"Uncovered Meat Sheik" is Back, and He's Brought More Insults With Him

Hat-Tip: YouTube viewers, TROP:

Most readers are now familiar with the troublesome Sheik Taj al-Din al-Hilaly, currently stirring up trouble in Australia, where he is increasingly unwelcome. Why is he becoming more and more unwelcome? Well, this is a fine tale. Mr. Hilaly is back in the press, and this time he has pegged all "white Australians" instead of just those women who are "Uncovered Meat".

Here, from The Age:

Speaking in Arabic on Egyptian television Sheikh Hilali said that white Australians arrived in the country shackled as convicts.

"We (Muslims) came as free people. We bought our own tickets. We are entitled to Australia more than they are," he said.

The mufti was on the Egyptian chat show explaining the controversy last year over his comments likening immodestly-dressed women to uncovered meat.

But according to the translation, he said the controversy was a white conspiracy aimed at terrorising Australian Muslims.

(...)

But while the convict jibes might be forgiven by some, as they are when levelled by English cricket fans, the Sheikh's comments are expected to cause outrage in some quarters - especially the claim that white Australians "are the biggest liars".

And then there was his claim that outrage over his controversial meat sermon was "a calculated conspiracy", that started with him, "in order to bring the Islamic community to its knees".

He also said "Australian law guarantees freedoms up to a crazy level", when reportedly referring to anti-Muslim courts and the harsh sentencing of a Muslim gang rapist in Sydney.

Now, it must be said that immigrant communities stirring up this much trouble in their new host country rarely has a positive outcome, either for one group or the other. Australia has also assimilated several immigrant groups (non-Muslim) successfully, with little more than the typical apprehension of the majority group usually seen in these situations, and which usually fades with time. There has been both movements of white supremacists which has been rightly fought, in my opinion. There have been movements in favor of expanded rights and reparations for the Aborigines, probably moreso than we have seen in the U.S. for our indigenous population.

I've heard Aussies make numerous statements that "hey, we're all immigrants, so we have no right to be against immigration, no matter what". I have no doubt that this is rote spewing as opposed to a well thought out argument, especially given the empty stares and lack of response upon questioning of this opinion. We ARE all immigrants, we ARE all conquerers and invaders, or at least our ancestors are. Find me a country that's even remotely arable and prove to me that it is still inhabited by a people who are "purely" the "original" inhabitants. Impossible, it doesn't happen.

Hilaly and his followers are wrong, plain and simple, and his immigrant group has no more claim to Australia that anyone, and should be opposed. Is his hope endemic warfare in Oz, conquest, or deportation back to Dar al-Harb? I'll keep watching. He is, however, pushing most of the buttons which I have ready responses to. In this case, no "uncovered meat". I did, however, cover this subject so extensively back in March during the "Illegals Gone Wild" protests here in America, that I will now just repost my thoughts from March, as they are applicable to the current subject:

Read the rest at What Would Charles Martel Do?