Palestinians Ask U.S. To Intervene in Suits Over Terrorist AttacksBy Glenn Kessler
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 12, 2008; A15The State Department is considering supporting the Palestinian Authority in its quest to avoid paying hundreds of millions of dollars in judgments won by American victims of Palestinian terrorist attacks in Israel, according to Palestinian officials and defense lawyers involved in the cases.
U.S. officials insist that no decision has been made regarding the complex litigation, which could force the Bush administration to choose between supporting compensation for victims of terrorism and bolstering the Palestinian government as the United States presses for a breakthrough in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.
Testimony in Israeli courts has connected senior Palestinian leaders -- such as the late Yasser Arafat -- to specific terrorist attacks involved in the lawsuits. But Palestinian officials have argued that it makes no sense for the United States to be providing millions of dollars in aid to the Palestinian Authority while U.S. courts are threatening to bankrupt it.
No shit. SCREW THEM. Their plan is to murder the innocent to achieve strategic success. The word, readers, you are struggling to come up with is "schmuck"
In response to a plea for assistance from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice 13 months ago sidestepped the issue, writing that "the United States is not party to these enforcement proceedings." But in December, a U.S. federal judge asked the government whether it would get involved, creating the current dilemma for the administration.
"There has been a rethinking in the State Department that I wholeheartedly welcome," said Afif Safieh, head of mission in Washington for the Palestine Liberation Organization. He said the lawsuits were "politically and ideologically motivated to drive the Palestinian Authority into bankruptcy."
Victims, who will meet with top State and Justice Department officials tomorrow, said that a U.S. intervention with the courts would make a mockery of the administration's fight against terrorism.
Leslye Knox, a 46-year-old mother of six children and widow of Aharon Ellis, a U.S. citizen who was killed in 2002 while singing at a bar mitzvah in Hadera, Israel, said that she has sued under a law passed by Congress in 1990 after the murder of Leon Klinghoffer by terrorists who seized the Achille Lauro cruise ship. In 2006, a federal judge ordered the PLO and the Palestinian Authority to pay Knox and other Ellis relatives nearly $174 million, but nothing has been paid while Knox has struggled to support her family.
3 comments:
quote ==> But in December, a U.S. federal judge asked the government whether it would get involved,
By what authority does this judge make such a move? Is this legal?
Are there limits to such action?
I find it unbelievable that a judge, at any time, can invite a third party to a suit- in the middle of litigation - without consent of both the existing defense and plaintiff.
Gah!
I put up a post over at Crusader Rabbit about the traitorous and incompetent weasels of the State Department.
I'm a mere foreigner, but it seems to me that this Dept. has consistently undermined the Administration's foreign policy and sold fellow Americans down the river for years now.
Time for a clean out.....
FDR on the State Dept at the outset of WW2 "So far they are neutral, I only hope they remain so"
Post a Comment