UN envoy as saying.

Top Immigration Agency Touts ‘Path To Citizenship’ As Means For Blunting Homegrown Terror

Referring to its efforts to promote citizenship, officials from USCIS made an appeal to nationalism: “These efforts emphasize the role that shared citizenship rights and responsibilities play to unify all Americans.

I have no comment on the utter stupidity of that remark as it apples to the wish of Muslims to assimilate into our society. Not a freakin' clue.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/04/uscis-is-marketing-citizenship-to-fight-homegrown-terror/#ixzz3hxkmQy1b

And then this bit of traitorus madness....

 Obama admits some unfrozen Iran cash will fund terror

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-admits-unfrozen-iran-cash-fund-terror-164816905.html 

President Barack Obama acknowledged Wednesday that Iran might use cash coming its way under sanctions relief to fund "terrorist organizations" but argued this is preferable to allowing it to develop nuclear arms.

Name your poison...

Kerry Frets Like a Big, Nail-Biting Pussy, About The Possibility of the United States "Screwing" The Ayatollah Khameini

John Effin Kerry, Reporting for Doody

From the Atlantic:
When I met with Secretary of State John Kerry in his office this past Friday, it was apparent that he was in an exceedingly feisty mood, and it’s not easy to display feistiness when you’re trapped, as he was, in a recliner. Kerry, who broke his leg two months ago, will be rid of his crutches soon, which for him is not soon enough, because he’d prefer to do battle in Congress for the Iran nuclear agreement—quite obviously the crowning achievement, in his mind, of his long and distinguished career in public life—with two good legs. 
Congress is the target of Kerry’s feistiness, as is his close friend and staunch adversary, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who is leading the charge against congressional ratification of the deal. In the course of a lengthy and freewheeling interview—which you will find published in full, below—Kerry warned that if Congress rejects the Iran deal, it will confirm the anti-U.S. suspicions harbored by the Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and eliminate any chance of a peaceful solution to the nuclear conundrum. 
“The ayatollah constantly believed that we are untrustworthy, that you can’t negotiate with us, that we will screw them,” Kerry said. “This”—a congressional rejection—“will be the ultimate screwing.” 
He went on to argue that “the United States Congress will prove the ayatollah’s suspicion, and there’s no way he’s ever coming back. He will not come back to negotiate. Out of dignity, out of a suspicion that you can’t trust America. America is not going to negotiate in good faith. It didn’t negotiate in good faith now, would be his point.”
Let me point out something else here:

Kerry and Obama negotiated a treaty with Iran. But according to the Constitution of the United States, Treaties negotiated by the Executive Branch must be ratified by 2/3rds of the Senators.

KERRY IS IMPLYING THAT,

FOR HE AND OBAMA,

FOLLOWING THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, IS NEGOTIATING IN BAD FAITH.

In other words, he is unwilling to follow the Constitution. He wants to screw the United States, so he doesn't have to screw the Ayatollah.

Frankly, that's because he is more afraid of the Ayatollah than he is of We the People.

When do we hang this fucking pussy for Treason, my friends?

When?

UPDATE -

John Kerry Says Iran Does Not Want To “Wipe Israel Off The Map”

Britain Finally Charges Terrorist Preacher Amjen Choudary For Inciting Terrorism


From Ace of Spades:
Choudary, you may remember, was the Special Guest Jihadist invited by USAToday to give his view on the Charlie Hebdo Massacre; his view was "They were warned, they got some righteous holy attempted murder." 
One of the most bizarre things I've ever seen was Choudary debating Pam Geller on Hannity over the proposition that she should, or should not be, murdered.
Yes, they FINALLY charged THAT guy:
British authorities on Wednesday charged a radical preacher under the country’s terrorism act for inviting support for the Islamic State (IS) group through lectures published online. 
Anjem Choudary, 48, is a well-known figure in Britain and is regularly interviewed by the media for his views on Islam and the Middle East. He is also the former leader of a banned radical group called al-Muhajiroun. 
The Crown Prosecution Service said Choudary and a second man, Mohammed Mizanur Rahman, 32, had been charged with inviting support for the IS group, a proscribed organisation, between June 29, 2014 and March 6, 2015. 
"It is alleged that Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Rahman invited support for IS in individual lectures which were subsequently published online."
Ace mentioned it above, so let's watch it: Choudary debating Pamela on whether or not she should be killed according to Sharia:

I Would Bet Anything That Did Not Change Her Opinion of Herself One Iota


Liberal Menstrual Rag Sponges Up Some Truth For Once: We must talk about Islam: A faith that affects everyone should be susceptible to critique by all


From Salon:
Eight months after it suffered one of the worst terrorist attacks in French history, the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo continues to provoke wrongheaded, confused and even cowardly analysis that disregards the facts and betrays a failure to understand – or a refusal to recognize — the stakes we in the West all have in what the publication stands for: freedom of expression. 
Lest we forget those facts: on Jan. 7, the brothers Cherif and Said Kouachi burst into the Paris headquarters of Charlie Hebdo, and, shouting “Allahu akbar!” systematically gunned down staff members and others present. 
After doing so, they announced “We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad! We have killed Charlie Hebdo!” 
Their motive: the cartoonists had satirized, on many occasions, the Prophet Muhammad, whose depiction Islam forbids. 
Put succinctly: inspired by their religion, the Kouachi brothers murdered cartoonists for drawing cartoons. They murdered for Islam. 
Now for the latest broadside against reason (and the magazine’s few, grief-stricken survivors) — a documentary produced by journalist Max Blumenthal and a British videographer, James Kleinfeld, called “Je ne suis pas Charlie.” The title is meant to refute the popular slogan (Je suis Charlie, or I am Charlie) adopted by the almost 4 million French citizens, who, to defend free speech, marched peacefully across France a few days after the massacre. (Disclosure: I have friends among Charlie Hebdo’s staff.) 
“Je ne suis pas Charlie” purportedly aims to explain why not all French citizens – and in particular, many in the country’s Muslim minority – approve of the slogan. But the documentary does something else: it delivers a strongly biased narrative of events in France after the crime that exculpates Islam, de facto inculpates the victims in their own deaths, and will surely comfort and encourage future potential assassins contemplating the execution of similar atrocities. 
As Blumenthal and Kleinfeld have it, the Kouachi brothers’ crime also occurred as the inevitable, if regrettable, outcome of France’s colonial history and the marginalized status of the country’s Muslim community. 
“Je ne suis pas Charlie” contains such an abundance of errors and unsubstantiated assertions that it confronts its critics with a crisis of plenty.   
For starters ...
GO READ THE WHOLE THING.